Are you a monergist or a synergist?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Which are you? Please vote only once and simply add 1 to the current total for what you choose.

  • Monergist Total = 0 Synergist Total = 0

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
  • Poll closed .
but it can ot be quickened, or made alive, while under the penalty of sin.

hence the issue

justification results in quickening, or us being made alive because the sin debt is removed.

not the other way around.
That's not what Ephesians 2:1 teaches. It says we were quickened when we were dead in trespasses and sins. Romans 5:10 say we were reconciled to God when we were enemies with God.
 
The crucial point is that God will not force sinners to receive His gift of salvation;
they must satisfy His condition of faith through wanting to have it.
God initiates/offers/gives; sinners may cooperate/accept/receive--or not.
“God will not force sinners to receive His gift; they must satisfy His condition of faith through wanting to have it.”
The problem with that statement is that Jesus explicitly denies it: He says no one can come unless the Father draws him, and that all whom the Father draws will come and will be raised on the last day — meaning faith is not a human condition we satisfy but a divine gift God gives.
If salvation depended on “wanting it,” then Jesus’ words about human inability (“no one can come”) would be false, Paul’s statement that faith is “not of yourselves” would be false, and the Spirit’s role in giving life (“the flesh profits nothing”) would be meaningless.
The entire point of John 6 is that believing, coming, receiving, drinking, and eating are Spirit‑produced responses, not human‑initiated choices.
God does not “force” anyone — He creates faith in the heart of the one He calls, just as He opened Lydia’s heart, granted repentance to the Gentiles, and appointed eternal life to those who believed in Acts 13:48. If sinners must “satisfy a condition,” salvation becomes a cooperative contract; Jesus presents it as a miracle of sovereign grace. The gift is received because God gives the ability to receive it — not because the sinner must generate the desire on his own.
 
God allowed it.

God did not force babylon to over run jersualem and do all the evil it did to the people it conquered.

God not only allowed it. But he punished them after..
The creation of those empires was the work of God. Reread Daniel 7:2...the four winds of heaven strove upon the great sea. As a result of this, four great beasts came up from the sea...Daniel 7:3. Verse 2 led directly to what happened in verse 3.

There is always the working of God in the spiritual realm impacting that which occurs in the natural realm. Do you genuinely believe that God is not at work in the world? Continue reading the chapter. Beginning at verse 9, God gives us a glimpse of that spiritual realm and what was transpiring there.

God created those 4 kingdoms and then brought them to naught as the kingdom of God began to grow and flourish and consume the others...Daniel 2:44-45.
 
Every passage you quoted actually proves the opposite of what you are trying to argue, because Jesus never presents salvation as a human‑initiated reception but as a Spirit‑given response to His own life‑giving words.
But you just hurt your own testimony. as non of those passages say anything about human initiating anything, and neither did I.

So your making a statment based on a false precept you have been tought, and not what anyone actually believes
When Jesus says “receive,” “believe,” “come,” “drink,” “eat,” and “hear,”
He immediately explains that the Spirit gives life and the flesh profits nothing, meaning these actions are not human prerequisites but Spirit‑enabled responses flowing from the life He gives.
John 6 makes this explicit: “All that the Father gives Me will come to Me… and I will lose nothing but raise it up on the last day.”
That is not an offer; that is a guarantee.
Yes it is an guarantee.

and you need to read the whole text.. Who does the father give? Those who see and believe


The same chapter says no one can come unless the Father draws, and everyone drawn is raised — which means salvation is not a marketplace where God waits for humility, but a miracle where God gives life to the dead.

No it does not say that. It says we cannot come unless we are drawn.. Not everyone he draws believes..

Your list of “requirements” collapses under Jesus’ own explanation: believing is Spirit‑given, coming is Spirit‑drawn, drinking is Spirit‑enabled, eating is Spirit‑sustained, and eternal life is Spirit‑secured.
No I never gave a list of requirments

I gave a list of how we are saved.

for by Grace I have been saved THROUGH FAITH

the list I gave is jesus showing us what this faith looks like.
The entire point of John’s Gospel is that eternal life is the result of Christ’s action, not the condition of ours, and every promise Jesus makes — “never perish,” “never thirst,” “never hunger,” “never cast out,” “lose nothing,” “raise on the last day,” “live forever” — is unconditional because the Spirit produces the very faith He commands.
your argument assumes human autonomy; Jesus teaches divine initiative. That’s the difference, and that’s why OSAS is simply taking Jesus at His word. I'm not denying your diligence, and even I struggled with this at first. But we can walk through it more if you need to.
Spoken like a true calvinist.

Now lets look to the word of God and see what God says
 
The crucial point is that God will not force sinners to receive His gift of salvation;
they must satisfy His condition of faith through wanting to have it.
God initiates/offers/gives; sinners may cooperate/accept/receive--or not.
but the believer is no cooperating.

God is handing us a gift. saying here, take it, it is mine to give

we either in faith recieve it

or we in lack of faith reject it.

That is no coperating with God.. We can do nothing to earn the gift.
 
That's not what Ephesians 2:1 teaches. It says we were quickened when we were dead in trespasses and sins. Romans 5:10 say we were reconciled to God when we were enemies with God.
Yes, it does. By Grace we have been saved.

he then in verse 8 explains what that means

for it is by grace we have been saved through faith

we recieve that gift of being made alive when we recieve the gift of Grace in faith.
 
The creation of those empires was the work of God. Reread Daniel 7:2...the four winds of heaven strove upon the great sea. As a result of this, four great beasts came up from the sea...Daniel 7:3. Verse 2 led directly to what happened in verse 3.

There is always the working of God in the spiritual realm impacting that which occurs in the natural realm. Do you genuinely believe that God is not at work in the world? Continue reading the chapter. Beginning at verse 9, God gives us a glimpse of that spiritual realm and what was transpiring there.

God created those 4 kingdoms and then brought them to naught as the kingdom of God began to grow and flourish and consume the others...Daniel 2:44-45.
lol..

Babylon had free will. they did what they wanted to do.

God did not force them to do anything,

And he punished them after, because they were guilty

if there is no free will. we can not be held accountable for a sin we did not do on our own.. but were forced to do by a God..
 
lol..

Babylon had free will. they did what they wanted to do.

God did not force them to do anything,

And he punished them after, because they were guilty

if there is no free will. we can not be held accountable for a sin we did not do on our own.. but were forced to do by a God..

That is the problem with the doctrine of determinism, it becomes all or nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Everlasting-Grace
We don't present "a gospel", we present "the gospel". There is only one true gospel message. You sound like one of those people who believe there are many truths and many different versions of the gospel.

There are 49,000 Christian Denominations in 2026, and they preach hundreds of radically opposed versions of the gospel. You can believe a different version everyday. The Denominations claim that diversity is good, as it demonstrates progress. You don't want to preach the same old boring gospel now do you.

There is no Good News unless it is personal... that includes Christ Jesus died for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Everlasting-Grace
lol..

Babylon had free will. they did what they wanted to do.

God did not force them to do anything,

And he punished them after, because they were guilty

if there is no free will. we can not be held accountable for a sin we did not do on our own.. but were forced to do by a God..
You can never stay on topic. The post has nothing to do with freewill. God clearly teaches that He acted and those kingdoms arose and were put down through His behest and activity. He acts sovereignly. He does His will in the armies of heaven and amongst the inhabitants of the earth, and none can stay His hand...Daniel 4:35.

I really don't understand why Christians run from the clear revelation of scripture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OMC
“God will not force sinners to receive His gift; they must satisfy His condition of faith through wanting to have it.”
The problem with that statement is that Jesus explicitly denies it: He says no one can come unless the Father draws him, and that all whom the Father draws will come and will be raised on the last day — meaning faith is not a human condition we satisfy but a divine gift God gives.
If salvation depended on “wanting it,” then Jesus’ words about human inability (“no one can come”) would be false, Paul’s statement that faith is “not of yourselves” would be false, and the Spirit’s role in giving life (“the flesh profits nothing”) would be meaningless.
The entire point of John 6 is that believing, coming, receiving, drinking, and eating are Spirit‑produced responses, not human‑initiated choices.
God does not “force” anyone — He creates faith in the heart of the one He calls, just as He opened Lydia’s heart, granted repentance to the Gentiles, and appointed eternal life to those who believed in Acts 13:48. If sinners must “satisfy a condition,” salvation becomes a cooperative contract; Jesus presents it as a miracle of sovereign grace. The gift is received because God gives the ability to receive it — not because the sinner must generate the desire on his own.

What I posted on another thread applies here:

The problematic part of tulipism is that if God/Love (John 3:16, 1John 4:7) were going to create faith, He would do so in everyone.
Otherwise, there is no way to avoid the heresy of implying God hates or disfavors those without faith (Rom. 2:6-11).

The solution is to harmonize relevant Scriptures. For example, John 6:44 says no one can come unless the Father draws,
and John 12:32 says Jesus will draw all.

Another example, 1Cor. 2:14 says the natural man cannot receive the things of the Spirit, and 1Tim. 2:3-4 says it is God's will for all to learn the truth and be saved.

The consistent pattern can be stated thusly: God initiates/offers grace (Eph. 2:8a);
sinners may cooperate/through (IF) faith (Eph. 2:8b)--or not (Deut. 30:19, Matt. 23:37, Rom. 2:4-5).

Beware the most false/heretical teaching on CC!
 
do not agree men killed Jesus ... although there are lots of folks who believe man could kill Him.

The Lord Jesus Christ willingly gave up His life ... no one could take it from Him.

Although Jesus willingly laid down His life and no one had the power to take it from Him apart from His own consent, the instrumental cause of His death was undeniably human action. He did not die in a fire rescuing a child, nor in a flood saving a family; He died because human beings—acting in unbelief, fear, and injustice—condemned Him and executed Him. That is precisely Paul’s point: you cannot understand the cross apart from the manner of His death. The entire arc of the gospel event—His death, burial, resurrection, and ascension—is the demonstration of God’s righteousness. His death exposes the depth of human sin; His resurrection reveals the depth of God’s justice; and His ascension and exaltation show that no human verdict can thwart God’s power to give life, meaning, and purpose to His Son and to all who follow Him.
 
Adam was in covenant relationship with God. It was a works based covenant with 1 requirement: don't eat. So man is responsible for sin. But God chose the judgement.

As God made Adam the representative for mankind, his fate passed upon us all.

What that fate is has been a matter of debate since. What actually happened to man? What is the extent of the corruption man suffered? One's answer to this question determines the extent to which one believes God need participate in man's salvation.
No. It was a covenant between a Father and a son. The only rule was "Do what I tell you". This was the same covenant between Jesus and God the Father. Jesus "only did what He saw the Father doing". As the last Adam, Jesus was able to secure man;s place with God for all who receive Him.
 
We probably think differently on what happened to man as a result of the fall. Like I said earlier, I believe every aspect of man was corrupted as a result of sin.
God's spirit in man cannot be corrupted. It can only be disconnected from God who gave it. Indeed, all men start in this condition save, perhaps, John the Baptist, who leaped in in mother's belly when the advent of Christ was announced.
 
You can never stay on topic. The post has nothing to do with freewill. God clearly teaches that He acted and those kingdoms arose and were put down through His behest and activity. He acts sovereignly. He does His will in the armies of heaven and amongst the inhabitants of the earth, and none can stay His hand...Daniel 4:35.
You have two choices.

1. God put leaders in place and allowed them to use their own free will to do what he needs
2. God puts them in place and has them do what he needs (no free will)

there i no third option.

I am on topic my friend..
I really don't understand why Christians run from the clear revelation of scripture.
I do not know. why do you run from the truth of scripture?
 
But you would have to have faith to take the faith!
Faith literally really is not a thing.

Again, I like pauls explaination usign abraham to show what saving faith looks like

What is faith?
1. contrary to hope. in hope do we believe?
2. do we not waver at the promise to undbelief, but are we strengthened in faith giving God the glory?
3. are we fully convinced that what God promised, he can fulfill?

Abraham was.

Rom 4
18 who, contrary to hope, in hope believed

20 He did not waver at the promise of God through unbelief, but was strengthened in faith, giving glory to God,

21 and being fully convinced that what He had promised He was also able to perform.


and because of it. God imputed, or accounted to him, to him as righteousness.

He was justified based on this confident faith.. faith caused the action of recieving

I can not boast because I recieved a gift.. Nor could he, when he recieved the gift.
 
No. It was a covenant between a Father and a son. The only rule was "Do what I tell you". This was the same covenant between Jesus and God the Father. Jesus "only did what He saw the Father doing". As the last Adam, Jesus was able to secure man;s place with God for all who receive Him.
I agree. That's what I thought I had said.