Christian Nationalists Have Forgotten Their First Priority

I did this and the cost should be free. I pulled books from the library, used the computer for the children to learn Math and geography, they took Karate at church, they were in the church choir. If you coordinate with 4 other families and your local church the cost should be minimal and parents would only need to supervise one day a week. If you have a husband and wife that is only twice a month for either one of them.

I did not teach lessons. They read books and the authors were their teachers. The only exception was the geography program and math program on the computer. Moses was not a good speaker and yet God sent him to speak to Pharaoh but God also provided Aaron. Most churches with 200 or more members will have a retired teacher in the ranks. You will have a few retired people who may be interested in coming out once a week to help.

No, you obviously have not been in a public school recently, they do not do that.

Also, this is a school. Perhaps in HS silent time is best, but in elementary school and JHS I think it would be best to have children choose which room they want to go to. This way the Christians can pray corporately, the Jews can pray corporately, the Muslims can pray corporately, and the Atheists can have silent time. Also teachers can choose as well. So a Christian teacher can pray with the Christian children, a Muslim teacher can pray with the Muslim children, a Jewish teacher can pray with the Jewish children, and someone else can supervise the atheists.

Yeah but I'm pretty sure Christian nationalist would throw a collective poopy fit if Muslim students wanted their prayer time in school
"Oh no, they're indoctrinating our kids with Sharia law"

Sounds straight from the desk of CNN. I don't think you understand this term is being used as propaganda by the left. I haven't seen any extreme other than the "summer of love" the most expensive in the history of the country.

I have never met any Christians who would have an issue with that, so even if there is someone who would be like that they are few and far between.

I guarantee you there will be more against having a moment to pray/ meditate then Christians against a Muslim praying.

That is such an old stale tactic that when somebody says something is white supremacist, I automatically know that it isn't, lol!

The Communist/Fascist/Anarchist/Racist Democrats have discovered that smearing conservative Americans with the INFLAMMATORY terms "white supremacist" and "racist" helps them to keep blacks under their thumb, and allows them to use identity politics to divide and conquer.

They called Donald Trump a white supremacist and a racist to deliberately inflame hatred against him, since he is neither of those. That was "hate speech" but the Left was perfectly happy with that. They called black Justice Clarence Thomas an "Uncle Tom" because he upholds the Constitution. That too was "hate speech" but no one objected.

The fact of the matter is that White Supremacist groups are very small in number, unlike BLM and Antifa thugs. But no one declared those two groups as domestic terrorists. Now they will be calling Christian Nationalists "terrorists" just like they labeled conservative parents "terrorists" and patriots from January 6 as "insurrectionists". These terms are being thrown around casually, but not a single news source has been consistently calling the Democrats "Communist/Fascist/Anarchist/Racists".

Now former Democrat Tulsi Gabbard has come right out and said that the current core beliefs of the Democrats are the same as those of Hitler and the Nazis. But the RINOs are giving their full support and cooperation to the real domestic enemies of America. So who is worse, an enemy that plainly declares himself an enemy, or a traitor who supports the enemy but does not plainly declare who he is?

Untrue.

How does it feel to be on Christian Chat branding Christians as dangerous.

Do you feel empowered? Does it make you feel powerful deriding Christians.

Liberalism always looks for enemies and works on silencing them. Study history, learn something accurate.

You Mr. Dude are in league with a group of people hell bent on the destruction of society and they are using Christians as the scapegoat.

I hope you feel really good about it.

Wow bro, ayyyyymen.

AWWWESOME!!!!!

He does. He feels he's right. He's drunk the Kool-aid and thinks the poison is good. He is part of the problem, being part of the Matrix the rest of us need to be opposing.

Aww well thank you!

This... *sniff* .. brought a tear to my eye. Oh, must be my allergies acting up again!

I jus call 'em as I see 'em. And that was perfectly put.

Sharia Law indoctrination can be argued for when public school kids are told to take a Muslim name, and basically practice to be a Muslim. Imagine the stroke the ACLU would have if a public school authorized their students to practice what it means to be a Christian.

I know this is off-topic, but it just came to me when reading this post.

There is an historical fact many believers are not aware of: The founders wanted the Bible taught in public schools. Thomas Jefferson got Bibles to the Indian tribes. When they had public prayers, it was to the God of the Bible, not a generic blend of the world's religions, and it certainly was not a Wiccan prayer. They wanted the US founded on Christian principles and a generally Biblical world view.

Why?

Because they saw this as the best generator -- and preserver -- of liberty. People fearing hell-fire judgment are more likely to police themselves, negating the need for a police state.

They didn't like what they saw in other religions around the world. They believed Christianity was a vital foundation for the country. Sorry atheists out there, that is an historical fact, and if you need it, I can prove it -- with their own words.

Now, does this mean that someone who decided to practice Judaism or Islam or Daoism would not be permitted to do so? No it does not. The founders believed in freedom. But, they did want the majority of the country Christian-influenced. That, though, only comes through teaching and convincing the public of the soundness of that, since we are about free will here. And, that is obviously where we have failed.

Well shoot, I'd better put out good posts then

Well I wanna tell ya pardner, we got bushwacked at the pass.