A Christian Response to Gun Confiscation

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Nov 23, 2021
502
105
43
#1
I have found some useful articles for those of us who are armed and facing the threat of disarmament by the government. I was impressed by the Lords example in the Garden of Gethsemone when confronted by Judas and his cohorts. These articles are not written in stone. Be led of the Spirit of God.
 

Attachments

shittim

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2016
13,749
7,751
113
#2
I click and it goes to "save as"
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,659
1,094
113
#3
In order for gun confiscation to happen, you would have to get rid of the second amendment and that's about as likely to happen as my beating LeBron James in one-on-one basketball
It's just a scare tactic Republicans used to get votes
Also any attempted gun confiscation would most likely lead to a civil war
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,789
29,178
113
#4
Since 1968, there have been 1.5 million gun deaths in the USA (the majority of which are likely
suicides), and since Roe v. Wade (1973) there have been 60 million babies aborted in the USA.


Worldwide, approximately 40 million abortions are performed each year. source
 

shittim

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2016
13,749
7,751
113
#5
Figures don't lie. Often though, it is liars that do the figuring.
Those raw numbers may hide critical information, how many were gang bangers, etc.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,659
1,094
113
#6
Since 1968, there have been 1.5 million gun deaths in the USA (the majority of which are likely
suicides), and since Roe v. Wade (1973) there have been 60 million babies aborted in the USA.


Worldwide, approximately 40 million abortions are performed each year. source
Remember when everyone said Obama was going to take our guns guns?
Remember when it didn't happen?
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,789
29,178
113
#7
Remember when everyone said Obama was going to take our guns guns?
Remember when it didn't happen?
Our guns... no. I am not American ;)
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,659
1,094
113
#8
Our guns... no. I am not American ;)
Gun confiscation in America would first require abolishing the second amendment, that will take a 2/3 Senate vote and that's about as likely to happen as my marrying a supermodel
 

Lynx

Folksy yet erudite
Aug 13, 2014
27,169
9,253
113
#10
Maybe he's directing this at our neighbors to the north. I hear it REALLY sucks to be a Canadian right now, at least if you want to buy a gun.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,659
1,094
113
#11
Just hypothetically if I were a dictator and I wanted to go all Kim Jun Un, instead of going through all the trouble to confiscate everyone's guns, it would be easier just to seize ammo production. You'll run out eventually
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
7,075
1,702
113
#12
Just hypothetically if I were a dictator and I wanted to go all Kim Jun Un, instead of going through all the trouble to confiscate everyone's guns, it would be easier just to seize ammo production. You'll run out eventually
:) Not before we overthrew your tyrannical backside.... speaking hypothetically, of course.
As you stated in your previous post, there would be a revolution if that type of thing was attempted.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,659
1,094
113
#13
:) Not before we overthrew your tyrannical backside.... speaking hypothetically, of course.
As you stated in your previous post, there would be a revolution if that type of thing was attempted.
Yeah that's my point. Gun confiscation is about as likely to happen as my beating Serena Williams at tennis
 
Nov 23, 2021
502
105
43
#14
Well , interesting comments. The whole idea is for someone to consider the articles contents in the context of what would you do if martial law were imposed and the government came for your guns. Would you shed blood ? To keep your guns. Honestly , I am armed to the teeth but what does the Bible say ? One guy , says Gun confiscation is never going to happen. Whether it does or does not is not the idea of articles. How is your shotgun going to hold up against the US Military?. In my world the policitians are either bought off or have a gun held to their head. You think you can stop what is coming ? Sounds like some folks are pretty confident and optimistic. One point is in martial law the Constitution is suspended. You buck the system , i.e. hold on to your firearms in civil disobedience then good luck. I don't think any of you are more for the Constitution than I . We are equal at least . I have pondered the idea of shedding blood to keep my guns. The only reason I have them is self-defense and a big If we are invaded. To try keep them when it's time to give them up. So much for bravado. Read the articles and think about if there will be a time ? What will you do ? Gun Confiscation will happen. There will be a world government . And No I would not vote for Trump a third time.
 
Nov 23, 2021
502
105
43
#15
I click and it goes to "save as"
It is asking if you want to save it as pdf or html . If the submenu gives you the option to "Open" go for that . If you are only getting download , then go for pdf . You will need a pdf reader. to view the file in pdf
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
7,075
1,702
113
#17
I have thought about that scenario quite a bit, and I lean toward "No, I would not surrender my firearms".... not because I value my firearms so much, but more because I know the kind of political persecution that would very likely follow, and I would prefer to protect my family as long as possible.
An interesting excerpt from the 12th chapter of Romans... " 18 If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone. "

And, I might let the gov't thieves take the firearms they know that I have. This is the main purpose for "ghost guns".... if I had any, of course.
 

shittim

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2016
13,749
7,751
113
#19
The Doofus from Delaware has spoken!
Thanks H & H.
I have been enjoying God, Family and Guns channel and saw this just yesterday about how MANY countries will have access to our info thanks to the etrace system the ATF is requiring, in spite of the law that states the government will NOT maintain a data base of owners.
 
Nov 23, 2021
502
105
43
#20
Biden intends to sign UN “Small Arms Treaty”
January 25, 2022 in News by RBN Staff



Share




By Rand Paul via email alert

Dear Fellow Patriot,
The United Nations’ “Small Arms Treaty” has been the Gun Control Lobby’s crown jewel for decades.
They’ve been waiting for an anti-gun President, like Joe Biden, to take the White House so they can launch an all-out effort to ratify it in the U.S. Senate.
Now, they think they finally see their opportunity to ram it through!
But you and I have a chance to stop them cold — as long as we take IMMEDIATE action to help dismantle this dangerous Treaty.
As Dudley Brown, President of the National Association for Gun Rights, explains in the email below, it’s absolutely critical we act now!
Sincerely,
The Hon. Rand Paul
U.S. Senator (R-KY)

Dear Fellow Patriot,
“BIDEN AIMS TO SIGN ON TO UN’S GLOBAL GUN REGISTRATION TREATY.”

That was the headline in the Washington Examiner shortly after President Biden’s State Department spokesman Bill Malzahn told international bureaucrats of “the continuing commitment of the United States” to the UN’s “Small Arms Treaty” during the gun control Conference of State Parties in Geneva, Switzerland.
Just a few weeks later, President Biden himself spoke before the United Nations in New York City, stating:
“We’ll continue to uphold the long-standing rules and norms… Bedrock commitments, like support for arms control measures to reduce the risk and enhance transparency.”​
Fellow Patriot, anyone hoping that President Biden wouldn’t use his bully pulpit to RAM the UN’s “Small Arms Treaty” down the throats of Americans just got those hopes CRUSHED.
The battle over implementation of the UN’s “Small Arms Treaty” — the crown jewel in the gun grabbers’ designs for the globe — is about to reach a fever pitch.
That’s why I’m counting on you to please sign your OFFICIAL FIREARMS SOVEREIGNTY SURVEY to tell your U.S. Senators “NO UN GUN BAN” at once!
As you’ll see, this survey insists that your U.S. Senators do everything in their power to oppose the UN “Small Arms Treaty” in the U.S. Senate.
If there’s anything we’ve learned, it’s that globalists have been telling LIES about the supposed “need” for the UN’s “Small Arms Treaty” for years.
From the beginning, gun grabbers have claimed the purpose of the Treaty is keeping arms out of the hands of terrorists, insurgents, rogue states, and gang members.
But at the very same time the Biden Administration was pledging their support for the UN’s “Small Arms Treaty,” they were leaving $83 BILLION in U.S. military weaponry to the Taliban!
They don’t care about keeping guns out of the hands of terrorists.
They care about keeping guns out of the hands of law-abiding Americans!
Reading through the details of the UN “Small Arms Treaty,” it’s hard to see how our Second Amendment could survive, if ratified.
For starters, the Treaty text demands the U.S. identity “end users” (gun buyers), document “the quantity, value, and model/type” of firearms and ammunition, and develop “national control standards” to regulate transfers.
In other words, by design it’s an International Gun Registry that’ll include detailed information on American gun owners just like you — the first step toward outright CONFISCATION.
Worse, all that information would be made accessible by despots and foreign governments including the Treaty’s largest signer — Communist China.
As you can see, it’s vital you sign your OFFICIAL FIREARMS SOVEREIGNTY SURVEY to your U.S. Senators demanding they reject this scheme!
Once a nation signs on, the UN’s goal is to quickly impose “International Small Arms Control Standards” (ISACS) on them. Introductory language already includes:
*** Mandated national “screening” for those seeking to own guns, giving bureaucrats the final say on whether or not you’re “competent” enough to own a firearm;
*** Restrictive licensing for gun and ammo sales, and perhaps even bans on anything from semi-auto rifles to shotguns and handguns;
*** Restrictions on the number of guns and amount of ammo any “properly-licensed” individual may legally own;
*** Bans on magazines holding more than ten rounds; and
*** Bans on owning a firearm for self-defense — unless a citizen can somehow get government approval (which will only happen if you’re “connected” — or paid half-a-million dollars for one of Hunter Biden’s paintings).
Believe me, the United Nations has no intention of slow walking any of this. To them, your Second Amendment freedoms are a threat to their grand “utopian” designs.
Enemies like Red China are so eager to see every American disarmed they’re pouring money into the UN “Small Arms Treaty” hand-over-fist.
So, it’s no wonder why they’re hell-bent on forcing the U.S. to submit to this globalist gun control scam — and why we must defeat it!
I’m counting on you to help beat the UN by signing your OFFICIAL FIREARMS SOVEREIGNTY SURVEY to your U.S. Senators.
As soon the gun grabbers have 67 votes to ratify the Treaty in the U.S. Senate, you can bet Biden’s pal, Sen. Chuck Schumer, will call for the vote.
But we can’t wait until then to fight back because even now, one-world bureaucrats are these gun controls deep into every part of government.
On top of Biden’s ATF anti-gun executive actions, a headline from The Hill shows how “Democrats’ latest backdoor plan to limit gun ownership” involves new State Department “sanctions” designed to drive the price of ammo by BANNING imports.
That’s the same State Department which NAGR caught red-handed trying to siphon your tax dollars into funding the UN “Small Arms Treaty.”
Worse, since day one of the COVID-19 outbreak, our court system has said yes to almost any politician cooking up any unconstitutional idea so long as it’s under the guise of “public health.”
So now Biden’s Center for Disease Control (CDC) is pushing a new Euro-centric gun control framework that says “Using a public health approach is essential to addressing firearm violence and keeping people safe and healthy.”
That’s why insisting that your U.S. Senators OPPOSE the ratification of the UN’s “Small Arms Treaty” is not enough.
We must insist that the U.S. Senate ensures that NOT ONE TAXPAYER CENT is spent by Biden on implementing any part of this Treaty or what it stands for.
But I’m counting on your help to send that message — before it’s too late.
READ MORE: First, please sign your OFFICIAL FIREARMS SOVEREIGNTY SURVEY to tell your U.S. Senators “NO UN GUN BAN” at once.
For Freedom,
Dudley Brown
President
National Association for Gun Rights
P.S. Reports say the Biden Administration will be signing on to the UN “Small Arms Treaty” any day, setting up an all-out fight over ratification and implementation here in the United States.
Please help fight back.