THIRD TEMPLE NEWS

I hope and Pray that a member of the Sanhedrin Reads this post and shows it to others in the Sanhedrin. Could it be that the greatest mistaken belief is Part of the Western Wall to the TEMPLE ? ? ? I thought the TRUTH about the TEMPLE being located on the OPHEL, was obvious, yet most of the JEWS do not see it. Is that what has blinded the JEWS to the TRUTH about the Temple for all these Centuries?


Notice, that red square at the bottom LEFT Hand corner has NEVER had an archeologist explore to the depth of the King David's Palace? WHY?

God has a perfect plan, after destruction of the temple and the diaspora the rains stopped and did not begin again until the Jews began to return until today it is a land flowing with milk and honey. I can see how they have been blinded until such a time as it is the perfect time for their eyes to be opened and the work on the third temple will begin, much of the work is already done, having been started in the 70's and it appears construction can be VERY soon.

I have mentioned this several time before, but what really baffles me is how there is not enough level space
on the TEMPLE MOUNT, to accommodate a rather LARGE THRESHING FLOOR.

NOR a 600 Foot, two story double bridge called a CAUSEWAY, south of the Ancient City wall, verified by JOSEPHUS the Historian.

And Paul was almost beaten to death by the Temple Crowd, just outside the TEMPLE, and then the Commander of Cohort on Duty that DAY, had to run DOWN HILL, with is Soldiers and Centurions to SAVE PAUL in Acts.

Acts 21:27-40 (ESV)
27 When the seven days were almost completed, the Jews from Asia, seeing him in the temple, stirred up the whole crowd and laid hands on him,
28 crying out, “Men of Israel, help! This is the man who is teaching everyone everywhere against the people and the law and this place. Moreover, he even brought Greeks into the temple and has defiled this holy place.”
29 For they had previously seen Trophimus the Ephesian with him in the city, and they supposed that Paul had brought him into the temple.
30 Then all the city was stirred up, and the people ran together. They seized Paul and dragged him out of the temple, and at once the gates were shut.
31 And as they were seeking to kill him (Paul), word came to the tribune of the cohort (Commander) that all Jerusalem was in confusion.
32 He at once took soldiers and centurions and ran down to them. And when they saw the tribune and the soldiers, they stopped beating Paul.
33 Then the tribune came up and arrested him and ordered him to be bound with two chains. He inquired who he was and what he had done.
34 Some in the crowd were shouting one thing, some another. And as he could not learn the facts because of the uproar, he ordered him to be brought into the barracks.
35 And when he came to the steps, he was actually carried by the soldiers because of the violence of the crowd,
36 for the mob of the people followed, crying out, “Away with him!”
37 As Paul was about to be brought into the barracks, he said to the tribune, “May I say something to you?” And he said, “Do you know Greek?
38 Are you not the Egyptian, then, who recently stirred up a revolt and led the four thousand men of the Assassins out into the wilderness?”
39 Paul replied, “I am a Jew, from Tarsus in Cilicia, a citizen of no obscure city. I beg you, permit me to speak to the people.”
40 And when he had given him permission, Paul, standing on the steps, motioned with his hand to the people. And when there was a great hush, he addressed them in the Hebrew language, saying:

And still the JEWS do not want to believe it.

.

That image on the right, is where the ROMAN TENTH LEGION was Barracks with 10,000 Troops and Support Personnel stayed. Most people do not know this, but no soldier was ever to spend money downtown. So 4000 of those Support Personnel were to man the shops on Post where they were allowed to spend money any what they wanted, 6000 were Soldiers. I colored in the Triple Gate as is was walled up when Turkey was in control of Jerusalem. I think at least one of those three door ways only went up to the second floor while the other two, went to the TOP Floor. "Herod Rebuilds Temple According to Jewish historian Josephus, the Judean king of Idumean descent, Herod the Great (74/73 BC-4 BC) decided to build a magnificent temple of God in the 18th year of his reign (listed as 20 BC on the Biblical Timeline)." In blue print, I pointed out the FORESTED HILL that is described in Jer. 26:18, that sits on Mt. ZION, the center mount on the Mt. Moriah RIDGE. YES, Mt. Moriah is the Name of the WHOLE RIDGE. So YES the BIBLE IS 100% ACCURATE, when it says Solomon built the Temple on Mt. Moriah, and Herod Rebuilds Temple According to Jewish historian Josephus, the Judean king of Idumean descent, Herod the Great (74/73 BC-4 BC) decided to build a magnificent temple of God in the 18th year of his reign (listed as 20 BC on the Biblical Timeline). on the Earth, they are BOTH the SAME PLACE.


Psalm 9:11 (NASB)
11 Sing praises to the LORD, who dwells in Zion; Declare among the peoples His deeds.

Isn't it sad, how much blood has been spilled, because they did not recognize that Mt. Moriah, and Mt. Zion are the exact same Location. Mt. Moriah is the Name of the Entire Ridge, AND Mt. Zion is specific Location on that Ridge where the TEMPLE was Located. One Mistake, and SO MANY LOST THEIR LIVES.













ALL BECAUSE THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT GOD IS SAYING. So much Blood. And the Irony of all of the FIGHTING, is the Correct Location is not even a Contested Property. An Israeli farmer sold the Property for the REAL TEMPLE, to an Israeli Investment Corporation who put up Rental Property and left Trees on the rest of the Property.

I am going to preciously identify in Picture where KING DAVID's Palace IS for sure, which would pinpoint where the Temple Should be. You see Josephus said it was adjacent to Solomon's Palace. It is reasonable that Solomon inherited the Property of King David. So most likely Solomon Remodeled King David's Palace, OR tore it down and Built his Palace on the same site. Here is the site that Archaeologists have all ready identified as The Millo which would have been the Royal Guard's Barracks. So the KING DAVID's Palace had to be adjacent to that. Further evidence Solomon Built his Palace on top of King David's. Why could they not find King Solomon's Palace. Caesar in 70 A.D. wanted all of Jerusalem and every Jewish building Torn Down, and replacing it with the Roman City of "Aelia Capitolina" . The following two Pictures of the Millo, and Corner what Archeologists Uncovered, it may be the corner of the building next door (upper left) is King David's Palace:
King David's Palace? ? ? ⬇. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OR - King David's Palace? ? ? ⬇



https://www.topsecretwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/kingdavid.jpg
Now notice the name of site that this image was published under. Is the Israeli Government trying to keep this HUSH - HUSH ? ? ?

QUOTE:
King David’s Palace and the Millo
Nadav Na’aman explores the Biblical and archaeological evidence

Robin Ngo January 08, 2022 21 Comments 24871 views Share
In the field of Biblical archaeology, Biblical texts and archaeological finds must be examined critically and independently, but ultimately, they must be interpreted together. Such an approach can be applied to King David’s Palace and the Millo, as explored in “The Interchange Between Bible and Archaeology: The Case of David’s Palace and the Millo” by Nadav Na’aman in the January/February 2014 issue of BAR.

Two major monuments lie south of the Temple Mount in the City of David: the Large Stone Structure and Stepped Stone Structure. Building on previous suggestions, Nadav Na’aman uses textual and archaeological evidence to identify these monuments as, respectively, the remains of King David’s palace and the Millo. :END QUOTE.

IF STEPPED STONE STRUCTURE is the Millo, then the Large Stone Structure is KING DAVID'S PALACE. And the WOODED HILL is Mt. Zion, where the TEMPLE WAS.


I will keep studying pictures and text, seeking a 100% positive Identification, where as Proof Positive the TEMPLE was located. YES, I AM 100% convinced in my mind it is on the OPHEL. I hope I can convince Everyone.

Not much left after the earthquake, that destroyed the Palace. I will keep searching:



Also Josephus also make the statement that Adjacent to King David's Palace was the Temple.

Fonts in Blue are my comments.





On the east side the seems to be one Gate, unless like Josephus reported, the Gate of the Essens, was a second name for the East Gate, or the entrance to eastern Colonnade was considered a GATE.

DID YOU NOTICE THAT ON THIS FACT SHEET FROM JOSEPHUS:

But if we go the other way westward, it began at the same place; and extended through a place called Bethso, to the gate of the Essenes: and after that it went southward: having its bending above the fountain Siloam; where it also bends again towards the east at Solomon’s pool, and reaches as far as a certain place which they called Ophlas [what they called the OPHEL], where it was joined to the eastern cloister of the temple. The second wall took its beginning from that gate which they called Gennath, which belonged to the first wall. It only encompassed the northern quarter of the city, and reached as far as the tower Antonia. - Josephus The Jewish War Book V chapter 4



Josephus placed the TEMPLE on the OPHEL, not on top of the so-called Temple Mount.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Fonts in Blue are my comments.





On the east side the seems to be one Gate, unless like Josephus reported, the Gate of the Essens, was a second name for the East Gate, or the entrance to eastern Colonnade was considered a GATE.

DID YOU NOTICE THAT ON THIS FACT SHEET FROM JOSEPHUS:

But if we go the other way westward, it began at the same place; and extended through a place called Bethso, to the gate of the Essenes: and after that it went southward: having its bending above the fountain Siloam; where it also bends again towards the east at Solomon’s pool, and reaches as far as a certain place which they called Ophlas [what they called the OPHEL], where it was joined to the eastern cloister of the temple. The second wall took its beginning from that gate which they called Gennath, which belonged to the first wall. It only encompassed the northern quarter of the city, and reached as far as the tower Antonia. - Josephus The Jewish War Book V chapter 4



Josephus placed the TEMPLE on the OPHEL, not on top of the so-called Temple Mount.


XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Josephus the Historian born 37 AD, Understood the TEMPLE was 33 years old, when the 70 A.D. destruction came about, so HE is a Credible Eye Witness when the Temple and Ancient Jerusalem were Destroyed in 70 A.D. He lived until he died at 100 AD. He said the TEMPLE was 600 feet to the south, dead center to the Southern wall, of Fortress of Antonia. I may be finished with this Post. I have never be so SURE, it is finished.

Don't worry, I still have some more info coming on an old post, involving WWIII and the Second Coming, called:
Does the BIBLE describe a coming Nuclear War? I will get into prophesies of WWIII, and the Second Coming. I only have 10 Pages, so there is more I need to explain. WWIII comes First, then HE WILL COME BACK TO REIGN FOR 1000 Years.

I like your enthusiasm and research. You might be right about the location of the Third Temple. But I am not convinced: there are also very compelling reasons others have given for the generally accepted current location of the Dome of the Rock.

I will hold my fire and opinion and wait to see what the end times reveal about the truth . . . .

OOPS, I copied the Second Part TWICE on post #2,767. So here is the First Part of it.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX





The Works of Flavius Josephus:
Book 8, Chapter 5, Section 2:

2. This house was a large and curious building, and was supported by many pillars, which Solomon built to contain a multitude for hearing causes, and taking cognizance of suits. It was sufficiently capacious to contain a great body of men, who would come together to have their causes determined. It was a hundred cubits long, and fifty broad, and thirty high, supported by quadrangular pillars, which were all of cedar; but its roof was according to the Corinthian order, with folding doors, and their adjoining pillars of equal magnitude, each fluted with three cavities; which building as at once firm, and very ornamental. There was also another house so ordered, that its entire breadth was placed in the middle; it was quadrangular, and its breadth was thirty cubits, having a temple over against it, raised upon massy pillars; in which temple there was a large and very glorious room, wherein the king sat in judgment. To this was joined another house that was built for his queen. . . .

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?...F1C0BD7557&view=detail&form=VDRVRV&ajaxhist=0

Ze'ev Orenstein, Director of International Affairs, City of David, a Messianic Jews I think, Explains the Bullaes found in found in in or near, the place where he is standing. I just found other Proof that where He is standing it the MILLO, Barracks and Office of the PALACE GUARDS. It makes all kinds of since, that Bullaes were retired to a place of Safe Keeping, and that would be the Palace Guards Barracks and Office. Notice the two Pillars where he is standing.

The Nathan-Melech Eved Hamelech Bullae found in the City of David.


Nathan-Melech can be found in only one verse of the BIBLE:

2 Kings 23:11-12 (HCSB)
11 He did away with the horses that the kings of Judah had dedicated to the sun. ⌊They had been⌋ at the entrance of the LORD’s temple in the precincts by the chamber of Nathan-Melech the court official, and he burned up the chariots of the sun.
12 The king tore down the altars that were on the roof—Ahaz’s upper chamber that the kings of Judah had made—and the altars that Manasseh had made in the two courtyards of the LORD’s temple. Then he smashed them there and threw their dust into the Kidron Valley.

2,600 year old seal discovered in City of David
“The discovery of a public building such as this, on the western slope of the City of David, provides a lot of information about the city’s structure during this period and the size of its administrative area,”
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3739207/posts

NOW SOME WHERE I REMEMBER READING OR MAY BE IT WAS OFFICE WAS DUE WEST OF THE TEMPLE. I WILL KEEP SEARCHING UNTIL I FIND IT. IT IS PROOF POSITIVE THAT THE TEMPLE IS ON THE OPHEL.

https://www.facebook.com/cityofdavi...struggle-from-2600-years-ago/338942893770241/

PRAISE THE LORD, I FOUND IT. Nethan-Melech Seal or his Bullae Was found in the Givati Parking Lot dig.


Here is the Seal of Nathan-Melech, and it was west of the TEMPLE OF GOD.


Slightly Southeast, is another dig, on the rim of Kidron Valley is the Millo, Barracks and Office of the Palace Guard.
Immediately above that to right of the northeast corner, is KING DAVID's Palace, verified by Flavious Josephus, Historian.


So Josephus also said, assuming Solomon built it on the same inherited property, three Buildings, that would have been:
Justice Hall, King Palace with Temple almost attached to it, and separated by covered Courtyard one of his Queen's dwellings, daughter of Pharaoh. Nothing was said that it too was attached to the TEMPLE. So I assume it extended past the East Gate.

The Works of Flavius Josephus:
Book 8, Chapter 5, Section 2:

2. This house was a large and curious building, and was supported by many pillars, which Solomon built to contain a multitude for hearing causes, and taking cognizance of suits. It was sufficiently capacious to contain a great body of men, who would come together to have their causes determined. It was a hundred cubits long, and fifty broad, and thirty high, supported by quadrangular pillars, which were all of cedar; but its roof was according to the Corinthian order, with folding doors, and their adjoining pillars of equal magnitude, each fluted with three cavities; which building as at once firm, and very ornamental. There was also another house so ordered, that its entire breadth was placed in the middle; it was quadrangular, and its breadth was thirty cubits, having a temple over against it, raised upon massy pillars; in which temple there was a large and very glorious room, wherein the king sat in judgment. To this was joined another house that was built for his queen. . . .


----------------------------------------------------------
Something like that, the ridge line, would had dictated the how the exact placement would have been for the King's Private Gate. Now for a Bird's Eye View:


That is the TRUE TEMPLE SITE, so why has not anyone ever dug their before ? ? ?

I think I forgot to post this video, which I was so excited about finding.

HERE IS THE VIDEO.

They want to be a part of it...they'll be a part of selling out mankind for a quick buck! Pathetic!

Saw this about the red heifer, thought you might enjoy-

shittim,
"Saw this about the red heifer, thought you might enjoy-"

Thank you for posting that video. VERY INFORMATIVE!

it's interesting the Jews claim we are at the year 5782. but if you research it they also claim it is possible they could be missing either a 100 year or 200 year period. that would make it 5982 if they have missed a 200 year period. to me, it makes sense to have a red heifer closer to the 5982 year mark because some believe the Rapture will be around the year 5993 leading to the Second Coming in the year 6,000. and would mean 6,000 year mark kicks off the 1,000 year Reign of Jesus. but having the Red Heifer now sets us up before the Rapture and gives us more signs we are that close because the Temple will be constructed with the sacrifice of this Red Heifer.

You Know more than any other verse, there is ONE VERSE, that if you think about it, spells out the location of the the TEMPLE, more specifically, on the OPHEL, beyond the shadow of a doubt.
And here it is:



Jeremiah 26:18 (HCSB)
18 . . . ‘This is what the LORD of Hosts says: Zion will be plowed like a field, Jerusalem will become ruins, and the temple mount a forested hill.’

In that 1857 Photo that I found, it is talking about the SAME HILL. I will prove it to you.

Psalm 135:21 (HCSB)
21 May the LORD be praised from Zion; He dwells in Jerusalem. Hallelujah!

A. Ancient Jerusalem is the City of David.
B. The FORESTED HILL, IT WHERE the THIRD TEMPLE BELONGS.
C. The FARMLAND is the slops of that HILL, AND NEVER HAS THE WATER BEEN ON TOP THE MOUNT UNTIL THE ROMANS DUG THE CISTERNS. It was a Potato Field for Centuries, while the So-called TEMPLE MOUNT had the Top Mount built the Dome of the ROCK built 688-691 A.D.

Psalm 9:11 (ASV)
11 Sing praises to Jehovah, who dwelleth in Zion: Declare among the people his doings.

That verse is Jer. 26:18 is talking about the SAME HILL, SAME FIELD, AND THE SAME LOCATION OF THE TOWN OF JERUSALAM, and not two locations, the hill in front of the Gray Domed Mosque, 600 feet south of the Southern Wall, which is Fortress Antonia. As Josephus described it.

This is a fairly accurate drawing of the TEMPLE, except the Slaughter Tables are misplaced. The had to be turned 90 degrees, and over close to the columns on the north. WHY? You would not have the blood running towards the front of the Holy Place, and between the Holy Place the Tables, you had to have a Blood Channel running out back and into the drainage Creek that ran South. Another error, is he forgot Chamber where the Sanhedrin Met; it would have been just west of the the Center Guard Tower on the South side.
(Notice: the Size of the complex, not counting the Gentile Courtyards was Four American Football Fields.)



H

So this room would have been attached to the west side of that center Guard tower, and stuck out both sides, and in this picture you can see why, as the High Priest always sat Facing East:





The wings of the TEMPLE were added by Herod. So here is what is probably what it looked like when Solomon got done: