Recent content by fredoheaven

Vowel points were invented around 600 AD or the second half of the 1st millennium AD and finally settled in the 11 Ce. AD. Some have pointed to the beginning of around 500 AD as mentioned by Thomas Ross. On the side of the history of the vowel point, the Catholics would always criticize this...

I just don't know if this is numerology or not, but I am counting in Acts 8: 34, 35, 36 __ 38 39 40 of NRSVue, and still not updated literally. I clicked on the Bible gateway but I found nothing... 34 The eunuch asked Philip, “About whom, may I ask you, does the prophet say this, about...

Here is James Snapp's (not a KJB only) link review on NRSVue https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2022/10/goodbye-nrsvue.html?fbclid=IwAR3ubU8mFpqATbLCHxcLsO-JmLyM6WOvC4CseOvbUkawNb_qKCbWStWHndM NRSVue accordingly, “…sets out to be the most literal translation…”, and as it “…follows the King...

3 And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.) The Jewish ‘days of unleavened bread’ refers to the 15th day after the celebration of the Jewish Passover. It commenced evenly with the resurrection day for another long...

I agree, the word 'Passover' was attributed to William Tyndale. Be blessed!

This is so confirmed via Google Maps where Modern day Kavala is Neapolis. Drawing a straight line will land you in England.

Ho,ho, prouduced them, can you link me to see if these were originals as you claimed? Another none sense!

- substantiate your claim biblically. Provide precept or principle that proves your argument. Clearly demonstrate that your conclusion is drawn from the Bible. Does this prove they were not in the original? Your daydreaming is over. First, you need to produce the original. Second, you don't...

Yes, I'm writing on my cellphone at that time. Yet the bottom line here is that you have no scripture reference while giving your conceited opinion. No evidences, I've found so far

Bottomline: You have no perfect Bible, I do have!

Circular! Isah 8:20 20 To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.

Vain babbling! You cannot prove it in the ORIGINAL you are saying. Your old mantra make no sense!

Please present scripture, you not put any scripture to your post. So you are allowing the logic of men. Paul says " he reasoned out of scripture", the LORD say " cone, let us reason together" Of course, my logic start with the logic of faith which I believe the Bible is given by inspiration. Now...

So you see, the need to to translate. It might your confuse!

Umm, you needs to prove they were not in the original. Give your best shot man!