Was Mary Sinless?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Having a sinful nature and committing sin are different, connected yes, but different nonetheless. Yes, the wages of sin is death, but the sin has to have been committed for the wages to be paid. That's why when a child is born it is innocent, has not committed any sin but is considered a sinner because of it's nature. As far as the battery is concerned, go back and look, I never said flat battery, I don't use that terminology, maybe Brits or Aussies do. I said we THINK it is dead but with a hotshot it is revived, just as the Holy Spirit revives, restores, revitalizes, renews our flat, deadened or dormant human spirits when we receive Jesus Christ as our Lord and Savior. The only new ( to us ) Spirit we receive at salvation is the Holy Spirit. Dead doesn't always mean lifeless, in this case it means dormant, deadened. I understand exactly what I am saying, you don't. " Spiritual death is separation of spirit and soul."?? " For the Word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, PIERCING EVEN TO THE DIVIDING ASUNDER OF THE SOUL AND SPIRIT,.... " Hebrews 4:12. So by your thoughts Gods' Word brings about spiritual death. And I don't know what I'M talking about. Sad. That rope you were talking about.............:-))

The sin was committed by Adam. By one man we all became sinners and because of that one sin, we were all born dead. Rom.5:12 Babies, not having committed any personal sin, does not make them innocent for too many die before they commit any personal sin of their own. So you are wrong about having to commit sin before death is applied. Physical death is the outward expression of the inner reality of spiritual death.

The scripture says you are dead. It does not say you are dormant. You continue to ignore this simple fact.

The scripture says the Spirit gives birth to spirit. It does not say He gives birth to Himself. He gives birth to a new spirit. Revival is not birth. You were not revived from your mother's womb.

Heb.4:12 is not speaking of the spirit returning to God who gave it which occurs at the death of a believer. This is you ignoring context again. Heb.4 is speaking of something entirely different.


You missed " in the context of THOSE PARTICULAR SCRIPTURES." I used the actual concordance meanings of the words we discussed, and you know it. In just about all instances I used the first explanation the concordance gave, I do not cherry pick. Of course YOU don't have ANY errors, do you? I just finished with one, a big one, #1777.

But you do cherry pick. Let's look at your methodology shall we from your post #1590?

Let us revisit a subject, if you will. When in the book of James it reads " For as the body without the spirit is dead,..." James 2:26 the word dead here is, Strong's 3498; nek-ros from prim. nekus ( a corpse ), dead lit. or fig, also as a noun dead, This speaks of people who are no longer alive. In Eph. 2:1 it reads " And you hath He quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;..." The word dead here is the same in James but it can't mean no life because to be in sin you have to be alive. So to study it out I found Strong's 3499, which is derived from 3498; nek-ro; TO DEADEN, I.E. subdue:- be dead, mortify. So the word dead DOES mean deadened in this case, as in our deadened spirits before being quickened, Strong's 2227 dzo-op-oy-eh-o;( re)-vitalize, (lit. or fig.)- make alive, give life, quicken. You revitalize, make alive and give life to something that's already in existence. C'mon Sawdust, gimme some more rope, unless, of course, you have use for it yourself :-)) P.S. Are you one of the ones who don't understand the Bible or one of those that do?

You acknowledge the word in James 2:26 is the same as Eph.2:1 but do you deal with that word? No, you find a derivative word with a slightly different meaning to suit your narrative. You don't show us the only three places where this Strong's #3499 is used. Why? Because it would prove it is used in a completely different context from both James and Eph. Strong's #3499 is used in the sense of "to consider something to be dead" whereas #3498 literally means "to be dead". Out from this deception you derived your stance of having a spirit that is not dead but only considered dead or "deadened" as you like to call it.

Romans 4:19
Without weakening in his faith, he faced the fact that his body was as good as dead – since he was about a hundred years old – and that Sarah’s womb was also dead.

Hebrews 11:12
And so from this one man, and he as good as dead, came descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky and as countless as the sand on the seashore.

Colossians 3:5
Put to death, therefore, whatever belongs to your earthly nature: sexual immorality, impurity, lust, evil desires and greed, which is idolatry.

In post #1634 you deceived us again by quoting Eph.2:1 while stating the Greek word used was #3499, which it is not.

I gave you dead, as in (dead in trespasses and sins Eph 2:1), nek-ro-o in Greek 3499, from Strong's Concordance and it says " to deaden i.e ( fig.) to subdue; be dead, mortify.

You have consistently insisted that the new birth is "again" meaning a second time when the Greek word used "anothen" does not mean a second time at all and this is backed up by the various other instances where it is used. It means from above or from the top or from the origin/beginning. https://biblehub.com/greek/ano_then_509.htm

You have refused to explain how a non-functioning spirit can hear or how a birth translates to being revitalized, two very different things.

You have ignored that many of these 'deadened' spirits are going to return to God yet have not explained how can God receive such spirits that are tainted by sin?

Your deception and refusal to deal with what is actually written has led you astray.

You have a nice day.

grace and peace
 
You just don't get it. I posted long ago, which you, of course, argued about, that mans spirit returns to God at death. You tried to make it only mans breath but the Bible says spirit, so I'm going with the Bible. The whole battle is where our minds, wills and emotions (souls) will spend eternity. Without a spirit you cannot be redeemed, you, of all people, should agree with that. But you are so used to contending with everything I say that you don't take the time to read and think before posting your vitriol aimed at me. Take time and think before you post. Again, without a spirit you cannot be redeemed and what is being redeemed IS YOUR SOUL. Get it?

No I get it. You think that spirits tainted with sin will return to God who gave them because according to you everyone has a spirit.

It's you who do not get it for I distinguished between spirit being used as breath and being used as the human spirit. You can't seem to understand that the same word can have different meanings according to context. Animals do not have spirits born of God, what they have is breath/life for God is the Lord of Life.

I do agree anyone without a spirit cannot be redeemed because they remain dead in their sin, having no spiritual life because they have no spirit. You are the one saying we all have a spirit, not me. But God is redeeming our soul, not our spirit. Our spirits are born of God and do not need redeeming.

I contend with what you say because it misrepresents what is written. According to you dead is not dead, it is deadened. Birth is not birth, it is a revitalization. From above is not from above, but a redoing of something already done once.

As far as thinking? It is pretty much all I can do nowadays. I have little energy for much else.

I pray your life is filled with the mercy of God and you learn to rest in His grace that sustains you. :)

Bye. 👋
 
  • Like
Reactions: Genez
The sin was committed by Adam. By one man we all became sinners and because of that one sin, we were all born dead. Rom.5:12 Babies, not having committed any personal sin, does not make them innocent for too many die before they commit any personal sin of their own. So you are wrong about having to commit sin before death is applied. Physical death is the outward expression of the inner reality of spiritual death.

The scripture says you are dead. It does not say you are dormant. You continue to ignore this simple fact.

The scripture says the Spirit gives birth to spirit. It does not say He gives birth to Himself. He gives birth to a new spirit. Revival is not birth. You were not revived from your mother's womb.

Heb.4:12 is not speaking of the spirit returning to God who gave it which occurs at the death of a believer. This is you ignoring context again. Heb.4 is speaking of something entirely different.




But you do cherry pick. Let's look at your methodology shall we from your post #1590?



You acknowledge the word in James 2:26 is the same as Eph.2:1 but do you deal with that word? No, you find a derivative word with a slightly different meaning to suit your narrative. You don't show us the only three places where this Strong's #3499 is used. Why? Because it would prove it is used in a completely different context from both James and Eph. Strong's #3499 is used in the sense of "to consider something to be dead" whereas #3498 literally means "to be dead". Out from this deception you derived your stance of having a spirit that is not dead but only considered dead or "deadened" as you like to call it.

Romans 4:19
Without weakening in his faith, he faced the fact that his body was as good as dead – since he was about a hundred years old – and that Sarah’s womb was also dead.

Hebrews 11:12
And so from this one man, and he as good as dead, came descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky and as countless as the sand on the seashore.

Colossians 3:5
Put to death, therefore, whatever belongs to your earthly nature: sexual immorality, impurity, lust, evil desires and greed, which is idolatry.

In post #1634 you deceived us again by quoting Eph.2:1 while stating the Greek word used was #3499, which it is not.



You have consistently insisted that the new birth is "again" meaning a second time when the Greek word used "anothen" does not mean a second time at all and this is backed up by the various other instances where it is used. It means from above or from the top or from the origin/beginning. https://biblehub.com/greek/ano_then_509.htm

You have refused to explain how a non-functioning spirit can hear or how a birth translates to being revitalized, two very different things.

You have ignored that many of these 'deadened' spirits are going to return to God yet have not explained how can God receive such spirits that are tainted by sin?

Your deception and refusal to deal with what is actually written has led you astray.

You have a nice day.

grace and peace
I'll respond to this one example you gave Eph.2:1, dead 3498 nek-ros; from an appar. prim. nekus ( a corpse ); dead (lit. or fig; also as a noun): dead " And you hath He quickened, who were DEAD in trespasses and sins;" Eph. 2:1. Lets look at the word quickened, again, Strong's 2227 dzo-op-oy-eh; from the same as 2226 and 4106 ; to (RE) vitalize (lit. or fig.) make alive, give life , quicken. Vitalize means to give strength and energy to something already in existence, proven by RE, again. So the Holy Spirit re-vitalizes, makes alive and gives life to our spirits. Before being quickened we were "dead" in trespasses and sins, not as corpses, from 3498, but from 3499 nek-ro-o, which is derived FROM 3498, and means to deaden, i.e. (fig.) to subdue: --be dead, mortify. That doesn't mean our spirits were dead, as in didn't exist, but were deadened or subdued spiritually, but at receiving Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior are re-vitalized. Dead doesn't always mean non existent. No deception here, missy. If you would, please explain away these scriptures written hundreds of years before, according to you, man had a spirit. " Pride goeth before a destruction, and an haughty SPIRIT before a fall." And " Better it is to be of an humble SPIRIT with the lowly, than to divide the spoil with the proud." Pro. 16: 18,19. Are they talking about mans breath? Were these scriptures prophetic, looking for the days when man would have a spirit at the receiving of Christ, since, according to you, they didn't have one. Why write it to them first since they had neither a haughty nor a humble nor any kind of spirit at all? Why not let the Apostle Paul or Peter or John etc., etc, be the human authors of these instructions after Christ? Or were they written because every man is born with a spirit. You choose
 
Genesis2-18s.png

Genesis 2 verse 18 The LORD God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.” (ezer kenegdo explanation)
:)
 
I'll respond to this one example you gave Eph.2:1, dead 3498 nek-ros; from an appar. prim. nekus ( a corpse ); dead (lit. or fig; also as a noun): dead " And you hath He quickened, who were DEAD in trespasses and sins;"
It does not say He quickened our dead human spirit.

You are more than just your human spirit.
 
Genesis2-18s.png

Genesis 2 verse 18 The LORD God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.” (ezer kenegdo explanation)
:)
When I used the words help meet I may have combined the two words making it one, my mistake, but the two are in the English Bible. I certainly don't mean to offend, as I know that there is no hierarchy with God concerning position with mankind, only differing responsibilities. What I meant when I posted that was that God didn't give Eve the instruction concerning the trees of the garden but gave them to Adam. Now don't get angry or offended with me, but a little kickback, " But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God." 1 Cor. 11:3. God has placed the responsibility on man, who follows Christ, as the head of the family but co-equal with the woman in marriage and in the Body of Christ. Not better nor worse, equal.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Magenta
I'll respond to this one example you gave Eph.2:1, dead 3498 nek-ros; from an appar. prim. nekus ( a corpse ); dead (lit. or fig; also as a noun): dead " And you hath He quickened, who were DEAD in trespasses and sins;" Eph. 2:1. Lets look at the word quickened, again, Strong's 2227 dzo-op-oy-eh; from the same as 2226 and 4106 ; to (RE) vitalize (lit. or fig.) make alive, give life , quicken. Vitalize means to give strength and energy to something already in existence, proven by RE, again. So the Holy Spirit re-vitalizes, makes alive and gives life to our spirits. Before being quickened we were "dead" in trespasses and sins, not as corpses, from 3498, but from 3499 nek-ro-o, which is derived FROM 3498, and means to deaden, i.e. (fig.) to subdue: --be dead, mortify. That doesn't mean our spirits were dead, as in didn't exist, but were deadened or subdued spiritually, but at receiving Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior are re-vitalized. Dead doesn't always mean non existent. No deception here, missy. If you would, please explain away these scriptures written hundreds of years before, according to you, man had a spirit. " Pride goeth before a destruction, and an haughty SPIRIT before a fall." And " Better it is to be of an humble SPIRIT with the lowly, than to divide the spoil with the proud." Pro. 16: 18,19. Are they talking about mans breath? Were these scriptures prophetic, looking for the days when man would have a spirit at the receiving of Christ, since, according to you, they didn't have one. Why write it to them first since they had neither a haughty nor a humble nor any kind of spirit at all? Why not let the Apostle Paul or Peter or John etc., etc, be the human authors of these instructions after Christ? Or were they written because every man is born with a spirit. You choose

I suggest you take you own advice.

👋
 
It does not say He quickened our dead human spirit.

You are more than just your human spirit.
There you go again. I have never said we had a dead human spirit. EVERYTHING STARTS IN THE SPIRITUAL REALM, EVERYTHING! Name me ONE thing that starts in the physical realm. I know that I am a three part human being, spirit, soul and body. And you KNOW that I know it, I've posted 1Thess. 5:23 several times. Quickening STARTS spiritually, then can affect your soul and then your body.
I suggest you take you own advice.

👋
I have, I have " studied to show myself approved unto GOD... " (2Tim. 2:15), not man. Do you agree that EVERYTHING begins in the spiritual realm or not?
 
The sin was committed by Adam. By one man we all became sinners and because of that one sin, we were all born dead. Rom.5:12 Babies, not having committed any personal sin, does not make them innocent for too many die before they commit any personal sin of their own. So you are wrong about having to commit sin before death is applied. Physical death is the outward expression of the inner reality of spiritual death.

The scripture says you are dead. It does not say you are dormant. You continue to ignore this simple fact.

The scripture says the Spirit gives birth to spirit. It does not say He gives birth to Himself. He gives birth to a new spirit. Revival is not birth. You were not revived from your mother's womb.

Heb.4:12 is not speaking of the spirit returning to God who gave it which occurs at the death of a believer. This is you ignoring context again. Heb.4 is speaking of something entirely different.




But you do cherry pick. Let's look at your methodology shall we from your post #1590?



You acknowledge the word in James 2:26 is the same as Eph.2:1 but do you deal with that word? No, you find a derivative word with a slightly different meaning to suit your narrative. You don't show us the only three places where this Strong's #3499 is used. Why? Because it would prove it is used in a completely different context from both James and Eph. Strong's #3499 is used in the sense of "to consider something to be dead" whereas #3498 literally means "to be dead". Out from this deception you derived your stance of having a spirit that is not dead but only considered dead or "deadened" as you like to call it.

Romans 4:19
Without weakening in his faith, he faced the fact that his body was as good as dead – since he was about a hundred years old – and that Sarah’s womb was also dead.

Hebrews 11:12
And so from this one man, and he as good as dead, came descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky and as countless as the sand on the seashore.

Colossians 3:5
Put to death, therefore, whatever belongs to your earthly nature: sexual immorality, impurity, lust, evil desires and greed, which is idolatry.

In post #1634 you deceived us again by quoting Eph.2:1 while stating the Greek word used was #3499, which it is not.



You have consistently insisted that the new birth is "again" meaning a second time when the Greek word used "anothen" does not mean a second time at all and this is backed up by the various other instances where it is used. It means from above or from the top or from the origin/beginning. https://biblehub.com/greek/ano_then_509.htm

You have refused to explain how a non-functioning spirit can hear or how a birth translates to being revitalized, two very different things.

You have ignored that many of these 'deadened' spirits are going to return to God yet have not explained how can God receive such spirits that are tainted by sin?

Your deception and refusal to deal with what is actually written has led you astray.

You have a nice day.

grace and peace
(1) Creation of Man;( Gen, 2:7), God forms man from the dust of the earth and breathes into his nostrils the breath of life. (2) The Breath of Life; this act of breathing signifies the impartation of the human spirit, making man a living being. (3) Spiritual Significance; The human spirit is seen as the essence that connects humans with God, enabling spiritual awareness. (4) Distinction from Animals: Animals are also living and breathing beings but humans are uniquely endowed with a spirit that reflects Gods' image.( Gen. 1:26-7) (5) Purpose of the Spirit; the human spirit is intended for relationship with God, moral understanding, and the capacity for worship. (6) New Birth; In the New Testament, believers receive a RENEWED SPIRIT through faith in Christ ( John 3: 6-8), emphasizing SPIRITUAL REBIRTH. Without a spirit man cannot connect or even be called by God to Himself. Man HAS to have a spirit. "The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, NOT WILLING THAT ANY SHOULD PERISH, but that ALL SHOULD COME TO REPENTANCE." 2 Pet 3:9. If Gods' will is that NONE perish and ALL come to repentance, and it is, He must give ALL the capacity to be redeemed and that capacity is through mans spirit, drawn by the Holy Spirit, the only part of us that can connect with God, not our souls nor our bodies. May God open up your eyes of understanding. Good Night.
 
  • Pray
Reactions: sawdust
There you go again. I have never said we had a dead human spirit. EVERYTHING STARTS IN THE SPIRITUAL REALM, EVERYTHING! Name me ONE thing that starts in the physical realm. I know that I am a three part human being, spirit, soul and body. And you KNOW that I know it, I've posted 1Thess. 5:23 several times. Quickening STARTS spiritually, then can affect your soul and then your body.

I have, I have " studied to show myself approved unto GOD... " (2Tim. 2:15), not man. Do you agree that EVERYTHING begins in the spiritual realm or not?
You have your own understanding.

Who am I to argue with you?
You choose what you want to believe....
I am sure you can find some others to agree with you.

Be happy.
 
You have your own understanding.

Who am I to argue with you?
You choose what you want to believe....
I am sure you can find some others to agree with you.

Be happy.
Simple question Nezzy, you try to answer everything else, why not this? Ideas and thoughts are in the spiritual realm. God, who is Spirit, and who created everything, so tell me what originates in any other realm but the spiritual? Yet you profess that God originates the calling of humans to Himself through our souls, to which the (spiritual) things of God are foolishness. SMH.
 
Simple question Nezzy, you try to answer everything else, why not this? Ideas and thoughts are in the spiritual realm. God, who is Spirit, and who created everything, so tell me what originates in any other realm but the spiritual? Yet you profess that God originates the calling of humans to Himself through our souls, to which the (spiritual) things of God are foolishness. SMH.
The drawing of God is not presenting what is foolishness to unregenerate souls. The natural man finds Bible doctrine as foolishness.
God's drawing is having a soul making contact with the essence of the invisible God, giving that soul thoughts to either accept or reject concerning the nature of God unawares to what causes it. That is not the same as having to analyze Bible teachings which the unregenerate will find as foolishness. The natural man finds Bible teaching foolishness. 1 Corinthians 2:14

......
 
The drawing of God is not presenting what is foolishness to unregenerate souls. The natural man finds Bible doctrine as foolishness.
God's drawing is having a soul making contact with the essence of the invisible God, giving that soul thoughts to either accept or reject concerning the nature of God unawares to what causes it. That is not the same as having to analyze Bible teachings which the unregenerate will find as foolishness. The natural man finds Bible teaching foolishness. 1 Corinthians 2:14

......
We were ALL unregenerate souls at one time. An unregenerate soul is a carnal soul, a natural man. When God drew me to Himself, as I said before, my (unregenerate, carnal, natural) soul did not want to answer, but there was a stronger pull within me that compelled me to go forward to receive Christ as my Savior and it wasn't by my mind, will or emotions. That pull, I was later to find out, was my spirit being led by the Holy Spirit, " For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, THEY are the sons of God." Rom. 8:14. The Holy Spirit doesn't lead you soul, He leads your spirit. Let me ask you this, " The spirit of man is the candle(lamp) of the Lord, searching all the inward parts of the belly." Pro. 20:27. If man didn't have a spirit until after receiving Jesus, as you believe, how did God search the " inward parts of the belly " of man hundreds and hundreds of years before Jesus? Why did He mention man having a spirit to those who, according to you, didn't have one? " Why doth thine heart carry thee away? and what do thy eyes wink at, That thou turn THY SPIRIT against God, and let such words go out of thy mouth?" Job 15:13. " As for me, is my complaint to man? and if it were so, why should not MY SPIRIT be troubled?" Job 21:4 " But THERE IS A SPIRIT IN MAN: and the inspiration of the Almighty gives them understanding." Job 32:8 " A talebearer reveals secrets: but he that is of a FAITHFUL SPIRIT conceals the matter." Pro. 11:13 " The SPIRIT OF A MAN will sustain his infirmity; but a wounded SPIRIT who can bear?" Pro. 18:14. There is more, but I guess( hope) you get the point, the Bible says, in the Old Covenant, repeatedly, that man has a spirit. Is the Bible proof enough for you? Is the Bible your final authority or the tradition of man?
 
We were ALL unregenerate souls at one time. An unregenerate soul is a carnal soul, a natural man. When God drew me to Himself, as I said before, my (unregenerate, carnal, natural) soul did not want to answer, but there was a stronger pull within me that compelled me to go forward to receive Christ as my Savior and it wasn't by my mind, will or emotions. That pull, I was later to find out, was my spirit being led by the Holy Spirit, " For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, THEY are the sons of God." Rom. 8:14. The Holy Spirit doesn't lead you soul, He leads your spirit. Let me ask you this, " The spirit of man is the candle(lamp) of the Lord, searching all the inward parts of the belly." Pro. 20:27. If man didn't have a spirit until after receiving Jesus, as you believe, how did God search the " inward parts of the belly " of man hundreds and hundreds of years before Jesus? Why did He mention man having a spirit to those who, according to you, didn't have one? " Why doth thine heart carry thee away? and what do thy eyes wink at, That thou turn THY SPIRIT against God, and let such words go out of thy mouth?" Job 15:13. " As for me, is my complaint to man? and if it were so, why should not MY SPIRIT be troubled?" Job 21:4 " But THERE IS A SPIRIT IN MAN: and the inspiration of the Almighty gives them understanding." Job 32:8 " A talebearer reveals secrets: but he that is of a FAITHFUL SPIRIT conceals the matter." Pro. 11:13 " The SPIRIT OF A MAN will sustain his infirmity; but a wounded SPIRIT who can bear?" Pro. 18:14. There is more, but I guess( hope) you get the point, the Bible says, in the Old Covenant, repeatedly, that man has a spirit. Is the Bible proof enough for you? Is the Bible your final authority or the tradition of man?

Unlike your own experience?

Paul was murdering Christians.

What happened with him?



......
 
Unlike your own experience?

Paul was murdering Christians.

What happened with him?



......
What happened to the answer to the question I've asked several times, why does the Bible, in the Old Covenant, repeatedly say that man, before Jesus, has a spirit, and you say differently. Then we can get to your question.
 
What happened to the answer to the question I've asked several times, why does the Bible, in the Old Covenant, repeatedly say that man, before Jesus, has a spirit, and you say differently. Then we can get to your question.

You've got a cheek. I asked you repeatedly to answer how your deadened spirit can respond when it has no life in it yet you never once bothered to explain, you simply keep repeating it did respond. Pft!

And in answer to your question above, because to be saved, we must be born again. If no-one in the OT was born from above then neither were they saved. You would have unsaved people writing scripture. Ludicrous!
 
What happened to the answer to the question I've asked several times, why does the Bible, in the Old Covenant, repeatedly say that man, before Jesus, has a spirit, and you say differently. Then we can get to your question.

When one says a pony has lots of spirit?
Does the context allow us to see its meaning?

And, a man can have a broken spirit.

You keep imposing only one meaning as a means to get your own way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sawdust