Apostasy 101

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Chris1975

Senior Member
Apr 27, 2017
2,492
517
113
I would say biased observation. Holy living involves works, yet we are not saved based on the merits of works which are produced from holy living. Believers should absolutely strive to live holy lives, which is part of our ongoing sanctification, but we must never fall into the trap of believing that we are "holier than thou" so based on that, the Lord will surely save me based on my performance, yet other believers fall short of my personal holy standard, so surely they won't be saved. This is where works salvation becomes a snare.
MMD, we are not saved based on the merit of works - agreed.
^^^^settled.

Now, if someone says they have faith but has NO WORKS AT ALL, are they saved? Y/N please.

James 2v14 What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him?
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,569
13,547
113
58
MMD, we are not saved based on the merit of works - agreed.
^^^^settled.

Now, if someone says they have faith but has NO WORKS AT ALL, are they saved? Y/N please.

James 2v14 What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him?
We are not saved by works or by an empty profession of faith/dead faith that produces no works. The key word in James 2:14 is SAYS they have faith but... Where is the evidence? Faith is the root of salvation and works are the fruit. No fruit at all demonstrates there is no root.
 

Chris1975

Senior Member
Apr 27, 2017
2,492
517
113
We are not saved by works or by an empty profession of faith/dead faith that produces no works. The key word in James 2:14 is SAYS they have faith but... Where is the evidence? Faith is the root of salvation and works are the fruit. No fruit at all demonstrates there is no root.
We agree on this.

And then your thoughts on this verse:
Matthew 7
19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,569
13,547
113
58
We agree on this.

And then your thoughts on this verse:
Matthew 7
19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
Matthew 7:17 - Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.
 

Chris1975

Senior Member
Apr 27, 2017
2,492
517
113
Matthew 7:17 - Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.
Good.

So a call to holiness, is that works?
 

Chris1975

Senior Member
Apr 27, 2017
2,492
517
113
Good works are produced out of holiness/holy living, but like I said in post #260....
Let me rephrase...

Paul exhorting Christians to abstain from X, Y and Z (fill in the blanks)…….is that Works?
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
Just my own interpretation, huh? Far from what the Bible teaches? So you reject justification, sanctification and glorification? There is only justification? o_O If it's merely my own personal interpretation, then why are there so many articles written on the 3 tenses of salvation? Feel free to google "3 tenses to salvation" and watch how many articles come up.

You turn salvation into probation and receiving eternal life into type 2 works salvation. The one who stands victorious in the end is the same one who truly has been saved through faith. Romans 8:30 - Moreover whom He predestined, these He also called; whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also glorified. *ALL of them. (y)

I am not full of contradictions. You are just full of confusion. Those who have been saved from the penalty of sin are still being saved from the power of sin because believers are going through the process of ongoing sanctification (work out your salvation) throughout their lifetime. It's not work for your salvation as works-salvationists teach. 1 Corinthians 6:11 - Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God. That is positional sanctification, yet there is also progressive sanctification in which the reality of that holiness becomes more and more evident in our actions, words, thoughts, attitudes, and motives.

1 Thessalonians 4:3-4, - For this is the will of God, your sanctification: that you should abstain (present tense) from sexual immorality; that each of you should know how to possess his own vessel in sanctification and honor. So becoming washed, sanctified and justified in Christ is a one time event, yet abstaining from sexual immorality and becoming more holy in our behavior is not a one time event. Here is how I see it. The believer possess a positional, judicial standing of righteousness in Christ and, second, a remaining need for practical, progressive holiness in our behavior. We will reach ultimate or final sanctification when we receive our glorified bodies.

You just don't get it because you read the scriptures through the lens of works salvation.

You confuse descriptive passages of scripture with prescriptive passages of scripture, which a common error made by works-salvationists.

In Revelation 14:12, the Amplified Bible reads - Here is [encouragement for] the steadfast endurance of the saints (God’s people), those who habitually keep God’s commandments and their faith in Jesus. The NASB reads - Here is the perseverance of the saints who keep (Greek word "tereo" - guard, observe, watch over) the commandments of God and their faith in Jesus. (descriptive of genuine believers) 13 And I heard a voice from heaven, saying, “Write, ‘Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord from now on!’” “Yes,” says the Spirit, “so that they may rest from their labors, for their deeds follow with them.”

You really stress "remain" to imply it's such a difficult burden to do so, which is typical from the mindset of type 2 works salvation. Also, their deeds follow them as the fruit of salvation, but not as the means of salvation. I usually hear SDA's quote Revelation 14:12 and stress commandment keeping as the means of obtaining salvation.

BTW did you ever come to understand that from the context of Romans 5:18 all men in Adam are condemned, and all men in Christ are justified? I will NEVER forget our conversation on Romans 5:18 in which you misinterpreted that verse to mean that one righteous act by Christ resulted in justification and life (automatically) for all people (including unbelievers). I almost fell out of my chair when I first heard you say that! :eek:



https://christianchat.com/bible-dis...tion-can-be-lost.185786/page-162#post-4021360
Well that's a start. Keep going. :)

Only the 4th soil did persevere and produced fruit. What does that tell you about the other 3 soils which did neither?

The mistake you are making is assuming that ALL belief is the same. *Unlike saving belief, shallow, temporary belief is not rooted in a regenerate heart. How can no depth of earth, no root, no moisture, no fruit, represent saving belief? :unsure: Also the same Greek word for believe "pisteuo" is used in James 2:19, in which we read that the demons believe "mental assent" that "there is one God," but they are not saved. So clearly, NOT all belief is the same.

John has portrayed people who "believe" (at least to some extent) but are clearly not saved. There is a stage in the progress of belief in Jesus that "falls short of firmly rooted, consummated belief resulting in salvation." As we see in John 2:23-25, in which their belief was superficial in nature and Jesus would not entrust/commit Himself to them.

Also, in John 8:31-59, where the Jews who were said to have "believed in him" turn out to be slaves to sin, indifferent to the words of Jesus’, children of the devil, liars, accused Jesus of having a demon and were guilty of setting out to stone and kill the one they have professed to believe in. We can see at best, these Jews believed in Him (based on their own misconceptions and expectations) of Jesus, yet upon gaining further knowledge about Jesus through His words, we see they did not truly "believe unto salvation" and become children of God (John 1:12; 3:18) but were instead children of the devil.

BTW: I remember having this conversion with Ralph (who many people suspect is YOU, yet when asked if you are Ralph, you simply dodge the question, which speaks volumes). ;)

I clearly proved my point from scripture that NOT all belief is the same, yet those in the nosas camp cannot seem to grasp this or refuse to grasp this in order to preserve their biased, predetermined nosas understanding of the parable. Roman Catholics and Mormons would strongly agree with your biased interpretation. No red flag, huh?

More bias from the nosas camp. The Galatians were getting side tracked by legalistic teachers, which does not mean they permanently stopped believing. Paul did not say they lost their salvation and it was all over for them, which seems to be the biased opinion from the nosas camp. Your obsession with attacking the osas doctrine is reaching the point of nausea and your arguments remind me of the same arguments I heard several years ago while still attending the Roman Catholic church.
Obsession ...
Good word for it.

Agree Galatians were getting side tracked, the did not loose their salvation.
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,569
13,547
113
58
Let me rephrase...

Paul exhorting Christians to abstain from X, Y and Z (fill in the blanks)…….is that Works?
If we are abstaining from X, Y and Z (various sinful behaviors) are we instead producing good works?
Honoring Paul's exhortation/obeying a command etc.. by refusing to give in to these sinful behaviors is works.
 

Chris1975

Senior Member
Apr 27, 2017
2,492
517
113
If we are abstaining from X, Y and Z (various sinful behaviors) are we instead producing good works?
Honoring Paul's exhortation/obeying a command etc.. by refusing to give in to these sinful behaviors is works.
Good.

Are we free to ignore these exhortations of Paul without any repercussions to our eternal security?
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
Good works are produced out of holiness/holy living, but like I said in post #260....
Exactly.....there are no good works outside of the assurance of salvation.... because only then can works be done with the proper motivation.
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,569
13,547
113
58
Good.

Are we free to ignore these exhortations of Paul without any repercussions to our eternal security?
Straw man argument. Completely ignoring these exhortations of Paul would demonstrate an unrepentant, unbelieving heart. "I'm saved, but I completely ignore these exhortations from Paul" is an oxymoron.
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
Good.

Are we free to ignore these exhortations of Paul without any repercussions to our eternal security?
God chastises his sons and daughters....they are adopted and stay adopted.
 

Noose

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2016
5,096
932
113
Just my own interpretation, huh? Far from what the Bible teaches? So you reject justification, sanctification and glorification? There is only justification? o_O If it's merely my own personal interpretation, then why are there so many articles written on the 3 tenses of salvation? Feel free to google "3 tenses to salvation" and watch how many articles come up.


You turn salvation into probation and receiving eternal life into type 2 works salvation. The one who stands victorious in the end is the same one who truly has been saved through faith. Romans 8:30 - Moreover whom He predestined, these He also called; whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also glorified. *ALL of them. (y)
The bible uses many words which ultimately mean the same thing. In your salvation protocol, i don't see the words reconciled and redeemed which are also used so many times and in the 'right' tense.

"..whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also glorified." Are you glorified? why not? look at the tense. That's why i said, you can not choose the first and the second and spare the last for future when the same tense has been used for all of them.
There's a very simple understanding for this, these words are applicable to those that will stand victorious at the end. Only those will have been justified/ reconciled/ redeemed/ sanctified/glorified- saved. Even the name itself (saved) is self explanatory. You can not be saved and still not saved. Saved is the outcome of a process, the very end.

I am not full of contradictions. You are just full of confusion. Those who have been saved from the penalty of sin are still being saved from the power of sin because believers are going through the process of ongoing sanctification (work out your salvation) throughout their lifetime. It's not work for your salvation as works-salvationists teach. 1 Corinthians 6:11 - Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God. That is positional sanctification, yet there is also progressive sanctification in which the reality of that holiness becomes more and more evident in our actions, words, thoughts, attitudes, and motives.
If you have been saved from the penalty of sin, there's nothing more that needs to be done because you have already been saved.
It is not possible to be saved from the penalty of sin and still be in the process of being saved from the power of sin, it simply means the first salvation is of no effect and you have to undergo these process of being saved from the power of sin.

Q. What can possibly happen if one is not sanctified (saved from the power of sin) after they have been justified (saved from the penalty of sin)?

1 Thessalonians 4:3-4, - For this is the will of God, your sanctification: that you should abstain (present tense) from sexual immorality; that each of you should know how to possess his own vessel in sanctification and honor. So becoming washed, sanctified and justified in Christ is a one time event, yet abstaining from sexual immorality and becoming more holy in our behavior is not a one time event. Here is how I see it. The believer possess a positional, judicial standing of righteousness in Christ and, second, a remaining need for practical, progressive holiness in our behavior. We will reach ultimate or final sanctification when we receive our glorified bodies.

You just don't get it because you read the scriptures through the lens of works salvation.

You confuse descriptive passages of scripture with prescriptive passages of scripture, which a common error made by works-salvationists.

In Revelation 14:12, the Amplified Bible reads - Here is [encouragement for] the steadfast endurance of the saints (God’s people), those who habitually keep God’s commandments and their faith in Jesus. The NASB reads - Here is the perseverance of the saints who keep (Greek word "tereo" - guard, observe, watch over) the commandments of God and their faith in Jesus. (descriptive of genuine believers) 13 And I heard a voice from heaven, saying, “Write, ‘Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord from now on!’” “Yes,” says the Spirit, “so that they may rest from their labors, for their deeds follow with them.”

You really stress "remain" to imply it's such a difficult burden to do so, which is typical from the mindset of type 2 works salvation. Also, their deeds follow them as the fruit of salvation, but not as the means of salvation. I usually hear SDA's quote Revelation 14:12 and stress commandment keeping as the means of obtaining salvation.
I can't dwell over this, it's just too lengthy.

BTW did you ever come to understand that from the context of Romans 5:18 all men in Adam are condemned, and all men in Christ are justified? I will NEVER forget our conversation on Romans 5:18 in which you misinterpreted that verse to mean that one righteous act by Christ resulted in justification and life (automatically) for all people (including unbelievers). I almost fell out of my chair when I first heard you say that! :eek:



https://christianchat.com/bible-dis...tion-can-be-lost.185786/page-162#post-4021360
That verse is a very simple comparison that can not be broken.

Did Adam's one act of trespass bring condemnation to all? Also (in the same manner), Christ's one act of righteousness brought justification for all, not just a few people.
 

Chris1975

Senior Member
Apr 27, 2017
2,492
517
113
Straw man argument. Completely ignoring these exhortations of Paul would demonstrate an unrepentant, unbelieving heart. "I'm saved, but I completely ignore these exhortations from Paul" is an oxymoron.
It was a simple Y/N answer. Not a straw man. You pulled back to your safety zone instead of answering this question. Please, answer the question.
 

KelbyofGod

Senior Member
Oct 8, 2017
1,881
721
113
I would say biased observation. Holy living involves works, yet we are not saved based on the merits of works which are produced from holy living. Believers should absolutely strive to live holy lives, which is part of our ongoing sanctification, but we must never fall into the trap of believing that we are "holier than thou" so based on that, the Lord will surely save me based on my performance, yet other believers fall short of my personal holy standard, so surely they won't be saved. This is where works salvation becomes a snare.
I'm not against the way you worded that. There's plenty of space between doing works and having a holier-than-thou attitude.

Honestly, this next question is kind of a separate topic but do you consider it a holier-than-thou attitude if a Christian suggests he/she is likely to go to heaven at the same time they think their non-Christian friend is headed towards hell?

That's meant to be a friendly question, not argumentative.

Love in Jesus,
Kelby
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,569
13,547
113
58
It was a simple Y/N answer. Not a straw man. You pulled back to your safety zone instead of answering this question. Please, answer the question.
Straw man arguments get neither a Yes or No answer. It's a trap. You sound like a lawyer. They want yes or no answers ONLY regardless of the details, which is designed to trap the person on trial and win their case at all costs.
 

Chris1975

Senior Member
Apr 27, 2017
2,492
517
113
Straw man arguments get neither a Yes or No answer. It's a trap. You sound like a lawyer. They want yes or no answers ONLY regardless of the details, which is designed to trap the person on trial and win their case at all costs.
The question is not an unreasonable one at all. Read it again.
 

Chris1975

Senior Member
Apr 27, 2017
2,492
517
113
Straw man arguments get neither a Yes or No answer. It's a trap. You sound like a lawyer. They want yes or no answers ONLY regardless of the details, which is designed to trap the person on trial and win their case at all costs.
There are only two options:
A) a Christian is free to ignore Paul's warnings
B) a Christian should heed Paul's warnings