Barr Affirms Mueller Probe: No Collusion

Barr affirms Mueller probe found no evidence of Russia-Trump collusion, prepares to release report

Attorney General William Barr on Thursday affirmed that Special Counsel Robert Mueller found no evidence of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians during the 2016 presidential election, as he tangled with reporters at a press conference shortly before releasing Mueller's report to Congress and the public.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/barr-press-conference

Minutes later, President Trump responded on Twitter:

That doesn't negate the fact that the man is a racist. He's already stolen one Tribe's land, and might be trying to take all tribal land.

They've put him through hell, all because Hillary lost. smh And they're not done. Not by a long shot.

They couldn't find evidence about HIM but what about Popodopolous, Manafort, Flynn and there cabal? They still haven't found Noah's Ark either. I'll give Trump as pass because I still think he's just a stooge. Sorry? Not!

I still think he's just a stooge. Sorry? Not![/QUOTE]
OOps, I left out Kisliac, Cushner and Don Junior.

Hilary was wrong too! Any choice between the lesser of two evils is still a choice for evil. "Be in the world not of the word."

Like that actually means anything. The wealthy can buy a clean record.

FYI. I boycott Fox and the Young Turks.

I feel that. It's almost impossible to find ANY unbiased news source these days.

Joe Kennedy proved that the wealthy can do what they want. People are just more pro active about hiding things today.

I'll admit Ben Schapiro vs Cenk Uger was interesting.

Pro active and hiding in the same sentence sound like an oxymoron to me. But I agree with what I think you mean. So I'm a nerd.

Tracybeanz on twitter has some pretty in depth observations on the report (she has read part 1 according to her).

I'll admit I was only drawn to the redacted portions and it was a definite barrier to reading. May give it a go soon. I don't know who half of these people are or what they have to do with me exactly but I'm sure there are a few nuggets in there.

Anyone with any sense knew this over TWO YEARS AGO, at which time Sessions should have been fired for his duplicity. It is entirely Mr. Trump's fault that this costly and phony report even saw the light of day. He could have shut down the Mueller conspiracy at the start, and failed to do so.

The whole thing was a bogus witch hunt. But what Barr now failed to do was state categorically that Mueller and his gang must be investigated immediately, along with Obama, Hillary, and all their co-conspirators in the Deep State. And Judge Jeanine should have been the new Attorney General, not Barr.

Now that that's over we should get our own special council to investigate Hillary Clinton and the FBI coverup.

I’ve been flipping through the part of the report that has been made public, and I think it’s hard to find any traces of the President being acquitted.

Looks like a good old not indicting him on the grounds of no criminal conduct proven beyond reasonable doubt to me.

If Trump had shut down the investigation they would have charged him with obstruction of justice.
Whether you like him or not, he had little choice but to let the investigation play itself out.


FYI, the obstruction laws are pretty vague and murky... they're amorphous enough to make an obstruction charge out of almost anything. So I do NOT think you want to be charged with obstruction.

This is precisely why the democrats are still yelling about obstruction, because according to the letter of the law, you can claim almost anything is obstruction. That doesn't mean you have enough evidence to actually prosecute a case, but almost anything can be loosely claimed as obstruction. So... it's a great way to attack him in the media.... pretty much forever.

.

.