Why Won't I Vote for Trump?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
More of your tax dollars going to a very worthy cause. Cheesy and racist video games that no one will ever play; or if they do they'll be bored after five minutes.

www.whitehouse.gov

Arcade

www.whitehouse.gov www.whitehouse.gov
 
  • Like
Reactions: true_believer
ResidentAlien said:
I'm aware of it but I don't know the specific mechanics of how it would work. I agree people who are ineligible shouldn't be voting, but how will this bill address those things? Who decides who's ineligible, the states or the federal government? Will there be transparency around the process. Can anyone even produce proof that there are large enough numbers of people voting illegally to justify such a bill? The US Congress is famous for pulling the trigger and asking questions later; I think it's good they're not rushing into anything.
Click to expand...
First thing is to remove people as registered voters when they die. The state fills out a death certificate and with modern computers it is an easy thing for each death certificate to show up in the Secretary of State's office for each state so that they can remove the name from the roll of registered voters.

Second thing, when people move they will have to update their driver's license and at the same time they'll show their old drivers license. The DMV should be required to notify the state they moved from so that their names can be removed off of the registered voter rolls in the state they left.

Convicted felons are barred from voting for some period of time (except in Vermont and Maine) so that should be seen as a valid precedent. Why are the felons being treated worse than anyone else? How would you bar them if you don't require ID? Now a driver's license or a state ID (for people who don't have a driver's license they can go through the same process to get an equally valid ID only it doesn't permit them to drive). This state ID should identify whether or not they are a resident of that state, and also whether or not they are a citizen. Non citizens should be barred from voting.

So then there are three possible IDs you can bring to vote: Driver's license, State ID, or Passport.
 
true_believer said:
At this point, anyone who defends Trump's policies are lying or are in severe denial.
Click to expand...
I think a lot of magas know Donald is a disaster; but they justify it by telling themselves someone on the left would be worse. I've never understood this logic. The lesser of two evils is still evil.

Why support evil? I'd rather not vote than vote for someone I know is evil. Are we at the point where anyone who runs for president in this country has to be evil? Let's get someone who's good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: true_believer
Didn't Donald say something about America first? I guess that doesn't include American cattle ranchers. Reality check: Seems he prefers corruption over America.

 
ResidentAlien said:
I think a lot of magas know Donald is a disaster; but they justify it by telling themselves someone on the left would be worse. I've never understood this logic. The lesser of two evils is still evil.

Why support evil? I'd rather not vote than vote for someone I know is evil. Are we at the point where anyone who runs for president in this country has to be evil? Let's get someone who's good.
Click to expand...
The Iran war is the worst. Trump put us as slaves to a foreign secular state.
Before Iran war things were ok.
Now I leave it in God's hand. All sides are equally bad.
 
Churchgoer said:
The Iran war is the worst. Trump put us as slaves to a foreign secular state.
Before Iran war things were ok.
Now I leave it in God's hand. All sides are equally bad.
Click to expand...
Satan offers you two choices. You can take the express lane to hell, or the slower local lane. You can justify this as you are going to hell slower, but either way, you are on the highway to hell. The whole world lies in the evil one. Just like we have been told, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. If you could simply have a vote to bring in the kingdom of the heavens there would have been no need for Jesus to have been crucified.
 
ZNP said:
Satan offers you two choices. You can take the express lane to hell, or the slower local lane. You can justify this as you are going to hell slower, but either way, you are on the highway to hell. The whole world lies in the evil one. Just like we have been told, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. If you could simply have a vote to bring in the kingdom of the heavens there would have been no need for Jesus to have been crucified.
Click to expand...
Thank God I am on the way to Jesus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZNP
Lightbeamrider said:
GROK

  • The move followed reports that Bartiromo shared internal Fox guidance—directing producers to avoid covering Trump's July 2026 primetime speech on election integrity, China, and 2020 voter data—with the White House, deemed a violation of company policy.
  • Bartiromo's attorney denies she is no longer an employee, calls firing reports false, and claims possession of receipts and witnesses, while Trump publicly praised her as a "true warrior" whose fans would be unhappy with the decision.
Does that mean Maria cannot work for any agency until after her contract with Fox expires?
Not automatically, but that is how these deals usually work. Pay-or-play means Fox still owes her the remaining contract money even if she is off the air. Those same contracts almost always include exclusivity: she cannot host or appear for a competing TV outlet while the deal is still in force.

hollywoodreporter.com
Her lawyer, Bryan Freedman, is arguing she is still a Fox employee through 2029. If that position holds and Fox does not release her, she would generally need Fox’s permission (or a buyout settlement) before she could take a similar on-air job elsewhere. Networks often negotiate exactly that kind of early release when they want the talent gone but the talent wants to work again.

thedesk.net
The exact wording of her contract is not public, so a court or a private settlement could change the outcome. Until then, remaining under contract typically keeps her from simply walking over to another network.
------------------------------
Maria Bartiromo is no dummy. It exposes Fox's internal workings, including what news it chooses not to report to the public. Pravda-adjacent.
Click to expand...
This expands on FOX News, which is alleged to be an outlet for MAGA and the right, but really isn't.

1) I lost my
@FoxNews
employee contract after refusing to sit quiet during NYT’s false and defaming allegations against me that I was to blame for the mass murder in AZ causing the deaths of a federal judge, an innocent child and others, and injury of Rep. Gabby Giffords (D). Fox wouldn’t defend me so I defended myself after being told by Roger Ailes I was not to talk about it on the air. Fox was capitalizing on the controversy while my reputation was getting ripped to threads, so I spoke up, as any responsible, ethical, innocent American would. They canned me for “disobeying,” as per word from on high.

Juggles viewers against a cadre of Fox News advertisers, most of whom despise Trump. Maximize profit business model.
https://twitter.com/x/status/2097755217521680642
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back