Is fellowship possible between Calvinists and Arminians?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
R

rauleetoe

Guest
#81
You are on wacked out individual and you need much help. Please go and get it and hope it is not too late.
So he is whacked because is not into the 'easygreasy' grace only gospel which is not really grace but a false gospel of licentiousness that always ties (OSAS/God has got you/just go on sinning because nothing can keep you from God)and refuses to believe a theology that would justify a continued life of sin? sounds like somebody wants some easy believism in their life..sounds like it is you who needs the help sir.
 
Jun 24, 2010
3,822
19
0
#83
So he is whacked because is not into the 'easygreasy' grace only gospel which is not really grace but a false gospel of licentiousness that always ties (OSAS/God has got you/just go on sinning because nothing can keep you from God)and refuses to believe a theology that would justify a continued life of sin? sounds like somebody wants some easy believism in their life..sounds like it is you who needs the help sir.
Do you believe God wants to make it difficult for believers to walk with Him by faith and to grow up in grace and knowledge of His Son? If I decided right now that I was going to make a commitment to God and vow that I was not going to sin anymore for the rest of my life, could I keep that vow? Do I have in me what it takes to not sin anymore? Do I have what it takes to make no provision for my flesh, not even one time? I have the Spirit in me and I am a new creature and I have the promises of God and grace to keep me from sin, but I still have a sin nature in me and will until I receive a new glorified body.

However, what would happen if I broke my vow and commitment and I sinned, not just once but several times in an area I had never even known sin or been a part of? This sin lead me into tremendous guilt because I pressed so hard and was faithful not to sin and really committed myself to God not to sin with all my heart but sin stilled happened. How could I have missed that way of escape that God promised? Now I live with being unfaithful to God and He must be upset and not pleased with me because of my sin. I am a failure in the eyes of God.

What do you think of that and moreover what would God think of that? What is your heart toward that kind of individual and what is God's heart toward them? Is God really angry with them or does He see them all that time trying to refrain from sin through the energy of the flesh? It's kind of like the dilemma Paul experienced and wrote about in (Rom 6,7,8). Do you know how many believers strive in the flesh not to sin and when they sin they are horrified and live in guilt because they do not know that the living God is full of mercy and grace? What are we to teach them, that God is angry and they need to repent or do we teach them that God loves them and is merciful to their unrighteousness like it says in (Heb 8:12)...

12 For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.

What kind of a God would be merciful (not to them here) but to their unrighteousness? And He is merciful by not remembering their sins or iniquities anymore. For some reason we think it is alright if we remember our own sins or iniquities or those of others, when God doesn't remember them ANYMORE. He won't even bring them up because they are no longer a part of His ALL-KNOWLEDGE, which includes His FORE-KNOWLEDGE.

This is where people love to jump in and condition all this with repentance. For those that do, did God send His Son as the Lamb, to take away the sins of the world based upon the fact that the world had repented first? OR Did God so loved the world, the world that had not repented and offered no sign of repentance, that He gave His only-begotten Son as a sacrifice for sin with the shedding of His blood without the world having repented? Did not Christ die while we were yet unrepented sinners, who were dead in our trespasses and sins? Was Christ not judged on the cross for the sin of the guilty and unrepentant before the light of the gospel had shined unto them? If God was merciful to the unrighteousness of the world being dead in sin and trespasses, how much more is He going to be merciful to those who belong to Him when they believed upon His Son for redemption?

When any believer strives through the energy of their flesh to abstain from sin, using the law or any other means outside of the cross and grace to do so, that is a work of the flesh just as much as any other work of the flesh and is unacceptable to God no matter how noble the effort may be. When a believer strives and brings their body in submission to abstain from sins of the flesh, they do it through a cross and the energy of grace provided by the Spirit and not through the flesh. So when sin abounds in a person's life, God does not demand that they repent, but He makes grace super-abundantly abound toward them to give them what they need to overcome that sin without condemnation.

What do we do when a brother has sinned? THE SAME THING. Why... because it is the only means that God gives through His mercy to restore sinful men. It is going to take lots and lots of God's goodness and mercy to bring a believer to a place of repentance so that they will have the power to turn and set aside those sins that so easily beset them. If there are those that do not like God's method, well, not much you can do except hope that God will give them grace to have the eye of their understanding opened to the ways of God. The narrow way and straight gate that we strive to enter is the way of the cross and the gate of God's abundant mercy and grace.
 
Last edited:
C

Crossfire

Guest
#84
So he is whacked because is not into the 'easygreasy' grace only gospel which is not really grace but a false gospel of licentiousness that always ties (OSAS/God has got you/just go on sinning because nothing can keep you from God)and refuses to believe a theology that would justify a continued life of sin? sounds like somebody wants some easy believism in their life..sounds like it is you who needs the help sir.


I wouldn't worry about anything that Red says. If Red is right and I'm wrong then everything is perfectly fine. After all, if "once saved always saved" is good for the goose then it is good for the gander. :D

However, if I'm right and Red is wrong, then he and his buddies are going to have a very hard time trying to explain to Jesus just how and why they thought His divine words and actions justified sin and very poor treatment of others. :(

By their fruit you shall know them. May the Lord have mercy on their poor souls...
 
Last edited:
R

rauleetoe

Guest
#85
Do you believe God wants to make it difficult for believers to walk with Him by faith and to grow up in grace and knowledge of His Son? If I decided right now that I was going to make a commitment to God and vow that I was not going to sin anymore for the rest of my life, could I keep that vow? Do I have in me what it takes to not sin anymore? Do I have what it takes to make no provision for my flesh, not even one time? I have the Spirit in me and I am a new creature and I have the promises of God and grace to keep me from sin, but I still have a sin nature in me and will until I receive a new glorified body.

However, what would happen if I broke my vow and commitment and I sinned, not just once but several times in an area I had never even known sin or been a part of? This sin lead me into tremendous guilt because I pressed so hard and was faithful not to sin and really committed myself to God not to sin with all my heart but sin stilled happened. How could I have missed that way of escape that God promised? Now I live with being unfaithful to God and He must be upset and not pleased with me because of my sin. I am a failure in the eyes of God.

What do you think of that and moreover what would God think of that? What is your heart toward that kind of individual and what is God's heart toward them? Is God really angry with them or does He see them all that time trying to refrain from sin through the energy of the flesh? It's kind of like the dilemma Paul experienced and wrote about in (Rom 6,7,8). Do you know how many believers strive in the flesh not to sin and when they sin they are horrified and live in guilt because they do not know that the living God is full of mercy and grace? What are we to teach them, that God is angry and they need to repent or do we teach them that God loves them and is merciful to their unrighteousness like it says in (Heb 8:12)...

12 For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.

What kind of a God would be merciful (not to them here) but to their unrighteousness? And He is merciful by not remembering their sins or iniquities anymore. For some reason we think it is alright if we remember our own sins or iniquities or those of others, when God doesn't remember them ANYMORE. He won't even bring them up because they are no longer a part of His ALL-KNOWLEDGE, which includes His FORE-KNOWLEDGE.

This is where people love to jump in and condition all this with repentance. For those that do, did God send His Son as the Lamb, to take away the sins of the world based upon the fact that the world had repented first? OR Did God so loved the world, the world that had not repented and offered no sign of repentance, that He gave His only-begotten Son as a sacrifice for sin with the shedding of His blood without the world having repented? Did not Christ die while we were yet unrepented sinners, who were dead in our trespasses and sins? Was Christ not judged on the cross for the sin of the guilty and unrepentant before the light of the gospel had shined unto them? If God was merciful to the unrighteousness of the world being dead in sin and trespasses, how much more is He going to be merciful to those who belong to Him when they believed upon His Son for redemption?

When any believer strives through the energy of their flesh to abstain from sin, using the law or any other means outside of the cross and grace to do so, that is a work of the flesh just as much as any other work of the flesh and is unacceptable to God no matter how noble the effort may be. When a believer strives and brings their body in submission to abstain from sins of the flesh, they do it through a cross and the energy of grace provided by the Spirit and not through the flesh. So when sin abounds in a person's life, God does not demand that they repent, but He makes grace super-abundantly abound toward them to give them what they need to overcome that sin without condemnation.

What do we do when a brother has sinned? THE SAME THING. Why... because it is the only means that God gives through His mercy to restore sinful men. It is going to take lots and lots of God's goodness and mercy to bring a believer to a place of repentance so that they will have the power to turn and set aside those sins that so easily beset them. If there are those that do not like God's method, well, not much you can do except hope that God will give them grace to have the eye of their understanding opened to the ways of God. The narrow way and straight gate that we strive to enter is the way of the cross and the gate of God's abundant mercy and grace.
Who in the world says we strive in the flesh to live for God? I did not..crossfire did not! Why are you making this assumption?
At the end of the day, you and God only know if you are truly in a state of 'non resistance' to his spirit..this is the one and only 'contribution' you make regarding whether God will or will not work with you. Are you submitting to his spirit or are you in a state of non resistance? Only you can answer that..If you truly understand grace and mercy then the response to that is not resisting. Do you truly want to live for God, or are you secretely trying to see just how much sinfull behavior that you can get away with an still consider yourself a believer? Or are you simply being religious about not looking to be religious to others? Are you seeking to please man and look 'grace oriented' in their eyes, thus justifying their sin, and your own..or do you please God? Which is the greater good? Please man or please God?
Nobody here is advocating works based salvation, do not get it twisted..if you have the spirit of God living on the inside of you as you claim that you do, then you cannot live the lifestyle of 'sinning' consistently anymore..will you have a speck of imperfection here and there.. a spotty instance? Yes, but you work on this..because the word says in hebrews 12 that without holiness nobody will see God.
 
R

rauleetoe

Guest
#86
I wouldn't worry about anything that Red says. If Red is right and I'm wrong then everything is perfectly fine. After all, if "once saved always saved" is good for the goose then it is good for the gander. :D

However, if I'm right and Red is wrong, then he and his buddies are going to have a very hard time trying to explain to Jesus just how and why they thought His divine words and actions justified sin and very poor treatment of others. :(

By their fruit you shall know them. May the Lord have mercy on their poor souls...
I agree there..What I am trying to understand is how is one called a legalist when you simply say, By God's Spirit I can live for him, and do not have to live in my old ways that i used to live when i once was in sin and without Christ! How in the world that is legalism? If this accusation is not seeking to defend a licentious lifestyle i do not know what it is. That or they simply are quick to accuse anything that convicts them or makes them feel less than 'spiritual' and hate all that they call and consider 'religious' for the sake of looking appealing to the world. Once again, this all is rooted in a sinfull mindset and if they are so unwilling to be holiness minded, maybe its because they are thinking and meditating more on sin, than on God and his holiness...hmmm..
 
Jun 24, 2010
3,822
19
0
#87
Who in the world says we strive in the flesh to live for God? I did not..crossfire did not! Why are you making this assumption?
At the end of the day, you and God only know if you are truly in a state of 'non resistance' to his spirit..this is the one and only 'contribution' you make regarding whether God will or will not work with you. Are you submitting to his spirit or are you in a state of non resistance? Only you can answer that..If you truly understand grace and mercy then the response to that is not resisting. Do you truly want to live for God, or are you secretely trying to see just how much sinfull behavior that you can get away with an still consider yourself a believer? Or are you simply being religious about not looking to be religious to others? Are you seeking to please man and look 'grace oriented' in their eyes, thus justifying their sin, and your own..or do you please God? Which is the greater good? Please man or please God?
Nobody here is advocating works based salvation, do not get it twisted..if you have the spirit of God living on the inside of you as you claim that you do, then you cannot live the lifestyle of 'sinning' consistently anymore..will you have a speck of imperfection here and there.. a spotty instance? Yes, but you work on this..because the word says in hebrews 12 that without holiness nobody will see God.
Do you think it is unholy to give a person grace when they have sinned and don't deserve it?
 
P

psychomom

Guest
#88
I agree there..What I am trying to understand is how is one called a legalist when you simply say, By God's Spirit I can live for him, and do not have to live in my old ways that i used to live when i once was in sin and without Christ! How in the world that is legalism? If this accusation is not seeking to defend a licentious lifestyle i do not know what it is. That or they simply are quick to accuse anything that convicts them or makes them feel less than 'spiritual' and hate all that they call and consider 'religious' for the sake of looking appealing to the world. Once again, this all is rooted in a sinfull mindset and if they are so unwilling to be holiness minded, maybe its because they are thinking and meditating more on sin, than on God and his holiness...hmmm..
By the same token, though, I'm sure you can see that those of us who (personally) know and understand God's grace (and I would totally include you in that group, Raulito!) wonder why that automatically makes one 'licentious', right? :rolleyes:

I consider that the biggest lie the enemy perpetrates on this board....that (most of) those who preach grace are automatically condemned as licentious, and (most of) those who preach obedience are automatically condemned as legalistic. :(
When, in reality, the vast majority of 'grace preachers' are just as obedient (as far as I can tell...) and the vast majority of those who preach obedience are just as gracious. :)

Of course, there are extreme examples of each...but, honestly, I see far more people abusing 'obedience' than I do grace. (and I certainly do NOT mean you ;) ) Perhaps it's just a predetermined mindset? idk...

I do think we all come to the Word of God with some sort of predetermined mindset, and see it accordingly. And we all need to be adjusted by the Holy Spirit at that point...
cuz isn't any form of not seeing God for Who He is some form of idolatry?
(just really wondering about that one)

Perhaps the other great trouble with believers is our narcissism. We want to make the Bible and life and just everything all about us.
When the reality is it's all about God. :)
And only about us insofar as He loves and chooses us, and then we're right back at 'it's all about God'. :)

love,
ellie
 
R

rauleetoe

Guest
#89
Actually..many do abuse grace..ive seen it firsthand when i was in a church that had leadership in sin, it was confronted in a biblical manner and the one that confronted leadership..the pastor and then informed the church of it was ousted. And not before a message was given the following sunday about 'erring on the side of grace' and not looking at or finding sin. What sin? I see no sin? The pastor said looking around a couple who was shacking up, of which one was in leadership there.
So..yea..grace is abused more than right living..those who do not like biblical holiness will accuse those who live biblical holiness of being high and mighty..simply because they are convicted.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#90
I agree there..What I am trying to understand is how is one called a legalist when you simply say, By God's Spirit I can live for him, and do not have to live in my old ways that i used to live when i once was in sin and without Christ! How in the world that is legalism? If this accusation is not seeking to defend a licentious lifestyle i do not know what it is. That or they simply are quick to accuse anything that convicts them or makes them feel less than 'spiritual' and hate all that they call and consider 'religious' for the sake of looking appealing to the world. Once again, this all is rooted in a sinfull mindset and if they are so unwilling to be holiness minded, maybe its because they are thinking and meditating more on sin, than on God and his holiness...hmmm..
hi rauleetoe:)
i would first like to say that despite the differences in our respective theological beliefs (i,e: you are a classical arminian/synergist - i am a confessional lutheran and monergist < we know these are just short-hand for our convictions), i respect your writings.

and am built up by much of what you profess personally, though our theology is so different.

i'm pretty sure i understand what you are saying overall, and actually readily agree with you when you express your hearts desire concerning living for Christ, by the Spirit, laying aside all that horrible old stuff of which we are now ashamed.

the only reason i chose this particular post of yours to respond to is to maybe help you see where some of us might be coming from (i'm not speaking for anyone else you're currently in dialogue with; perhaps not for anyone but myself, at all...i dunno).....but i wanted to say this....

your observation here is actually a really good one:

"maybe its because they are thinking and meditating more on sin, than on God and his holiness...hmmm"

in one very important respect, what you have said is true. so much preaching of the LAW DOES keep us "thinking about sin". just not always our own, as you may think. i'm just really concerned for new believers.

for myself (and i know for others) it's not that we are personally "thinking and meditating more on [our] sin...how much can i get away with kind of thing" (and as has been claimed here "using a mythical cloak of Christ's Imputed Righteousness as an excuse for wicked rebellion!!) < ugh.

it's that here in the forums and in far too many pulpits and through other means, we hear THE LAW THE LAW THE LAW being hammered away, and hammered away. this in the long run is not good for Christians and it certainly is a disaster for unbelievers who do not hear the Good News right alongside the Law!

rauleetoe, i am aware you know all this, having read many of your posts.
so we can hopefully by-pass all the cross-purpose posting. at least, i'd like to.

"maybe its because they are thinking and meditating more on sin, than on God and his holiness...hmmm"

i know you know the Law is Good.
the problem is not with the Law.

the problem is we need a permanent and trustworthy remedy for our inability to live up to the Law in our own strength (flesh). i know you agree with that, you said so in the very post above.

so what's the point of this reply? i guess just to try to say that not everyone who raises an objection to repeated preaching of LAW LAW LAW is reacting out of a 'secret desire to live a licentious lifestyle'. i know for me it isn't true. i hate it when i sin....i did so much of it before i was washed i am sick of it! i abhor it. i get physically ill. i don't however ever claim to be without sin...no, unfortunately not.

the objection i have to so many LAW LAW LAW (perfectionism and/or total failure) threads and posts is the lack of Christ Crucified, God blotting out our transgressions and truly persuading us, delivering and conforming us....the lack of encouragement for those who ARE really, really struggling (if they weren't being convicted and suffering as a result of sin, they wouldn't be struggling!)...i object to the lack of real encouragement (not from you rauleetoe - that's why i'm writing to you - i know you are reasonable and are not preaching just LAW, but are genuine in your pursuit of holiness. i see you bringing the Gospel into your posts as well) that though the sin has to be overcome, the Holy Spirit ABSOLUTELY WILL DELIVER US Home.

the Scripture is clear on it. if we persevere...if we keep fighting for the faith...we are ASSURED He will deliver us. maybe we need to look at what the Scriptures say about those who actually have received the Spirit. there's so much comfort there (not comfort to wallow in sin...comfort that He is FOR US in our agony AND joy, not against us).



i also see many who say they too are focusing on the Law (they won't admit that's what they're doing) because they are in pursuit of holiness, but in reality, they are only putting on a religious show concerning that. after awhile we can eventually discern, i think you'll agree. not all who just talk the talk also truly walk the walk.

so, your valid concerns about people not laying aside sin and sloth and so on acknowledged..... why do so many claim near sinlessness and nearly continuous holiness (which they oft place side by side with God's Pure Holiness) but are merely putting on a show? my belief is that they have grown up under and actually think they fulfill THE LAW! that's all they've heard from a youth...LAW.

honestly, i must say i would rather be found admitting to my loathsome failures when i sin than to be found consistently claiming super-holiness because i have begun to believe i can and do fulfill the LAW!

again, i know this is not what you are saying...i've been careful to read your writing.

but i'm sure you've seen some of the wretched threads here which are all about "WE ARE PERFECTLY RIGHTEOUS UNDER THE LAW, and this is indeed supposed to be our goal!" < this kind of teaching can only and ever lead to failure, and actually, if we know our scriptures, it is an outrage to the Lord, after having sent His Son - we STILL have ppl who think they are as Righteous as He is!!!!

so, this post isn't so much TO you rauleetoe (though i do want to say hello, and that i get what you are saying and say amen to your desire), but is more to/about those who preach LAW (dressed up as their victorious selves) all day long - about how that LAW LAW LAW continually without the Gospel is what causes some of us to react repeatedly with the Gospel.....which, i agree with you at times seems to lack any conviction under the Law at all.

anyway, i prolly made no sense at all....
but hopefully Jose won't minf if i do this:

"Re: Is <fruitful dialogue> possible between <Lutherans> and Arminians?"

i don't know...is it?
God Bless
zone

~

SCRIBES AND LAWYERS IN CYBERLAND AND OUR CHURCHES: please...if you're going to preach your great righteousness under the LAW...at least have a scrap of paper with the Gospel at hand to strengthen the hands that hang down and to give hope to those miserable tax-collectors you have jump-started into striving in their flesh!

Galatians 3
By Faith, or by Works of the Law?

1O foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you? It was before your eyes that Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified. 2Let me ask you only this: Did you receive the Spirit by works of the law or by hearing with faith? 3Are you so foolish? Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected bya the flesh? 4Did you sufferb so many things in vain&#8212;if indeed it was in vain? 5Does he who supplies the Spirit to you and works miracles among you do so by works of the law, or by hearing with faith&#8212; 6just as Abraham &#8220;believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness&#8221;?

7Know then that it is those of faith who are the sons of Abraham. 8And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justifyc the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, &#8220;In you shall all the nations be blessed.&#8221; 9So then, those who are of faith are blessed along with Abraham, the man of faith.

The Righteous Shall Live by Faith
10For all who rely on works of the law are under a curse; for it is written, &#8220;Cursed be everyone who does not abide by all things written in the Book of the Law, and do them.&#8221; 11Now it is evident that no one is justified before God by the law, for &#8220;The righteous shall live by faith.&#8221;d 12But the law is not of faith, rather &#8220;The one who does them shall live by them.&#8221; 13Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us&#8212;for it is written, &#8220;Cursed is everyone who is hanged on a tree&#8221;&#8212; 14so that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles, so that we might receive the promised Spirite through faith.

The Law and the Promise
15To give a human example, brothers:f even with a man-made covenant, no one annuls it or adds to it once it has been ratified. 16Now the promises were made to Abraham and to his offspring. It does not say, &#8220;And to offsprings,&#8221; referring to many, but referring to one, &#8220;And to your offspring,&#8221; who is Christ. 17This is what I mean: the law, which came 430 years afterward, does not annul a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to make the promise void. 18For if the inheritance comes by the law, it no longer comes by promise; but God gave it to Abraham by a promise.

19Why then the law? It was added because of transgressions, until the offspring should come to whom the promise had been made, and it was put in place through angels by an intermediary. 20Now an intermediary implies more than one, but God is one.

21Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could give life, then righteousness would indeed be by the law. 22But the Scripture imprisoned everything under sin, so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe.

23Now before faith came, we were held captive under the law, imprisoned until the coming faith would be revealed. 24So then, the law was our guardian until Christ came, in order that we might be justified by faith. 25But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian, 26for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith. 27For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slaveg nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29And if you are Christ&#8217;s, then you are Abraham&#8217;s offspring, heirs according to promise.


Romans 8:3-4
3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
 
Last edited:
P

psychomom

Guest
#91
Actually..many do abuse grace..ive seen it firsthand when i was in a church that had leadership in sin, it was confronted in a biblical manner and the one that confronted leadership..the pastor and then informed the church of it was ousted. And not before a message was given the following sunday about 'erring on the side of grace' and not looking at or finding sin. What sin? I see no sin? The pastor said looking around a couple who was shacking up, of which one was in leadership there.
So..yea..grace is abused more than right living..those who do not like biblical holiness will accuse those who live biblical holiness of being high and mighty..simply because they are convicted.
I'm very sorry that was your experience.
And, of course, our experience colors our viewpoint, doesn't it?
Whether for good or ill, it just does. :(

But I was strictly speaking of the people who post here.
I don't see anyone here 'shacking up' and saying grace covers all...:rolleyes:
which is a clearly ludicrous idea.

I think it may be more appropriate to say, "Grace is abused more than right living' in your experience. :)
Because I have seen exactly the opposite.
And, we're right back at personal experience again! :)

And I have to add a hearty 'amen' to zone's plea for a scrap of the Gospel in the midst of all the LAW preaching, for the young ones, and for those weary souls who are so overburdened by their own sin and its ugliness they know not what to do...:(

Without the Remedy preached, where would any of us be? &#9829;
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#92
I am going to have to disagree with you, because many do not adhere to OSAS(btw this is the nicest response and most non attacking reply you've given me so far in some time)
Why don't we try this. We stop calling it OSAS. I think one major problem is people are fighting a name, not a doctrine. I am not sure where the term OSAS came from. Maybe it came from these arguments between calvan and arminian or other areas.. thus people fight a name and do not look at what is being said.
I disagree that believing one can possibly apostasize(fall away from the faith as it talks about in 1timothy4:1, and romans 11:21-22,and hebrews 3:14..
Once again, arminian theology that is truly classical arminian theology never teaches or appeals to works..I cannot convince you of this obviously. I can only point to Arminian theology,myths and realities by Roger E Olson.
So again we want to find out what Men teach and say and not look to what each other believes? And did I hear you right? that one can not apostatize after coming to true faith, and this is your faith?

PS. I am not hear to fight Armenian or Calvinism. I have major issues with both of them.. Thus why I do not claim to be any of them


If you choose to read it, it may and i am sure will most likely dispel the many false ideas you have of us in the arminian emphasis/theological expression of faith. I am speaking now of what a true classical arminian says he believes..Much of what you said here and in other threads is simply untrue and unfounded..and at best, unfair about arminianism. Disagree with us if you must, but disagree with what is truly factual about us..not your assumptions, which are untrue. No arminian ever appeals to works based salvation..we have a high view of grace too. We simply believe in a response after accepting that grace, as many calvinists agree with too. So, before you go on implying i am condemned(i am growing tired of saying this in plain english, i never appealed to works based salvation) But if you are truly seeking to live for God, you cannot live how you once lived..this is what i believe. I am sure you do too. That said, no 'good theology' will save you if you live like the devil and thus prove you are without fruit of the spirit/not working out your own salvation/examining yourself to see if you are truly in the faith..btw that is scriptural.
This is the issue. According to what you just said. Someone can not be saved by a licentious gospel. ALL three of us would agree then (although I know many who practice Armenian which do not put it this way) as they would say a calvanist believes this is not true. that we can have faith and live like a devil, which is also not true.

As I was saying, this is what the arguments come off of. and what separates an Armenian from a Calvinist when we really get down to the nitty gritty. An arminian would call a calvanist a licentious, and a calvanist calls an arminian a legalist.

so why can we not get to the jist of the argument and found out why they call each other these things?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#93

You do realize that conservative Calvinists do consider all who believe in OSAS to be Arminians despite the similarities in OSAS and Perserverance of the Saints?
As I said, I disagree with many things on both sides. and I agree with many things on both sides. I do not think everyone who does not believe in OSAS (again lets leave this term, I think it causes more arguments, as people tryo to stand their ground) Catholics and many old religions which are not weslyin based do not believe in it either.

what do you mean by similarities? I am not sure I understand.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#94

You do realize that conservative Calvinists do consider all who believe in OSAS to be Arminians despite the similarities in OSAS and Perserverance of the Saints?
As I said, I disagree with many things on both sides. and I agree with many things on both sides. I do not think everyone who does not believe in OSAS (again lets leave this term, I think it causes more arguments, as people tryo to stand their ground) Catholics and many old religions which are not weslyin based do not believe in it either.

what do you mean by similarities? I am not sure I understand.
To be honest. I think both "terms" can be misleading
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#95
I have more respect for an Arminian or a Calvinist who uncompromisingly and without personal attacks proclaims and defends his or her position than for. any one who belittles theology for the sake of 'just getting along '.Martyn lloyd Jones did point out that in extreme circumstances such as in a WWII bomb shelter the denominational divides fade into "Lord, help us!".
You know what is even a better thing to do? Let a calvanist and arminian or anyone else NOT defent their fiath. we do not need to defend anything, if it is truth, God will defend it for us. But let us with open hearts try to figure out what the other truly believes. I think as you hinted at earlier. there are many different types on both sides.. Some diehard, and some more laxed. or however you want to classify it.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#96
sure. most non-denominational movements become 'denominational' in time. Calvary Chapels are a good example, even though they say they are not a denomination, I can tell you where they stand on each topic as well as their usual 'liturgy'. A rose by any other name is...
while I agree alot of so called non denoms do this. there are many who do not.

My church is non denom. we just got away from the traditional way church runs. I have been to so many denomination churches. and the repetition which occurs every Sunday I think takes people away from the true meaning of church. My father, an avid Baptist) would cring because we do not do this or that. But when you go and every Sunday it is the same routine, it loses its flavor.

we also are free to not be bound by denominational theology or cruxes. Once a year we have a 3 day institute where we have guest speakers from all over the world, and from every aspect of theology come speak on certain topics. Since we are not bound, and have an understanding that ALL denomination have wonderful doctrines and beliefs in many areas. we are free to chose from all.

many other things I love about my church. Home groups, discipleship programs. Cell groups etc etc.. Things I did not see in my denominational visitations. Church is not just on sunday and wed event, it can happen every day of the week.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#97

A heart that has truly encountered the the grace of God will be transformed in some manner or another because God's word is never void. Scripture states that they are a new creature who's old hearts of stone have been replaced with new hearts of flesh both humble and contrite. One can not be inhabited by the most powerful force in the universe and not be changed in some manner. A truly regenerate heart inhabited by the Holy Spirit will indeed show evidences of the Holy Spirit's inhabitation be it through repentance, works of compassion or the manifestations (fruit) of the Holy Spirit.


Agree 100%

Unfortunately, many in certain grace camps today have turned good works into a bad thing. They've even gone so far as to incorporate sin as "works" in an attempt to dismiss sin as having no bearing on one's salvation when in truth sin is nothing short of rebellion against God, the evidence / result of a heart that has already willfully distanced itself from God no longer abiding in Him.
This is not a new thing, it went on in Jesus day, and in Pauls day. and in James day (which is why he wrote the epistle of James) as Jude said. many turn the grace of God into licentious, whose damnation was pre-ordained

As I said earlier. This is where I think the issue lies. Many will say because of this. one can LOSE salvation. Others say that one can not lose it. They never had it to begin with. So which is it? this is what the discussion should be.

Can a person who claims to have salvation, yet lives as the devil be saved?

Can a person who confessed salvation. had many great works in Jesus name, then due to some reason, fell aside, and stops doing works (or at least as many works) and in leaving the church and its protection. falls under temptation and maybe falls into some old sin habits still be saved? or did he lose salvation?
 
C

Crossfire

Guest
#98
Why don't we try this. We stop calling it OSAS. I think one major problem is people are fighting a name, not a doctrine. I am not sure where the term OSAS came from. Maybe it came from these arguments between calvan and arminian or other areas.. thus people fight a name and do not look at what is being said.

So again we want to find out what Men teach and say and not look to what each other believes? And did I hear you right? that one can not apostatize after coming to true faith, and this is your faith?

PS. I am not hear to fight Armenian or Calvinism. I have major issues with both of them.. Thus why I do not claim to be any of them




This is the issue. According to what you just said. Someone can not be saved by a licentious gospel. ALL three of us would agree then (although I know many who practice Armenian which do not put it this way) as they would say a calvanist believes this is not true. that we can have faith and live like a devil, which is also not true.

As I was saying, this is what the arguments come off of. and what separates an Armenian from a Calvinist when we really get down to the nitty gritty. An arminian would call a calvanist a licentious, and a calvanist calls an arminian a legalist.

so why can we not get to the jist of the argument and found out why they call each other these things?
Many Calvinists embrace an idea dubbed "Lordship Salvation", the belief that a believer should surrender every area of their lives to Christ, to guard against licentious living. When I was an Arminian, it was the the subject of Lordship Salvation that bridged the gap between myself and various Calvinists that I encountered thus providing common ground to build a firm foundation on which we could start and maintain a healthy and respectful relationship.

It is my recommendation to any Calvinist or Arminian looking to extend an olive branch to the other, Lordship Salvation is most likely the place to research and open the lines of communication.
 
Last edited:
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#99


I wouldn't worry about anything that Red says. If Red is right and I'm wrong then everything is perfectly fine. After all, if "once saved always saved" is good for the goose then it is good for the gander. :D

However, if I'm right and Red is wrong, then he and his buddies are going to have a very hard time trying to explain to Jesus just how and why they thought His divine words and actions justified sin and very poor treatment of others. :(

By their fruit you shall know them. May the Lord have mercy on their poor souls...

and thus we get why there can never be an agreement. Who teaches that Gods devine word justifies sin and poor treatment of others.

As someone said earlier. Extreme calvanists think all people who reject OSAS are calvanist. The same goes the other way. Everyone who believes in justification by faith alone and the eternal security of the soul based on God and his promise are licentious and teaches a freedom to sin.

Niether are true. which is why we should listen with open hearts. not closed denominational bias!
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
You are on wacked out individual and you need much help. Please go and get it and hope it is not too late.
And this really helps :rolleyes: This just goes to show what the OP said. and why we can never listen to each other. responses like this are based on pride and arrogance. and do not help anyone at all.