I agree the man of sin is known by many names but not "The Anti-Christ"
He is anti-christ by his deeds, but there have been many anti-christ in the past and even today.
My opinion is to just call him anti-christ does not explain just how evil and wicked this man is.
Daniel 9:26-27 does not referring to the man of sin.
Jesus is the one who confirms the covenant promised by the Father in Jer. 34. Go study Hebrews.
The people of the prince to come are referring to Vespasian's army that entered Israel in 67 and destroyed the city, temple and the nation in 70 under thee leadership of his son Titus.
Vespasian returned to Rome in 68 and was made Emperor leaving his army (the people of the prince) to complete the destruction of Israel just as Jesus said would happen.
He is anti-christ by his deeds, but there have been many anti-christ in the past and even today.
My opinion is to just call him anti-christ does not explain just how evil and wicked this man is.
Daniel 9:26-27 does not referring to the man of sin.
Jesus is the one who confirms the covenant promised by the Father in Jer. 34. Go study Hebrews.
The people of the prince to come are referring to Vespasian's army that entered Israel in 67 and destroyed the city, temple and the nation in 70 under thee leadership of his son Titus.
Vespasian returned to Rome in 68 and was made Emperor leaving his army (the people of the prince) to complete the destruction of Israel just as Jesus said would happen.
The anti-Christ will always plot the death of the Son, whether He be on the earth as a man or in us as Spirit. It’s to the enemy's advantage that he finds the child immature. An immature Son is no threat to the enemy’s schemes.