It strikes me that "institutional Christianity" has erected filters, barriers and obfuscations to many of Jesus teachings and commands. Which of Jesus teaching do you reject in word, thought and deed. Not to mention through your personal theology?
It strikes me that "institutional Christianity" has erected filters, barriers and obfuscations to many of Jesus teachings and commands. Which of Jesus teaching do you reject in word, thought and deed. Not to mention through your personal
God granting every request is still available today.It is not a question of rejection, but of application. Jesus ministered to the nation of Israel in fulfillment of the prophecies for the nation. If we today try to appropriate everything for ourselves, we can find that it does not fit. For example, Jesus told the those who were faithful and would enter the earthly kingdom would have any request made of God in faith granted. This was because those would enter the kingdom would be changed by God to have the law written in their hearts and could be trusted that such a promised could be made to them. The gospel of the kingdom was for the nation of Israel. The gospel of grace given to Paul was for gentiles and Jews outside of Israel and today is the only path to God.
It strikes me that "institutional Christianity" has erected filters, barriers and obfuscations to many of Jesus teachings and commands. Which of Jesus teaching do you reject in word, thought and deed. Not to mention through your personal theology?
If Jesus is our Savior, Teacher, and Lord, how can we possibly reject any of His teachings?It strikes me that "institutional Christianity" has erected filters, barriers and obfuscations to many of Jesus teachings and commands. Which of Jesus teaching do you reject in word, thought and deed. Not to mention through your personal theology?
It strikes me that "institutional Christianity" has erected filters, barriers and obfuscations to many of Jesus teachings and commands. Which of Jesus teaching do you reject in word, thought and deed. Not to mention through your personal theology?
Perhaps the "in plain sight" is not getting through.
I will kick it off. "It is harder for a richman to go to heaven than for a camel to go through the eye of a needle." By the way, that old dodge about a camel gate into Jerusalem is pure fiction. Jesus meant what he said. In Luke Jesus says "Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God." In Luke 14:33 In the same way therefore not one of you can be my disciple if he does not renounce all his own possessions.
Let's stick to the words of Jesus as we process this question.
I would agree that the change in what the church practices has been a slow drift, nor was there ever evil intent involved, at least not from the believers. But an intentional distortion I could support, not for evil purposes, but to keep the dangerous non-believers away from some points that were considered unfit for outsiders. Unfortunately keeping certain teachings for only the initiated proved the process by which even the initiated forgot them. Constantine merely intensified the problem by never truly converting but instead always keeping one foot in the pagan realm, and thus not being deemed trustworthy to learn some things. But never let Constantine know that.The year was 325 AD. Emperor Constantine had just legalized Christianity across the Roman Empire and church leaders from across the known world gathered in the city of Nika. What happened in those marble halls would reshape Christianity forever. But it would also begin a slow, almost imperceptible process of editing. not editing the scriptures themselves, but editing which parts would be emphasized, which would be quietly set aside, and which would be transformed into something altogether different.
Imagine walking into a typical Sunday service today. The pastor speaks of love, salvation, and eternal life. The congregation nods in approval as familiar verses are quoted. But what if I told you that some of the most radical, challenging, and socially revolutionary teachings attributed to Jesus of Nazareth are sitting right there in their Bibles, yet remain largely unspoken from the pulpit. These aren't hidden gospels or secret texts. These are words recorded in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, the very books that every Christian denomination accepts as canonical.
Yet, for nearly 17 centuries, many of these teachings have been softened, reinterpreted, or simply overlooked. Why? Because they're inconvenient. They challenge power structures. They demand a level of commitment that would empty pews and collection plates. The carpenter from Galilee spoke words that would make modern megachurch pastors uncomfortable, that would challenge the political allegiances of countless congregants, and that would demand a complete restructuring of how many Christians live their daily lives. These teachings remain hidden in plain sight. Tucked between the verses that get highlighted and memorized.
This is not a cover-ups in religious history. Not a conspiracy of evil intent, but a slow cultural drift away from teachings that prove too challenging for institutional Christianity to fully embrace.
Perhaps the "in plain sight" is not getting through.
I will kick it off. "It is harder for a richman to go to heaven than for a camel to go through the eye of a needle." By the way, that old dodge about a camel gate into Jerusalem is pure fiction. Jesus meant what he said. In Luke Jesus says "Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God." In Luke 14:33 In the same way therefore not one of you can be my disciple if he does not renounce all his own possessions.
Let's stick to the words of Jesus as we process this question.
Well I will admit to having questions about the camel part. There is a single vowel difference, and similar sounding vowel, between the work for camel and the word for a hawser, or rope to tie off a boat. I tend to think that given how many disciples had been fishermen and the unlikeliness of camels around Jerusalem (in the desert regions maybe, but not mountainous Jerusalem areas) O prefer rope.The title of this thread raises the question of which teachings we reject.
So is there something you reject about Matthew 19:24... the verse about the camel and the needle?
Are my posts 3 and 6 in harmony with your question?
Watchman22: more citations on the 3 tithes.Are my posts 3 and 6 in harmony with your question?
Religious culture puts a lot of emphasis on long-term decision-making. Like studying for good grades so you can make more money in the future. Or delaying marriage until old age to find the "perfect spouse", but there are so many scriptures against worrying about long-term decision making.34 Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.
Flories71:Religious culture puts a lot of emphasis on long-term decision-making. Like studying for good grades so you can make more money in the future. Or delaying marriage until old age to find the "perfect spouse", but there are so many scriptures against worrying about long-term decision making.
Luke 12:16-21
16 Then he told them a story: “A rich man had a fertile farm that produced fine crops. 17 He said to himself, ‘What should I do? I don’t have room for all my crops.’ 18 Then he said, ‘I know! I’ll tear down my barns and build bigger ones. Then I’ll have room enough to store all my wheat and other goods. 19 And I’ll sit back and say to myself, “My friend, you have enough stored away for years to come. Now take it easy! Eat, drink, and be merry!”’
20 “But God said to him, ‘You fool! You will die this very night. Then who will get everything you worked for?’
Im saying this because I know Jesus' teachings to be true, at least intellectually. But this is extremely difficult for me to accept, by my nature I want to plan my life out because its "wise" by human thought.
I agree with you. If I look down the road of my life, I am not sure how things will work out.Religious culture puts a lot of emphasis on long-term decision-making. Like studying for good grades so you can make more money in the future. Or delaying marriage until old age to find the "perfect spouse", but there are so many scriptures against worrying about long-term decision making.
Luke 12:16-21
16 Then he told them a story: “A rich man had a fertile farm that produced fine crops. 17 He said to himself, ‘What should I do? I don’t have room for all my crops.’ 18 Then he said, ‘I know! I’ll tear down my barns and build bigger ones. Then I’ll have room enough to store all my wheat and other goods. 19 And I’ll sit back and say to myself, “My friend, you have enough stored away for years to come. Now take it easy! Eat, drink, and be merry!”’
20 “But God said to him, ‘You fool! You will die this very night. Then who will get everything you worked for?’
Im saying this because I know Jesus' teachings to be true, at least intellectually. But this is extremely difficult for me to accept, by my nature I want to plan my life out because its "wise" by human thought.