Hegelian Dialectic
1. Thesis -- Problem
2. Antithesis -- Solution
3. Sythesis -- Implementing the solution to the problem I created will result in the actions I was hoping for.
For example, I am a banker, I want to loan a lot of money, billions and billions and I don't ever want it paid off, I just want to receive interest year after year on billions of dollars.
Houses aren't that good, people pay them off after a decade or so, and the paperwork on billions of dollars worth of houses will cost me millions of dollars.
Credit cards are even worse, lot of delinquents, lot of work collecting the money, tracking the money, documenting, and then all the fraud.
No, what the really big bankers do is loan money to countries for wars. You can put a country into debt during WWII and they are still in debt 80 years later, paying off that debt. So the synthesis you are looking for is a big war that will borrow a whole lot of money from you, but you don't want that war in your country you want it somewhere else. This is a problem, people are very willing to fight to protect their home, but are far less interested in fighting in some country that has never done them any harm and is not threatening to do them harm.
So then you have to create a thesis that some people living in tents on the other side of the world want to kill people in America. The Antithesis is "let us do unto them before they do unto us" and poof, you get hundreds of billions in loans, actually over time it is trillions of dollars borrowed. You can send your kids to boarding school, you can live in a gated community, and you attend the country club. You fly in private jets, life is wonderful.
So how do I create this thesis? I am a big sponsor of the main stream media and want that narrative pushed everyday. I also pay millions for candidates to get elected and they in turn pass budgets for billions of dollars (oops I mean trillions of dollars). Life is good!