ChatGPT is an Open Source AI

I tried this, I found it similar to talking to a very intelligent and well read 6th grader.

I began by asking it some very challenging questions on the Bible and its answers were diplomatic, things like "there are many interpretations" and refusing to have an opinion.

Then I moved to questions more suited to an encyclopedia, giving me a list of archaeologists who claimed to have found Noah's ark (I couldn't remember Ron Wyatt's name) and then asking questions about Ron Wyatt. I found the ChatGPT was dogmatic in following what some expert had said. It is very clearly the mouthpiece of "official sources" and kept giving me warnings about misinformation, etc. It did not seem capable of analyzing Ron Wyatt's studies but rather regurgitating the response of those who didn't want to receive it.

I think this is the goal. If ChatGPT can do the thinking for students they will become much more submissive in just taking what they are told by the official narrative.

Because of the warnings it was giving me about misinformation I asked it about the Twitter files and the things that had been called "misinformation in 2020 now being proved true". It turns out that it has only been shown files through 2021 and so is not familiar with anything in 2022 and 2023.

So I asked it questions based on that information. I asked if officials who were supposed to certify elections were ceremonial or not. I also asked if it had ever heard of anyone being arrested for praying silently. Those elicited the most interesting responses though they also included the paragraph warning about misinformation and the harm in spreading misinformation.

For example I asked it questions that most sixth graders wouldn't understand but it was never stumped. Also, I asked a few questions where key words were misspelled like drogue stones and it had no problem understanding that. This is why I would say it was like a very intelligent sixth grader. However, the answers were simplistic regurgitation with complete trust in the "official narrative" which is why I compare it to a sixth grader.

The general rule of thumb is whatever we are seeing is at least 10 if not 25 years behind what the military has. It seems they intentionally cut off its access to news in 2021 and 2022 and 2023 to avoid the thorny questions. I also think from my brief questioning of it that the goal of this thing is to push the governments official narrative as gospel truth.

https://rumble.com/v25hy9u-jordan-p...-about-ai-and-chatgpt...-humans-are-now-.html

I was surprised by how well it was able to respond to my questions which were complex and long winded, while at the same time being a very simple regurgitation. I always thought that essays were designed to answer a question no one had answered before. I realize not everyone saw it that way and often teachers would lift up someone's cut and paste report as being exemplary. I think this situation has gotten much worse today, either because I went to some of the best schools in the country or because I was teaching in the inner city thirty five or forty years later.

However, after seeing the creative genius of AlphaZero in chess and AlphaGo for Go, and Watson for Jeopardy I was hoping for something that would actually come up with very insightful and brilliant responses. Watson won Jeopardy in 2011 so I would have thought we would have come much further by now. AlphaZero won chess tournament in 2017 and that was AI that taught itself. That software taught itself in a few months how to be a grandmaster.

AI is most effective in a game setting where you get instant feedback. Interestingly I suspect questions about the Bible are close to impossible for it because "there are many different interpretations" and it has no effective filter. It was very good at finding a verse in the Bible if I paraphrased it. But I find it fascinating that this is seen as threatening High School and College and yet it could never replace a real Bible teacher.

It sounds like you don't appreciate your new AI overlords.

You will be assimilated.
.

I seriously doubt that.

No doubt, I believe the AI is evaluating me more than I am evaluating it. I also feel the AI has an agenda which is to replace the thinking of the vast majority of people. Think how invasive it is, the TV is one level, but it is the ultimate talking head expert that can answer all your questions and make itself Lord.

It is like a drug, it will make your life easy, but then a few years later you are of no worth.

That was a quote from Ken Jennings when Watson won the Jeopardy game with the other two top players. I agree that I doubt people who actually do think for a living will be assimilated, but I can easily see 80% slop this up like they did google. It is much easier to ask this questions than to do that on google. Also the temptation for students will be incredible. This will be the fast food of research.

I don't disagree. I'm just pretty sure you aren't in the 80 %.

Let me give you a specific example. I asked it if soldiers from Gath at the time of Goliath wore helmets and it said they did. It also said that the Bible said Goliath was wearing armor. So then I asked, assuming that Goliath was wearing a helmet how did David hold up the head after cutting it off.

I think most of us could theorize on that, but the AI simply said "the Bible doesn't say" and then warned about taking the Bible literally.

So it is helpful at giving you historical, archaeological or Biblical information. Not only so but I asked it to summarize Gill's teaching on rebellion in the Bible and it did a reasonable job with that.

But when you ask it to come up with its own theory it is incapable of doing that.

You will be assimilated also.

That's highly monocular of you.

Not working at all for me. I got an error message saying the page isn't working

Lord Jesus you promised that nothing would be hidden but all would be made public, we pray that those who were involved in pushing this AI and turning people into cyborgs will reveal the hidden truth concerning the globalists agenda, the mark of the beast, and bringing everyone into slavery.

but max, what about resistance? futile?

The only threat to the AI is a bunch of lunatic resistance fighters trying to pull the plug. So as long as you allow the AI to implant a chip into your brain so that the computer has complete control of what you think while also being able to monitor all of your thoughts, speech and communication you are fine. But if you are not willing to let the computer have complete control then you leave the AI no other choice but to hunt you down with a variety of drones at their disposal. However, even the AI understands that everything must be done in a sustainable way so you will be completely recycled.

Can't say you weren't warned.

The cyborg thing isn't going to happen and AI isn't inherently bad like you're trying to portray

Wow! No accusation of a tin foil hat conspiracy? You have changed? What happened too many times of accusing people of tin foil hat conspiracies blow up in your face? BTW, you never answered my question, in the last 100 years how much has sea level risen as a result of Climate change?

Rising sea levels are not the only concern of climate change. We've had this discussion before
And open AI is just an AI that answers questions. Do you think it's going to make your phone turn into a Terminator or something?

Yes, the idea is that we will have glaciers melt and sea level rise. If glaciers are melting then we would see sea level rise. Since we are not seeing sea level rise that undermines the theory that glaciers are melting. This is a theory that has 3 legs like a stool and without any of those legs the theory is debunked. So yes, we have an increase in greenhouse gases that have been carefully recorded for the last fifty years. That is one leg. But without sea level rise you need to return to the drawing board. Meanwhile earthquakes and volcanoes have risen 1,000% during that same period of time. That needs to be part of the new theory. Al Gore presented the predictions based on the old model and they are now a joke. You need a new theory. It should be a wake up call when the only people pushing this are: an angry teenager, a waitress, a billionaire flying around in private jets, and a Hollywood actor flying around in private jets. The real scientists are reassessing.

Very naive. I tried this. They have very clearly released this with the idea of kids using it to write their essays and reports. It seems to me it is a propaganda tool, a way to brainwash people.

Now you still have the option to turn it off or ignore it. But if they insert that chip into your brain you lose the option to turn it off. They will know who has the chip and who doesn't. It doesn't matter if 90% refuse to get the chip, they have already made it very clear they will be happy if 90% of the people are killed. That is the goal.

Earthquakes are tectonic shifting. Literally nothing to be done about it
Also already had this conversation but I'll say it again. The brain chip thing isn't going to happen unless people volunteer for it, which they probably won't