Is praying in public against a direct command from Jesus? Does this also include church and public meals?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I know.. See the OP and every post I've made since then.

Legalism pertains to salvation. in that salvation is dependent on strict adherence to the rules.

Praying like a hypocrite is not a matter of salvation. Praying like a hypocrite is not identified as a sin here. What Jesus says is if you want God to answer your prayers go pray privately. So no, this is not a matter of legalism.

No I quoted Jesus in John11: 42 I knew that you always hear me, but I said this for the benefit of the people standing here, that they may believe that you sent me.”
He said I prayed in public so the people witnessing His miracle knew that He was from God.

So Is Jesus a hypocrite for doing so?
Or is being nailed to a cross a good enough reason to not go into seclusion to pray? If performing a Miracle so that people know God sent you is a legit reason?

Again. Jesus Makes no provision for those who don't pray as hypocrite do.. This means if you pray as a hypocrite or you pray as a non hypocrite that resolution for both is to go into your room close the door and pray to your Father in secrete.


start reading earlier and Keep reading longer for the full context.

5 “And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. 6 But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.

So Jesus is speaking to the non hypocrite crowd, He is saying to them do not be like they who pray for the attention of others. But he did not end there. He did not say or imply that if you do not pray for the attention of other men you can pray publicly. He says to the non hypocrite crowd To go into their rooms close the door and pray to your Father in secrete.

Again, Jesus remedy to not being like a hypocrite is not to pray in public. His remedy is for EVERYONE to pray in private. Then He says for what you do in secrete, your Father will reward you publicly.

Are you Jesus? Do you perform Jesus level miracles? Are you performing Miracles So that people Know you have been sent by God? Are you bring glory to God with your miracles or glory to yourself?

lol, are you really asking why does Jesus get to do things we are told not to do?

What does the term "King of kings and Lord of lords" mean to you?

Do kings and lords live by rules we don't?

So then would it not follow that a King of all other kings, and a Lord of All other lord, get to live by rules even kings and lord are forbidden to live by?
what a ridicules comments you are making . I cant take you seriously.

"So Is Jesus a hypocrite for doing so?"
By your understanding of the text, he would have been.


The context of being a hypocrite was playing in public to get man's praise. Jesus did not do that. I thought you knew that?

And Jesus said the very work HE did we shall do also. Your legalistic approach on prying in public is far more than just salvation.
I'm your you know how to pray for people in a public Hospital if you were asked to do so. I think God fully knows ones intention when they pray. No matter where they are. For yo the church is to be seen and not heard.

Ok, that's you.
 
what a ridicules comments you are making . I cant take you seriously.
The questions I am asking are the logical questions that youre theological position creates. Meaning if you think my questions are foolish then you should look more closely of what you said that triggered these questions.
"So Is Jesus a hypocrite for doing so?"
By your understanding of the text, he would have been.
_Or.. The rules that apply to us do not apply to Jesus.
The context of being a hypocrite was playing in public to get man's praise. Jesus did not do that. I thought you knew that?
Jesus did his miracles and subsequent prayers in order to get mans attention so as to prove He was sent from God. He says so in John 11:41–42
And Jesus said the very work HE did we shall do also.
Do you have a link to you performing any sort of Miracle like Jesus did? If not, then know praying in public doesn't apply to you. I think that is the hypocrisy part. Jesus lists only one reason as to why praying in public is acceptable in John 11. Yet those who have NEVER performed a single miracle do so anyway.
Your legalistic approach on prying in public is far more than just salvation.
Again, Legalism pertains only to salvation. Jesus does not identify praying as a hypocrite as even being a sin let alone challenge your salvation. So your legalism charge is moot/unfounded.. Jesus says if you want your prayers answered go to your room and close the door and pray to your Father in secrete. If you like the adoration of others when you pray in public, then you are free to continue to do as you please and your salvation not be effected. Just know that adoration you get for praying in public is all you will ever get.

Mat 6: 5They want people to see them. The truth is, that’s all the reward they will get.

Do you think Jesus was lying when He said this? if no then why argue? is the praise of others all you really want out of prayer?
I'm your you know how to pray for people in a public Hospital if you were asked to do so. I think God fully knows ones intention when they pray. No matter where they are. For yo the church is to be seen and not heard.
Where in mat 6 does it say if your intentions are good, then pray in public? Because verses 5 and 6 says no matter what your intentions, pray in a private place.
Ok, that's you.
???
 
You’re redefining every corporate prayer in Acts as “private,” every explicit prayer as “not prayer but praise,” and every public prayer of Jesus as “forced by circumstance,” but that’s not how Luke presents these scenes; Acts 1:14 is not a secret closet prayer but the church gathered,
We do not seem to be speaking on the same level/understanding. So when I say "Private" I mean:
private
/ˈprīvət/
The word private primarily means belonging to or intended for a single person or group rather than the public. [1]
Miriam webster

When I say public I mean:


public
/ˈpəblik/
The word public means relating to, shared by, or available to all people in a community, nation, or society as a whole, rather than being private or hidden. [1, 2]

When I say corporate
corporate
/ˈkôrp(ə)rət/
Corporate means relating to a large business, company, or organization. [1]

Ok so defination 1 provides us with the understanding that a "private" gathering can still be a private affair even if there is more than one person attending, as the only qualifier between public and private is the general public's ability to access this gathering or meeting.

The meeting in the upper room was NOT a corporate church service as at that point the church had not been established. The church is born on the day of pentacost in acts 2 when the Holy Spirit is poured out onto the people.

So, no acts 1:24 is not a gathering of the church. this was a gathering of the disciples of Jesus hiding from the authorities because they feared being captured and face jail or even death.

Acts 2:42’s devotion to “the prayers” uses the definite article and refers to established corporate prayer, and Acts 4:24 explicitly says they “lifted their voices together to God,” which is the very definition of corporate prayer, not merely praise.

So, even if you want to pretend that lifting up your voice in every other instance does not mean Praise/singing you haven't established that devotion to prayer was a public display of prayers. Corporately lead prayer (where one man prays and all other respect his prayer by the bowing of heads and silence) is still a private prayer as per the definitions provided above.

Jesus’ public prayers are not incidental; John 11:41–42 tells you the principle: He prayed aloud for the sake of the hearers, which is exactly the category Matthew 6 is addressing — motive, not location.
In John 11 Jesus is giving reason as to why this prayer was not silent. (So that those witnessing the resurrection of Lazarus knew Jesus was sent by God/Had power over death.)

Matthew 6 condemns performative prayer, not shared prayer, and the NT repeatedly shows believers praying aloud together without any hint of violating Jesus’ command.
Mat 6 provides no exception or path for those who have good intentions in their prayer outside of being directed to pray in secrete.

Let me put it this way..
To whom is Jesus telling to go to their rooms and close the door?

Clearly He is not speaking to the hypocrites because 1. they do not care/have justified their public prayers. and 2. He points out that they have their reward in that those who see them pray publicly.

This only leaves those who pray with a pure heart.

That means everyone who is not a hypocrite must go to their rooms and pray privately. Otherwise God will not answer their prayers.

>The problem is not that I’m “pairing verse fragments with my own teachings”;

You literally just did that in your last scriptural reference of john 11 41. You focous on your reason why He prayed and Ignored the stated reason why He openly prayed/the Reason the Jesus Himself gave, to why He openly prayed. Do you persume to know more than Jesus knew of why He openly prayed?

>it’s that your interpretation requires redefining clear prayer texts so they don’t contradict your system.

maybe you can give an example.

>The NT’s pattern is simple: private prayer guards motive, corporate prayer builds unity, and neither contradicts the other.

That's a great sentiment... Now just show some book chapter and verse from the bible that makes this claim, and you are in business... Oh, and make sure that passage also over rides the authority of Jesus, because again it is Jesus telling the non hypocrites to go to their rooms and pray.
 
We do not seem to be speaking on the same level/understanding. So when I say "Private" I mean:
private
/ˈprīvət/
The word private primarily means belonging to or intended for a single person or group rather than the public. [1]
Miriam webster

When I say public I mean:


public
/ˈpəblik/
The word public means relating to, shared by, or available to all people in a community, nation, or society as a whole, rather than being private or hidden. [1, 2]

When I say corporate
corporate
/ˈkôrp(ə)rət/
Corporate means relating to a large business, company, or organization. [1]

Ok so defination 1 provides us with the understanding that a "private" gathering can still be a private affair even if there is more than one person attending, as the only qualifier between public and private is the general public's ability to access this gathering or meeting.

The meeting in the upper room was NOT a corporate church service as at that point the church had not been established. The church is born on the day of pentacost in acts 2 when the Holy Spirit is poured out onto the people.

So, no acts 1:24 is not a gathering of the church. this was a gathering of the disciples of Jesus hiding from the authorities because they feared being captured and face jail or even death.



So, even if you want to pretend that lifting up your voice in every other instance does not mean Praise/singing you haven't established that devotion to prayer was a public display of prayers. Corporately lead prayer (where one man prays and all other respect his prayer by the bowing of heads and silence) is still a private prayer as per the definitions provided above.


In John 11 Jesus is giving reason as to why this prayer was not silent. (So that those witnessing the resurrection of Lazarus knew Jesus was sent by God/Had power over death.)


Mat 6 provides no exception or path for those who have good intentions in their prayer outside of being directed to pray in secrete.

Let me put it this way..
To whom is Jesus telling to go to their rooms and close the door?

Clearly He is not speaking to the hypocrites because 1. they do not care/have justified their public prayers. and 2. He points out that they have their reward in that those who see them pray publicly.

This only leaves those who pray with a pure heart.

That means everyone who is not a hypocrite must go to their rooms and pray privately. Otherwise God will not answer their prayers.



You literally just did that in your last scriptural reference of john 11 41. You focous on your reason why He prayed and Ignored the stated reason why He openly prayed/the Reason the Jesus Himself gave, to why He openly prayed. Do you persume to know more than Jesus knew of why He openly prayed?



maybe you can give an example.



That's a great sentiment... Now just show some book chapter and verse from the bible that makes this claim, and you are in business... Oh, and make sure that passage also over rides the authority of Jesus, because again it is Jesus telling the non hypocrites to go to their rooms and pray.
Your definitions don’t change the fact that Luke presents Acts 1:14, Acts 2:42, and Acts 4:24 as the gathered people of God praying aloud together, not individuals retreating to private rooms; “private” in Matthew 6 refers to motive, not architectural access, because Jesus is correcting performative prayer, not forbidding shared prayer.
In Matthew 6 He tells sincere disciples to avoid praying to be seen, not to avoid praying with others, and the NT repeatedly shows believers praying aloud together without any hint of violating His command — the church prays in one voice (Acts 4:24), leaders pray over people (Acts 13:3), and Jesus Himself prays publicly for the sake of the hearers (John 11:41–42).
You keep insisting that any prayer not done in a locked room is disobedience, but that requires redefining every clear prayer text in Acts as “not prayer,” redefining Jesus’ public prayers as “exceptions,” and redefining Matthew 6 as a universal ban on shared prayer — none of which the text supports.
Matthew 6 guards motive,
Acts shows corporate unity, and the
NT pattern is consistent: believers pray privately to avoid pride, and they pray together to build the body.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DavidLamb
Your definitions don’t change the fact that Luke presents Acts 1:14, Acts 2:42, and Acts 4:24 as the gathered people of God praying aloud together, not individuals retreating to private rooms; “private” in Matthew 6 refers to motive, not architectural access, because Jesus is correcting performative prayer, not forbidding shared prayer.
In Matthew 6 He tells sincere disciples to avoid praying to be seen, not to avoid praying with others, and the NT repeatedly shows believers praying aloud together without any hint of violating His command — the church prays in one voice (Acts 4:24), leaders pray over people (Acts 13:3), and Jesus Himself prays publicly for the sake of the hearers (John 11:41–42).
You keep insisting that any prayer not done in a locked room is disobedience, but that requires redefining every clear prayer text in Acts as “not prayer,” redefining Jesus’ public prayers as “exceptions,” and redefining Matthew 6 as a universal ban on shared prayer — none of which the text supports.
Matthew 6 guards motive,
Acts shows corporate unity, and the
NT pattern is consistent: believers pray privately to avoid pride, and they pray together to build the body.
You talking past me. Every one of your points has been addressed and refuted. yet you just repeat yourself, as if I haven't said anything. Clearly you are at the end of what you can comfortably discuss. So unless you have something new to say/address the points I made, then I will leave you with the last word if you need it.
 
We do not seem to be speaking on the same level/understanding. So when I say "Private" I mean:
private
/ˈprīvət/
The word private primarily means belonging to or intended for a single person or group rather than the public. [1]
Miriam webster

When I say public I mean:


public
/ˈpəblik/
The word public means relating to, shared by, or available to all people in a community, nation, or society as a whole, rather than being private or hidden. [1, 2]

When I say corporate
corporate
/ˈkôrp(ə)rət/
Corporate means relating to a large business, company, or organization. [1]
Your definitions of private, public, and corporate are modern, English, sociological categories, but Scripture does not use prayer language that way; the Bible distinguishes prayer by motive and audience, not by access or group size.
In Matthew 6, “private” means hidden from human praise, not “restricted access,” and “public” means performed to be seen, not “open to society.” Likewise, “corporate” in Scripture never means “business‑like organization” but the gathered people of God (ekklesia).

Acts 2:42’s devotion to “the prayers” uses the definite article and refers to established corporate prayer, and Acts 4:24 explicitly says they “lifted their voices together to God,” which is the very definition of corporate prayer, not merely praise.

So, even if you want to pretend that lifting up your voice in every other instance does not mean Praise/singing you haven't established that devotion to prayer was a public display of prayers. Corporately lead prayer (where one man prays and all other respect his prayer by the bowing of heads and silence) is still a private prayer as per the definitions provided above.
Your claim fails because your definitions treat prayer as public vs. private access, but Scripture’s definitions treat prayer as seen vs. unseen motive, so Acts 2:42 and Acts 4:24 describe shared prayer offered without public display, which is corporate prayer in the Bible’s sense, not “public performance,” and not the “private prayer” category you’re trying to force onto the text

Jesus’ public prayers are not incidental; John 11:41–42 tells you the principle: He prayed aloud for the sake of the hearers, which is exactly the category Matthew 6 is addressing — motive, not location.
In John 11 Jesus is giving reason as to why this prayer was not silent. (So that those witnessing the resurrection of Lazarus knew Jesus was sent by God/Had power over death.)
You’re treating Jesus’ audible prayer in John 11 as a one‑off exception justified only by the miracle, but Jesus Himself says He prayed aloud “for their sake”, which proves the biblical category is motive — prayer aimed at God vs. prayer aimed at hearers — and that is exactly what Matthew 6 condemns, not the mere fact that a prayer is spoken where others can hear
Matthew 6 condemns performative prayer, not shared prayer, and the NT repeatedly shows believers praying aloud together without any hint of violating Jesus’ command.
Mat 6 provides no exception or path for those who have good intentions in their prayer outside of being directed to pray in secrete.

Let me put it this way..
To whom is Jesus telling to go to their rooms and close the door?

Clearly He is not speaking to the hypocrites because 1. they do not care/have justified their public prayers. and 2. He points out that they have their reward in that those who see them pray publicly.

This only leaves those who pray with a pure heart.

That means everyone who is not a hypocrite must go to their rooms and pray privately. Otherwise God will not answer their prayers

You’re treating Jesus’ command “go into your room and shut the door” as a universal ban on any prayer spoken where others can hear, but Jesus applies it to those tempted to pray in order to be seen, not to all sincere disciples, which is why the same NT that records His command also records shared prayer (Acts 1:14; Acts 2:42; Acts 4:24), public intercession (James 5:14), and Jesus’ own audible prayers, proving that Scripture defines prayer by motive, not location, and your interpretation collapses because it forces Jesus to forbid what He Himself and His apostles openly practiced.

>The problem is not that I’m “pairing verse fragments with my own teachings”;

You literally just did that in your last scriptural reference of john 11 41. You focous on your reason why He prayed and Ignored the stated reason why He openly prayed/the Reason the Jesus Himself gave, to why He openly prayed. Do you persume to know more than Jesus knew of why He openly prayed?
In John 11:41–42 I’m not inventing a “reason” beyond Jesus’ own words; I’m using His stated reason—“I said this on account of the people standing around, that they may believe”—to show that Scripture itself frames audible prayer in terms of motive toward hearers, which is exactly what Matthew 6 condemns, so I’m following Jesus’ explanation, not presuming to know more than He does

>it’s that your interpretation requires redefining clear prayer texts so they don’t contradict your system.

maybe you can give an example.
Your system forces you to redefine Acts 4:24 (“they lifted their voices together to God”) as “not prayer but praise,” Acts 2:42 (“devoted to the prayers”) as “not corporate but private,” and Matthew 6:6 (“go into your room”) as a universal ban on any audible prayer, which means you must reinterpret clear prayer texts so they don’t contradict your rule that all non‑silent prayer is disobedience

>The NT’s pattern is simple: private prayer guards motive, corporate prayer builds unity, and neither contradicts the other.

That's a great sentiment... Now just show some book chapter and verse from the bible that makes this claim, and you are in business... Oh, and make sure that passage also over rides the authority of Jesus, because again it is Jesus telling the non hypocrites to go to their rooms and pray.
Jesus’ command in Matthew 6:6 guards motive, not location, and the NT itself shows the pattern — private prayer guarding the heart (Matt 6:6; Mark 1:35) and corporate prayer building unity (Acts 1:14; Acts 2:42; Acts 4:24) — so the passages he demands are the very ones that prove Jesus did not forbid shared prayer but forbade performative prayer, and nothing in Matthew 6 overrides what Jesus and His apostles openly practiced.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DavidLamb
Do you think Jesus would have prayed for someone publicly, the same way you would have?

Yes. He prayed for the children. One of the most beautiful images in the Bible is Jesus praying for the children. And He prayed in public at other times. Are you saying it's a sin to pray in public?


If yes, what scripturally makes you think you would pray with the same effort He would?

Pray with the same effort?? I don't know what you mean. The Bible says that the power of Christ is in us. He said "you will do greater things".
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
Typically, whenever I see the term used against praying like legalism my initial thought is I wonder if maybe that person doesn't have enough to say to God to pray for an hour or more.
 
Your definitions of private, public, and corporate are modern, English,
That is because the translation I am using is written in modern english. When ever a text is translated into another language then the translated language is where we start. Because unless you are challenging the translation/saying it is wrong, then the purpose of the translation is to use modern english to make what was written in the koine greek understandable.

sociological categories, but Scripture does not use prayer language that way;
Then it is your Job to establish scriptural construct in which it is used.

Plus remember when I said your talking past me?/Not reading what I write? I have made several allowances for corperatly lead prayer. This is why your references to acts 2&4 are irrelevant. Acts 1 is irrelevant as nothing in the passage says the diciples where praying in public and at that point had not become a church yet.

We are not even having the same discussion.
the Bible distinguishes prayer by motive and audience, not by access or group size.
In Matthew 6, “private” means hidden from human praise, not “restricted access,” and “public” means performed to be seen, not “open to society.” Likewise, “corporate” in Scripture never means “business‑like organization” but the gathered people of God (ekklesia).
Prayer motive is irrelevant. as previously stated:
Mat 6 provides no exception or path for those who have good intentions in their prayer outside of being directed to pray in secrete.

Let me put it this way..
To whom is Jesus telling to go to their rooms and close the door?

Clearly He is not speaking to the hypocrites because 1. they do not care/have justified their public prayers. and 2. He points out that they have their reward in that those who see them pray publicly.

This only leaves those who pray with a pure heart.

That means everyone who is not a hypocrite must go to their rooms and pray privately. Otherwise God will not answer their prayers.
Your claim fails because your definitions treat prayer as public vs. private access, but Scripture’s definitions treat prayer as seen vs. unseen motive, so Acts 2:42 and Acts 4:24 describe shared prayer offered without public display, which is corporate prayer in the Bible’s sense, not “public performance,” and not the “private prayer” category you’re trying to force onto the text
acts 2:42: 42 They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer.

In the above text show me where the passage indicates that the pray these men devoted themselves to was public.

Acts 4:24 So when they heard that, they raised their voice to God with one accord and said: “Lord, You are God, who made heaven and earth and the sea, and all that is in them,

This is from the NKJV, where does it say they prayed? Verse 25 continues their praises with a Psalm which would be a clear indication they where singing or chanting the psalm.. Which is not a strong indicator of prayer.
You’re treating Jesus’ audible prayer in John 11 as a one‑off exception justified only by the miracle, but Jesus Himself says He prayed aloud “for their sake”, which proves the biblical category is motive — prayer aimed at God vs. prayer aimed at hearers — and that is exactly what Matthew 6 condemns, not the mere fact that a prayer is spoken where others can hear
Jesus only prayed aloud 6 different times through out the gospels. 3 of those times was from the cross. (meaning He could not go into seclusion) 1 was when He fed the 5000, and another was when He fed the 4000, and at lazarus' tomb for the stated reason of letting people know He was from God.

There are no other instances of Jesus praying publicly. So at the very least you oughta ask WWJD when face with praying publicly, then realize, unless you are on the cross dying for the sins of the world or performing miracles on the level of Christ, then you should humble yourself when you pray by following the directives given by Christ.
You’re treating Jesus’ command “go into your room and shut the door” as a universal ban on any prayer spoken
Nope. I clearly say praying as the hypocrite pray is not identified as a sin. However Jesus did say if you want the Father to answer your prayer then you are to pray in secrete.
> where others can hear, but Jesus applies it to those tempted to pray in order to be seen, not to all sincere disciples,
Again, who is Jesus speaking in mat 6 Potential/sincere disciples or the hypocrite?

Clearly He is not speaking to the hypocrites on how to get their reward for their prayers as He points out they have their reward when seen by other men. Jesus is telling those who are or strive to be sincere when they pray to go to their rooms and pray.
which is why the same NT that records His command also records shared prayer (Acts 1:14; Acts 2:42; Acts 4:24),
Again youre doubling down on your refuted points. In the future I will just ignore the point you made based on these verses unless you can provide the scripture I requested to prove your use of these passages.

Neither Acts two nor 4 claims these prayers where made aloud period much less than a public place. only that prayers where offered. If you want to use these verses then you must show that the prayer where offered aloud. Given Jesus' direct probation on prayers offered aloud, it is likely that the prayers offered where silent, especially if you are claiming they where in a public place.
The acts 1 example shows the disciples huddled together in an upper room which is exactly what Jesus prescribes.

public intercession (James 5:14), and Jesus’ own audible prayers, proving that Scripture defines prayer by motive, not location, and your interpretation collapses because it forces Jesus to forbid what He Himself and His apostles openly practiced.
As previously stated:
Jesus only prayed aloud 6 different times through out the gospels. 3 of those times was from the cross. (meaning He could not go into seclusion) 1 was when He fed the 5000, and another was when He fed the 4000, and at lazarus' tomb for the stated reason of letting people know He was from God.

There are no other instances of Jesus praying publicly. So at the very least you oughta ask WWJD when face with praying publicly, then realize, unless you are on the cross dying for the sins of the world or performing miracles on the level of Christ, then you should humble yourself when you pray by following the directives given by Christ.

I'm 100% ok that Jesus makes rules that do not apply to Him, but applies to us.
In John 11:41–42 I’m not inventing a “reason” beyond Jesus’ own words; I’m using His stated reason—“I said this on account of the people standing around, that they may believe”—to show that Scripture itself frames audible prayer in terms of motive toward hearers, which is exactly what Matthew 6 condemns, so I’m following Jesus’ explanation, not presuming to know more than He does
You are not following Jesus' example unless you are bring someone back from the dead, feeding crowds of 1000s or hanging from a cross.

Plus this is another example of you butchering a bible verse to support your own ends. you said:
“I said this on account of the people standing around, that they may believe”

You cut off His explanation on What they where to believe:
42 And I know that You always hear Me, but because of the people who are standing by I said this, that they may believe that You sent Me.”

The "You Sent Me" part takes away your right to claim you are following Jesus' example as God did not send you, like He sent Christ.

Again, Jesus is playing by a different rule set than everyone else. He has every right to tell you to pray in private while He makes exceptions for Himself and His ministry.
Jesus’ command in Matthew 6:6 guards motive, not location, and the NT itself shows the pattern — private prayer guarding the heart (Matt 6:6; Mark 1:35) and corporate prayer building unity (Acts 1:14; Acts 2:42; Acts 4:24) — so the passages he demands are the very ones that prove Jesus did not forbid shared prayer but forbade performative prayer, and nothing in Matthew 6 overrides what Jesus and His apostles openly practiced.
That's a great sentiment... Now just show some book chapter and verse from the bible that makes this claim, and you are in business... Oh, and make sure that passage also over rides the authority of Jesus, because again it is Jesus telling the non hypocrites to go to their rooms and pray.
 
Yes. He prayed for the children. One of the most beautiful images in the Bible is Jesus praying for the children. And He prayed in public at other times. Are you saying it's a sin to pray in public?
Book Chapter and verse please where Jesus prays openly 'for the children" Because mat 19 only records that He place his hands on them and departed.
Pray with the same effort?? I don't know what you mean. The Bible says that the power of Christ is in us. He said "you will do greater things".
I do not know what this is in reference two I went three pages back and could not find anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Watchman22
Typically, whenever I see the term used against praying like legalism my initial thought is I wonder if maybe that person doesn't have enough to say to God to pray for an hour or more.
where was the term "praying like legalism" used?
 
That is because the translation I am using is written in modern english. When ever a text is translated into another language then the translated language is where we start. Because unless you are challenging the translation/saying it is wrong, then the purpose of the translation is to use modern english to make what was written in the koine greek understandable.
A modern English translation gives you English words, but it does not replace Scripture’s categories, because “private,” “public,” and “corporate” in English describe access, while the biblical text describes motive and audience, meaning you cannot start with Webster’s definitions and then force the NT to fit them — you must start with what the Greek meant, or you end up redefining clear prayer passages to protect your system rather than submitting your system to the text.
Then it is your Job to establish scriptural construct in which it is used.

Plus remember when I said your talking past me?/Not reading what I write? I have made several allowances for corperatly lead prayer. This is why your references to acts 2&4 are irrelevant. Acts 1 is irrelevant as nothing in the passage says the diciples where praying in public and at that point had not become a church yet
You’re demanding that I “establish a scriptural construct,” but the construct is already in the text — Scripture itself defines prayer by motive (seen vs. unseen) and audience (God vs. spectators), not by access, which is why Acts 1:14, Acts 2:42, and Acts 4:24 are absolutely relevant: they show believers praying together without any performative display, proving that your English‑dictionary categories cannot override the NT’s own categories, and your claim that Acts 1 “doesn’t count” because they weren’t yet a church is an artificial rule the text never gives.
acts 2:42: 42 They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer.

In the above text show me where the passage indicates that the pray these men devoted themselves to was public.

Acts 4:24 So when they heard that, they raised their voice to God with one accord and said: “Lord, You are God, who made heaven and earth and the sea, and all that is in them,

This is from the NKJV, where does it say they prayed? Verse 25 continues their praises with a Psalm which would be a clear indication they where singing or chanting the psalm.. Which is not a strong indicator of prayer.
Acts 2:42 does not need to say “public” because Luke uses the phrase “the prayers” — a technical term in Second‑Temple Judaism for set, communal prayers (the Shema, the Eighteen Benedictions, temple prayers), not private closet prayer; your claim that “devoted to the prayers” could mean silent, individual prayer ignores the fact that Luke uses the definite article to point to established, shared liturgical prayer.
Acts 4:24 explicitly says they “lifted their voices together to God,” which is the biblical definition of corporate prayer; the fact that they quote Psalm 2 afterward does not turn the prayer into “singing,” because quoting Scripture inside prayer is normal throughout the Bible (see Neh 9, Dan 9, Jonah 2).
Your argument that Acts 4 is “just praise” collapses because Luke says they said (εἶπαν), not “sang,” and the entire speech is addressed to God, not to one another, which is the biblical marker of prayer.
The only reason you deny these are prayers is because your system requires Matthew 6:6 to forbid any audible prayer, so you must redefine clear prayer texts as “not prayer,” but the NT itself shows believers praying aloud together without violating Jesus’ command, proving your interpretation is driven by your categories, not by the text
As previously stated:
Jesus only prayed aloud 6 different times through out the gospels. 3 of those times was from the cross. (meaning He could not go into seclusion) 1 was when He fed the 5000, and another was when He fed the 4000, and at lazarus' tomb for the stated reason of letting people know He was from God.

There are no other instances of Jesus praying publicly. So at the very least you oughta ask WWJD when face with praying publicly, then realize, unless you are on the cross dying for the sins of the world or performing miracles on the level of Christ, then you should humble yourself when you pray by following the directives given by Christ.

I'm 100% ok that Jesus makes rules that do not apply to Him, but applies to us
As I have said so many times already, Your entire argument collapses because you treat Jesus’ rare audible prayers as proof that audible prayer is forbidden for everyone else, but Jesus’ frequency of public prayer is irrelevant — what matters is the category He Himself gives in John 11:41–42: He prayed aloud “for their sake,” meaning Scripture defines audible prayer by motive, not by rarity, location, or miracle‑context. Matthew 6:6 does not say “pray only in secret,” it says “do not pray to be seen,” and Jesus’ own audible prayers prove that the command is about performative prayer, not about forbidding audible prayer. Your WWJD argument fails because Jesus also prayed with His disciples present (Luke 9:18), before meals (Matt 14:19; Matt 15:36), in Gethsemane within earshot (Matt 26:39–44), and in public thanksgiving (Luke 10:21), none of which involve miracles or crucifixion. If Matthew 6 meant what you claim, then Jesus violated His own command repeatedly, and the apostles violated it constantly (Acts 1:14; Acts 2:42; Acts 4:24). The NT pattern is clear: prayer is judged by audience (God vs. spectators) and motive (humility vs. display), not by access, volume, or visibility, and your interpretation forces Jesus to forbid what He Himself and His apostles openly practiced.
You are not following Jesus' example unless you are bring someone back from the dead, feeding crowds of 1000s or hanging from a cross.

Plus this is another example of you butchering a bible verse to support your own ends. you said:
“I said this on account of the people standing around, that they may believe”

You cut off His explanation on What they where to believe:
42 And I know that You always hear Me, but because of the people who are standing by I said this, that they may believe that You sent Me.”

The "You Sent Me" part takes away your right to claim you are following Jesus' example as God did not send you, like He sent Christ.

Again, Jesus is playing by a different rule set than everyone else. He has every right to tell you to pray in private while He makes exceptions for Himself and His ministry
Your entire rebuttal depends on treating Jesus’ audible prayers as exceptions tied to miracles or crucifixion, but Jesus Himself tells you the principle behind His audible prayer — “I said this for their sake, that they may believe You sent Me” — which means the text itself defines audible prayer by motive toward hearers, not by miracle‑context, rarity, or Christ‑uniqueness.
You’re trying to turn “that they may believe You sent Me” into a reason why His audible prayer cannot teach anything about ours, but that misses the point: Jesus is explaining why He prayed aloud, and His explanation is about audience and motive, the exact categories Matthew 6 addresses.
If Matthew 6 meant what you claim — that all non‑hypocrites must pray only in secret — then Jesus violated His own command every time He prayed audibly, and the apostles violated it constantly (Acts 1:14; Acts 2:42; Acts 4:24).
Your argument that “Jesus can break the rule He gives us” collapses because Matthew 6 is not a location‑law but a motive‑law; secrecy is the antidote to hypocrisy, not the essence of prayer.
Jesus is not “making exceptions for Himself”; He is modeling the very principle He taught — prayer aimed at God, not at spectators — and the NT shows believers praying aloud together without violating His command, proving that your system is built on location‑based categories the Bible never uses, instead of the motive‑based categories Jesus Himself gives.
That's a great sentiment... Now just show some book chapter and verse from the bible that makes this claim, and you are in business... Oh, and make sure that passage also over rides the authority of Jesus, because again it is Jesus telling the non hypocrites to go to their rooms and pray
Matthew 6:6 commands secrecy as the antidote to performative prayer, not as a universal ban on any prayer spoken where others can hear, and the proof is that the same Jesus who gave that command also prayed audibly (Luke 10:21; John 11:41–42; Matt 14:19; Matt 26:39–44) and taught a corporate prayer (“Our Father,” Matt 6:9).
The apostles then obeyed Him exactly as He intended: they prayed privately to guard the heart (Mark 1:35) and prayed together to build unity (Acts 1:14; Acts 2:42; Acts 4:24). These passages do not “override” Jesus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DavidLamb
The directive was to not pray like men who pray in the public pray. Jesus is saying ALL who pray in public do so to be seen by others.

No He do not. YOU are adding your opinion or belief. Jesus is talking about attitude, as He always did with the Pharisees. It's like the Catholic church, when you see the Pope come out dressed in hats 10 ft tall and robes with red and jewelry, THAT is what Jesus was getting at. Then he mumbles some words in another language, not from the heart. That was what the Pharsees were like and that was what Jesus was speaking against.



Then He tells Not to openly Fast, or openly give to the poor. Jesus spends almost a whole chapter in the sermon on the mount telling us, when we do works like fasting prayer and giving to do so in secrete. Why would He tell us to do 2 of those three things always in secrete, but pray openly if your heart is in the right place?

No, again, you're not understanding. When you give money in church you put it in the plate, that's not secret. When you give at Christmas to the Salvation Army, is that in secret? It is how you do it that is Jesus point.




And if He intended us to pray publicly if our heart is in the right place why wouldn't He tell us this point blank, rather than tell us to go to our room and pray in secrete? Then pair this teaching with two others that also says always do these things in secrete?

Because Jesus is warning against praying to be seen not against praying where people can see you. There's a difference.
Timothy said "I will therefore that men pray every where, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and doubting."

  • Acts 3:1 and Acts 5:12 show Peter, John, and other believers regularly attending the temple at the standard "hour of prayer." By praying publicly in the temple courts, they repositioned the message of Jesus directly within the heart of public Jewish life.


  • Public prayer frequently led to public miracles. In Acts 3, praying at the temple gate resulted in the healing of a lame man, drawing a massive public crowd. In Acts 16:25, Paul and Silas prayed and sang hymns aloud while in a public prison—and the other prisoners were listening. This public display of faith culminated in an earthquake and the salvation of the jailer's entire household.

    Public prayer was used to initiate outreach to the Gentile world. In Acts 10, the Roman centurion Cornelius was praying openly when he received a vision, leading to Peter's visit and the subsequent baptism of the first Gentile believers.
 
I ask this because our pastor likes to hold these big long prayer meeting where he 'aggressively encourages' people to pray publicly after the sermon. This last Wednesday he and one of the older members bumped heads about the pastors use of an outline which was established by the Lord's prayer in mat 6 and luke 11.

The arguments centers around the Pastor's want to justify praying publicly using this outline, while the older member pointed out that in mat 6 Not only is the out line given, but we also have a directive that publicly praying in a place of worship, or in public is wrong. Jesus directly says that the people who pray loudly in the synagogues and street corners Do Not get a response from God. That the adoration of their fellow men who see what they are doing and makes them think they are 'holy' for their prayer is all the reward they will get.

Mat 6: 5“When you pray, don’t be like the hypocrites. They love to stand in the synagogues and on the street corners and pray loudly. They want people to see them. The truth is, that’s all the reward they will get. 6;But when you pray, you should go into your room and close the door. Then pray to your Father. He is there in that private place. He can see what is done in private, and he will reward you.

2/3s of this chapter talks about do not do your works or praise in the sight of others. So it follows that praying for meals in public, (at least at the table infront of others) and public prayers in church is heavily frowned upon/will not be heard by God. According to Jesus and His teachings found in mat 6.

What say you?
I :) don't see anything wrong with praying in public. what Jesus was talking about .. He was not talking about Christians. Those that did pray out in the open did it to be seen and heard. You as a believer are righteous because you believe in trust in Jesus Christ.. so praying in the streets or at home.. He GOD always hears you this is written. I don't know the heart here of the pastor.. it may be to get the lost to see to hear.
 
A modern English translation gives you English words,
Yes. I gave those definitions so that we could have a common understanding of the word the word private. Or when I say public /Corporate. So if you have a different understanding of this word, now would be the time you explain why your understanding is different.
but it does not replace Scripture’s categories, because “private,” “public,” and “corporate” in English describe access, while the biblical text describes motive and audience,

If you want to pretend the the greek words for private or public mean something different than the modern english words do, now is the time to provide reference material to support your claim.

Otherwise I'm just going to ignore any of your unsupported claims.
meaning you cannot start with Webster’s definitions and then force the NT to fit them
Go back and read the reason those definitions where given. It has nothing to do with the NT definitions.
— you must start with what the Greek meant, or you end up redefining clear prayer passages to protect your system rather than submitting your system to the text.
Which you have failed to do, if you contend that the greek word is different from it's english counter part, then it is on you to proove the error. I content that Those words are selected in english because they most closely represent the words used in the greek. So to knw the english is to know the intention of the greek.
You’re demanding that I “establish a scriptural construct,” but the construct is already in the text
Nope. I am telling you that your first two examples in Acts 1 and 2 never claim the prayer mentioned where said out loud in a public area.

A point you seem to have 'over looked' in your last 6 posts.
— Scripture itself defines prayer by motive (seen vs. unseen) and audience (God vs. spectators), not by access, which is why Acts 1:14, Acts 2:42, and Acts 4:24 are absolutely relevant: they show believers praying together without any performative display, proving that your English‑dictionary categories cannot override the NT’s own categories, and your claim that Acts 1 “doesn’t count” because they weren’t yet a church is an artificial rule the text never gives.

Acts 2:42 does not need to say “public” because Luke uses the phrase “the prayers” — a technical term in Second‑Temple Judaism for set, communal prayers
Luke was a gentile who was writing to another gentile, and neither would have knowledge of temple specific lingo.
(the Shema, the Eighteen Benedictions, temple prayers), not private closet prayer; your claim that “devoted to the prayers” could mean silent, individual prayer ignores the fact that Luke uses the definite article to point to established, shared liturgical prayer.
Ah, no. Luke uses the definite article to show they lifted their voices as one.

This can happen in two ways. 1. they sit down and write out a formal prayer that they all practice, and then recite, or they take a known song/psalm and sing it.

If you read on down to verse 25 Luke tells us what they all said "in one accord." Then Low and behold we have the words of their one accord. it was psalms 2:1 But, if you keep on reading to the end of the chapter it does say they where praying as one.. Perhaps that is the key. No one person is the focus of the prayer and God is glorified rather than one individual moaning and growning to himself.
Acts 4:24 explicitly says they “lifted their voices together to God,” which is the biblical definition of corporate prayer; the fact that they quote Psalm 2 afterward does not turn the prayer into “singing,” because quoting Scripture inside prayer is normal throughout the Bible (see Neh 9, Dan 9, Jonah 2).
Irrelevant
Your argument that Acts 4 is “just praise” collapses because Luke says they said (εἶπαν), not “sang,” and the entire speech is addressed to God, not to one another, which is the biblical marker of prayer.
(read This in a trump voice to get the full effect:) "Wrong."

Any form of praise or worship which includes songs, hymns, psalms, or prayer all are directed at God, not just prayer.
The only reason you deny these are prayers is because your system requires Matthew 6:6 to forbid any audible prayer, so you must redefine clear prayer texts as “not prayer,” but the NT itself shows believers praying aloud together without violating Jesus’ command, proving your interpretation is driven by your categories, not by the text
You have been talking past me for so long you do not seem to know that I have stated multiple times that Mat 6 does not forbid corporately lead prayer. What's more I also amended my argument to allow for acts 4 prayer because they spoke in prayer as one, and not individual voices, which again models corporate prayer. One speaking for many or many speaking as one. either-way God gets the glory. This is in contrast to the individuals who take attention from God when they pray as an individual in public.
As I have said so many times already, Your entire argument collapses because you treat Jesus’ rare audible prayers as proof that audible prayer is forbidden for everyone else, but Jesus’ frequency of public prayer is irrelevant

Not when you pair his lack of public prayer with His teaching to pray in secrete. If Jesus did not tell us to refrain from praying publicly, then you would be right. The frequency of his prayer means nothing. However because we have a direct teaching on this subject His public prayer frequency supports His directive to pray privately.
Your entire rebuttal depends on treating Jesus’ audible prayers as exceptions tied to miracles or crucifixion,
Bro.. Jesus prayed 6 times. Three times he was literally nailed to the cross. the other three times he prayed, He did so so that people would know God the Father sent Him. He even says this in john 11. So yes... Jesus' 6 individual prayers are the exception as His directive. This is in contrast to His primary prayer life, which was done in private Just as He taught. As there are around a dozen examples of Jesus going into seclusion to pray.
but Jesus Himself tells you the principle behind His audible prayer — “I said this for their sake, that they may believe You sent Me” — which means the text itself defines audible prayer by motive toward hearers, not by miracle‑context, rarity, or Christ‑uniqueness.
One question, would Jesus prayed for these miracles if He did not intend to raise lazarus or feed the multitudes?

It would be kinda cruel if He had, would it not? "Dear Lord I ask a blessing on the food we are about to eat." Then He gets up and leaves?!?! Or " Guys, move the rock for the entrance of the tomb," and then he says "Dear Lord please raise lazarus from the dead."

But then He leaves and does not raise lazarus.

The above is how your argument plays out in real time, if the motive behind the prayer was not to supplement the miracles. Why would Jesus have prayed if not for the Stated reason "So that they know you sent me."

Meaning the Miracles are the reason why they would know that "you sent me." The "prayer" (Invoking God the Father) is the connection between the miracle and the knowledge that Jesus was sent from the Father. It is what informs who Jesus is.
 
You’re trying to turn “that they may believe You sent Me” into a reason why His audible prayer cannot teach anything about ours, but that misses the point: Jesus is explaining why He prayed aloud, and His explanation is about audience and motive, the exact categories Matthew 6 addresses.
We discussed why motives are irrelevant, do you remember? here it is again:

as previously stated:
Mat 6 provides no exception or path for those who have good intentions in their prayer outside of being directed to pray in secrete.

Let me put it this way by asking a question..
To whom is Jesus telling to 'go to their rooms and close the door?'

Clearly He is not speaking to the hypocrites because
1. they do not care/have justified their public prayers in their mind's eye.
2. He points out that they have their reward in that those who see them pray publicly.

This only leaves those who pray with a pure heart/good motives.

That means everyone who is not a hypocrite must go to their rooms and pray privately. Otherwise God will not answer their prayers.


If Matthew 6 meant what you claim — that all non‑hypocrites must pray only in secret — then Jesus violated His own command every time He prayed audibly,
Again, Jesus did not identify praying out loud was a sin. He simply said if you pray out loud you will get nothing from God.

And Yes Jesus violated his own directive. Even so.. So what.
Your argument that “Jesus can break the rule He gives us” collapses because Matthew 6 is not a location‑law but a motive‑law;
It's not a law at all. It is a directive. there is a difference.
secrecy is the antidote to hypocrisy, not the essence of prayer.
Jesus seems to disagree in mat 6 verses 6 and 7
Jesus is not “making exceptions for Himself”; He is modeling the very principle He taught — prayer aimed at God, not at spectators
When in your room at home with the door closed 100% of your prayer is aimed at God. When in public Jesus says it is aimed at the people.
— and the NT shows believers praying aloud together without violating His command,
Because they prayed as one. Corporately lead prayer is clearly allowed. You make no distinction between individual public prayer, and corporately lead prayer.
proving that your system is built on location‑based categories the Bible never uses,
mat 6: 6;But you, when you pray, go into your room, and when you have shut your door, pray to your Father who is in the secret place; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you openly.

The Phrase Jesus used "Room with door closed" seems to be a "location‑based categorie" that the Bible indeed uses.
instead of the motive‑based categories Jesus Himself gives.

Matthew 6:6 commands secrecy as the antidote to performative prayer, not as a universal ban on any prayer spoken where others can hear, and the proof is that the same Jesus who gave that command also prayed audibly (Luke 10:21;
How is luke 10 a Prayer? Jesus is simply thanking God. Jesus gives an outline to what prayer is in mat 6 and in luke 11. Your verse fragment does not meet the requirements of "prayer." Your verse fragment would be an example of 'thanksgiving." This is a subset of prayer. Note in luke 10 Jesus simply gives thanks and leaves.
John 11:41–42
Jesus raises Lazarus and tells us why He prays aloud. clearly an exception and not the rule.
; Matt 14:19; Matt 26:39–44)
As previously stated Jesus prays aloud when He perform miracles so as to inform the crowd He is sent from God.
and taught a corporate prayer (“Our Father,” Matt 6:9).
Again corporately lead prayer is permitted.
The apostles then obeyed Him exactly as He intended: they prayed privately to guard the heart (Mark 1:35)
Mark 1:35 Now in the morning, having risen a long while before daylight, He went out and departed to a solitary place; and there He prayed.

So this verse works for my argument not yours. Jesus going to a solitary place to pray, is the homeless guy's version of going to your room and closing to the door to pray.
These passages do not “override” Jesus.
then your whole argument is sunk. Because everything you claim about motives and whatever else has to over ride a direct command from Jesus the identifies a physical place of isolation.
 
If you want to pretend the the greek words for private or public mean something different than the modern english words do, now is the time to provide reference material to support your claim.
The claim isn’t that Greek words “mean something different” than English in some arbitrary way; it’s that the semantic range of the Greek terms is not reducible to the modern English category of “access.”
When the NT uses δημοσίᾳ (“publicly,” Acts 20:20), BDAG defines it as “in public, openly, in the presence of people,” which is a visibility/audience term, not an access‑control term.
When it uses ἰδίᾳ (“privately”), BDAG gives “one’s own, personal, pertaining to the home,” which is a relational/social sphere, not “restricted access.”
When Jesus contrasts ἐν κρυπτῷ (“in secret”) with ἐν τῷ φανερῷ (“in the open”) in Matthew 6, the contrast is explicitly motive‑laden—done “to be seen by men” versus done “before your Father.”
And λάθρα (“secretly,” Matt 1:19; 2:7) is used for both compassionate discretion and wicked plotting, proving the term carries ethical coloration, not mere privacy.
So the reference material shows the point: English “private/public” is a neutral structural category about access; NT Greek uses morally and rhetorically charged categories about visibility, audience, and intention, which is why you cannot simply map the English abstraction onto the biblical usage without flattening the text.
Nope. I am telling you that your first two examples in Acts 1 and 2 never claim the prayer mentioned where said out loud in a public area.

A point you seem to have 'over looked' in your last 6 posts.
The NT’s prayer‑visibility categories come straight from the Greek lexica: δημοσίᾳ (Acts 20:20) is defined by BDAG as “openly, publicly, in the presence of people,” a visibility/audience term, not a location‑access term; ἰδίᾳ (“privately”) is defined as “one’s own, personal, pertaining to the home,” a relational sphere, not “restricted access”; ἐν κρυπτῷ (“in secret,” Matt 6) is glossed as “hidden, not in public view,” and Jesus ties it explicitly to motive (“to be seen by men” vs “before your Father”), proving it is not a spatial category; φανερῶς (“openly”) is defined as “in the open, visibly, publicly,” again a visibility term; λάθρα (“secretly,” Matt 1:19; 2:7) is defined as “secretly, clandestinely,” used for both compassionate discretio
We discussed why motives are irrelevant, do you remember? here it is again:

as previously stated:
Mat 6 provides no exception or path for those who have good intentions in their prayer outside of being directed to pray in secrete.

Let me put it this way by asking a question..
To whom is Jesus telling to 'go to their rooms and close the door?'

Clearly He is not speaking to the hypocrites because
1. they do not care/have justified their public prayers in their mind's eye.
2. He points out that they have their reward in that those who see them pray publicly.

This only leaves those who pray with a pure heart/good motives.

That means everyone who is not a hypocrite must go to their rooms and pray privately. Otherwise God will not answer their prayers
Your entire argument collapses once you look at the Greek terms Jesus actually uses:
ἐν κρυπτῷ (“in secret”) is not a location requirement but a visibility/motive category—BDAG: “hidden, not in public view,” used in direct contrast with
φανερῶς (“openly, visibly”), and Jesus explicitly ties the contrast to intent (“to be seen by men” vs “before your Father”), meaning the command targets performative display, not all audible prayer.
Your claim that motives are “irrelevant” contradicts the grammar of the passage itself: the hypocrites’ defining trait is their motive (“because they love to be seen”), and the Father’s reward is tied to the secrecy of motive, not the secrecy of venue.
And your argument that Jesus must be speaking only to “pure‑hearted” disciples fails because the imperative σύ (“you, singular”) is the standard rhetorical device for addressing the listener as the moral alternative, not a restriction of the command to a subset; Jesus is contrasting two motives, not two locations.
Nothing in the Greek supports your leap from “don’t pray to be seen” to “all non‑hypocrites must pray only in private or God won’t answer.” That conclusion is not in the text, not in the lexica, and not in the syntax—it is an English access‑based construct imposed on a Greek motive‑visibility passage.
Again, Jesus did not identify praying out loud was a sin. He simply said if you pray out loud you will get nothing from God.

And Yes Jesus violated his own directive. Even so.. So what
Your “so what” collapses your entire system, because Matthew 6:6 is either a moral command or it isn’t — and if you say Jesus “violated His own directive,” then you’ve admitted the directive cannot mean “all non‑hypocrites must pray only in secret,” because Jesus is the one person who cannot violate His own moral instruction; the moment you concede He prayed audibly and still remained perfectly righteous, you’ve conceded that Matthew 6:6 is not a location‑law but a motive‑law, which is exactly what the Greek shows
How is luke 10 a Prayer? Jesus is simply thanking God. Jesus gives an outline to what prayer is in mat 6 and in luke 11. Your verse fragment does not meet the requirements of "prayer." Your verse fragment would be an example of 'thanksgiving." This is a subset of prayer. Note in luke 10 Jesus simply gives thanks and leaves.
Jesus’ thanksgiving in Luke 10:21 is explicitly addressed to the Father, uses the standard prayer‑address formula, is classified in every Greek lexicon as a prayer of εὐχαριστία (thanksgiving), and since thanksgiving is a subset of prayer in both Jesus’ own teaching (Matt 6; Luke 11) and the NT’s prayer vocabulary, His audible thanksgiving is still an audible prayer, which means your attempt to exclude it collapses because the category “thanksgiving isn’t prayer” does not exist in Scripture or Greek.
Mark 1:35 Now in the morning, having risen a long while before daylight, He went out and departed to a solitary place; and there He prayed.

So this verse works for my argument not yours. Jesus going to a solitary place to pray, is the homeless guy's version of going to your room and closing to the door to pray
Mark 1:35 shows Jesus withdrawing to avoid visibility and interruption, not obeying a supposed location‑law, because Matthew 6:6’s command uses ἐν κρυπτῷ (“in secret”) as a motive‑visibility category, not a requirement to find a room, meaning Jesus’ solitary prayer is an example of guarding the heart from an audience, not proof that all righteous prayer must occur in a private enclosure.
then your whole argument is sunk. Because everything you claim about motives and whatever else has to over ride a direct command from Jesus the identifies a physical place of isolation.
If Matthew 6:6 were a location‑law requiring all righteous people to pray only in physical isolation, then Jesus’ own solitary prayer in Mark 1:35 would merely show He sometimes guarded His heart from an audience, but His many audible prayers would make Him a habitual breaker of His own command — which is impossible — so the command cannot be a physical‑place rule and must be the motive‑visibility rule Jesus Himself explains.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DavidLamb
Not only that, the directive He gives on prayer are also mirrored the other two works He requires of us mentioned in mat 6. In that we are to give in secrete, and to fast in secrete. Which make sense, in that whatever we do for God we do not do it publicly, but in secrete.

Read the following Jesus said::

Matthew 5:14 - Matthew 5:16
(Matthew 5:14-16) "Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid. {15} Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. {16} Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven."

So again giving charity is a good work.. Do you agree? Jesus said let our light shine before men that they may ""SEE YOUR GOOD WORKS"" Why? The intent we should have is to cause other people to give glory to The Father.. Of course if i give charity seeking to get the glory of other human beings thats is against the teachings of Jesus.. The Intent of the giver is the Key to whether it is approved by the LORD or rejected by the LORD..

Jesus said in the verse about giving Alms "Charity"

Matthew 6:1
(Matthew 6:1) "Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven."

Again Jesus provides 2 Combined actions..
1) Doing Arms before men ( giving charity )
2) Giving Alms to be seen by them..

So the teaching against doing this includes not only the action but also the Wrong Objective ( to get social praise from the community because you gave charity ) What ever good works we do should be to give glory to God.. So it is not what the person is doing it is WHY they are doing it..


If this is the case then could you not also fast and give publicly if you have 'good intentions?' If so then why did Jesus waste almost a whole chapter in the sermon on the mount telling us otherwise?

As for Fasting the verse also deals with the same issue.. The persons objective/ intention should not be to gain any social/ human praise or credit for engaging in a fast..

Again Jesus said in the verse::

(Matthew 6:16) "¶ Moreover when ye fast, be not, as the hypocrites, of a sad countenance: for they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward."

So Jesus is consistent in each point.. Prayer, Charity and Fasting.. Thgat we should never do any of these things with the objective of getting any personal praise or social credit from other people for doing them.. Again the Intent is added to the action in the scriptures..
 
Read the following Jesus said::

Matthew 5:14 - Matthew 5:16
(Matthew 5:14-16) "Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid. {15} Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. {16} Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven."

So again giving charity is a good work.. Do you agree?
No. doing a thing Does not make it good or bad. It is why you do what you did that makes an act good or bad.. For example most would say killing another person is always a terrible thing. But there are examples where killing was considered an act of divine Justice in the bible which is a good thing. Where as if you know a person can not handle money and you give them More than they can manage more times then not they will self destruct. So, giving them that money would be a bad thing.

Jesus said let our light shine before men that they may ""SEE YOUR GOOD WORKS"
The light spoken of here, isnt your deeds. Read what Jesus says again: "Let your light shine... So that they MAY SEE your good deeds."

Your light/Your Faith is what illuminates your deeds. Light in scripture is almost always a metaphor for the Holy Spirit. If People see what you do through the light of the Holy Spirit Then the deeds you do are not attributed to you persay, but to God. Meaning If you allow the light/Holy Spirit to decide what gets made known to others, then it is not you who is 'illuminating' those works.. This is why we are told to do those deeds in private, and let Your light/The Holy Spirit illuminate them. So, Do your works in secrete as Mat 6 tells us to do and allow God the Holy Spirit show case what He decides needs to be made known. Because if you do all of your works before men, then it is no different than the hypocrite who sounds the trumpet to be seen by men doing a good deed.
" Why? The intent we should have is to cause other people to give glory to The Father..
agree. We do that by doing our deeds in secrete and allowing our light/Holy Spirit decide what to illuminate to others.
Of course if i give charity seeking to get the glory of other human beings thats is against the teachings of Jesus.. The Intent of the giver is the Key to whether it is approved by the LORD or rejected by the LORD..
Which is why we are to do our deeds in secrete and allow the Holy Spirit (our light) to determine what is seen and what is not.
Jesus said in the verse about giving Alms "Charity"

Matthew 6:1
(Matthew 6:1) "Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven."

So let's keep reading chapter 6:
6 “Take heed that you do not do your charitable deeds before men, to be seen by them. Otherwise you have no reward from your Father in heaven. 2Therefore, when you do a charitable deed, do not sound a trumpet before you as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory from men. Assuredly, I say to you, they have their reward. 3But when you do a charitable deed, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, 4 that your charitable deed may be in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will Himself reward you openly.

So again do the deed in secrete and allow the Light in you/Holy Spirit decide what is or is not seen.