Why Apologetics?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jan 29, 2011
61
9
8
#1
In order to answer the question of “Why apologetics?” it will be advantageous to answer a more important underlying, namely, “what is apologetics?” Apologetics derives from the Greek word, apologia, which means defense. Apologetics seeks to “provide a rational justification for the truth claims of the Christian faith” [1]. A plethora of Christians misconstrue
apologetics with apologizing for ones faith, which is not what apologetics is.


Why apologetics?


It is shocking how Christians dramatically depreciate the importance of apologetics. “Apologetics is pointless” they’ll tell you. Or “No one gets saved through arguments”. This attitude towards apologetics, however is drastically narrow-sighted to the reach apologetics has, not to mention a limitation on God’s ability to use arguments. There are a advantages that apologetics has, let me list four.


1) Apologetics is Biblical.


Many Christians tell apologists that apologetics isn’t Biblical, but is this assertion true?
The Biblical foundation upon which we establish apologetics can be found is in 1st Peter 3:15 in which we are told to be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give a reason for the hope that you have, bud do this in gentleness and respect.
Moreover, the early apostles would often argue for the truth of their claims by appealing to Jesus’ miracles, fulfilled prophecies, and Jesus’ resurrection [Acts 22-32] when speaking with Jews. When the apostles spoke to non-Jews, they would appeal to His handiwork in nature [Acts 14:17]. And In Romans 1:20, Paul says, for the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen. That is to say, when we look at the creation, we should know that God exists.

Let’s look as some other examples of apologetics found in the Scriptures.

In the book of Acts chapter 19 and verse 8, we find Paul persuasively arguing for the Kingdom of God. In Jude 3:1, Paul says, I found it necessary to write to appealing to you to contend for the faith. Or again, in 17:2-3 and
Acts 17:22-31.


2) Cultural Significance


In America, our culture is deeply post-Christian due to the Enlightenment in which it propagated “free thought” which led to pursuit of knowledge by means of human reason alone. This type of thought inevitably leads to non-Christian conclusions. And if our slipping into secularism remains unchecked in America, Christianity will not be seen as an intellectually viable option. We can already see the remnants of this in Europe and have the potential to share their fate. Although the majority Europeans’ retain an affiliation with Christianity, only about 10 percent are practicing believers, and less than half of those are evangelical in theology. Why does this matter? It matters because the soil in which we plant the seeds of the gospel will be harder to plant. Thus, our preaching the gospel will become a more difficult task for the believer to preach, say, in the university in which people reject it due to intellectual inquiries.


3) Prevents Believers from Falling Away


The generations of believers today in the church today seem to have questions pertaining to the faith which typically go unanswered by pastors, fellow church goers, and elders. If this trend continues, the consequence of this will lead some believers into agnosticism or even atheism. To illustrate, Dr. William Lane Craig, a well known apologist attests that as he speaks in churches, he frequently has parents say things like, “If only you’d been here two or three years ago! Our son [or daughter] had questions about the faith which no one in church could answer, and now he’s lost his faith and is far from the Lord.” This is the sad reality that the church is facing today, but it gets worse. The church isn’t the only place that believers are losing their faith in God. In college, believers face an even more harsh war over their mind. Professors and classmates attack the belief in God, the reliability of the Bible, and Jesus’ resurrection, and for the most part, this is the first time that the believer has had his beliefs challenged. And the Christian who is not adequately trained in apologetics, they begin to believe these objections and most end up as just another statistic. It is said that 50-75% of students who grew up in church that go to college lose their faith.

Let's take a look at a testimony of a man that encountered much of what I have said to give you what’s it like for someone that encounters this. If you visit Reasonablefaith.org, you can read many more testimonies like this one.


Dear Dr. Craig,


I went off to college 37 years ago, having been raised a Christian, who believed in the main tenets of the faith simply because everyone I knew and trusted believed in them. Once in college, in the mid 70s when atheism and anti religious sentiment was quite fashionable, this led to a process wherein daily intellectual and social assaults on my faith led eventually to a faith crisis that was so devastating that I still remember those dark times and have night mares about it to this day.

I wish to God that you had been around all those years ago. Having gone through a long period of utter despondency over the nihilistic implications of atheism, and although never self destructive, I finally came around, on my own, to subject atheism, and all the standard criticisms of theism and orthodox christian dogma to the same level of scrutiny as my professors did of theism. I find that your ministry of defense of the central tenets of Christianity to be extraordinary and only blind faith in materialism, or atheism, or fear of professorial peer pressure can stand against many of the insights that you have, and the broader counteroffensive that believers have made these past 20 years.

I also found that when I actually took up the Bible and read it for myself, that Jesus first asked his prospective disciples to follow him, not so much to believe in a preexistent body of beliefs about him. I have found that by actually trying to follow Jesus has made all the difference in my life. You have shown to me conclusively that the central tenets of the Christian faith are not an attempt to "believe ten impossible things before breakfast", but overall make the most sense, and even better yet, yield the most hope.

I have been a street cop in the worst neighborhoods of --------, made famous by several different police shows on TV for over 26 years. I have seen up close and personal more death and senseless violence than the vast majority of police officers ever see. These horrors, combined with the worldview of hopelessness and pointlessness that is the byproduct of pop nihilism could have driven me simply mad. Due in part to your ministry, intellect and powers you have brought to bear on what are the questions of the most profound import to our lives, you have shown Christianity to be quite credible, and along with asking Jesus into my life, to show himself to me, then joining a Christian community and with them attempting to practice Christ and Christianity, this has made an incredible impact in my life. Jesus offers us a new life, a better hope and a better way to be in this life, and in part due to your demonstrations, this is not a pie in the sky, wishful thinking hope, but rather is a set of beliefs not merely emotionally and spiritually satisfying, but cognitively persuasive as well. God bless you sir.


4) Apologetics Ministers to Atheists


Apologetics gives the Christian and non-believer common ground upon which the Christian is able to effectively evangelize to the non-believer, namely, logic, reason, and evidence. Without common ground, the theist will find himself talking past the non-believer which can be detrimental to effectively ministering to the non-believer. Consider Paul, when he would debate with the Jews to convince them Jesus was the Messiah, he appealed to the Scriptures, miracles, and Jesus’ resurrection. How effective would it had been if Paul would’ve approached them with, say, an appeal to nature [as described in Romans 1:18-23] to convince the Jews of Jesus? Obviously this wouldn’t work, so Paul, knowing who he was speaking too used the tools that would get the job done. To illustrate, imagine if a maintenance man used a hammer where a drill was necessary to complete the job. Would he be effective at his job if he didn’t know the appropriate tools to use for specific jobs? Likewise, when Christians encounters an unbeliever, he should be the maintenance man who not only has the right tools for the job, but knows what tool to use for that job. I think C.S. Lewis put it best when he said,

To be ignorant and simple now - not to be able to meet enemies on their own ground - would be to throw down our weapons, and betray our uneducated brethren who have, under God, no defense but us against the intellectual attacks of the heathen.

For all of these reasons, we can confidently conclude that apologetics is necessary.
 
C

Consumed

Guest
#2
Pauls apologia to king Agrippa, his testimony, anything else is a argument in the making. Lol
 
A

AnandaHya

Guest
#3
Acts 26
29 And Paul said, “I would to God that not only you, but also all who hear me today, might become both almost and altogether such as I am, except for these chains.”
 
I

imachristian637789

Guest
#4
Pauls apologia to king Agrippa, his testimony, anything else is a argument in the making. Lol
If that's what you think then you don't know very much about christian apologetics. See www.equip.org
 
C

Consumed

Guest
#5
If that's what you think then you don't know very much about christian apologetics. See Christian Research Institute and the Bible Answer Man, Hank Hanegraaff
I openly declare I don't nor care to. We've made a doctrine even out of that, paul gave his testimony not an argument over it, just his testimony that they would come to know Him, Jesus. Been down this kinda thread before but in a chat room, my antoganist, cause he was, ended by being a good friend out of it and confessing sin in his life, he started by being offensive cause I don't care with "apologetics" and I just kept on that God does the revealing and saving, I just need to keep loving and not have to argue my way thru it. It was awesome to have had the privilege and trial(believe me I wanted to just end the onslaught ) going thru it but love melted his heart and God set him free from that which hindered him out of it all. How good is that, all without apologetics wow but him arguing about the need for it,, go figure.
Is that apologetics?? Hmmm I wonder now, seriously I do
 
B

BlackDove

Guest
#6
Keep up the good work man! I too have a heavy conviction for apologetics and spreading the awareness thereof. I just started teaching a class on apologetics recently, trying to show people the importance of it and build a well rounded foundation for them for when they start their own studies and hopefully fall into a field of expertise. It is sad to me that Christians seem to argue the case for Christ more from an emotional standpoint rather than verifying the truth-claims of Christianity with evidence, like the apostles and early church had to do. I'm a firm believer that the coming generations will take Christ and Christianity a lot more seriously if every Christian was able to lay the factual smack-down on any opposition to the faith whatsoever.
 
C

Consumed

Guest
#7
Keep up the good work man! I too have a heavy conviction for apologetics and spreading the awareness thereof. I just started teaching a class on apologetics recently, trying to show people the importance of it and build a well rounded foundation for them for when they start their own studies and hopefully fall into a field of expertise. It is sad to me that Christians seem to argue the case for Christ more from an emotional standpoint rather than verifying the truth-claims of Christianity with evidence, like the apostles and early church had to do. I'm a firm believer that the coming generations will take Christ and Christianity a lot more seriously if every Christian was able to lay the factual smack-down on any opposition to the faith whatsoever.
Brother, one doesn't need to argue at all, especially from a emotional standpoint, but to share the good news of what Jesus has done for us. Honestly though, each to their own understanding and way of sharing the gospel. Some use intellect others use His love to just share the good news.
Shalom
 
B

BlackDove

Guest
#8
Brother, one doesn't need to argue at all, especially from a emotional standpoint, but to share the good news of what Jesus has done for us.
Haha, I think Apollos might beg to differ about arguing: Acts 18:24-28 (emphasis on v. 28)

Testimony can be a valid form of witnessing in our culture (to a degree), but here's the problem:

A doctrinally orthodox Christian can share with someone "what Jesus has done for them", and a heretical "Christian" (e.g. a Mormon, Jehovah's Witness, etc) can also share the same things, but the two come from entirely different truth-claims. Without some sort of intellectual backing (or use of apologetics), the seeker is left blind in a sense to what they're getting into, and can be convinced to go to either side of the fence simply because they are emotionally compelled. As heralds of universal truth, I think we can do better than that. We don't have to fight on even ground, because we have the high ground! There is no reason why Christians can't present the factual evidence of the gospel before sharing their testimonies. Furthermore, general testimonies alone appear to be rather circular in reasoning to me:

1. Jesus has done much for me
Therefore, Jesus exists, died and rose from the dead, etc.

The conclusion of the case is contained in the premise, therefore making it fallacious altogether. First, prove Christianity is truth, and then share with the world what the truth of Christ has done.
 
C

Consumed

Guest
#9
I hear your point, I suppose what we are doing is something like apologetics, I don't know brother. This I do know, convincing someone is not my goal, planting a seed or watering it is, God will bring the increase. To a non believer many a people have been brought to their knees before Jesus thru testimonies, knee jerk reaction or conviction of heart??

Holy spirit convicts the world of sin, His saints of His righteousness .

All in all, I'm sure you agree or hope u do but even if u don't that's ok, whichever way Jesus does the saving not us, we just position ourselves to be His vessel to work thru. Apologetics or not, I just hate arguements is my problem lol debating like this is good

With honor
Shalom
 
C

Consumed

Guest
#10
Hey bro v28 apollos was pointing scriptures out to Jews where Christ Jesus (concealed in ot) had come and fulfilled scripture.
 
Jan 29, 2011
61
9
8
#12
Keep up the good work man! I too have a heavy conviction for apologetics and spreading the awareness thereof. I just started teaching a class on apologetics recently, trying to show people the importance of it and build a well rounded foundation for them for when they start their own studies and hopefully fall into a field of expertise. It is sad to me that Christians seem to argue the case for Christ more from an emotional standpoint rather than verifying the truth-claims of Christianity with evidence, like the apostles and early church had to do. I'm a firm believer that the coming generations will take Christ and Christianity a lot more seriously if every Christian was able to lay the factual smack-down on any opposition to the faith whatsoever.
BlackDove,

I want to extend to you an offer to make active the apologetics group here on CC.com. You can submit written articles, videos, and lectures from the top apologists--as well as the unknown apologists. I hope that you get on chat some time so that we can discuss the various topics in apologetics.

Consumed,

Thank you! You are the first Christian that has disagreed with me but was friendly in your response! You sir are a shining example of Christ and I hope that you continue to allow him in your life to contiously use you. You did not get hung up on whether or not apologetics is bad, rather you acknowledged that God--as I have--will use what He pleases to draw us to Him!

To all who responded, thank you! I hope that you all will enjoy my next article in which I will explain the Trinity!
 
Jan 29, 2011
61
9
8
#13
Haha, I think Apollos might beg to differ about arguing: Acts 18:24-28 (emphasis on v. 28)

Testimony can be a valid form of witnessing in our culture (to a degree), but here's the problem:

A doctrinally orthodox Christian can share with someone "what Jesus has done for them", and a heretical "Christian" (e.g. a Mormon, Jehovah's Witness, etc) can also share the same things, but the two come from entirely different truth-claims. Without some sort of intellectual backing (or use of apologetics), the seeker is left blind in a sense to what they're getting into, and can be convinced to go to either side of the fence simply because they are emotionally compelled. As heralds of universal truth, I think we can do better than that. We don't have to fight on even ground, because we have the high ground! There is no reason why Christians can't present the factual evidence of the gospel before sharing their testimonies. Furthermore, general testimonies alone appear to be rather circular in reasoning to me:

1. Jesus has done much for me
Therefore, Jesus exists, died and rose from the dead, etc.

BlackDove,

Excellent response, brother! I am impressed with the gentleness and respect that you have shown! I agree completely with the following statement, "There is no reason that we cannot provide the factual evidence of the Gospel beofe sharing our testimonies".

Moreover, You seem to be endowed in logic and philosophy as well, again, I am impressed. Your analysis that our testimony that Jesus has done so much for me doesn't warrant the conclusion that Jesus exists, died on the cross, and rose from the dead.

I apologise for not responding three days ago when I seen that you had responded. I honestly didn't feel like responding. I would like to speak to you further in chat if you wish, for I think that there is much to gain! I have quite a few people who are interested in apologetics in the chat.

Anyway, God bless you and I hope to speak to you in chat soon!

The conclusion of the case is contained in the premise, therefore making it fallacious altogether. First, prove Christianity is truth, and then share with the world what the truth of Christ has done.
 
D

dmdave17

Guest
#14
In his first letter, Peter wrote, "But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have." (1 Peter 3:15) I believe that this is the basic premise of apologetics.
 
May 2, 2011
1,134
8
0
#15

Why apologetics?” -- “what is apologetics?”

1) Apologetics is Biblical.

2) Cultural Significance

3) Prevents Believers from Falling Away

4) Apologetics Ministers to Atheists
[/quote]

Note there is another thread on Apologetics here is the link:

http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/27265-objections-apologetics-answered.html
<<-- LINK

Sound Apologetics needs to start with a Sound Foundation:


SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY
http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/27584-systematic-theology.html
<<-- LINK

BIBLICAL HERMENEUTICS
http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/26690-biblical-hermeneutics.html
<<-- LINK

DOCTRINAL STATEMENT
http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/26386-doctrinal-statement-mission-statement.html
<<-- LINK


AN OUTLINE ON BIBLICAL APOLOGETICS:
THIS IS A VERY CUT BACK VERSION OF THE ENTIRE OUTLINE --


Biblical Apologetics, Part 1

Preliminary Considerations


I Peter 3:15-16 – 15But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give
an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with
meekness and fear: 16Having a good conscience; that, whereas they speak evil of you, as
of evildoers, they may be ashamed that falsely accuse your good conversation in Christ.


I. Preconditions for doing apologetics.

A. Sanctifying Christ –
B. as Lord in your heart.
C. "Every area of Life:" World View in apologetics.
D. Preparing a defense.

II. Character Qualities of the Apologist.


A. Gentleness (Meekness).
B. Reverence ("Fear").
C. Good Conscience.

III. The Apologetic Situation: Results of a Strong Christian
Character.


A. Everyone who asks you.
B. You are Slandered.
C. You are Reviled.

Biblical Apologetics, Part 2: The Myth and the Robbery of Neutrality

I. What is neutrality?

A. Definition:
B. Assumptions:

II. Why is neutrality urged on us?

III. What is wrong with neutrality?

IV. Neutrality vs. Antithesis:


A. The Old Man vs. the New Man. (Eph. 4:17ff)

B. Darkened Understanding vs. the Mind of Christ.

C. Self-Deception and Delusion vs. All the Treasures of Wisdom and Knowledge.


D. Blended together vs. Set Apart.


E. Adultery vs. Faithfulness.


F. Alienation vs. Reconciliation –

G. Arrogant Autonomy vs. Every Thought Captive

Biblical Apologetics, Part 3: Unbelieving Thought


I. A Summary Review of the Concept of "Neutrality."


A. The Idiocy of Neutrality.

B. The Immorality of Neutrality.

C. The Impossibility of Neutrality. Neutrality attempts to maintain two contradictory
allegiances simultaneously. This cannot be done in the world that is.

II. The True Nature of Unbelieving Thought: It Is Not Neutral! Its
Main Characteristics: Vanity and Deceitfulness.


A. Vanity

B. Deceitfulness.

Biblical Apologetics, Part 4: Conversion – The New Man and the
New Mind


I. What is it to be in Christ? The Nature of Conversion.

A. What conversion is not:

B. What conversion is:

C. Conversion is death and resurrection;

II. What is it to be "Rooted in Christ"? The nature of our life
commitments.


A. As in conversion Christ was acknowledged as Lord

B. You did not come to Christ by worldly wisdom,

C. The Christian becomes a Christian in renouncing his own autonomy

D. The Christian therefore proclaims his faith as absolutely authoritative truth.

III. What is the "Neutrality" of worldly thinking? The Gospel and
Antithesis.


A. Definition of Term:

B. The Reality behind neutrality:

C. The Reality behind the Gospel: It is Wisdom from God:

Van Til on the Nature of Biblical Authority

" It is Christ as God who speaks in the Bible. Therefore the Bible does not appeal to human
reason as ultimate in order to justify what it says. It comes to the human being with
absolute authority. Its claim is that human reason must itself be taken in the sense in
which Scripture takes it, namely, as created by God and as therefore properly subject to
the authority of God... The two systems, that of the non-Christian and that of the
Christian, differ because of the fact that their basic assumptions or presuppositions differ.
On the non-Christian basis man is assumed to be the final reference point in predication....
The Reformed method... begins frankly "from above." It would "presuppose" God. But in
presupposing God it cannot place itself at any point on a neutral basis with the
non-Christian... Believers themselves have not chosen the Christian position because they
were wiser than others. What they have they have by grace alone. But this fact does not
mean that they must accept the problematics of fallen man as right or even as possibly
right. For the essence of the idea of Scripture is that it alone is the criterion of truth."

Biblical Apologetics, Part 5
Revelation as the Fountain of Knowledge


I. Neutrality and Epistemic Despair
.

A. Hard Agnosticism –
B. Soft Agnosticism –
C. Relativism –

II. Commitment to Christ as the only hope for true knowledge.

A. The place of trust in Christian Epistemology –

1. Knowledge is Covenantal.
2. Knowledge is Derivative.

B. Revelation as normative –

C. Where is God's Revelation found?

1. General Revelation –
2. Special Revelation –
3. Both are covenantal in form. Implications:
4. Why does God have this authority?

Biblical Apologetics, Part 6
The Self-Attesting God


I. All knowledge is deposited in Christ; mans knowledge of the truth


A. depends upon God's prior knowledge;
B. begins with the fear of the Lord,
C. and requires submission to God's word.

II. Philosophy that doesn't presuppose God's word is deception:


A. It suppresses the Truth,
B. It submits to human traditions,
C. It reasons according to the presuppositions of the world instead of Christ.
D. It leads to a darkened mind and futile conclusions; God makes foolish the wisdom of the
world.

III. Consequences of Neutralist thinking:

A. It erases the Christians' distinctiveness,
B. It blurs the antithesis between worldly thinking and believing mind-sets,
C. It ignores the gulf between "Old Man" and "New Man."
D. The Christian who strives for neutrality endorses assumptions which are hostile to his
faith.
E. Pretended epistemic neutrality is an impossible stance between presupposing God's
word and not presupposing it, an immoral attempt to serve two lords.

IV. The Christian is a "New Man." He now has received from Christ:


A. A renewed mind,
B. New commitments,
C. A new direction and a new goal,
D. A new Lord
E. New presuppositions in the world of thought.
F. The Believer's thinking ought to be rooted in Christ

V. The alternatives are then quite clear:

A. either ground all your thought in Christ's word
B. or follow the dictates of autonomous thought

VI. Therefore, God's Word in Scripture has absolute authority for us

A. Christianity demands ABSOLUTE TRUST in God and His Word.
B. Christianity demands ABSOLUTE REPENTANCE.
C. Christianity demands ABSOLUTE SUBMISSION.


Biblical Apologetics, Part 7:
Arguments Against This Position


I. Objection One: Your Position Is Obscurantist Arrogance.

A. This is an ad hominem argument:
B. We are indeed guilty of Dogmatism and Absolutism.

II. The Christian Attitude Toward This Objection: Humble Boldness.

III. Humility.
A. Our faith is a gift, not an accomplishment: Eph. 2:8-9.
B. The Repentance that leads to true knowledge is also is a gift,
C. Our faith is a gift, not an accomplishment.

IV. Boldness: What Do We Have To Be Bold About?

A. The Christian cannot compromise with non-Christian standards of thinking
B. We have the command of God, upon ourselves and extended to all men
C. We have been renewed out of ignorance into wisdom by a faith

V. Objection Two: On Your Position, the Unbeliever Could Know
Nothing,


A. Difference between Systems and Persons.
B. Christianity does not claim that unbelievers know nothing.

VI. Unavoidable Knowledge.

A. The Argument – The Absence of the Necessary Stupidity.

B. The Reply – Why the Unbeliever Knows In Spite of Himself.

VII. The Implications.

A. Since presuppositionalism is true, all of reality is one gigantic refutation of the
unbeliever's world view.
B. Therefore every fact in all of reality calls the unbeliever to repent of his autonomous
principle.

VIII. Objection Three: On Your Position, There Is No Common
Ground Between the Believer and the Unbeliever,


A. The Truth: There is no NEUTRAL ground on which the believer and the unbeliever can
meet and dialogue.
B. The Error: There is most certainly COMMON ground between the believer and the
unbeliever.
C. Therefore, the common ground but not neutral ground on which the apologetic
encounter occurs does not make apologetics futile or end the discussion before it begins.

IX. Common Ground Which Is Not Neutral – Point of Contact:

A. The God We Deal With.

B. The Sinner We Deal With.

X. The Context of Our Dealings – God the Creator meets Man the
Creature in God's Universe.


A. Reality as Revelational Pressure –
B. Evasive Maneuvers – the Sinner we deal with
C. ANY AREA OF LIFE is point of contact.

Biblical Apologetics, Part 9
The Foolishness of Unbelief


I. The Apologetic Task: Expose the wisdom of the world as
foolishness.


A. No piecemeal, atomistic defenses against individual complaints from the unbeliever.
B. Total War: A Presuppositional conflict of world views.

II. The Wisdom of This World.


A. The Presupposition of Autonomy.

B. The Lack of any Foundation (Matt. 7:26)

III. The Fool


A. His Hatred of Knowledge.

B. His Commitment to Autonomy.

C. His Destructiveness, and His Destruction.

D. His Rebellion Against Known Truth.

Biblical Apologetics, Part 10
Answering the Fool


I. This intellectual outlook of the unbeliever: The Fool.

A. His Hatred of Knowledge. Proverbs 18:2 --
B. His Commitment to Autonomy. Proverbs 12:15 –
C. His Destructiveness, and His Destruction. Proverbs 17:10 –
D. His Rebellion Against Known Truth. Psalm 19:1-4 –

II. God makes foolish the wisdom of the world and puts it to shame
through His people,


III. Answering the Fool: A Two-Fold Procedure.


A. Refuse to answer in terms of the fool's presuppositions,
B. Answer in terms of the fools presuppositions in order to show where they lead:

IV. 2 Timothy 2:23-25 – A summary of our apologetic procedure.

Avoid foolish and undisciplined questions, knowing that they produce quarrels, and a
servant of the Lord must not quarrel, but must be gentle toward all, skillful in teaching,
patient, one who courteously instructs those who oppose themselves, in perhaps God
may grant to them conversion unto a genuine knowledge of the truth.

A. The Proper Attitude: Not pugnacious, but courteous, patient, and humble.

B. The Unbeliever opposes himself. Do not let the fool set the agenda

C. Not a little new information, but a total rejection of his current world-view

V. The Source of Success: God's Sovereign Will. Conversion,
regeneration, repentance, faith –


Biblical Apologetics, Part 11
Barham's First Law and the Problem of Starting Point


I. Dealing with Barham's First Law.

A. Barham's First Law: Before anything can be done, something else must be done first.
(Principle of Infinite Regress)
B. Consequences of Barham's First Law.

II. The relationship between argumentation and world view.


A. All arguments must account for the world view out of which they come.

B. Factual argumentation may be necessary, but never sufficient.

C. Therefore, until we compare positions with the unbeliever at the presuppositional level,
we are going to be talking past each other.

III. The Problem of World-View Circularity.

A. The nature of world-view circularity. Every world view begins with an ultimate starting
point which is accepted as being:

1. The final foundation.
2. Self-validating.
3. Self-attesting.
4. Ultimate authority.
5. Unquestionable.

B. The Problem. If both participants in the Apologetic Encounter begin with such a starting
point, how can one man's starting point be shown to be superior to another's?

C. The Solution: Impossibility of the Contrary.

1. Logical form:
2. Propositional form:
3. We have already shown how all other world views make nonsense of existence.
4. But there IS meaning and intelligibility to existence.

D. Christ presents himself as self-attestingly true.

E. Refusing to Flatter Our Guest: Things we must NOT tell unbelievers.

F. The Reality: Insofar as the unbeliever is consistent with his first principles, his world
view destroys meaning, intelligibility, rationality, and hope for his existence.

IV. The Inevitable Objection: How can you assume the truth of the
Scriptures while arguing the Truth of the Scriptures?



Biblical Apologetics, Part 12
The Nature of Reason and the Necessity of Apologetics


"Defend the Bible? I would as soon defend a lion!" – attributed to C. H. Spurgeon.

I. Is Apologetics Necessary?

A. How Apologetics is NOT needed – God does not need our efforts in order to gather his
people. It is not a divine necessity.
B. How Apologetics IS needed – God chooses to require us to engage in this activity as the
means by which He gathers His people. It is a moral necessity.

II. What Apologetics is NOT – Things 1 Peter 3:15 does NOT say.

A. Apologetics is not PUGNACITY

1. an arrogant spirit out looking for a fight.
2. a spirit of intellectual superiority and pride.

B. Apologetics is not RESULTS.

1. We do not "convert" people.
2. We do not change hearts.
3. Jesus Christ, operating through the Word & Spirit, does.
4. We can close his mouth; only God can open his heart.

C. Apologetics is not MEETING THE UNBELIEVER'S STANDARDS.

III. The Place of Reason.


A. Reason is not Ultimate.

B. Reason is an attribute of God.

C. Reason is a gift

D. Reason is a capacity.


IV. Two Mistakes Regarding the Use of Reason.

A. The error of Autonomy –

1. Rightly sees that reason is a useful intellectual faculty.
2. Wrongly uses reason as the ultimate authority apart from its authoritative foundation
in the revelation of God.

B. The error of Pietism –

1. Rightly avoids the rebellion of intellectual autonomy.
2. Wrongly rejects reason as a faculty and takes an irrationalist, anti-intellectual stand,
abandoning the field of thought to the unbeliever.
3. Paul's Refutation of both errors – Col. 2 All of the treasures of wisdom and knowledge
are deposited in Christ.

a. Wisdom, knowledge, and reason are good and noble things, being aspects of the
character of God and gifts from Him to us through Christ.
b. The authority and foundation of our wisdom knowledge, and reason is only in Christ ...
c. Resting on and bound up in the person of Christ, who IS wisdom and knowledge and
reason, our faith is no mere religious sentiment: We have sure and certain truth from the
source of truth Himself.




 
Oct 18, 2009
60
0
6
#16
"... knowledge by means of human reason alone. This type of thought inevitably leads to non-Christian conclusions."

Human reason leads to non-Christian conclusions if the faculty is faulty, which it is, being fallen. A non-faulty reasoning faculty (try saying that ten times fast) would lead to christian conclusions.
 
M

McFluffin

Guest
#17
This was awesome! I came back to God, and grew stronger in my faith and my relationship with Jesus, after I had come across Dr. William Lane Craig's debates and read his book "On Guard". It's amazing to go back and realize the little things God did in your life to draw you closer to Him!
 
May 2, 2011
1,134
8
0
#18
"... knowledge by means of human reason alone. This type of thought inevitably leads to non-Christian conclusions."

Human reason leads to non-Christian conclusions if the faculty is faulty, which it is, being fallen. A non-faulty reasoning faculty (try saying that ten times fast) would lead to christian conclusions.
Biblical Apologetics, Part 6
The Self-Attesting God


I. All knowledge is deposited in Christ; mans knowledge of the truth:


A. depends upon God's prior knowledge;
B. begins with the fear of the Lord,
C. and requires submission to God's word.
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#19
This was awesome! I came back to God, and grew stronger in my faith and my relationship with Jesus, after I had come across Dr. William Lane Craig's debates and read his book "On Guard". It's amazing to go back and realize the little things God did in your life to draw you closer to Him!
That is an exccellent book!

I've got it sitting on my dressor.

I come at the cosmological arguments at a different starting point of reference in philosophy of science, but it's great to demonstrate that even on scientific naturalism, one cannot avoid God.