Police officer fired for tick tock video

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#1
Mar 19, 2011
12,358
1,047
113
#1
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/former-police-officer-claims-fired-081152707.html
This officer was fired on accusation of racism for calling out LeBron James on the subject of what in my opinion was a justified shooting.
However the police department he worked for claims he was fired for knowingly violating the department's social media policies.
So what are your thoughts? Was he a victim of canceled culture or was he firing justified?
 
Beckie

Beckie

Well-known member
#2
Feb 15, 2022
2,516
936
113
#2
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO


ARTICLE I DECLARATION OF RIGHTS




Section 9. FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Every person may freely speak, write and publish on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that liberty.
 
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#3
Mar 19, 2011
12,358
1,047
113
#3
Beckie said:
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO


ARTICLE I DECLARATION OF RIGHTS




Section 9. FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Every person may freely speak, write and publish on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that liberty.
Click to expand...
Well yeah but one can also argue that an employer in this case the police department can enforce social media policies at their own discretion
Just looking at both sides of the issue
 
E

EndQualifiedImmunity

Banned
#4
Sep 22, 2022
65
12
8
#4
I don't know the exact wording of the policy stating officers can't use social media, but if it was not mentioned that termination is the consequence for first time offenders then I would say the punishment is a little harsh.

I've seen cops in other cities do exponentially worse than make a TikTok video and still keep their jobs. It just seems odd that doing this is that egregious of a police policy violation.

Then again, cops have qualified immunity which essentially allows them to commit exponentially more egregious violations and keep their job... So I shouldn't compare apples to oranges with offenses. It's unfortunate the cop can't use his get-out-of-jail-free card and claim qualified immunity for his policy violation.
 
ZNP

ZNP

Well-known member
#5
Sep 14, 2020
33,111
5,802
113
#5
I was a teacher. We had very severe policy concerning social media.

1. You could not say that you were a teacher in that school system because only those whose job it was to speak for the school system could do that.

2. If you said or did something that would offend parents of kids at your school you could get fired. So if you identified as pro life you could see vile attacks coming to the school over your post and the principal would be very unhappy with you. So even if you didn't identify yourself as a teacher your students would find you and identify you.

3. There were other rules that you were given about what you could or couldn't do.

So then unless you are an idiot take proper precautions.
 
E

EndQualifiedImmunity

Banned
#6
Sep 22, 2022
65
12
8
#6
EndQualifiedImmunity said:
I don't know the exact wording of the policy stating officers can't use social media, but if it was not mentioned that termination is the consequence for first time offenders then I would say the punishment is a little harsh.

I've seen cops in other cities do exponentially worse than make a TikTok video and still keep their jobs. It just seems odd that doing this is that egregious of a police policy violation.

Then again, cops have qualified immunity which essentially allows them to commit exponentially more egregious violations and keep their job... So I shouldn't compare apples to oranges with offenses. It's unfortunate the cop can't use his get-out-of-jail-free card and claim qualified immunity for his policy violation.
Click to expand...
I'm watching the Dr. Phil episode right now and there was more information given. Apparently, the former mayor who is now a state legislature, reports this officer was warned about his social media policy violations.

So what ended up happening here, in my opinion, is that the mayor found a legal loop-hole to terminate the officer. BECAUSE of the content and the fact the officer had a history of posting social media content, the mayor can then claim it wasn't for the content but rather the repeated violations of his social media postings which he was warned about under a "last chance agreement".

If it's true that he was under the "last chance agreement", and insisted to post, then unfortunately the cop gets what he deserves. He chose to work in an environment that restricts social media. No one to blame but himself.
 
Billyd

Billyd

Senior Member
#7
May 8, 2014
5,089
1,510
113
#7
As an employer, if an employee did or said something that brought a negative image to my company, he would be on the street in a heartbeat. I don't care where he said or did it. You are free to say or do what you wish, but when you do or say it, be willing to accept the consequences.
 
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#8
Mar 19, 2011
12,358
1,047
113
#8
The officer insinuated that LeBron doesn't really care about black people's lives because the officer was protecting another black person's life
This is an emotionally charged issue for a lot of people so the officer should have known this was going to be problematic for him
 
R

Runningman

Banned
#9
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,680
113
#9
He was a police officer talking about race; that's all they needed to come after him. While he wasn't racist, he made himself a target. People saw it, formed a mob, and came after him because many people are anti-police and love stoking racial division in the USA. It isn't even that this is a majority position, it is more like that activists and extremists are the loudest. They form a mob and coordinate their efforts to come after people.

On that note, I hope he finds an employer who won't destroy his career over a TikTok video and continues to make TikToks if that's what makes him happy.
 
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#10
Mar 19, 2011
12,358
1,047
113
#10
I don't believe he had racist intent but I think it's a bad idea for cops to be going on tick tock in uniform discussing sensitive racial topics
 
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#11
Mar 19, 2011
12,358
1,047
113
#11
Beckie said:
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO


ARTICLE I DECLARATION OF RIGHTS




Section 9. FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Every person may freely speak, write and publish on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that liberty.
Click to expand...
An employer reserves the right to fire someone if the person's behavior reflects negatively on the company .
But with police unions, I'm surprised he got fired.
Like those two Milwaukee police officers who hand it over a 14 year old child to a serial killer and got an award for it. And then they wonder why America doesn't like cops
 
You must log in or register to reply here.