The truth about Muhammad "Feedback appreciated"

So I don't need to watch the video to know what will be said. In Islam a holy war is not considered immoral. They believe it is justified, they are doing it in the name of their god.

Well he didn't do it alone did he?!

that's right netanyahu says Adolf struck deals with the arabs.

But then netanyahu likes John Hagee who said God trained Adolf to be a hunter.

I guess the word go figure springs to mind 😁

this is what's written in there Quran

And they all have long debates over it

Point to me where it says " Jesus is the Son of God and there is no other way but through Him," because I'm not seeing it.

I'm not going to debate on behalf of Islam, I'm only going to show you what they say.

You asked where do they claim Jesus is the Messiah

I showed you.

Some arabs or Muslims, what ever you call you them, claim he is the Messiah, other muslims debate if Messiah means healing or traveling.

I'm only telling you what I've found out.

I think the reason why they debate so much is because Muhammed could not read or write

Can you post the Hagee quote? Thanks. Hitlers brain child was the Holocaust and he was evil enough to sway like minded fools.

I can post you three quotes one where netanyahu quotes Adolf did deals with Muslims

One where netanyahu gives John Hagee approval.

One where John Hagee quotes God used Hitler to bring the Jews home.

But I would have to spend a while finding them.

And right now my truck as just been dropped off, so I have to take it back to the depo.

Truck driving, all the men in my family have or are doing that for a living. A lot of hard work.
Yes, I believe God took the evil that Hitler intended and gave the Jews a safe place to go, their own homeland.

While Islam condemns adultery, it is permitted for a Muslim man to rape an infidel (unbeliever). Some women were raped by their Hamas captors. Some are pregnant. There is nothing of any moral, natural or spiritual value in Islam. It is utterly opposed to Christianity and any religion not Islam. Some Muslim countries tolerate Christians, Turkey for one. Many do not, especially the Middle East. Every culture has its own moral standards. Just because something the Bible condemns is also condemned by a particular culture does not make that culture acceptable to God.

Muslims are terrified of sinning. There is no saviour in Islam. It is a twisted and sick religion. What other religion encourages suicide by promising paradise to those who blow up their enemies? And themselves in the process?

but yet the idea that angels mated with humans is allowed 🤑🤑🤑🥵🥵🤢🤢🤮👺

I would rather post this

Why are you sharing it? Is there a point to it?

the Muslims are gentiles too 😂

I've seen some videos that say that the wall facing Mecca, the direction of prayer, in the earliest mosques actually faced Petra in the Levant. Al-Qur'an mentions olive trees and tribes which are present in that part of the world, but not down in what is now Mecca. Also, they argue that there is no historical evidence found that Mecca existed as a city in the time Muhammad supposedly lived there. The direction of prayer walls changed over time toward Mecca, with some being between the two locations, probably while there was some fighting to see who would control the empire.

I suspect there was a Muhammad, but I am also open to the idea that stories about Muhammad are partly a bit like Aeneas in the Aeneid is to Octavian, stories about the ruler or rulers of the dynasty modified a bit and set in the past.

1 Corinthians 4:6
I have applied all these things to myself and Apollos for your benefit, brothers, that you may learn by us not to go beyond what is written, that none of you may be puffed up in favour of one against another.

Also, no where did God say, he will give another book besides the Bible.

Jude 1:3

Beloved, although I was very eager to write to you about our common salvation, I found it necessary to write appealing to you to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints.

"Furthermore, the Roman historians Pliny the Younger and Seutonius, along with non-Roman historians Thallus, Phlegon, and the satirist Lucian of Samsota, refer to the crucifixion of Jesus in their writings. (Martin Hengel s book, Crucifixion in the Ancient World, gives more details.) "
https://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/kmi/off...an historians Pliny,World, gives more details.)

“And with regard to the eclipse in the time of Tiberius Caesar, in whose reign Jesus appears to have been crucified, and the great earthquakes which then took place, Phlegon too, I think, has written in the thirteenth or fourteenth book of his Chronicles”12

“On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were rent by an earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were thrown down. This darkness Thallus in the third book of his History, calls, as appears to me without reason, an eclipse of the sun.”14


“The Christians, you know, worship a man to this day,–the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account…. You see, these misguided

Or the Jews by killing their wise king,

and cursed the name of Christ. But they declared that the sum of their guilt or their error only amounted to this,

“At this time there was a wise man who was called Jesus. His conduct was good, and [he] was known to be virtuous. And many people from among the Jews and the other nations became his disciples. Pilate condemned him to be crucified and to die. But those who had become his disciples did not abandon his discipleship. They reported that he had appeared to them three days after his crucifixion, and that he was alive; accordingly he was perhaps the Messiah concerning whom the prophets have recounted wonders.”27

Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judæa, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular.”31

https://biblearchaeologyreport.com/...cal-references-to-jesus-outside-of-the-bible/

https://christianchat.com/arab-chri...dback-appreciated.196621/page-22#post-5234808

[95] L Trajan to Pliny.

You assuredly know, my dear Pliny, how sparingly I grant these favours, for I often declare in the senate that I have not exceeded the number with which I told that august order I should be content. However, I have granted your request, and I have ordered a note to be entered on my diaries that I have bestowed the privilege of the ius trium liberorum upon Suetonius Tranquillus on the customary understanding.



[96] L To Trajan.

It is my custom, Sir, to refer to you in all cases where I do not feel sure, for who can better direct my doubts or inform my ignorance? I have never been present at any legal examination of the Christians, and I do not know, therefore, what are the usual penalties passed upon them, or the limits of those penalties, or how searching an inquiry should be made. I have hesitated a great deal in considering whether any distinctions should be drawn according to the ages of the accused; whether the weak should be punished as severely as the more robust; whether if they renounce their faith they should be pardoned, or whether the man who has once been a Christian should gain nothing by recanting; whether the name itself, even though otherwise innocent of crime, should be punished, or only the crimes that gather round it.

In the meantime, this is the plan which I have adopted in the case of those Christians who have been brought before me. I ask them whether they are Christians; if they say yes, then I repeat the question a second and a third time, warning them of the penalties it entails, and if they still persist, I order them to be taken away to prison. For I do not doubt that, whatever the character of the crime may be which they confess, their pertinacity and inflexible obstinacy certainly ought to be punished. * There were others who showed similar mad folly whom I reserved to be sent to Rome, as they were Roman citizens. ** Subsequently, as is usually the way, the very fact of my taking up this question led to a great increase of accusations, and a variety of cases were brought before me. A pamphlet was issued anonymously, containing the names of a number of people. Those who denied that they were or had been Christians and called upon the gods in the usual formula, reciting the words after me, those who offered incense and wine before your image, which I had given orders to be brought forward for this purpose, together with the statues of the deities - all such I considered should be discharged, especially as they cursed the name of Christ, which, it is said, those who are really Christians cannot be induced to do. Others, whose names were given me by an informer, first said that they were Christians and afterwards denied it, declaring that they had been but were so no longer, some of them having recanted many years before, and more than one so long as twenty years back. They all worshipped your image and the statues of the deities, and cursed the name of Christ. But they declared that the sum of their guilt or their error only amounted to this, that on a stated day they had been accustomed to meet before daybreak and to recite a hymn among themselves to Christ, as though he were a god, and that so far from binding themselves by oath to commit any crime, their oath was to abstain from theft, robbery, adultery, and from breach of faith, and not to deny trust money placed in their keeping when called upon to deliver it. When this ceremony was concluded, it had been their custom to depart and meet again to take food, but it was of no special character and quite harmless, and they had ceased this practice after the edict in which, in accordance with your orders, I had forbidden all secret societies. † I thought it the more necessary, therefore, to find out what truth there was in these statements by submitting two women, who were called deaconesses, to the torture, but I found nothing but a debased superstition carried to great lengths. So I postponed my examination, and immediately consulted you. The matter seems to me worthy of your consideration, especially as there are so many people involved in the danger. Many persons of all ages, and of both sexes alike, are being brought into peril of their lives by their accusers, and the process will go on. For the contagion of this superstition has spread not only through the free cities, but into the villages and the rural districts, and yet it seems to me that it can be checked and set right. It is beyond doubt that the temples, which have been almost deserted, are beginning again to be thronged with worshippers, that the sacred rites which have for a long time been allowed to lapse are now being renewed, and that the food for the sacrificial victims is once more finding a sale, whereas, up to recently, a buyer was hardly to be found. From this it is easy to infer what vast numbers of people might be reclaimed, if only they were given an opportunity of repentance.

https://www.attalus.org/old/pliny10b.html#96