there is s lot of chatter on social media ( you can decide how real it is), but there are a lot of guys saying they are breaking up with their girlfriends due to them supporting clancy.
Modern Relationships and Lindsey Clancy Case. 3 Children Strangled. Overwhelming Support From Females and Male Backlash.
- Thread starter Lightbeamrider
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
there is s lot of chatter on social media ( you can decide how real it is), but there are a lot of guys saying they are breaking up with their girlfriends due to them supporting clancy.
Which has nothing to do with anything. She had lots of support and help, yet she still CHOSE to brutally murder her three children with plenty of evidence that she PLANNED the murders. I literally don't give a crap what she did after she killed her children. She's not a victim.
33 year old schizophrenic male here I can tell by the picture of her smiling that she is sick and I think it’s possible she didn’t mean to kill her children psychosis can really really alter you and make you think and do things you would never do. Ok just wanted to say it now getting the hell out of here lol
None of that makes him responsible. The husband was not charged with anything for a reason. Working from home is not a crime. It is up to you to make a guilt case for the husband, which you have not done. So it is your problem.
That diagnosis was cooked up after the fact by a paid-to-testify psychologist (Zeizel) who has done it before. Paid in both cases. Posted earlier and ignored, using soft science techniques more akin to voodoo as opposed to actual. Also benefiting pharma interests to drug women (there i used the word so that lame indictment is put to rest.
) with their for-profit products. From my link above| And get this: he’s done this before. Public court transcripts reveal he (Zeizel) evaluated Carlos Asencio—another high-profile Massachusetts defendant whose insanity defense relied heavily on post-event claims of “voices” directing him to commit acts of horrific violence. He elicits, records, and weighs post-event command narratives for a living. Was Zeizel paid to testify in both cases? Yes. Dr. Paul Zeizel was a retained defense expert in both cases and received compensation for that work. 77thhub.asia In the Lindsay Clancy trial, he was hired by defense attorney Kevin Reddington, who called him the night of February 3, 2023. During cross-examination, prosecutors noted he was paid roughly $340,000 by the Committee for Public Counsel Services (CPCS) in fiscal year 2024 and about $300,000 in fiscal year 2025 at the fixed government rate for such experts. |
| Eleven days after the event, Zeizel handed Lindsay his personal cell phone for a speakerphone call with her husband, during which she suddenly remembered a “male command voice” telling her to kill the children. |
Clancys were dual-income professionals living in a home purchased for half a million dollars, meaning an advantage most of us do not have. Lindsay an RN. No history of male command voices prior to the murder event. Killing her three children. All of a sudden, the male command voices come out, directing Lindsay to kill her children so they would be safe in heaven. Nonsense by a paid fellow who has a history of testifying on behalf of the defense using voodoo science. These guys can take the same set of facts and come to two different conclusions, all paid and we are supposed to believe it is all on the up and up. Yeah sure. Lindsay is not criminally responsible and is absolved because of the male voice in her head. The not criminally responsible part is the problem most of us have here.
So so scary, can't believe a human is capable of such a crime...... how distorted human has become.
See here is where I have the issue. I have a nephew who is 2 and a half. And I'm thinking how long it took her ... I can't. Cry just thinking about it. I heard that the little boy ran to his fathers office, if that is correct, that just blew my heart up.
Again I heard that she was a labor delivery nurse and had a nanny. And still was unable to cope? With the father working from home. I don't believe that she didn't know what she was doing when she killed her children or didn't know the consequences. She sent her husband away just long enough to do what she did. In his shock I don't know how he didn't kill her. But again, no one here is condoning murdering children.
Yeah, that's where I'm stuck. I don't believe she didn't know what she was doing or the consequences of her actions. That said I'm not judging others here either.
I agree. I get that she might have been depressed, going through a hard time, etc. Does that mean she didn't know that killing her children was wrong? On the contrary I think her attempted suicide was designed to punish her husband and killing the three kids was a big part of her "punishing him". I could be wrong, hence their may be some doubt, but "beyond all reasonable doubt" cannot refer to what is going on in a persons mind since we don't know and will always have reasonable doubt. The "beyond all reasonable doubt" has to be for the act of committing the crime. No one has any doubt that she killed the kids, the only doubt is about whether or not she knew it was wrong, and that will be true of every single criminal who commits a crime. If a jury is required to determine beyond a reasonable doubt what a criminal was thinking when they committed a crime before convicting them, then no one can be convicted of a crime.
I know, and I feel exactly the same. It is amazing he didn't kill her right on the spot. She chose to kill her own kids in a slow, painful, and horrifying way knowing they would see her as they died. This whole case is beyond sickening, from her actions and attitude to the slimy defense attorney. I'm not a lawyer and I could be wrong, but the judge and prosecutors seem weak in comparison and have made many mistakes. Is this incompetence by accident or orchestrated on purpose to make sure she gets off? It's a radical left state so who knows.
Whether it's men or women, I'm absolutely fed up with the "mental health" excuse slapped on everything. I don't care how depressed or hormonal or sad or 'psychotic' anyone claims to be, they do not have the right or excuse to take another life or commit crimes in general. Liberal judges need to be impeached immediately, and we need to apply real consequences to violent criminals. I'm way past done with all of this leftist soft-on-crime BS.
Also: Investigators really need to look into her work history and see if there were an unusual number of deaths while babies were in her care.
In related news, the leaders of the WNBA (Women's NBA) met to decide what a woman is, and were unable to come up with a definition. It seems to me if you can't define what a woman is you shouldn't be a commissioner of the Woman's NBA.
Anyone , male or female , that does serious harm to any child needs to b removed from society permenantly . Hospital or prison ? It doesn't matter , nothing will bring those poor children back . Just put her where she can't hurt anyone else , that's all that we can do now .
Like most areas controlled by libtards, Massachusetts' government is completely defunct. When a government downplays the severity of murder by eliminating the death penalty entirely, it's abandoning its chief responsibility. A functioning State ensures that it's people know that murder is unlawful and immoral; and that an exceptional scenario where someone doesn't know is rare, implausible, and only happens under the most extreme circumstances.
Michigan first banned executions at the beginning of the second industrial revolution... totally because of popular moral objections, and definitely not because the state and corporate interests wanted more people for the penal slavery systems from which they profited... because how could that totally not-manufactured moral superiority possibly be anything else at all, let alone a plot to increase profits and de-value labor across the board?
Massachusetts didn't officially ban the death penalty until 1984; but governors simply stopped signing death warrants in 1947. While penal labor is no longer allowed to compete in the market, it is used to sustain "public institutions", including Massachusetts' massive healthcare infrastructure.
Michigan first banned executions at the beginning of the second industrial revolution... totally because of popular moral objections, and definitely not because the state and corporate interests wanted more people for the penal slavery systems from which they profited... because how could that totally not-manufactured moral superiority possibly be anything else at all, let alone a plot to increase profits and de-value labor across the board?
Massachusetts didn't officially ban the death penalty until 1984; but governors simply stopped signing death warrants in 1947. While penal labor is no longer allowed to compete in the market, it is used to sustain "public institutions", including Massachusetts' massive healthcare infrastructure.
This woman is guilty as charged.
I am a man. Change it to males as a whole, most males are puny, little skinny jeans pansies nowadays.
The males are turning female and the females think they are men.
Sorry to hurt peoples feelers but it is the way the world is rapidly turning.
She should have killed herself first. She carefully planned the circumstances leading up to her MURDERING her babies and was successful.
She must not have planned out her "suicide" as well as her MURDER plot........Or she also planned her "suicide" with the same precision she used to MURDER those babies.
She lives, all others DIE.
I think she was definitely mentally ill. But then most all murderers are. That's not a justification for her actions. She knew she was ill and she deliberately kept things from her doctors. She was clearly sane and sober enough to plan this out, fake suicide attempt wounds on her arms, and IMO the only thing she screwed up on was the jump from the window (she likely thought she'd end up with broken bones, probably not that she'd end up landing just right to get paralyzed), planned how long her husband would be out, answered her phone in between stranglings, etc.. Anyone trying to say she should be let free because of hormones, etc., yeah you should likely leave such a person in the dust. The ones either saying they know how she feels and making 'same, Lindsay' posts, or who are claiming the husband did it are even worse, and you should run, not walk, away from any relationship with them.
I've seen the 'suicide wounds'. There's not a scar visible anywhere on her throat, and if it's anything like the tiny scratches she made on her arms, they're nothing but superficial wounds unlikely to cause any death.
I suspect that she did this, planned it, took the time to strangle them one by one while planning how long she had, then tried to fake a suicide attempt (and thought she'd only end up with broken bones instead of paralysis). The images of her arm wounds are what sealed it for me, they're the sort of fake looking ones you'd see on tv, but she was a literal nurse and would certainly know better (she did horizontal cuts instead of vertical ones which would be more likely to lead to death, and they were shallow).
,nbvljvlkjb'lkb;kjb
She's not crazy, if she had cut deeper you don't know, she could have bled out before the EMT's arrived.