Flat Earthers

Gosh! Your'e SOOO witty!!!



Nah.... Just lazy sarcasm. Have a great day!

same guy had a thread going on a science forum, where his proposed experimental methodology was similarly criticized, and if you compare what he said he did on the science forum with what he records on his video and admits he did in the metabunk thread, he lies to the science forum. then, in the comments of his youtube video, despite being shown in two separate discussions that he has an inconclusive experimental design, he claims he has 'proved' flat earth, and calls the science forum trolls. he wasn't banned from the science forum, but he stopped participating in the thread there.

https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/98386-laser-curvature-test-on-lake-balaton/


end of the story is, what he set up as an experiment was full of problems. what he reported as data was unsubstantiated and didn't match his own video. he either intentionally falsified his data or didn't know how to record it properly. he clearly knew better ways to collect accurate data but did not pursue them.

it's not proof. it's bad science, and interesting only in terms of an illustration of poor experimental design & confirmation-bias induced data collection error.

What makes you think I trust the governments? I think the level of deception may be so layered so that they might have bases on the moon. Then to make people think the moon is unreachable, they fake a moon landing, and then blow the whistle on it themselves. Everything is a mystery...wrapped in enigma...encased in a riddle. Is the moon hollow? Is Nibiru returning? Is that really what Revelations describes? I think it is a very real possibility. It fills in so many blanks. Ridiculous right? Maybe while the flat earthers are busy chasing their tails, Planet X sneaks up on us. Maybe it’s visible in the South Pole and that’s why there are laws against freely exploring there.

No. I didn't realise all this. But to me, if the main substance of the experiment is accurate - i.e. the height of the laser at 1 mile, 2 miles, 3 miles remained at 0.5m - it's still enough to prove Earth flat. Obviously, if his credibility has been cast into doubt over other aspects of the experiment, I can understand you doubting him.

However, as I stated, his experiment (rather than Steve Hawkins') is consistent with my observations of reality, so until I actually get the time and money to do it myself, and in the absence of any better experiment in the meanwhile, I'm going to trust his results.

Hungry,

And with that logic, why are you here?

When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost. John 19:30

My Lord and Savior Jesus Christ died on the cross for my sins around 2,000 years ago. That means it is finished. It is done. There is nothing I can do to add onto it, or to change it. God just told me to believe it. And I do. Glory to God.

But here you are, acting all high and mighty, as if the world has to be round, and who could this be that is coming around here, with scriptures, saying that the world is flat? He must not be taken literally. But I am here to tell you that I am standing up for the truth. The truth is the word of God, and I am standing up for it. And I will not back down. You don’t want to talk to me, fine. But don’t keep acting like you know for sure that the world is round, and that there is not even a need to answer me, as I should not even be taken seriously. I am standing up for the word of God, and those who believe it.

You don't think it's the Planet X, Nibura and fake moon landing that are the diversions, and flat Earth that is the reality? 'Cause that's my view.

I think the opening of the sixth seal perfectly describes the passing of a large heavenly body, and the consequences that it would render. Even to the sky rolling back like a scroll, as the atmosphere is moved by a gravitational pull of something else.

You know that a scroll rolls best flat, right? Flat Earth - flat sky. Kinda fits. 'Though the flat Earth model does usually have a dome sky.

If you ever do want to try to make a measurement like this, the metabunk people were trying to convince him to do it as Wallace's experiment instead. There are a lot less ways to introduce error, and you don't have to be as acurate to get meaningful results.

It’s clear your logic can twist anything to fit a flat earth model.

@he-rat_of_the_circus-mice

i just saw that someone over at metabunk was supposed to have done this at the Bedford canal just a few days ago, actually. page 7 of the thread has a link to a video announcing their plans to do so.

https://www.metabunk.org/where-and-how-could-the-wallace-experiment-easily-be-repeated.t7920/

I think from memory Rowbotham already did similar experiments. The horizon does appear to drop slightly through a telescope (believed to be due to refraction), so my prediction is that B will visually appear higher than C, from the telescope. I disagree that this means B is actually higher than C, though. Better to try something with similar setup, but using a laser. If B really is higher than C, laser wouldn't reach C. But laser will reach C (provided it is powerful enough).

we haven't talked about what the sky looks like near the equator & south of it yet..

It's prohibited without a licence, which makes exploration very difficult. I'm not talking about the tourism profiteering where people are charged a substantial fee for travelling not far enough to disprove (or prove) the midnight sun. If the world governments are hiding something (which is made obvious by their collusion on the licence requirement to explore), one wouldn't want to advertise to them the fact one is exploring, as they may work to make the mission perilous and unsuccessful.

This is true. But how would it profit the cause of evil to claim the Earth is flat, when in fact, it is spherical? Surely you have this reversed?

Not sure what you're getting at here. Are we talking about times and seasons, or day and night?

Yeah, those Antarctica videos only started popping out when people started making this claim, despite a presence in Antarctica for decades. No such issue with the North. Without independent people being able to access and explore Antarctica and film such videos for themselves, I'm putting these in the same bucket as the NASA lies. Science is testable and repeatable, and the governments of the world have taken away repeatability on this one.

Exploration is incredibly difficult with or without a said licence. Have you considered going on one these tourism charters and seeing the giant ice wall for yourself?

how does the equator has a constant 12 hour day and 12 hour night all year long at the same time the poles have 24 hour day and night six months all year on a flat earth model.

They claim the sun is too far to see when the sun speeds up to traverse closer to the Antarctic ice shelf. ??? I know...it all makes sense when they just explain it.