Yours are the special pleading and questions begging fallacies. The language used is the same. If it does not need to mean exhaustive past, present and future knowledge in the case of a man, then it does not need to mean those things in God's case. To insist that it does mean past, present, and future knowledge because it is God we are talking about, and God has exhaustive past, present, and future knowledge is exactly question begging and special pleading.