That is a possibility, but also consider those "doubters" that see the story of the shroud, and think to themselves... "this COULD be a proof that Jesus was crucifed".... then continue to study, only to find that there are many, MANY reputable scientists and archeologists that don't see any hard evidence (proof) that it is, indeed, real... those doubters will very likely drop any and all interest in learning about Jesus, because their original doubts were found to be "true"....
There is plenty of proof that Jesus DID live, and WAS crucified, so the shroud actually "proves" nothing that has not already been proven through many historians' records of that time in history.
What doubters need "proof" of is that Jesus not only lived and was crucifed, but that he was indeed raised from the dead. THAT is the part of the story that is most important.... the shroud does not prove that at all.
Having the shroud that Jesus was wrapped in is no "evidence" that he rose from the dead. The Romans and Jews of that time, who witnessed all of it, still did not believe it... they believed that Jesus' body was stolen by his disciples, to make people think he had risen.
This shroud could have been saved through history by those disciples that were trying to keep the "myth" alive...
No, I still believe that
@studentoftheword assessment is the best description of the shroud's existence.