Compulsory micro chipping of all dogs in England

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#2
#2
It's on it's way. I'm just doing what I can without it for now. :)
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#3
#3
A mark in the head and paw?
is the number woof woof woof?
 
K

Kefa52

Guest
#5
#5
Well...Here in the US we have social security numbers, and drivers license #. A person with clearance can find out anything they want to know about you. I would say we are already marked.
 
JGPS

JGPS

Banned
#6
Jan 11, 2013
629
0
0
#6
Oh I dislike that on so many levels.
 
Blain

Blain

The Word Weaver
#7
Aug 28, 2012
19,215
2,551
113
#7
Naw i don't think we are marked just yet. But this new chip.... idk I have heard it is the mark of the beast and this lady posted on youtube a dream about this chip being the mark of the beast. Out of fear i am tempted to believe it because what if it really is but we accepted saying there is no way its the mark?
 
R

Repentionofignorance

Guest
#8
#8
When the mark of the beast does come by, you will also be given the choice of choosing one of his names, (666 to choose from). I dont think this is the mark yet, but i think this may start some similar ideas in the us.
 
B

BarlyGurl

Guest
#9
#9
there is a whole lot more going on in terms of abuse of authority in that article. the US has been fighting the pre-emptive strike legislation for years concerning dogs and property rights...
 
zone

zone

Senior Member
#10
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#10
A

Anonimous

Guest
#11
#11
Everything starts out for our benefit. Of course, wetend to abuse it in the end. If anyone thinks that this will not include humans at one point they have their heads in the sand. People also think this is not the "mark". I honestly don't know if it is or not. Eventually, we 'll see who is who and where their loyalty lies.
 
A

Anonimous

Guest
#12
#12
I agree. I think part of the mark will have to include a declaration as to allegiance or something.
 
S

Songbird_7

Guest
#13
#13
Well, when you consider the absolute explosion of technology in the past century, it isn't hard to imagine where this could lead. Whether it's the mark or not, there is no way anyone in my house is getting 'chipped.
 
R

Relena7

Guest
#14
#14
I don't see anything terribly wrong with micro chipping pets. The practice has been around for years. Seems a bit extreme to make it mandatory for all dogs though.

The article didn't mention anything about microchips in humans. I think due to technology and credit card history, etc, we have plenty of enough other ways of being tracked down.
 
P

Precious_Sunflower

Guest
#15
#15
There are some parts in the USA where they have already test chipped some humans. The idea of chipping humans have been there for years as well, it is just not very known yet among most people. But it is gradually developing towards this form of system.

With the animals I have heard that if they are over a certain distance they can not track them down. But once the other system with chipping humans comes, then they can track you down anywhere you are, as whenever you move yourself, this recharges more energy into the chip, so you will always be seen and easily tracked down if you have let yourself get chipped.

There are different theories about this topic. I think this one is very beleivable. We should keep our eyes open anyways, and not let ourselves get lured into something that makes us feel uneasy about it either.
 
JGPS

JGPS

Banned
#16
Jan 11, 2013
629
0
0
#16
Relena7 said:
I don't see anything terribly wrong with micro chipping pets. The practice has been around for years. Seems a bit extreme to make it mandatory for all dogs though.

The article didn't mention anything about microchips in humans. I think due to technology and credit card history, etc, we have plenty of enough other ways of being tracked down.
Click to expand...
It's really only the 'compulsory' part that is a problem.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#17
#17
The greenies will all line up to be chipped.
 
zone

zone

Senior Member
#18
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#18
Relena7 said:
I don't see anything terribly wrong with micro chipping pets. The practice has been around for years. Seems a bit extreme to make it mandatory for all dogs though.

The article didn't mention anything about microchips in humans. I think due to technology and credit card history, etc, we have plenty of enough other ways of being tracked down.
Click to expand...
but.....many of the animals who have been chipped have developed cancer at the chip site.
 
zone

zone

Senior Member
#19
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#19
AgeofKnowledge said:
The greenies will all line up to be chipped.
Click to expand...
they're actually red, AoK:rolleyes:
they are the ones calling for one-child policies in the west...or total sterilization.
i reckon the bisphenol A and other methods aren't working fast enough.

Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development

"...At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and their privacy—to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability.

Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit.

In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests.

In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth...."
the Rockefeller Foundation

http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/uploads/files/bba493f7-cc97-4da3-add6-3deb007cc719.pdf < click

^ good guessers i reckon
 
S

Songbird_7

Guest
#20
#20
I think the issue is the element of force. If you can force a population to get a micro chip implanted in their dogs, what's next? I never like it when any government says "you HAVE to do this" especially when it involves your body, your child's body, your pet's body. This is why I'm so nervous about Obamacare here. They already use our tax dollars to fund abortions, to tell us we HAVE to have vaccines (even though there are still exemptions but there is increasing pressure to have those exemptions go bye bye), etc. etc. We're just frogs in the proverbial pot of water.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.