[pre-tribber here!
Me!]
I was just curious...
My question (about what the OP vid is saying) is,
from where does the video speaker believe the quote in Eph5:14 stems/originates? For example, John Gill points out how there are differing viewpoints on just where it came from:
[quoting from
Gill ...on
Ephesians 5:14]
"
Wherefore he saith,.... Either the man that is light in the Lord, who reproves the unfruitful works of darkness;
or else the Holy Ghost by Paul, who here speaks after the manner of the prophets; or God, or the Spirit, or the Scripture; see James 4:6;
but where is it said? some think the apostle refers to
Isaiah 9:2;
others to
Isaiah 26:19;
others to
Isaiah 60:1;
some are of opinion the words are
cited out of an apocryphal book of Jeremy,
or from some writing now lost;
and some have thought them to be
a saying of Christ, that was fresh in memory:
it may not be improper to observe
what Maimonides says [
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maimonides ] (m), that
" "the blowing of the trumpet in the beginning of the year had an intimation in it, as if was said, "awake ye that sleep", from your sleep, and ye that slumber rouse up from your slumber, and search into your actions, and return by repentance, and remember your Creator;'' "
[end quoting Gill; bold and underline mine; inserted bracketed wiki link mine]
I'm just curious about what the speaker's viewpoint is, on that, as to where he believes the referenced quote in Eph5:14 originates (so I can try to ascertain more clearly as to his reasonings for his conclusion... which, if he is attaching "our Rapture" with "RH," I would say that I am
disinclined to agree, even as a pre-tribber myself [having studied out a great many of the viewpoints, on this subject]--does it sound as though the speaker may be drawing from the last of these examples, above, in Gill's comment?)
Just wondering... was curious.
IOW, what is the basis of his argument?
[
to be clear, I
do believe Paul references it throughout his epistles, outside of the usual one or two we commonly think of
, but I have question re: how the OP video speaker
came to the specific conclusion he has (here in this clip)... so that I can look into
his reasonings further... again, because I am
disinclined to agree with it,
but am curious as to the basis for his argument. Thanks!
]