Total Depravity

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Hakawaka

Active member
Jul 1, 2021
307
157
43
True. God changes a person's heart so they CAN understand, because until then, the gospel message is foolishness.


Does God make everyone (every single person) alive while they were dead in their sins? I do not see that in Scripture.
Are you reformed in your soteriology or no`? Not here to label you, but here to understnad
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,467
450
83
well ... you may have to "go into that here" in order for me to understand what you're saying.

It appears you're saying:

Abel brought his offeringthen in process of time, Cain brought his offeringthen God accepted Abel's offering but did not accept Cain's offering
or is it:


Abel brought his offeringGod accepted Abel's offeringin process of time, Cain brought his offeringGod did not accept Cain's offering
please clarify ... and explain why it is that Abel brought his offering before Cain even though in Scripture it appears that Cain brought his offering "and Abel, he also" ... from the way the record appears in Scripture it looks like they both offered pretty much at the same time ... thanks
https://hebrew.billmounce.com/BBH.1st.17.pdf

This chapter from Mounce should help you. If you look at an interlinear Hebrew-English text of Gen. 4, you should note which verbs have a waw prefix and which verbs do not. Where there is a perfect verb without a waw prefix, it is beginning a sequential chain of actions or states that includes the subsequent imperfect verbs with waw prefix. If a new perfect verb not having waw prefix is introduced into the narrative, the sequence is broken and the perfect verb without waw prefix is NOT temporally sequential to the previous chain, but begins a new temporal chain. followed by as many imperfect verbs with waw prefix as follow it.

You will see that Gen 4 verses 1, 2 and 3 give a single chain of waw + imperf3ct verb forms following the perfect verb from at the beginning, the verb "knew", in "And-Adam knew Eve..."Therefore all the verbs in vv 1-3 are temporally sequential.

But verse 4 has a perfect verb form without waw, so iit is NOT sequential to verses 1, 2 and 3. It happened not after, but some time before the last verb on the previous chain. So, Abel had brought his offering before Cain had.

Verse 5 introduces another perfect verb without waw, so is introducing a chain that is temporally disconnected from the previous chain in the narrative. "[God] did not respect...." This indicated that the narrative is jumping to a another event that was not narratively sequential to Abel's offering. The narrative is jumping back to the events of verse 3, making verse 4 parenthical to verses 1-3 and 5.

That is why I undertand Abel made his offering first and Cain took his lead lqter. It is cnjecture how Cain recognised that Abel's offering was accepted and his was not. My theory is by the productivity of their labours in the year following each of their offerings.
 

Beckworth

Active member
May 15, 2019
597
199
43
I understand it a little differently ... we are under sin because we are born after the image and likeness of our parents.

Adam was created in the likeness of God (Gen 5:1) ... descendants of Adam are born after the image and likeness of their parents (Gen 5:3).

As far as Romans 5:12, the verse states that sin entered into the world through Adam and it is death that passed upon all men ... because all sin.

possibly a little nit-picky on my part ... but that's the way I understand it.
.

Read Ezekiel 18. Sin is not inherited. We did not inherit Adam’s sin. We suffer the CONSEQUENCES of his sin—an evil world, a cursed earth, hard work, pain in childbearing; but we are not BORN SINNERS because of Adam’s sin. God says a son does NOT inherit the sin of his father. The one who sins is the one who dies.
Also, Psalms 106:38 talks about those people who offered their children to idols, God says they shed INNOCENT blood. Babies and children are innocent Jesus used a little child as an example of purity and innocence and said we must become like them if we want to go to heaven.
GOD DOES NOT SEND BABIES TO HELL.
 

Hakawaka

Active member
Jul 1, 2021
307
157
43
None of those texts say that all men are completely corrupt and every person's deeds are filthy rags. I recognise your resort to a moralistic argument: i.e. Paul Thomson is proud because he does not admit to complete and thorough depravity. Be careful not to listen to that ungodly fellow, or I will label you proud as well. You don't want to be considered proud, do you, for acknowledging some good in yourself?
Luke 1:6
And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.

Ecclesiastes 7:29
Truly, this only I have found: That God made man upright, But they have sought out many schemes.”

That verse completely destroys total depravity in my view. God made man UPRIGHT, its us who are seeking out many schemes and making crooked our paths which are infact straight (and narrow!)
 

Hakawaka

Active member
Jul 1, 2021
307
157
43
I wonder if the people are aware that calvinism would be better called augustinianism. As Augustine was the one who originally brought this idea to the church, some say from manichean gnosticism, I haven't looked into the topic enough to make that judgment. What I do know is: Before he shows up, no church father ever talks about determinism. In fact, they ALL unanimously agree on FREE WILL, despite them disagreeing on a multitude of topics.

For the sake of the readers I will post a few of these:


  • 110-165AD Justin Martyr "We have learned from the prophets, and we hold it to be true, that punishments, chastisements, and rewards are rendered according to the merit of each man's actions. Otherwise, if all things happen by fate, then nothing is in our own power. For if it be predestined that one man be good and another man evil, then the first is not deserving of praise or the other to be blamed. Unless humans have the power of avoiding evil and choosing good by free choice, they are not accountable for their actions-whatever they may be.... For neither would a man be worthy of reward or praise if he did not of himself choose the good, but was merely created for that end. Likewise, if a man were evil, he would not deserve punishment, since he was not evil of himself, being unable to do anything else than what he was made for." (Justin First Apology chap. 43)
  • 190 AD Clement of Alexandria "A man by himself working and toiling at freedom from sinful desires achieves nothing. But if he plainly shows himself to be very eager and earnest about this, he attains it by the addition of the power of God. God works together with willing souls. But if the person abandons his eagerness, the spirit from God is also restrained. To save the unwilling is the act of one using compulsion; but to save the willing, that of one showing grace." (Clement Salvation of the Rich Man chap. 21)
  • 190 AD Clement of Alexandria "Neither praise nor condemnation, neither rewards nor punishments, are right if the soul does not have the power of choice and avoidance, if evil is involuntary." (Clement Miscellanies bk. 1, chap. 17)
  • 250-300 AD Archelaus "All the creatures that God made, He made very good. And He gave to every individual the sense of free will, by which standard He also instituted the law of judgment.... And certainly whoever will, may keep the commandments. Whoever despises them and turns aside to what is contrary to them, shall yet without doubt have to face this law of judgment.... There can be no doubt that every individual, in using his own proper power of will, may shape his course in whatever direction he pleases." (Archelaus Disputation With Manes sees. 32, 33)
  • 260-315 AD Methodius "Those [pagans] who decide that man does not have free will, but say that he is governed by the unavoidable necessities of fate, are guilty of impiety toward God Himself, making Him out to be the cause and author of human evils. " (Methodius The Banquet of the Ten Virgins discourse 8, chap. 16)
Quoted from here: https://www.bible.ca/H-Freewill.htm

More quotes and discussion on the topic here: https://soteriology101.com/2014/12/16/did-the-early-church-fathers-teach-calvinistic-doctrine/
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
5,773
2,253
113
Luke 1:6
And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.

Ecclesiastes 7:29
Truly, this only I have found: That God made man upright, But they have sought out many schemes.”

That verse completely destroys total depravity in my view. God made man UPRIGHT, its us who are seeking out many schemes and making crooked our paths which are in fact straight (and narrow!)
I think the concept of 'total depravity" is a required to tenet (by taking verses out of contexts) as a rational for the other tenets.

Man is a sinner because he sins, not because he is inherently depraved or born a sinner.
Yet because of the weakness of his carnal nature, man cannot overcome sin.
Only in Jesus Christ can man be freed from sin’s power which wars against his soul.
Romans 6 explains this.

However, this does not mean that man is incapable of responding in faith to the Truth of the Gospel message.
 

Hakawaka

Active member
Jul 1, 2021
307
157
43
I think the concept of 'total depravity" is a required to tenet (by taking verses out of contexts) as a rational for the other tenets.

Man is a sinner because he sins, not because he is inherently depraved or born a sinner.
Yet because of the weakness of his carnal nature, man cannot overcome sin.
Only in Jesus Christ can man be freed from sin’s power which wars against his soul.
Romans 6 explains this.

However, this does not mean that man is incapable of responding in faith to the Truth of the Gospel message.
For sure, calvinism is part of the "domino-theology" family. One falls down and it all comes crashing down.

I agree with you. This debate should never exist, but thanks to Augustine it does. I am personally invested in this because of God's holiness and righteousness. I don't like it when they compare my Father to the islamic god who has just predestined everything to be the way that it is, while clearly many many things are in violation of God's laws here on earth.

If you've spent some times watching debates on the subject, you can tell how cold the calvinists tend to be, cold, condescending....
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
5,773
2,253
113
I wonder if the people are aware that calvinism would be better called augustinianism. As Augustine was the one who originally brought this idea to the church, some say from manichean gnosticism, I haven't looked into the topic enough to make that judgment. What I do know is: Before he shows up, no church father ever talks about determinism. In fact, they ALL unanimously agree on FREE WILL, despite them disagreeing on a multitude of topics.
:)
I stated this as well on different thread.
Interesting his thinking being given so much weight after the Protestant Reformation via Calvinism.

The Early Church was continually defending the doctrine of the will free to make choices which are not always predetermined and refuting the Gnostic's who held to the doctrine of total inability and determinism or fatalism.

Having stated this John Calvin did not teach saving faith was a gift, this is a more recent permutation to make the tenets of the reformed movement more cohesive.

In his commentary on Ephesians, John Calvin said, Paul’s “meaning is, not that faith is the gift of God, but that salvation is given to us by God.”
John Calvin, Commentaries on the Epistles of Paul to the Galatians and Ephesians (Edinburgh: Calvin Translation Society, 1855), 228–229.

John Calvin understood it properly.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
5,773
2,253
113
For sure, calvinism is part of the "domino-theology" family. One falls down and it all comes crashing down.

I agree with you. This debate should never exist, but thanks to Augustine it does. I am personally invested in this because of God's holiness and righteousness. I don't like it when they compare my Father to the islamic god who has just predestined everything to be the way that it is, while clearly many many things are in violation of God's laws here on earth.

If you've spent some times watching debates on the subject, you can tell how cold the calvinists tend to be, cold, condescending....
Sadly these ideas are ubiquitous .. they have made their way into Baptist Churches and non-denominational churches.

I have an article on file somewhere how young Calvinists have been trained and sent out to become pastors of churches across North America.
So yes this debate would never exist for the fact but some people somewhere seem to want to keep promoting it.
A different god than the God of scripture.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
5,773
2,253
113
If you've spent some times watching debates on the subject, you can tell how cold the calvinists tend to be, cold, condescending....

Yes, and they use the Saul Alinsky tactic sometimes.:censored:
There is a study on the psychological profile of people drawn to this view and those who adopt it, it is very interesting.

I have had friends in the Reformed Church, and I will say they were quite nice, friendly, but they do have a sense that they are the 'elect" above the fray.
I will say some of their scholarship is very good when it not overly tainted with with their "tulip" tenets.

Glad you are here we need more balance on this board. :)
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,775
29,154
113
Are you reformed in your soteriology or no`? Not here to label you, but here to understnad
Isn't reformed a label? Calvinists say I am not reformed. I say I am not a Calvinist. I am
not Arminian either. Some say those are the only choices, but there is also Molinism. :)
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,775
29,154
113
If you've spent some times watching debates on the subject, you can tell how cold the calvinists tend to be, cold, condescending....
This is a bit funny/peculiar/odd given the absolutely caustic remarks aimed at some
of us whom others would accuse of being Calvinists even though we are not. The haste
with which they wish to label us, the erroneous assumptions and false accusations made...
and the hypocrisy. Yes, truly stunning at times.
 

Evmur

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2021
5,219
2,618
113
London
christianchat.com
Fact is babies are not born dead unless they are still births.

They receive what they need through the placenta until they are born, and typically the baby takes its first breathe within about 10 seconds, a little gasp with typically a cry, as the baby reacts to change in its environment.
Medline Plus.
wrong

... the doctor smacked your bottom to make you breathe
 

Evmur

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2021
5,219
2,618
113
London
christianchat.com
Faith in God. faith in God links us back into God. Jesus is the mediator of that linking, whether we know Him or not. The gospel gives assurance of salvation by revealing/explaining the mechanism by which God has proven His desire for reconciliation with mankind. It is the love of God that is in Christ that draws people to God, whether they have heard the name of Jesus or not. Faith in God links us to the life that is in God and revealed in the clearest possible manner in Jesus and the cross.
this is a perfect piece of nonsense

high blown nah de dah, meaningless philosophy.

Faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the word of God. The gospel is the power of God unto salvation.... to everyone who believes.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
5,773
2,253
113
wrong

... the doctor smacked your bottom to make you breathe
Even when they did that the baby was not dead.

The doctor suctions the nose and mouth, they do not need to be slapped to breathe, once they have been suctioned they breathe.
They are not dead, they still receive what they need via the placenta.
As well, my first hand experience also supports this.
Babies are not born dead unless they are still births.

This is not really debatable it is a fact.
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,467
450
83
wrong

... the doctor smacked your bottom to make you breathe
Funny! If it was that easy to raise the dead, doctors in hospitals would be slapping flat-liners' bottoms instead of using the electric paddles.
 

Hakawaka

Active member
Jul 1, 2021
307
157
43
Isn't reformed a label? Calvinists say I am not reformed. I say I am not a Calvinist. I am
not Arminian either. Some say those are the only choices, but there is also Molinism. :)
Molinism? I have to look into that. I have heard it mentioned by James White when talking about William Lane Craig. It seemed really complicated so I never looked into it. I will now.