Trump Outsmarts them again
- Thread starter Silverwings
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
A vote for Biden is a vote for the satanic elite NWO!
https://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=4288&mn=564243&pt=msg&mid=21237226
Wake up Christian. Do not be deceived.
https://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=4288&mn=564243&pt=msg&mid=21237226
Wake up Christian. Do not be deceived.
-
1
- Show all
section 230 of the decency act makes it so that ChristianChat.com is not held responsible if you encourage people to revolt against the US government on it. you are responsible for your actions, not CC.
it means that if foreign or domestic terrorists post something on youtube inciting sedition or the violent overthrow of the government, youtube cannot be criminally charge for the content of their users.
this section of the law prevents facebook itself from being prosecuted when Russian & Chinese intelligence agencies make accounts on it and use them to promote Trump by spreading misinformation and inflammatory content against the DNC.
the law makes it so that when white-supremacists use twitter to threaten minorities with violence and physical harm, twitter is not criminally responsible for the content; the people who make the statements and post the content are.
of course moderators at CC, youtube, facebook, twitter, etc are free and able to exercise whatever controls they feel necessary or prudent to prevent or remove whatever content they don't want on their sites -- they are independent businesses and organizations and can self-police as they see fit and deem wise.
but according to the decency act, per section 230, they cannot be sued or imprisoned just because some user posts some criminal content on their site.
do you think this is an unjust law?
it means that if foreign or domestic terrorists post something on youtube inciting sedition or the violent overthrow of the government, youtube cannot be criminally charge for the content of their users.
this section of the law prevents facebook itself from being prosecuted when Russian & Chinese intelligence agencies make accounts on it and use them to promote Trump by spreading misinformation and inflammatory content against the DNC.
the law makes it so that when white-supremacists use twitter to threaten minorities with violence and physical harm, twitter is not criminally responsible for the content; the people who make the statements and post the content are.
of course moderators at CC, youtube, facebook, twitter, etc are free and able to exercise whatever controls they feel necessary or prudent to prevent or remove whatever content they don't want on their sites -- they are independent businesses and organizations and can self-police as they see fit and deem wise.
but according to the decency act, per section 230, they cannot be sued or imprisoned just because some user posts some criminal content on their site.
do you think this is an unjust law?
consider the alternative , @Truth7t7
suppose Biden wins the white house two weeks from now.
suppose after that, CV5 becomes enraged, and starts posting things here encouraging people to take up arms and revolt against the government.
suppose the FBI sees that.
do you think in that scenario the FBI should shut ChristianChat down completely and arrest all the site admins?
or do you think in that scenario the FBI should track down and take action against only those people who were actively promoting treason?
section 230 of the decency act says that the FBI would only be prosecuting those who are guilty, not the entire website.
is this just or unjust?
this is still a Christian site, right? not just a GOP fan page? so what does the Bible say -- is this provision just or not just?
suppose Biden wins the white house two weeks from now.
suppose after that, CV5 becomes enraged, and starts posting things here encouraging people to take up arms and revolt against the government.
suppose the FBI sees that.
do you think in that scenario the FBI should shut ChristianChat down completely and arrest all the site admins?
or do you think in that scenario the FBI should track down and take action against only those people who were actively promoting treason?
section 230 of the decency act says that the FBI would only be prosecuting those who are guilty, not the entire website.
is this just or unjust?
this is still a Christian site, right? not just a GOP fan page? so what does the Bible say -- is this provision just or not just?
the whole tech censorship thing is a slippery slope.
it certainly seems they censor certain indaviduals above others, but they are a private business.
they do have terms of service that all users have to agree to, but the terms are very vague, and can be selectively enforced.
they are in waist deep with china, but then many other american based companies are too.
they seem to favor a liberal agenda, but then so do a lot of companies.
but, calling in zuckerburg and dorsey to congress and having the 75+ year people wagging their fingers at them, saying " ya'll stop doing that" is a waste of time.
it certainly seems they censor certain indaviduals above others, but they are a private business.
they do have terms of service that all users have to agree to, but the terms are very vague, and can be selectively enforced.
they are in waist deep with china, but then many other american based companies are too.
they seem to favor a liberal agenda, but then so do a lot of companies.
but, calling in zuckerburg and dorsey to congress and having the 75+ year people wagging their fingers at them, saying " ya'll stop doing that" is a waste of time.
-
1
- Show all
It's not a waste of time. The Senate judiciary committee is a very big dog with very sharp teeth. They can subpoena anybody in America anytime. And after the election they are going to redefine the law so that these tech companies can be SUED. And after they are sued then they will learn their lesson. And it would be a very simple matter to pass laws so that Social media is covered under the umbrella of the FCC, and must adhere to strict rules of fairness.
The first shot has been fired and wisely. And as usual it is only the Republicans who have the white hats.
The first shot has been fired and wisely. And as usual it is only the Republicans who have the white hats.
Rudy Giuliani With Lou Dobbs; The Biden Crime Family
The Biden crime family syndicate is not going to be able to endure this storm of criticism.
Should Trump hire on Rudy Giuliani as a special prosecutor in this case it will be the end of the Biden crime family. Rudy Giuliani is the utmost expert on RICO law, which he will use to prosecute them.
The Biden crime family syndicate is not going to be able to endure this storm of criticism.
Should Trump hire on Rudy Giuliani as a special prosecutor in this case it will be the end of the Biden crime family. Rudy Giuliani is the utmost expert on RICO law, which he will use to prosecute them.
Facebook & Twitter have and do censor the conservative (Press) and political (Speech), the perfect example is the recent (New Your Post) article censorship, regarding factual political content on Hunter and Joe Biden, a political candidate.
Twitter & Facebook allows the liberal (Press) and (Speech) to be promoted without censorship.
Twitter & Facebook are publishers, and campaign platforms for the DNC, just as liberal news media outlets are, they will soon have (NO) protection from liability regarding their biased political platforms.
Twitter & Facebook allows the liberal (Press) and (Speech) to be promoted without censorship.
Twitter & Facebook are publishers, and campaign platforms for the DNC, just as liberal news media outlets are, they will soon have (NO) protection from liability regarding their biased political platforms.
-
2
- Show all
that's patently false.
subversive, misleading and false content coming from far-left wing groups is taken down from these sites the same way subversive, misleading and false content coming from far-right wing groups is.
https://www.newsbreak.com/news/2044558901639/facebook-removes-thousands-of-antifa-qanon-groups
but so what, anyway?
if you post a bunch of garbage here on CC and you get banned for it that doesn't mean your 'free speech' is being taken away.
using and posting on these websites is a service provided by private companies not a 'right'
subversive, misleading and false content coming from far-left wing groups is taken down from these sites the same way subversive, misleading and false content coming from far-right wing groups is.
https://www.newsbreak.com/news/2044558901639/facebook-removes-thousands-of-antifa-qanon-groups
but so what, anyway?
if you post a bunch of garbage here on CC and you get banned for it that doesn't mean your 'free speech' is being taken away.
using and posting on these websites is a service provided by private companies not a 'right'
that's equally patently false.
have a look at my own facebook feed any day of the week and the political content is about 70% republican propaganda memes and 30% democratic propaganda memes. the percentage is a result of me having majority Christian acquaintances and the republican party having a decades-long history of preying on Christians.
facebook is a platform for user-submitted content. you have a lot of right-wing users in your acquaintance group, then you have a lot of right-wing propaganda being submitted, and the only people you're hearing from getting garbage taken down or marked as misleading are people who are only posting right-wing garbage.
left-wing garbage is also taken down -- but i'm gonna guess that you personally hardly ever talk to anyone ((if at all)) that posts things like that, so you hardly ever ((if at all)) hear about any of it being taken down, amiright?
and it doesn't matter regardless insofar as whether it's an infringement of anyone's rights. facebook can do whatever the heck it wants with its site; CC can do the same.
the reason they and other major social media platforms have been called to testify before congress is that foreign governments have been conducting intelligence operations designed to interfere with our elections by spreading BS around the internet and shape public opinion with it. alot of that BS is reposted right here in this very thread -- the KGB aren't amateurs.
have a look at my own facebook feed any day of the week and the political content is about 70% republican propaganda memes and 30% democratic propaganda memes. the percentage is a result of me having majority Christian acquaintances and the republican party having a decades-long history of preying on Christians.
facebook is a platform for user-submitted content. you have a lot of right-wing users in your acquaintance group, then you have a lot of right-wing propaganda being submitted, and the only people you're hearing from getting garbage taken down or marked as misleading are people who are only posting right-wing garbage.
left-wing garbage is also taken down -- but i'm gonna guess that you personally hardly ever talk to anyone ((if at all)) that posts things like that, so you hardly ever ((if at all)) hear about any of it being taken down, amiright?
and it doesn't matter regardless insofar as whether it's an infringement of anyone's rights. facebook can do whatever the heck it wants with its site; CC can do the same.
the reason they and other major social media platforms have been called to testify before congress is that foreign governments have been conducting intelligence operations designed to interfere with our elections by spreading BS around the internet and shape public opinion with it. alot of that BS is reposted right here in this very thread -- the KGB aren't amateurs.
Example: The DNC, Hillary Clinton, bought and paid for (Steele Dossier) was unverified Russian disinformation a proven fact!
It was allowed to be posted and promoted against a conservative political candidate (Donald J. Trump) without censorship on Twitter & Facebook
Twitter & Facebook are publishers, and campaign platforms for the DNC, just as liberal news media outlets are, they will soon have (NO) protection from liability regarding their biased political platforms.
The Horse Is Dead, Next!
It was allowed to be posted and promoted against a conservative political candidate (Donald J. Trump) without censorship on Twitter & Facebook
Twitter & Facebook are publishers, and campaign platforms for the DNC, just as liberal news media outlets are, they will soon have (NO) protection from liability regarding their biased political platforms.
The Horse Is Dead, Next!
-
1
- Show all
come on man, you are way smarter than this.
the whole, entire trump-russia was a made-up hoax.
if you go back to the 2016 election cycle , hillary mentioned that russia might try to interfere in the election. most of the media ignored it, some even mocked her for saying it.
as soon as she lost ( and sobered up), she began to repeat this, and this time, the whole media picked it up and ran with.
so that, and the dossier mentioned in the post above is the origins of the whole false russia narritive
the whole, entire trump-russia was a made-up hoax.
if you go back to the 2016 election cycle , hillary mentioned that russia might try to interfere in the election. most of the media ignored it, some even mocked her for saying it.
as soon as she lost ( and sobered up), she began to repeat this, and this time, the whole media picked it up and ran with.
so that, and the dossier mentioned in the post above is the origins of the whole false russia narritive
-
1
-
1
- Show all
100% correct, Twitter & Facebook promoted the unverified DNC-Hillary Russian Disinformation (Steel Dossier) for years, a proven fact!
It was allowed to be posted and promoted against a conservative political candidate and President (Donald J. Trump) without censorship on Twitter & Facebook for years, prompting the Russia Hoax Investigation (Coup Attempt) against President Trump that failed!
Twitter & Facebook are publishers, and campaign platforms for the DNC, just as liberal news media outlets are, they will soon have (NO) protection from liability regarding their biased political platforms.
It was allowed to be posted and promoted against a conservative political candidate and President (Donald J. Trump) without censorship on Twitter & Facebook for years, prompting the Russia Hoax Investigation (Coup Attempt) against President Trump that failed!
Twitter & Facebook are publishers, and campaign platforms for the DNC, just as liberal news media outlets are, they will soon have (NO) protection from liability regarding their biased political platforms.
-
1
- Show all
you mean trump ( who had the virus) thinks it is not that big of deal, and does not push the panic narritive that the media does?
trump does not push the overinflated numbers and deaths, and does not always promise a 2nd wave and overflowing hospitals that never come...
who unto he who calls evil good and good evil.
trump does not push the overinflated numbers and deaths, and does not always promise a 2nd wave and overflowing hospitals that never come...
who unto he who calls evil good and good evil.
-
1
- Show all