Is YOUR church doctrinal statement ONE with SATAN?

There are two manuscript lines that DIFFER greatly in what they say. One of them came from the Vatican's anus and the other is uncorrupted version.

I can't believe you said translations aren't grapes. SMH The two vines in the bible are the vine of Christ and the vine of Sodom. Remember Jesus said I am the VINE and ye are the branches? Well the vine of Sodom IS NOT the vine of Christ. The vine NOURISHES the branches.... do you see what I mean? The bible nourishes OUR SPIRIT. I can't make it any clearer.

"We used to all speak the same KJV language for 400 years" is absurd. The KJV language was obsolete even in it's own time. They intentionally used archaic English to make the text seem holy, rather than translating into the common language of the time.

My point is that highly qualified people have an agenda. They work for the god of this world.

It never was a contemporary language because the TRUMPET has to make a DISTINCT SOUND. I don't know why I'm wasting my time with this, you don't understand anything I'm saying. And what I just said is straight out of the bible.

Well then, use a different translation. Maybe that will help.

"Of course, you could not. Since you could not be bothered by being corrected and reproved by the truth in it. You are a like a lot of modern Christians today, who answer a matter before they actually hear it. "

Were you unable to read your own words in the post of yours that I quoted?

God didn't "show indifference toward finishing His Bible". He finished it through the pen of John, who wrote down the Revelation.

Gee, that says it all, doesn't it? Now I understand... you have no respect for highly qualified people. You would rather pay attention to every whim of those who claim to be experts, even though they are unqualified.

If you can't be reasoned with by intelligent people why don't you join a different forum?

God speaks more than one language, I hope you know. He also has more than one way of doing things such as "preservation, and translation of His holy word".

You mean you and the people in the video?

Do you know these people or just follow them?
If you know them, are they willing to back Scripture for Scripture against the materials that the KJV Bible was interpreted from?

It would be really easy to show you about 50 errors within the KJV that claims something else from the materials they were translated from!

Did Jesus have a complete Bible from which to quote? No.

You can "mean" all you like, but you're not making your point from Scripture. Scripture does not say, "The Bible must not contradict itself". That's an imposition of human reasoning. I'm not saying it's wrong or bad, but it is not Scripture.

KJV1611, what is your purpose here? You have made one attempt after another to hype the KJV and discredit all other translations. Why do you strain out a gnat and swallow a camel?

There are many of us on this forum who believe strongly in God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit and follow Jesus' instructions on how to live, how to relate to others, and how to make the world a better place.

If you can't discern the body of Christ but instead go on and on and on about a single translation I feel very sorry for you.

Your rage toward others in the body of Christ is not Christian behavior!

There are many translations of the Biblical texts, some with different emphases than others. None of them are perfect.

I mean everyone on this earth today. The perfect and infallible word of God in the King James Holy Bible is available to absolutely anybody who is searching and seeking for it.



I know brother G. John Rov who is doing the main teaching in the video.

Biker, there are no errors in the KJV. Not even one error has ever been found in the KJV.

I'm here to learn and help others with what I've learned. I'm not enraged, I just speak exactly what's on my mind and I don't sugar coat it. I have nothing against you nor anybody else on this forum.

People need to hear an alternative to the garbage that you're putting out. All I can do is show them, if they don't buy it then I've still done my part. So step down off of that high moral horse that you're riding. You are no better or worse than me, we are all sinners that fall short of the glory of God.

When the definition of BEGOTTEN is a child from 2 parents or a purpose put into place, we can see how the KJV makes us think wrongfully concerning God and the WORD. Begotten either means someone existed BEFORE the other, or it means a purpose was put into place for a reason. By all technicality, the term BEGOTTEN removes co-eternal and co-equal. And that leads to "now what does that mean for the Trinity?" KJV dropped the ball.

Because in 1 John 5:18
We know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not; but he that is begotten of God keepeth himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not.
^
We were never physically born of God, but we are definitely BEGOTTEN of God for His Purpose!

Your mindset, Jaybo, is not scriptural. God's Scriptures say that His word is very pure and that His Law Is perfect (Psa. 119:140, Psa. 19:7)

Personal insults will get you nowhere. They show where your heart is, despite your claim that you're here to learn and help others with what I've learned.

I will not respond in kind, as I am a Christian.