History of K.J.B.

well so you should,

so I guess you would rather be a smart alec then put what you said right.

But let me make this clear, seeing as you like to make things clear.

I want to see you write down the words you where wrong to tell me your wife was dead like that.

Then I want to see you write down if you believe
April 24, 2024 is a rapture date.

Then I want to see you write down if it's right to call the holy bible the king James bible

Then I want to you write down if you believe it's ok to keep on insulting people.

Then I want to know how come you've started 20 threads or so in a week your no longer replying to.

are you copying pasting someone else's ideas.

Is there a King Jesus Bible

James actually was the Lords brother, but yea...be good if there was a King Jesus Bible.

KJV is just the Holy Bible offered up in English to the monarch of England and Scotland at the time, King James.

They call it the United Kingdom because that King united England and Scotland and Ireland. I dont know about Wales. Welsh is its own unique langauge. English was the language royalty spoke and most of the common people in England spoke. Scots people speak a dialect of English.


Scripture was translated into English but it would not have been written in the way ordinary people spoke english at the time. (with all its regional variations and slang) The Bible is a very ancient book and was written by many different people over time that God inspired - prophets.

I think its an amazing book...well actually 66 books (even though some of them are letters) and must have been a huge undertaking translating it all. Reading it will change your life. Sure God can speak to you without it but Hes said most of everything you'll need to know of Him in His book.

Exactly. The language of the KJV is unique to the Bible itself. One only has to compare the language in the preface ("The Translators to the Reader") to what is in the Bible to see the difference. At the same time, scholars of English literature in recent times have stated that the KJV itself molded the English language, and many of the sayings in the Bible have become a part of the language. Indeed they consider this translation a classic in its own right. Even its enemies in the 19th century felt compelled to praise this bible.

But the Authorized Version (spelled Authorised Version for the British) was not merely to satisfy King James. The Calvinistic Puritans in the Church of England were not too happy with the Bishops Bible, and they demanded a fresh translation. James -- as the "head" of the Church of England -- simply authorized this translation, but under strict rules. So even though all the translators were not Puritans, the collective translation committee had only one goal in mind -- to produce a translation to which no one would taken exception. And that is exactly what happened until modern unbelieving textual critics began attacking this venerable bible in the late 19th century.

The Greek word ‘aion’ for world is in (ALL) the following verses. Now, if some say the word ‘World” in Matthew 24:3 means age, it must be it means age in the following verses that use the same Greek word ‘aion.’

Take ‘world’ out and replace it with ‘age.’

Matthew 12:32, “neither in this age, neither in the age to come.”

Matthew 13:22, “The cares of the age.”

Luke 20:34, Jesus said, “The children of this age marry, and are Luke 20:35, Jesus said, those “counted worthy to obtain that age,”

John 9:32, “Since the age began was it not heard---.”

Acts 3:21, “which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the age began.”

Acts 15:18, “Know unto God are all his works from the beginning of the age.”

The N.I.V. was first published in 1974; that’s why it’s called the ‘New” International Version. It has gone through at least three new copyrights that I know of since 1974. Those who did the work apparently did not know what they were doing.

The New World Translation of the Jehovah’s Witnesses used the K.J.V. until 1951, but the King James disagreed with their teaching, so they published their version and have had four copyright changes since 1951. Why? Because they are themselves corrupt.

The N.A.S.V. came out in 1971 and has five new copyrights.

Let’s now move on to a few changes in the N.I.V. concerning the term “only begotten Son.”

N.I.V. John 1:14, “the glory of the One and Only,”

John 1:18, “but God the One and Only,”

John 3:16, “he gave his one and only Son.” Why did they go from upper to lowercase? Strange.”

John 3:18, “God’s one and only Son.” Same, lowercase.

Acts 13:33, “You are my Son; today I have become your Father.” What!!! K.J.V. “Today I have begotten thee.”

1 John 4:9, “He sent his one and only Son.”

So, here’s what we have to replace only begotten Son. One and Only once: one and only twice; “Today I have become your Father, once.”

No consistency.

K.J.V. Matthew 17:19, The disciples asked Jesus, “Why could not we cast him (the demon) out?” Jesus said, Verse 21, “Howbeit this kind (of demon) goeth not out but by prayer and fasting.”

In the N.I.V., verse 21 has been removed and put into the footnotes—a question with no answer in the text.

In Acts 8:37, the N.I.V. removed verse 37. Here was Philips’s reply to the eunuch, K.J.V.: “If thou believest with all thine heart, thou may. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.”

In Acts 23:9, “Let us not fight against God” has been removed.

I can give hundreds of examples of errors in the N.I.V. Go check it out.

Rev 1:6 And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.

Jesus made us kings and He is the King of kings which He is King of the saints.

And we are priests and Jesus is the High Priest.

Some people may argue we are not kings but Jesus made us kings so who are they to argue.

But I understand how they think that they will not say we are kings for that is false, and giving glory to ourselves, but Jesus is the King so He above them so what is the problem.

If you say you are a king it is not wrong for Jesus made you that way and does not take away His glory for He is the King of kings, the saints, so He is still above them.

It is strange that there is a book with one meaning throughout it and many people argue over the meaning of it.

Rev 1:6 And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.

The saints are kings and priests with Jesus being the King of kings, the saints, and the High Priest.

nice verse i wonder what @GRACE_ambassador would make of that 😊. She was unhappy about the idea 🤔

amen it reminds me of a song to 😊

The Ryder's will not stop us because the only love they'll find is paradise

Here's one more in case anyone is interested.

History of KJV and Why I Use It

Then there's this \/.

Best watched at higher 720 resolution.
Adjust with the settings.
Those who love God's Word be warned that this movie/ documentary may cause excessive tearing of the eyes.

Extra by Ronald Reagan and great news following credits, so stay tuned.
☕🙂👍📖
Trigger Warning


Then This \/