Is there a difference.....

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

daisyseesthesun

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2024
797
444
63
#21
We understand there are rights and wrongs, but liberals don't. You'll never convince a liberal that way. Abortion is always going to be wrong, but they will never believe abortion is wrong. They think it's their right. The only way to argue this point is to make it personal, based on the mother's point of view. She will likely think that having the baby will ruin her life and ambitions, but telling her this is not so and that there are many programs and childcare today will allow her to pursue her dreams. It would be better to say, "You will lose your closest family member, your best friend, and it will hurt your psyche to abort such a gift. You will always wonder what the child was like or how old he/she would be today. Yes, you may have more children later on, but who knows, you might like this child more (after all, the first child is blessed by God)
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
61,521
30,530
113
#23
Not a bad suggestion but like you said Rose, depending on the mood and emotional distress level of the person who is going to have the abortion the best you can do, I have found, is to try to help people you know something about as opposed to strangers who might get triggered, angry or even attack you.
People that you know are usually family and friends and since you know something about them then you can suggest ideas which don’t make them angry.
Maybe the other option is to try to listen to the stranger on the street why she is trying to have an abortion and maybe suggest other things like give up the baby for adoption as opposed to murder or depending what the situation is.
This is a very complicated and personal topic so if you try to make people feel guilty they’re going to have an angry response at you because they know it’s wrong.
Almost all the females that have this procedure are affected and traumatized on some level so they know it beforehand.
The question is how to get them to change their minds without pushing them.
It’s not an easy topic.
It’s a very difficult topic!
Just like guns is a difficult topic despite killings of many children in schools.
Back in the day... well, back when I was a teen, to have sex outside of marriage was still more or less a shameful thing in the eyes of the older gens, though more and more people were dong it, and living out of wedlcok, so over time it slowly became more common-place and accepted. And if you think about it, the issue that people are fighting for is really at least in part sexual freedoms, and this ties in too with all the pronoun nonsense and gay and trans issues of/with anything goes any more... except cheating on your partner! This always strikes me as a little bit more than a little incongruous because on the one hand they fight tooth and nail for sexual freedom (to where murder is acceptable) but then they draw the line at straying when it is part and parcel of the whole serial monogamy and multiple partners' scenario.
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,567
2,642
113
#24
This is a link to an AP article stating that abortions are up since Roe-Wade as overturned.

https://www.breitbart.com/news/abor...icated-picture-as-women-turn-to-pills-travel/

The kindest thing I can say about this article is that it is highly one-sided and biased. It's factuality is questionable. I will leave my criticism at that!

My question, in God's eyes is there a difference between nationally supported and approved abortions, and abortions supported by States?
LACK OF DATA:

The journalists at AP gave no data to support their thesis.

1.) They offered links to many adjacent issues, but they gave no links to data supporting their actual thesis that "abortions are up since Roe-Wade was overturned."

2.) Their thesis may be true, but when professional journalists, who are trained in acquiring evidence, make a very strong and controversial claim but fail to support it with evidence, it is frequently because there is no such evidence.

3.) It seems prudent to be skeptical of this thesis until we see:
a.) evidence
b.) an explanation of the methodology used to to derive the evidence

.
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
2,102
511
113
#26
Bro, you’re talking to a Christian audience about abortion.
Why?
What’s the purpose of this discussion?
Everyone here (I hope) knows that abortion is murder.
I have a few ideas why you mention this topic while you ignore guns but I’m trying to walk with you not ahead of you.
Why are you asking me instead of Seeker47?!
 

Cranberry

Active member
Dec 7, 2024
320
106
43
#27
It is my view we should not be surprised abortion remains in practice in this world where Satan is lord.

After all, the wages of Sin is death.
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
2,102
511
113
#28
The argument of viability = personhood fails miserably when you consider that a great many post-birth persons are non-viable on their own. If we take the viability position to its logical conclusion, then it is merely "abortion of a non-viable mass of cells" to refuse life support for those who have suffered a major injury or illness. Then you get people redefining "viability" based on other factors in order to encompass rare edge cases, just like they do with murder of the unborn.

Try again.
Actually, the viability argument is gaining ground and may be the most common against the pro choicers at this time, but I was planning on trying again as soon as y/all catch up with where I am at regarding the steps to take in order to get our society to ban abortion.
 

Eli1

Well-known member
Apr 5, 2022
5,164
2,236
113
47
#29
Why are you asking me instead of Seeker47?!
Because i like you and because you're making these technical arguments about trying to tell the audience that abortion it's murder.
We already know!
So the question i had for you was: Have you tried talking to a liberal atheist at an abortion clinic about this topic?
 

Seeker47

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2018
1,151
988
113
#30
Because i like you and because you're making these technical arguments about trying to tell the audience that abortion it's murder.
We already know!
So the question i had for you was: Have you tried talking to a liberal atheist at an abortion clinic about this topic?
My OP was not about abortions of convenience but about God's reaction to overturning Roe and what will happen to those states that continue to allow unrestricted abortions.
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,567
2,642
113
#31
So the question i had for you was: Have you tried talking to a liberal atheist at an abortion clinic about this topic?
You've definitely put your finger on the dilemma.


Although "some" pro-choicers are merely misinformed, most simply have no interest in the legal or philosophical status of the unborn... they just want this unpleasant responsibility terminated.

Our society has a serious problem of conscience, an unfathomable blackness of heart, to have no care for the life of their own babies.
The problem is this blackness of heart... not clever debate.
We can win the debates, we surely can... but that doesn't solve the problem.



I'm sure we're in agreement here.

.
.
 

Eli1

Well-known member
Apr 5, 2022
5,164
2,236
113
47
#32
My OP was not about abortions of convenience but about God's reaction to overturning Roe and what will happen to those states that continue to allow unrestricted abortions.
This question is very loaded with a heavy mix of political and theological doctrines which is very difficult for me to give you a straight answer as to what God's reaction is at this point in time, while we're both alive and the hot topic of the day is abortion which is very hyped in opposite fashion by both political parties.
 

Eli1

Well-known member
Apr 5, 2022
5,164
2,236
113
47
#33
You've definitely put your finger on the dilemma.


Although "some" pro-choicers are merely misinformed, most simply have no interest in the legal or philosophical status of the unborn... they just want this unpleasant responsibility terminated.

Our society has a serious problem of conscience, an unfathomable blackness of heart, to have no care for the life of their own babies.
The problem is this blackness of heart... not clever debate.
We can win the debates, we surely can... but that doesn't solve the problem.



I'm sure we're in agreement here.

.
.
Well said Maxwell and good to see you again.
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
2,102
511
113
#35
Because i like you and because you're making these technical arguments about trying to tell the audience that abortion it's murder.
We already know!
So the question i had for you was: Have you tried talking to a liberal atheist at an abortion clinic about this topic?
Well, I would like it better if you would engage in a discussion instead of trolling me.

Given that most folks would probably agree that abortions should not be allowed after the age of viability or when fetuses are able to survive outside of the womb, the question became whether folks could be persuaded with proper education to agree that abortions should not be permitted beyond the stage when the brain waves used to determine a person is alive are detectable, which may be called "sentience". I like to think most folks are reasonable enough to agree with this logic.

Sentience is detectable at about the 8th week the last time I checked, so society's agreement on this point would eliminate seven months of abortions, and we only need to move the Overton Window another couple of months. :^)
 

Eli1

Well-known member
Apr 5, 2022
5,164
2,236
113
47
#36
Well, I would like it better if you would engage in a discussion instead of trolling me.

Given that most folks would probably agree that abortions should not be allowed after the age of viability or when fetuses are able to survive outside of the womb, the question became whether folks could be persuaded with proper education to agree that abortions should not be permitted beyond the stage when the brain waves used to determine a person is alive are detectable, which may be called "sentience". I like to think most folks are reasonable enough to agree with this logic.

Sentience is detectable at about the 8th week the last time I checked, so society's agreement on this point would eliminate seven months of abortions, and we only need to move the Overton Window another couple of months. :^)
First of all you do passive trolling yourself. Can't tell if it's conscious or unconscious.
Second, Donald Trump himself trolls people all day. It's a lot of fun and engaging for those who want and are able to engage.
You, are man enough to handle it which is why i engage you because i like you. I know you get a little sensitive when people disagree with you while showing humor or being serious but when you use the word 'troll' in this case is to sort of to dismiss things you don't like or agree with, while what you see as 'trolling' is simply a different style of communication which is very direct and to awake you in giving a straight and serious response.
We can talk more about this if you want.

You think proper education is the solution to abortion then?
Okay, i agree with you again. This is along the lines of what Maxwell said, which is a combination of a lot of indoctrination from the left which is fueled by the ideology of one political party. So to counterbalance this, we have to apply some common sense ideology which is based on fact (and this is where your technical data comes in) to educate people in schools about this topic so they are more morally conscious to never make this choice.
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,567
2,642
113
#37
Well, I would like it better if you would engage in a discussion instead of trolling me.

Given that most folks would probably agree that abortions should not be allowed after the age of viability or when fetuses are able to survive outside of the womb, the question became whether folks could be persuaded with proper education to agree that abortions should not be permitted beyond the stage when the brain waves used to determine a person is alive are detectable, which may be called "sentience". I like to think most folks are reasonable enough to agree with this logic.

Sentience is detectable at about the 8th week the last time I checked, so society's agreement on this point would eliminate seven months of abortions, and we only need to move the Overton Window another couple of months. :^)
As a general rule, I'm in favor of rational arguments that will reduce the number of abortions.

But this particular argument has some inherent problems.
If we use brain wave activity as a corollary for life, that may leave us in a hole we cannot dig ourselves out of.

.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,769
6,929
113
#38

ThereRoseaLamb

Well-known member
Jan 17, 2023
4,938
2,146
113
#39
Not a bad suggestion but like you said Rose, depending on the mood and emotional distress level of the person who is going to have the abortion the best you can do, I have found, is to try to help people you know something about as opposed to strangers who might get triggered, angry or even attack you.
People that you know are usually family and friends and since you know something about them then you can suggest ideas which don’t make them angry.
Maybe the other option is to try to listen to the stranger on the street why she is trying to have an abortion and maybe suggest other things like give up the baby for adoption as opposed to murder or depending what the situation is.
This is a very complicated and personal topic so if you try to make people feel guilty they’re going to have an angry response at you because they know it’s wrong.
Almost all the females that have this procedure are affected and traumatized on some level so they know it beforehand.
The question is how to get them to change their minds without pushing them.
It’s not an easy topic.
It’s a very difficult topic!
Just like guns is a difficult topic despite killings of many children in schools.
Oh, on a one to one, that is a totally different approach. There are stats showing that many women, especially younger, feel pressured to have an abortion. I don't come by this subject lightly. My nephew who just turned twenty today has a one year old son. Suddenly the subject became very real and close to home. We were against abortion as a family but this was life changing. And my sister couldn't come to terms with it. She and her in laws actually joked that hopefully his then girlfriend would trip and lose the baby. I took a stand, very unpopular, and helped my nephew get married. The situation is not ideal, they are young and immature raising a baby. But I felt that was a better choice than abortion. My sister hasn't yet forgiven me for my "interference". So I understand it's not simple and there are issues and complications and pat answers don't always help. But I will strive with anyone as long as possible to try and convince them that abortion isn't the solution they think it is. They are being lied to.
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
2,102
511
113
#40
As a general rule, I'm in favor of rational arguments that will reduce the number of abortions.

But this particular argument has some inherent problems.
If we use brain wave activity as a corollary for life, that may leave us in a hole we cannot dig ourselves out of.

.
We already use the cessation of that brain wave activity as the definition/determination of death, which is why the corollary is to use it for the beginning of brain life that reasonable folks should accept.

The part of the problem I have not stated yet is--supposing society outlaws abortion after two months--what should be the punishment for those who commit murder?