Recent content by Hawkeye

I think I see the problem. When I said the “latter” I was referring to the second covenant…..not Sinai.

I Don’t believe I suggested the commandments were abolished. What I said…..was the Moab covenant (Deuteronomy.1.1-5) was abolished and was/is the covenant spoken of in Hebrews. The Sinai Covenant (The Ten Commandments) are not the obsolete covenant mentioned in Hebrews. If it was misstated in...

It is very unfortunate that folks just don’t understand that Israel had been given two covenants in their journey from Egypt to the Promised Land (Deuteronomy 29:1). (Deuteronomy 1:1-5) shows Moses explaining the second covenant on the Plains of Moab forty years after the first covenant Israel...

.???

I have always been fond of nick names and try to give one to all my family members and attempt to offer something apropos. My grandchildren are pleased with their nick names I’ve given them (I think) and let me name them for your perusal….given according to their age (oldest first/ youngest...

O.K. This question will not affect anyone’s salvation….so we can disagree without igniting a firestorm. Blessings to your home and all within……

Yes….because of ignorance by translators recently emerging from 1000+ years of “Dark Ages”. Mt. Sinai is a mythical location. Even today historians cannot identify the mountain of the Covenant. Oh sure……some think they know…..but the Desert of Sinai is the proper name where Israel received the...

Deuteronomy 29:1 speaks of two separate Covenants in two separate locations separated by 40 years of wandering…..

The 613 commandments are not biblical……they are from the Babylonian Talmud. “Tractate Makkot 23 b” I would recommend further study…….

Actually…..Israel arrived in the DESERT of Sinai. The Mountain was Mt. Horeb. They were given the Law of Yahweh. That’s correct….. This is also correct……but the Aaronic Priesthood was not the Levitical Priesthood. This is also true. The mistake most folks make is assuming the Aaronic...

Actually……it is not. There are substantial differences between Yahweh’s Law and the Law of Moses. The Father’s intention with Israel was to make them a holy nation of priests (Exodus 19:5-6) and a Kingdom. Our Father’s Covenant did not require a separate Levitical Priesthood with all its...

I would still suggest…….more study.

This speaks of the Levitical Law (Hebrews 7:11-28) and not one other thing. If you notice….it speaks of a change in the law …….not an elimination. Hebrews 9 tells us further that the law under discussion required the blood of goats and calves (KJV) and the action of sprinkling the scroll and...

Since I first became drawn to the Word of our Father I have often pondered many hard to explain, difficult to understand and seemingly total contradictory positions presented to us by traditional biblical knowledge.. And eventually I came to understand that the big problem in all of this is...

I have never heard that phrase, “It is obsolete” regarding the Word of our Father. I would hope someday you might reconsider that position……