Elect according to the foreknowledge of God. 1 Peter 1:2

It may in many ways.

He may believe in conditional election, resistance grace, that Christ died for all, to name three.

impossible.

the blood of bulls and goats could never take away sin.

if they took away sin, then every Jew would be saved. Whether they believed or not

You would know if you would set your anti calvin bias.

i believe in salvation based on free will choosing to trust god after he has drawn you to himself and convicted you of sin.

Amen, the hidden mystery as paul calls it. They didn’t know hw god would save them just that he would

1 Peter 1:1-2
Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,
Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied.

Is there something in the Bible that makes you believe Jews and Gentiles even in the New Testament have different rules or doctrines? Because even if Peter is writing to Jews or John is writing to Jews, so what, these are Christian people still they are in Christ, so why does it matter? I thought there is no jew and gentile when it comes to salvation.
Are there any verses that say Jews have different set of instructions in the NT than Gentiles?

That still does not work completely I do not think, actually out of context scripture will pose a big problem.

I like how some state they are taking the moral high road (generally speaking on this forum) but still find a way to get their digs in..

I think @throughfaith shares some good insight.

God was covering sins through animal sacrifices. Christ's blood washed away sins.

I believe Jesus died for all without exception . But not the other two points you said .

I could list dozens more...

Leviticus 4:5 And he shall do with the bullock as he did with the bullock for a sin offering, so shall he do with this: and the priest shall make an atonement for them, and it shall be forgiven them.

Sins were forgiven but not washed.

I'm going on what you said you believe.

Remission v redemption

In this case, every Jew at any time where the atoning sacrifice was made is saved.
Whether they believe god or not

the sacrifices were a symbol, of the only thing which could save.

Thankyou 😊 we can all learn off each other.

And trying to add a calvinist flare to it, which means you may hear the words, but you have no understanding of what was said

Both are only found in Christ

Ok you've made your point, no need to keep harping on about it .

Sins were remitted . They needed redeeming. They needed washing away .
21¶But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets;
22Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference:
23For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
24Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:
25Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;
26To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.
No this verse ( as the Catholics teach ) is not talking about our past sins .
But all the sins before the cross that were only remitted.

I see your sister is backing you up, then again you are just like her, that’s why she is on ignore, she does not know how to have a normal conversation either without attacking people from a tainted point of view.

we will see if you change, if you continue I will continue to expose.