Who is voting for Trump again?
- Thread starter Janeaux
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
7
he is not
just check a person's profile
if public, you can find out
most climate huggers are blissfully unaware of the fact that once upon a time, people grazed cattle in Greenland in what is now
an ice field
Vikings discovered Greenland during a period called the Medieval Warm Period, from about 900 to 1300
volcanic activity changed the climate around the world at the end of that period
not cows inna field
mooooo
-
2
-
1
- Show all
I never claimed to understand climate change or gave my opinion on climate change. Usually when someone is trying to understand anothers position they ask questions.
No one is denying climate change. But from looking at the evidence from many different sources over the years. Not everyone agrees that the warming is caused by mankind.
A theory that is still debated. Please tell me are you a macro evolutionist also?
Stop emitting greenhouse gases..... simple to say but how would you do this? Have you already started? Let's say we did as a country put all our effort towards climate change. Would one country make any significant difference?
https://www.numbeo.com/pollution/rankings_by_country.jsp
The US is 88 on the list of countries ranking in pollution. China being one of the top contributors. Do you think we can get China to get as strict? And what kind of strain would that put on our economy?
"There are no other scientific theories on the subject. It is the overwhelmingly accepted reality in the scientific world."
Not true. There are many books and articles that have different theories. Plus the 97% majority claimed by politicians has been debunked for years now.
"Many decades ago. The Earth is warming faster than natural processes would allow. This is fact."
Very vague. Do you believe that a few decades is enough time to accurately predict? We are still warming from the last ice age which means the earth was once much warmer.
"As opposed to what, an armchair critic who clearly doesn't even understand the computer modelling?"
Data science has had little impact on furthering our understanding of our planet in spite of the abundance of climate data.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174912
You have made a lot of assumptions in what I believe.
"This isn't a matter of opinion. It is a matter of fact.
People who don't understand, or ignore, scientific data and facts, are invariably less intelligent.
You're asking ME for evidence? You deny something that is accepted in the scientific world. The facts are already clear. You just don't want to heed them. As for "the world will end anyway", what a lot of irresponsible nonsense that is."
Your fact is your matter of opinion. If you didn't know of more theories then I can see how you can make that assumption.
So far you haven't provided any evidence for your beliefs or explained the evidence and why the evidence is better than other theories. I'm asking you because your the intellectual one and we all need your help in understanding.
As for my statement on Biblical end times. I never said we shouldn't take care of the Earth God gave us to manage. I'll explain so you dont assume again. Even if man made climate change was real. Number 1. if you are Biblical the world will not end that way. 2. As a realist I would imagine we would have to get almost every country to act against climate change. Doesn't seem plausible just look at what's happening to the Amazon rainforest. I truly believe more trees would fix our climate warming and greenhouse gas emissions. Greenhouse gases are only a problem due to our destruction of forests. ( uh oh this is another theory that you claimed didn't exist)
By the way you to talk to others isnt a productive way to get your beliefs heard. By attacking intelligence is usually a way to 1. Get ignored 2. Laughed at. 3. Makes you and your argument look weak.
No one is denying climate change. But from looking at the evidence from many different sources over the years. Not everyone agrees that the warming is caused by mankind.
A theory that is still debated. Please tell me are you a macro evolutionist also?
Stop emitting greenhouse gases..... simple to say but how would you do this? Have you already started? Let's say we did as a country put all our effort towards climate change. Would one country make any significant difference?
https://www.numbeo.com/pollution/rankings_by_country.jsp
The US is 88 on the list of countries ranking in pollution. China being one of the top contributors. Do you think we can get China to get as strict? And what kind of strain would that put on our economy?
"There are no other scientific theories on the subject. It is the overwhelmingly accepted reality in the scientific world."
Not true. There are many books and articles that have different theories. Plus the 97% majority claimed by politicians has been debunked for years now.
"Many decades ago. The Earth is warming faster than natural processes would allow. This is fact."
Very vague. Do you believe that a few decades is enough time to accurately predict? We are still warming from the last ice age which means the earth was once much warmer.
"As opposed to what, an armchair critic who clearly doesn't even understand the computer modelling?"
Data science has had little impact on furthering our understanding of our planet in spite of the abundance of climate data.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174912
You have made a lot of assumptions in what I believe.
"This isn't a matter of opinion. It is a matter of fact.
People who don't understand, or ignore, scientific data and facts, are invariably less intelligent.
You're asking ME for evidence? You deny something that is accepted in the scientific world. The facts are already clear. You just don't want to heed them. As for "the world will end anyway", what a lot of irresponsible nonsense that is."
Your fact is your matter of opinion. If you didn't know of more theories then I can see how you can make that assumption.
So far you haven't provided any evidence for your beliefs or explained the evidence and why the evidence is better than other theories. I'm asking you because your the intellectual one and we all need your help in understanding.
As for my statement on Biblical end times. I never said we shouldn't take care of the Earth God gave us to manage. I'll explain so you dont assume again. Even if man made climate change was real. Number 1. if you are Biblical the world will not end that way. 2. As a realist I would imagine we would have to get almost every country to act against climate change. Doesn't seem plausible just look at what's happening to the Amazon rainforest. I truly believe more trees would fix our climate warming and greenhouse gas emissions. Greenhouse gases are only a problem due to our destruction of forests. ( uh oh this is another theory that you claimed didn't exist)
By the way you to talk to others isnt a productive way to get your beliefs heard. By attacking intelligence is usually a way to 1. Get ignored 2. Laughed at. 3. Makes you and your argument look weak.
