When we post in public, we're open to the public. If we want to keep it private, there's a place on site for that too.
1st. By your silence, you acknowledge you misquoted Scripture. Luke does not say,
Adam, the son of God. But rather
Adam, which was the son of God.
The change makes all the difference between a man that was a son of God, vs a man that remains the son of God...
2nd. Also by your silence on showing how I had not given Scripture proving my point, then you acknowledge the Scripture proves the point.
3rd. Scripture does not always specifically state what Scripture teaches. That's why we must study all of Scripture together, in order to teach all that Scripture says.
Jhn 14:15
If ye love me, keep my commandments.
If we are keeping His commandments, we are loving the Lord. And so, if we break His commandments, we are not loving the Lord, but hating Him.
Mat 6:24
No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
We are either loving or hating God. Scripture does not allow for both at the same time. We cannot be keeping His commandments by transgressing them. Nor can we be keeping some of His commandments, while transgressing others:
Jas 2:8
If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well: But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors. For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
Conclusion: If we are keeping His commandments, we are loving Him. If we are transgressing His commandment, we are hating Him.
When Adam was transgressing His commandment, Adam was hating the Lord. Whether Adam later repented is not revealed in Scripture, but only that he did not repent in the garden when driven out by the Lord.
We can also judge the manner of Adam's transgression, that he believed a lie about God's goodness, and instead followed the one that hated Him most, and lies about God's own love for Adam, and all people created in His own image:
Gen 3:4
And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
And finally we have Jesus' own testimony about them that betray Him for no reason:
Jhn 15:24
hey hated me without a cause.
Adam was the first man to hate the Lord without cause, when transgressing His commandment by the lie, that God did not love Adam.
After the transgression, we all ought to fear the Lord's judgment and wrath:
Heb 10:26
For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
2Co 5:9
Wherefore we labour, that, whether present or absent, we may be accepted of him. For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done. Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord, we persuade men;
Deu 10:17
For the LORD your God is God of gods, and Lord of lords, a great God, a mighty, and a terrible, which regardeth not persons, nor taketh reward:
The Scripture is speaking of all men created in His image, and His sons that transgress Him, without repect of persons.
Some transgressors however learn not to fear the Lord's righteous and equal judgment of our works. I suppose some would believe, that our own transgression is not so bad as others, nor are we hating the Lord but still loving Him, while sinning against Him without cause...
To Adam the transgressor, that God certainly did judge dead to the Spirit, in the day he ate thereof.
Gen 2:17
But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
If anyone seeks to move the day of death for sin to a later time, in order to preserve Adam's, and our own, spiritual life with God when transgressing Him, then that's another change to Scripture for vain personal purposes.
True. After Cain, whose works were evil, and hated his brother.
1Jo 3:11
For this is the message that ye heard from the beginning, that we should love one another. Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother's righteous.
And Abel was born before Seth, through whom the seed of Christ came in the flesh.
Gen 4:25
And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew.
And to Seth, to him also there was born a son; and he called his name Enos: then began men to call upon the name of the LORD.
And so, we see that natural seed of man has nothing to do with the righteousness nor evil of the parent nor offspring, but only the works of a man justifies or condemns us with God.
Cain is evil because his works are evil, and Abel is righteous because he does righteousness.
1 John{3:7}
Little children, let no man deceive you: he that is doing righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous.
As Scripture shows, all flesh is natural, but only the heart is pure or corrupt to do good or evil.
Mat 15:17
Do not ye yet understand, that whatsoever entereth in at the mouth goeth into the belly, and is cast out into the draught? But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man.
And once again, we don't know if Adam ever repented, whether immediately or later in life. He did however raise three sons, of which we know only one was an evil doer.
Already answered. If you want to go back and read it, then I'd be glad to see your own response to it.
Otherwise, ideological or philosophical arguments have no place with God's will and works:
Rom 9:20
Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?
