Reactions received by Kavik
-
I was wondering id you still held to the diglossia interpretation of Acts 2? That's got to be one of the worst interpretations of the... -
GThere is, unfortunately, just no instance of actual documented xenoglossy – anywhere. Clearly, this is false. You may be thinking of a...
-
Sketch reacted
to Kavik's post in the thread Challenging the theory of interpretive hearing in Acts chapter two.
It's also important to keep in mind that this is not a list of languages; it's a list of place names. I think many people kind of miss... -
NBelow is an example of "tongues" that I recently transcribed from a YouTube video - it is shown in simple IPA transcription (apologies...
-
NAnd that passage in Romans has absolutely zero to do with the modern tongues phenomenon. It's typically taken completely out of context...
-
GAnd that passage in Romans has absolutely zero to do with the modern tongues phenomenon. It's typically taken completely out of context...
-
YAnd that passage in Romans has absolutely zero to do with the modern tongues phenomenon. It's typically taken completely out of context...
-
And that passage in Romans has absolutely zero to do with the modern tongues phenomenon. It's typically taken completely out of context... -
SI’m not sure I quite understand your question. When it comes to the subject of “tongues”, one must make a distinction between “Biblical...
-
Yes, I agree - they are manifestations; not "gifts".
-
Y(in your response to lukeabers' posts) - I don’t know why, but Aramaic and Hebrew are the two most common “go to” languages for...
-
(in your response to lukeabers' posts) - I don’t know why, but Aramaic and Hebrew are the two most common “go to” languages for...
-
Yes, context is essential; the word "tongue" itself has multiple meanings in English, however, when describing something spoken, the...
-
"here is yet another wonderful testimony to the truth of Pentecostal faith from Faye who attends the same local assembly that I do here... -
Not sure where you're getting that one from - 'glôssa' is the Greek word for 'language'.
-
YThe concept of ‘prayer language came about in the early 1900’s when the early Pentecostal church had to redefine their understanding of...
-
The concept of ‘prayer language came about in the early 1900’s when the early Pentecostal church had to redefine their understanding of...
-
Except modern 'tongues' is not language.
-
GThe KJV says, 'no man understandeth him.' How does this fit with your own intepretation of the passage? First, the “him” here is a...
-
Not sure where you're getting that one from - 'glôssa' is the Greek word for 'language'.
