opening statement in Jackson Supreme Court confirmation hearings
- Thread starter CS1
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
What you have stated is self-contradictory. Her primary qualifications -- according to the Democrats -- are that she is a black woman. But she is highly qualified only to promote her Leftist/Communist agenda, which includes giving criminals all the breaks, while destroying law-abiding citizens and children.
That any US president -- especially an imposter -- would have the gall to say that race and gender are the two chief criteria for selecting a supreme court judge shows how low America has fallen. All the Republicans should have totally boycotted this sham selection and done something more about the perversion of the selection process. Ketanji's record -- according to someone who has done his research -- shows that she is totally unfit to be given such a critical position, when her agenda also includes black racist Critical Race Theory.
Yes, The Senate Should Investigate Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Leniency Towards Sex Predators
Beginning with a paper she authored while a student at Harvard Law School, Judge Jackson appears to have a track record of both advocacy and sentencing decisions demonstrating extreme leniency toward child sex predators. Perhaps more concerningly, her record also demonstrates an attempt to normalize a radical sexual ideology of adults being attracted to minors – categorizing it not as flatly criminal, but simply as misunderstood.
https://thefederalist.com/2022/03/1...rown-jacksons-leniency-towards-sex-predators/
Ever since January 2020 the Supreme Court has shown itself incapable of doing the right thing at the right time. They are now another political entity with absolutely no regard for the Constitution. If this evil woman gets into SCOTUS that will be the final nail in the coffin of justice in America.
That any US president -- especially an imposter -- would have the gall to say that race and gender are the two chief criteria for selecting a supreme court judge shows how low America has fallen. All the Republicans should have totally boycotted this sham selection and done something more about the perversion of the selection process. Ketanji's record -- according to someone who has done his research -- shows that she is totally unfit to be given such a critical position, when her agenda also includes black racist Critical Race Theory.
Yes, The Senate Should Investigate Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Leniency Towards Sex Predators
Beginning with a paper she authored while a student at Harvard Law School, Judge Jackson appears to have a track record of both advocacy and sentencing decisions demonstrating extreme leniency toward child sex predators. Perhaps more concerningly, her record also demonstrates an attempt to normalize a radical sexual ideology of adults being attracted to minors – categorizing it not as flatly criminal, but simply as misunderstood.
https://thefederalist.com/2022/03/1...rown-jacksons-leniency-towards-sex-predators/
Ever since January 2020 the Supreme Court has shown itself incapable of doing the right thing at the right time. They are now another political entity with absolutely no regard for the Constitution. If this evil woman gets into SCOTUS that will be the final nail in the coffin of justice in America.
-
2
-
1
- Show all
The Supreme Court play politics instead of administering justice:
"Well, what changed was starting in the 1960’s and the 1970’s the Supreme Court’s role in our society changed dramatically; the Supreme Court became a policy-making body rather than merely a judicial body. … Our Democratic colleagues want the Supreme Court to be anti-democratic. Our Democratic colleagues get frustrated with the democratic process. When they can’t pass gun-control laws because the American people don’t support them, they want unelected judges to mandate those same laws instead. Law after law after law that they can’t get through the democratic process the Democrats have decided it’s much simpler to convince five lawyers in black robes than to try to convince 330 million Americans. That is why Supreme Court confirmations have become so contentious, is because the Supreme Court has arrogated to itself a responsibility the Constitution doesn’t give it, which is to make contested policy decisions and take them away from the American people." -- Ted Cruz
"Well, what changed was starting in the 1960’s and the 1970’s the Supreme Court’s role in our society changed dramatically; the Supreme Court became a policy-making body rather than merely a judicial body. … Our Democratic colleagues want the Supreme Court to be anti-democratic. Our Democratic colleagues get frustrated with the democratic process. When they can’t pass gun-control laws because the American people don’t support them, they want unelected judges to mandate those same laws instead. Law after law after law that they can’t get through the democratic process the Democrats have decided it’s much simpler to convince five lawyers in black robes than to try to convince 330 million Americans. That is why Supreme Court confirmations have become so contentious, is because the Supreme Court has arrogated to itself a responsibility the Constitution doesn’t give it, which is to make contested policy decisions and take them away from the American people." -- Ted Cruz
-
1
- Show all
I guess there is no "multi quote" functionality in this forum...
Anyway, a big motivation for Branch Rickey to promote Jackie Robinson to a big league spot on the Brooklyn Dodgers in 1947, was because Robinson was black.
However, he didn't sign Robinson to the Dodgers solely because he was black! Robinson clearly had the talent to play well at that level, for one. He also had the mental fortitude to deal with demonic evil right wing racists.
In other words, Branch Rickey had a set of criteria he wanted to fit for major league baseball's first black ball player in 60 years.
Being the for first black female SCOTUS justice may have been a motivation, but obviously she also needed to have the credentials. What good is it to promote equality between the races, when you just put any old person up there just because of skin color? You do this, specifically to show that blacks and whites, and males and females, truly ARE equal in terms of talent, intelligence, hard work, and professionalism. I mean, after all, homo sapiens are homo sapiens. Skin color has nothing to do with anything. It's just being promoted to prove this to right wing racists.
Anyway, a big motivation for Branch Rickey to promote Jackie Robinson to a big league spot on the Brooklyn Dodgers in 1947, was because Robinson was black.
However, he didn't sign Robinson to the Dodgers solely because he was black! Robinson clearly had the talent to play well at that level, for one. He also had the mental fortitude to deal with demonic evil right wing racists.
In other words, Branch Rickey had a set of criteria he wanted to fit for major league baseball's first black ball player in 60 years.
Being the for first black female SCOTUS justice may have been a motivation, but obviously she also needed to have the credentials. What good is it to promote equality between the races, when you just put any old person up there just because of skin color? You do this, specifically to show that blacks and whites, and males and females, truly ARE equal in terms of talent, intelligence, hard work, and professionalism. I mean, after all, homo sapiens are homo sapiens. Skin color has nothing to do with anything. It's just being promoted to prove this to right wing racists.
-
1
- Show all
Ketanji Brown Jackson, Biden's Supreme Court pick, refuses to define the word 'woman'
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ke...e-court-pick-refuses-to-define-the-word-woman
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ke...e-court-pick-refuses-to-define-the-word-woman
I think it is just like Jackie Robinson, if you are going to have someone break a barrier whether it is the first woman Supreme Court Justice like Sandra Day O'Connor, or the first black baseball player like Jackie Robinson you want someone who is better than average.
I have a very different opinions than this person, but ignoring the fact that we have different ideologies she came across as an idiot. They were talking about a bill that she brought up that was passed in 2003 and she said she thought it was the 80s? We have quotes from her that make absolutely no sense, essentially saying that in the past it was harder to get and disseminate child porn hence the penalties for having it should be greater but now that we have the internet penalties should be less. To me that was saying a serial killer who kills with a pistol should be given a much stiffer penalty than if you use a bazooka.
She apologized the perpetrator and his family as though they were the victims? She said the 18 year old perpetrator was very close in age to the 8 year old victims as though that meant this wasn't a serious crime.
They refuse to give us her LSAT scores? She was accepted to Harvard, they tell us that so we can assume she is an elite legal mind, yet they hide her scores?
During the Kavanaugh hearing they went over in detail everything written in his high school yearbook from his friends, yet asking to see the LSAT scores for the SCOTUS nominee is labelled abhorrent and racist.
We had #MeToo movement hyperventilating over an alleged assault (not a rape and probably not even a sexual crime) that was unsubstantiated because the witness couldn't tell us the date of the event or the location of it. Yet here we have this woman's documented notes on 7 pedophile cases she ruled in and bringing that up is abhorrent, racist and "how low can the right go"!
What do I think? I think the left has revealed themselves to be the lowest of the low, the most despicable in your face hypocrites and liars filled with hate.
I have a very different opinions than this person, but ignoring the fact that we have different ideologies she came across as an idiot. They were talking about a bill that she brought up that was passed in 2003 and she said she thought it was the 80s? We have quotes from her that make absolutely no sense, essentially saying that in the past it was harder to get and disseminate child porn hence the penalties for having it should be greater but now that we have the internet penalties should be less. To me that was saying a serial killer who kills with a pistol should be given a much stiffer penalty than if you use a bazooka.
She apologized the perpetrator and his family as though they were the victims? She said the 18 year old perpetrator was very close in age to the 8 year old victims as though that meant this wasn't a serious crime.
They refuse to give us her LSAT scores? She was accepted to Harvard, they tell us that so we can assume she is an elite legal mind, yet they hide her scores?
During the Kavanaugh hearing they went over in detail everything written in his high school yearbook from his friends, yet asking to see the LSAT scores for the SCOTUS nominee is labelled abhorrent and racist.
We had #MeToo movement hyperventilating over an alleged assault (not a rape and probably not even a sexual crime) that was unsubstantiated because the witness couldn't tell us the date of the event or the location of it. Yet here we have this woman's documented notes on 7 pedophile cases she ruled in and bringing that up is abhorrent, racist and "how low can the right go"!
What do I think? I think the left has revealed themselves to be the lowest of the low, the most despicable in your face hypocrites and liars filled with hate.
Where is the empathy?
Judge Jackson does not know what a woman is and everyone thinks that is a joke? Something to mock? Imagine you were at a restaurant, you need to use the restroom but then you discover one is for men and the other women?! For me and you this is easy, but for Judge Jackson, what is she going to do? Welcome to her world. Granted there might be a biologist at the restaurant that can help, but you can't count on a biologist being there every time! Imagine the potential for misunderstanding and you can understand her sympathy for pedophiles.
Instead of seeing her as some kind of idiot pervert, why not instead be thankful that for the first time in US history idiot perverts will be represented on the Supreme court.
Judge Jackson does not know what a woman is and everyone thinks that is a joke? Something to mock? Imagine you were at a restaurant, you need to use the restroom but then you discover one is for men and the other women?! For me and you this is easy, but for Judge Jackson, what is she going to do? Welcome to her world. Granted there might be a biologist at the restaurant that can help, but you can't count on a biologist being there every time! Imagine the potential for misunderstanding and you can understand her sympathy for pedophiles.
Instead of seeing her as some kind of idiot pervert, why not instead be thankful that for the first time in US history idiot perverts will be represented on the Supreme court.
I am so upset with the GOP leaders during the Supreme Court justice hearing. The GOP failed us again because they are afraid to address this Judge because of her color. Even when we know the current POTUS picks her because of her color. I wanted to hear four questions asked of her. 1. what is a law 2. what is the US Constitution 3. what is truth 4. what is the job of a judge 5 what is the word that ties them all together. The answer is " FIDELITY" !!!!! Not a revisionist version of the truth but the real truth. That law is absolute. the Truth that the US Constitution is the law of the land. the truth is to be looked for, protected, told, and upheld in a court of law. The Job of the Judge is to be faithful to the law and the US Constitution and defend it at all costs. And to be faithful to seek the truth before making a judgment. This was not asked of her. The GOP again are weak wimps. This woman was weak on child porn and was given a pass because of her race and sexuality/ gender. Yet no one asked her if a law was created and founded on harming Americans of the United States, would that law be seen as Good today? As passed laws that allowed the owning of Slaves? If the answer is no, then Judge do you think the precedence of ROE vs Wade of today that was built from a woman who created "Planned Parenthood" to reduce the population of blacks in 1922 is today a good law? IF so please tell me how Margaret Sanger's idea of the population of black needed to be reduced/ And do you think those who are 80 years old should also be reduced? I would have held her feet to that fire. AT all costs.
This woman was weak on child porn.
This woman was weak on child porn.