Deplatforming trump and parler..A fearful left?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Lisamn

Active member
Dec 29, 2020
795
229
43
#1
Why platforms had to cut off Trump and Parler
https://www.theverge.com/22224860/p...moderation-censorship-facebook-amazon-twitter

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/big-tech-bans-trump-indefinitely/

https://markets.businessinsider.com...permanently-banned-tweeting-2021-1-1029946778

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...he-bank-for-future-business-nyt-idUSKBN29H0PM

That people can be cut off for free speech is astounding! Not the least the president of the US can be cut off from speaking to anyone when the msm and tech companies disagree with him...should prove that there is overwhelming conspiracy to shut down free speech and the side that disagrees with the people who control the world. So..to make sure that trump never happens again...they are going to come down hard on him and the voters who voted for him.

The ‘attack’ on the capital building with trump supporters..and I believe antifa infiltration to make it seem that patriots are the criminals...are all to try to deter 80 million voters from really rising up. Why let blm/antifa loose for the last year..and then come down hard on trump supporters who didn’t do near what those groups did. It makes no sense...unless you see it that they are scared of we, the people figuring it all out and somehow coming together to stop them? There seems to be a serious double standard happening now in America..that is becoming more and more obvious!

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55578092
https://apnews.com/article/b57315d97dd2146c4a89b4636faa7b70
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,977
1,148
113
#2
I think Google is just trying to protect themselves from liability
 

Lisamn

Active member
Dec 29, 2020
795
229
43
#4
I think Google is just trying to protect themselves from liability
Lol...if you say so..we know that they are really just getting rid of the other pov.

I took the liberty of crossing out the f word but it's stuff like this that got parler deplatformed
Sure it did...again parler came up as an alternative for actual free speech and they shut it down.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,778
113
#6
I took the liberty of crossing out the f word but it's stuff like this that got parler deplatformed
The f work is commonplace in just about any book that is published today. But when one of the Leftists said "F*** the Constitution" there was no hue and cry. In fact that person was applauded. The DOUBLE STANDARD must prevail if Totalitarianism and Fascism must take control of America.
 

Lisamn

Active member
Dec 29, 2020
795
229
43
#7
The f work is commonplace in just about any book that is published today
Even on socks...I was looking in a sock store...and the crass things that are put on socks nowadays is astounding!

The DOUBLE STANDARD
It used to be that they could push off any idea of a double standard..but the dems/left have come out openly how they have a double standard. You can trash US cities for a year but don’t go into the capital building at a trump rally or you will be rounded up and hit with the full force of the law! Yet...how many times did I read in Andy Ngo’s twitter that they caught some of the Portland rioters but they were all released without bail? It was a revolving door all for show I suppose..I started to wonder why they even tried to catch anyone after awhile.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,977
1,148
113
#8
The f work is commonplace in just about any book that is published today. But when one of the Leftists said "F*** the Constitution" there was no hue and cry. In fact that person was applauded. The DOUBLE STANDARD must prevail if Totalitarianism and Fascism must take control of America.
That's not fascism.
That's Google protecting themselves from liability
 
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,691
113
#9
The first amendment only guarantees that the government will not infringe on it. The first does not guarantee that a private entity or individual will not violate your constitutional rights.

However, the government has all but ensured that private entities have more rights than individuals. For example, large technology companies can boot you from the virtual town square of the Internet because they have direct access to the hardware and software that hosts the services you want to use.

Conversely, there is no legal method to deplatform a private entity as an individual person. Therefore the government is, ipso facto, instrumental to the overwhelming ability of large conglomerates and monopolies to exercise power over the general public.

By extension, the government can exercise dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and the economy vicariously through private entities.
 
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,691
113
#10
Companies are therefore unofficial arms of the government. Private entities get giant tax cuts and bailouts. The government gets plausible deniability of being directly responsible for violating your rights.

People are busy looking at the government, but it's the corporate giants that have "crept in unawares."
 

Lisamn

Active member
Dec 29, 2020
795
229
43
#11
Companies are therefore unofficial arms of the government. Private entities get giant tax cuts and bailouts. The government gets plausible deniability of being directly responsible for violating your rights.

People are busy looking at the government, but it's the corporate giants that have "crept in unawares."
I think those companies have the same political bent and don’t mind using their technology or their product to sellout the peoples the government’s are supposed to represent.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,977
1,148
113
#12
Yeah I can't believe parler got deplatformed.....I mean all they did was threaten to kill people
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,778
113
#13
It used to be that they could push off any idea of a double standard..but the dems/left have come out openly how they have a double standard. You can trash US cities for a year but don’t go into the capital building at a trump rally or you will be rounded up and hit with the full force of the law! Yet...how many times did I read in Andy Ngo’s twitter that they caught some of the Portland rioters but they were all released without bail? It was a revolving door all for show I suppose..I started to wonder why they even tried to catch anyone after awhile.
Here is what we now have:
1610566154709.png
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,111
4,374
113
#14
Why platforms had to cut off Trump and Parler
https://www.theverge.com/22224860/p...moderation-censorship-facebook-amazon-twitter

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/big-tech-bans-trump-indefinitely/

https://markets.businessinsider.com...permanently-banned-tweeting-2021-1-1029946778

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...he-bank-for-future-business-nyt-idUSKBN29H0PM

That people can be cut off for free speech is astounding! Not the least the president of the US can be cut off from speaking to anyone when the msm and tech companies disagree with him...should prove that there is overwhelming conspiracy to shut down free speech and the side that disagrees with the people who control the world. So..to make sure that trump never happens again...they are going to come down hard on him and the voters who voted for him.

The ‘attack’ on the capital building with trump supporters..and I believe antifa infiltration to make it seem that patriots are the criminals...are all to try to deter 80 million voters from really rising up. Why let blm/antifa loose for the last year..and then come down hard on trump supporters who didn’t do near what those groups did. It makes no sense...unless you see it that they are scared of we, the people figuring it all out and somehow coming together to stop them? There seems to be a serious double standard happening now in America..that is becoming more and more obvious!

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55578092
https://apnews.com/article/b57315d97dd2146c4a89b4636faa7b70
agree and the facts show you are right.
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,111
4,374
113
#15
Yeah I can't believe parler got deplatformed.....I mean all they did was threaten to kill people
they did not do that you are untruthful. I see you did not answer my question in the other thread this is somewhat the same topic.

I will ask you again Should a person who is not a Christian also known to be an atheist be banned from CC? YU did not answer me IF it is ok to ban the POTUS for the action of others would it be fair in your case?
 

Lisamn

Active member
Dec 29, 2020
795
229
43
#16
We probably always did have that...I think it took trump and his ability to get things done that the politicians said they would fix every year to really prove to people that the government really is a house of cards. What is amazing is that even with the events of last year...many people still think that the msm etc..are still bastions of truth when it really comes down to it.

I remember in 2019 a poll said most Americans didn’t trust the msm but then covid hit and all of a sudden the same people who said they didn’t trust the msm believed everything the msm said about covid. So that got me to thinking that they must have really believed the msm after all.

Since the father of lies is satan and he rules this world...it really shouldn’t be so surprising that truth is always going to be in short supply and the people who rule the world would do his bidding. I think we’d all like to think that there is a chance for good to win though.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,977
1,148
113
#18
they did not do that you are untruthful. I see you did not answer my question in the other thread this is somewhat the same topic.

I will ask you again Should a person who is not a Christian also known to be an atheist be banned from CC? YU did not answer me IF it is ok to ban the POTUS for the action of others would it be fair in your case?
The reason Trump was banned from every social media site isn't it people are being radicalized by his rhetoric
The reason parler was deplatformed is because people were on their making death threats band parlor refused to moderate
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,111
4,374
113
#19
The reason Trump was banned from every social media site isn't it people are being radicalized by his rhetoric
The reason parler was deplatformed is because people were on their making death threats band parlor refused to moderate

You did not answer my question you deflected it. Don't be afraid to answer it I won't ban you like a left leading buffoon you are associated with. FYI he is the POTUS. The reason why parler was removed was that Google, Apple, Fb, Twitter are all left leading socialist democrats who hate President Trump. By your own logic you should not be here the moderator should ban you because you are not a professing Christian?
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,977
1,148
113
#20
You did not answer my question you deflected it. Don't be afraid to answer it I won't ban you like a left leading buffoon you are associated with. FYI he is the POTUS. The reason why parler was removed was that Google, Apple, Fb, Twitter are all left leading socialist democrats who hate President Trump. By your own logic you should not be here the moderator should ban you because you are not a professing Christian?
People were on parler making death threats and parlor refused to moderate