I fail to see any comments on Romans six by yourself.NO ONE has commented on Romans 6?
Well... I have been told I'm a nobody before. I guess this is another data point on the graph.
I fail to see any comments on Romans six by yourself.NO ONE has commented on Romans 6?
Well... I have been told I'm a nobody before. I guess this is another data point on the graph.
You have got to be kidding me...I fail to see any comments on Romans six by yourself.
I posted this.Given your combative nature, are you sure you didn't take a wrong turn somewhere? You should be in the Bible Discussion Forum. That's where they browbeat people and call them not REAL Christians and take so much umbrage that we have to start importing umbrage from other countries to shore up the supply.
I'm not saying this thread is wrong. One should live without sin. Romans 6 makes that very clear.
But your manner of expressing it here in this thread, that is VERY wrong. You are here to start fights. I think you are deliberately looking for them. I know for certain that you are enjoying them.
I posted this, which is in direct reference to Romans 6.Yeah the Bible was pretty clear on both of those points, that you shouldn't beat yourself up over not being perfect, but you also shouldn't just give up and live in sin.
What good would that do?You and others have denigrated me and my belief in heart holiness BUT no one has commented or answered my post #49 about Romans chapter six and what Paul wrote! Rather telling I think. Is it because you have no answer?
I am not being a martyr, just don't like being flamed like everyone else.What good would that do?
You claim you don’t sin. Or at least ever intentionally.
So stop being a martyr and flat out tell us if you ever intentionally sin.
You mean the John Wesley that wrote this to his brother later in life?I am not being a martyr, just don't like being flamed like everyone else.
Holiness is more than deliverance from sin; it is being renewed in the image of the Lord Jesus Christ. It is a life where the love of God reigns supreme. As John Wesley rightly affirmed, holiness is love.
See posts #25 & #52.You mean the John Wesley that wrote this to his brother later in life?
"In one of my last I was saying that I do not feel the wrath of God abiding on me; nor can I believe it does. And yet (this is the mystery), I do not love God. I never did. Therefore I never believed, in the Christian sense of the word. Therefore I am only an honest heathen..." [1]
I’d say not loving the Lord qualifies as sin.
I’ll also add you still haven’t answered the question. Do you ever deliberately sin? No matter how small.
Like Elijah under the juniper tree wishing he were dead. Or Charles Spurgeon, days spent in the depths of depression, John Wesley had his times of melancholy and spiritual depression. Sanctification does not destroy our humanity, just cleanses it from sin.You mean the John Wesley that wrote this to his brother later in life?
"In one of my last I was saying that I do not feel the wrath of God abiding on me; nor can I believe it does. And yet (this is the mystery), I do not love God. I never did. Therefore I never believed, in the Christian sense of the word. Therefore I am only an honest heathen..." [1]
I’d say not loving the Lord qualifies as sin.
I’ll also add you still haven’t answered the question. Do you ever deliberately sin? No matter how small.
With respect, I'm not sure what the differences are. Almost every Christian I know, especially me, struggle with grace. We sometimes understand it intellectually, but still return to the false feelings that it can't possibly cover me!
I don't think this is sin but the working of the Holy Spirit within us.
As for atonement, there are some who falsely believe acts of atonement bring salvation, true enough.
I read that in the OP. But acts of righteousness given to glorify God from deep love and gratitude appear nearly universal following redemption. Without those acts we may be saved, but cannot glorify God.
Finally, acknowledging our sins, even after salvation, is central to Christs message. "Forgive us our sins" was a prayer given to His disciples.
If you are saying we should not be overly preoccupied with our sins, then I agree and probably miss-understand that part of your message.
The two messages appear the same to me.
If you take the time to read the context, 1 Tim 1:13,14, Paul was referring to his past sinful ways, not his present status.
You have taken 1 Jn 1:8 out of its context to mean something that John did not intend.
I can still find very little difference between my post and yours, only semantics.Why? Why can't the atonement of a perfect sinless being not cover you?
You don't think what is sin?
Only the Act of Atonement by Jesus brings us salvation..
All who are indwelled by the Holy Spirit ( are saved ) will do good works.. If a person has no good works that proves the truth is not in them and they are not saved.. But again their good works are not what saves them..
Jesus did include that in His example to the Jews of how they should pray.. Note he was talking to the Jews on the mount not just to His disciples.. And that was given before His Atonement was paid.
I feel more convicted about the good things that i have failed to do rather then the bad things i have done.. But they are both sins..
What two messages? I am not clear as to what the two messages you are referring to..