Recent content by fredoheaven

Thank you for your response. As we examine the context, I'd like to reiterate that the presence of the Hebrew suffix 'im' is no longer a valid reason to claim that the KJV is in error for translating Genesis 1:1 as 'heaven' (singular). I've listed previous English Bibles that also translated...

The point is clear: it is possible to translate the masculine plural 'שָׁמַיִם' (shamayim) into English as a singular noun. The primary reason for this is syntactic agreement, where the singular verb 'created' and the singular noun 'earth' in Genesis 1:1 influence the translation of 'שָׁמַיִם'...

I appreciate your input, but quoting DBW is irrelevant. You're essentially reiterating the article's points. However, the article disregards the legitimate translation of masculine plural forms into English singulars. Notably, Daniel B. Wallace's Net Bible supports this translation approach, as...

Umm, a snippet view of the link you provided just give a snippet opinion and no documentation so far for any heberw grammatical rules. So my snippet view on the article of Genesis 1:1 is incorrect.. It is because the Heb word is plural it demands to be plural in the English language. A...

could you have a new one? Or are you willing to document Genesis 1:1? What are your thoughts why Kjb is in error? Thanks

Could you have a one or two examples of 10's of thousands documented changes? Thanks

Including this one were already taken in the many threads. Thanks

Ok, the only difference is that King James did not wrote or translate The KJB. I just think many of the arguments are already taken in the many other threads. You could look them for youself. Thanks

Thanks for the link but some quotes need to be verified. Still, this sounds like no good evidence. Anyway that is not part of the scripture:)

Have you already looked out for the other English Bibles in Luke 3:3? No, we don't need to look for Greek counterparts just plain English if your argument of similarity is valid but I am not going to stress you, and perhaps if you only have spare time to do it and I agree, that God's word is...

Hi, I see no inspiration to the method or the translators or even the authors if biblical inspiration is being talk about. Inspiration is only to the words of God. Now , you are claiming that the King himself is a bi- sexual, ate stating a fact or just a fiction? Thanks

H Hi Studentoftheword, Actually, I have you my thumbs-up here, that the Niv amd Kjb is saying the same. I simply asked if you are NIV onlyist which I believe you are not. Your argument that "all bibles" say the same thing seems incoorect, if you made your researched welll. I expect you to check...

Ate you an NIV Onlyist? Thanks

Please check Luke 3:33 and you can spot the difference.

A mansion not only shows the vastness, the grandest, or spaciousness but also the quality of being permanent unlike rooms, dwellings or abode., which are temporary. Thanks for the PDF