M
Ok I will do my best be patient and I will get to it.
I didn’t trying to twist you words that’s what I thought you meant.
So the 4th beast is Rome a kingdom, and
10 kings shall arise:
and another shall rise after them;
and he shall be diverse from the first,
and he shall subdue three kings.
In that 4th beast, 10 kings come to power, and another one comes up and destroys three kings
But you say the one horn that comes up after the 10, that destroys three, is Satan’s spiritual kingdom of islam? Not a kingdom with a king but a individual peoples a religion YES?
10 kings shall arise:
and another shall rise after them;
and he shall be diverse from the first,
and he shall subdue three kings.
In that 4th beast, 10 kings come to power, and another one comes up and destroys three kings
But you say the one horn that comes up after the 10, that destroys three, is Satan’s spiritual kingdom of islam? Not a kingdom with a king but a individual peoples a religion YES?
We are talking about the beast of Rev 13:2 . I said the beast of Rev13:2 is a kingdom. I said we can prove it is kingdom because we can see from Daniel that in prophetic language God uses the term beast to describe kingdoms. Weren’t Daniels beasts kingdoms? Wasn’t Daniels lion Babylon,? Wasn’t Daniels bear Medo-Persia? Wasn’t Daniels leopard Greece? And wasn’t Daniel’s 4th kingdom Rome?
Do you agree that the Word was God?
Joh 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Do you agree that God is the same yesterday, today and forever?
Heb 13:8 Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.
Do you agree that God’s inspired word tells us beats or kingdoms in Daniel?
Dan 7:23 Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth…….
So if God said a beast in Daniel is a kingdom and God doesn’t change it stands to reason that if a beast in Daniel is a kingdom then a beast in Rev is also a kingdom .
Did God change or is it man that is trying to change God by changing the definitions God gave in order to justify a doctrine? If God changed and beasts are no longer kingdoms as you insist then surely you could provide the verse where God has redefined a beast as the man of sin. So I’ll wait patiently (like forever) for you to provide this verse that does not exist. We all have free will go ahead believe the beast of Rev 13:2 is the man of sin, if that’s what you want to believe. Just don’t expect me to believe it when God himself told us beasts are kingdoms