Calvin did not invent the doctrines of grace

it's "of" - genitive - ownership.

Jesus Christ alone IS the Savior. Without him nobody could be saved. God loves people and made it available for anyone to be saved. He does not want any to perish, but all to come to repentance (2 Pet 3:9).

But God does require something from people in order to save them, about the simplest thing He could: faith in Christ.

We have to use the rules for interpretation the Bible set-forth for its interpretation. No verse of itself should be
taken as doctrine. We should compare other spiritually like verses to arrive at it. For example:

[2Pe 1:20 KJV] 20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.

[1Co 2:13 KJV] 13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.

Agreed. No private interpretation. Suggesting that "all men every where" does not mean all men everywhere is private interpretation.

No, think about what you've just said. were it dependent upon anything but Christ, then He wouldn't/couldn't be the Saviour and
something would be required from the recipient to bring salvation to fruition.

It means that to find out who the "all men" are, is completed elsewhere. Using your definition would make people
co-saviours with Christ and that pov would contradict the entire Bible

Something IS required from the recipient to bring salvation to fruition: faith in the gospel, falth in Jesus Christ.

God does not save people against their will. He is righteous and just. God does not "enable" some people to believe while leaving others to die in their sins.

God is far more loving than Calvinism portrays Him to be.

For God to save someone is neither unrighteous nor unjust - He paid the price to do exactly that.

Respectfully, VARob, one's faith is a byproduct of salvation, not cause. God saves those whom He has chosen irrespective of anything else. He is God and if it is His will, it will happen. Before being saved we all were dead in sin. A spiritually dead person
cannot choose. What is given by God is spiritual life and after receiving it, who would reject it?

[Gal 5:22 KJV] 22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,

[Eph 2:1-2.5 KJV]
1 And you [hath he quickened], who were dead in trespasses and sins;
2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:
5 Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved

To continue a little, would it be "more loving" of God, for someone who was unable to come to faith for reasons outside
of their control to face God's judgment- the infirm, the mentally challenged, the very old, the very young, etc. What would happen
to those who are unable to come to faith?

It is righteous of God to make salvation available to everyone.

That is not true. It is when a person chooses to have faith in the gospel that he becomes saved.

God chooses people who choose Him.

It is God's will for all men to be saved (1 Tim 2:4). He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance (2 Pet 3:9). He commands all men everywhere to repent (Acts 17:30).

That is true.

Yes, they can. Salvation is available to everyone.

And that spiritual life is given when a person chooses to believe the gospel (Eph 1:13).

There have been many saved Christians who have stopped actively pursuing Christianity. Demas, for example.

Yes, faith is a fruit of the spirit, but not the faith to get saved.

We were quickened when we decided to believe the gospel (Eph 1:13).

Yes. We were made alive together with Christ when we chose to believe the gospel.

God will be fair. Nobody will be unjustly condemned.

Very true.

Therefore presenting scripture after scripture to them is futile.
It is not an easy feat to shake them loose from their belief system.
Consider, R. C. Sproul, a brilliant man, knew scripture in depth and yet a Calvinist.

They have, that is not the problem.

Acts 17:30

From Gill's Exposition of the Whole Bible:

What do you make of Jesus being the author of faith?

instead of believing that something (i.e. faith) "would be required from the recipient to bring salvation to fruition", why don't you just believe what Scripture tells us ... that a person is not to suppress the truth in unrighteousness when someone preaches the gospel of Christ to him or her?
.