Modern Relationships and Lindsey Clancy Case. 3 Children Strangled. Overwhelming Support From Females and Male Backlash.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Right. There have been new stories about this where schools are kicking kids out of school over this sort of thing and the cops are investigating and charging kids with crimes.

As I understand it, those that advocate for AI claim it can do know wrong and so they desire to keep their heads in the sand refusing to admit AI is running amok and is unable to be controlled growing more dangerous by the day.

AI is the new tower of babble which cannot be stopped except through divine intervention which comes after the great tribulation

Not sure how this relate?
 
It's what actually happened.

Some demons told her to murder her babies and she complied.
That's a lie.
Ms.Clsncy said an unfamiliar male voice spoke to her.

She never identified it as a demon. And hypocrisy at the outermost is reprehensible in someone who claims a church would reach out to Lindsay. And on the other hand later says she should be murdered by the State because she's mentally ill.

None of that is Biblical for New Testament Christians.

Especially when the one advocating such wicked unbiblical punishment insists the moral law of God in the OT no longer applies to believers in Jesus.


She knew it was wrong but did it anyway so this is grievous sin before the Lord and illegal under man's law so she should be sent to the electric chair or better yet the firing squad.

Some local preachers in her area should be reaching out to her to minister to her because she's on her way to the lake of fire.
No.
That's not true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarriePie
Here is a novel idea, no one with an active restraining order, allegations of criminal conduct or conviction(s) should be allowed to serve on a jury.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarriePie
It's what actually happened.

Some demons told her to murder her babies and she complied.

She knew it was wrong but did it anyway so this is grievous sin before the Lord and illegal under man's law so she should be sent to the electric chair or better yet the firing squad.

Some local preachers in her area should be reaching out to her to minister to her because she's on her way to the lake of fire.

Best you never serve on a jury that is for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarriePie
That's a lie.
Ms.Clsncy said an unfamiliar male voice spoke to her.

Yes, that was the voice of a demon spirit

Do you think it was an angel; of the Lord Jesus telling her to murder her innocent children?

Jesus tells us in John 10:10 that satan comes to steal, kill, and to destroy

This means when an "unfamiliar male voice" tells someone to do murder, it's the voice of the devil speaking.

She never identified it as a demon

No, she just takes orders from demons.

And hypocrisy at the outermost is reprehensible in someone who claims a church would reach out to Lindsay

Nobody should witness to her to try and get her to accept Jesus and repent from her grievous sins so she can go to Heaven?

Really?

And on the other hand later says she should be murdered by the State because she's mentally ill.

The Lord is the One Who prescribes the death penalty for those that commit murder.

Especially when the one advocating such wicked unbiblical punishment insists the moral law of God in the OT no longer applies to believers in Jesus.

The New Testament teaches God is not mocked, we reap what we sow and it also teaches civil authority is setup by the Lord and they do not bare the sword in vain and are God's ministers who minister wrath upon evil doers such as this lady who murdered he innocent children.

Can't get more evil than that.

That's not true.

Jesus said all murders will have their part on the lake of fire.

Did Jesus get it wrong? Is the Lord in error?

Revelation 21:8 - But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

Certainly you aren't saying this lady is going to Heaven even without becoming a Christian and repenting of her sins are you?

I sure hope you know the Word of the Lord better than that.
 
Yes, that was the voice of a demon spirit

Do you think it was an angel; of the Lord Jesus telling her to murder her innocent children?

Jesus tells us in John 10:10 that satan comes to steal, kill, and to destroy

This means when an "unfamiliar male voice" tells someone to do murder, it's the voice of the devil speaking.



No, she just takes orders from demons.



Nobody should witness to her to try and get her to accept Jesus and repent from her grievous sins so she can go to Heaven?

Really?



The Lord is the One Who prescribes the death penalty for those that commit murder.



The New Testament teaches God is not mocked, we reap what we sow and it also teaches civil authority is setup by the Lord and they do not bare the sword in vain and are God's ministers who minister wrath upon evil doers such as this lady who murdered he innocent children.

Can't get more evil than that.



Jesus said all murders will have their part on the lake of fire.

Did Jesus get it wrong? Is the Lord in error?

Revelation 21:8 - But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

Certainly you aren't saying this lady is going to Heaven even without becoming a Christian and repenting of her sins are you?

I sure hope you know the Word of the Lord better than that.
I know it far better than you make out.

Light bringer sure knew who to invite to his womanhatefest.

Lord.
 
  • Heart
Reactions: CarriePie
Light bringer sure knew who to invite to his womanhatefest.

If someone is opposed to seeing innocent little children murdered, that means they hate women?

I think some have it backwards

People who support this woman believing she should not be punished for her murderous crimes are mocking God because they believe she should not reap what she has sown. Gotta read Galatians 6
 
The year was 1994, right after the disgusting OJ acquittal.

I got selected to serve on sexual assault/rape trial, It was the first time I became aware that women are dangerous on a jury.

The guy was a complete and utter scum. He ran an “escort” service. We all understood what that really was.

The girl was 19 and replied to an ad to be an escort, and get hired by him.
She went with the owner, and several other guys in a limousine to a couple of Jersey bars.

Her claim was that the owner of the escort service forced her to give him “ oral “. Sorry, About as delicate as I can put it.

The guy then took the stand, He claimed he asked her to, and she did. And that her real problem was he didn’t give her any money for it.

For whatever reason we didn’t hear from any of the other guys. Only the limo driver, who claimed he didn’t see or hear anything. But he said,
AFTER this supposedly traumatic event, they stopped off and all the guys spent an hour or so time together in a bar.

She got back IN the limousine, and THEN demanded to be dropped off, where she subsequently called a friend to pick her up.

That’s it! NOTHING else. The whole trial took about an hour. I will say the prosecutor (a woman for reference) really did a horrible job.

The jury was composed of 6 men and 6 women.
Not sure how other juries do it, but we suggested to take a vote to see where everyone was.

Understand we all believed this guy was trash, but he wasn’t on trial for being a trashy human being.

To my shock, ALL 6 women voted guilty!

ALL 6 men voted not guilty.

When we started deliberating, and asked the women what evidence was there to convict, they all women
said some variation of, “ well , the evidence is that she said he did it!”

We requested the reading back of the girl’s testimony and resumed. This kinda shook up the defense, and I was a little happy he was nervous.

So we resumed, and after another half hour or so one woman changed to not guilty and no guys switched.

But that these women were willing to throw someone in jail for who knows how long, simply because she said he did it, with absolutely ZERO corroborating evidence, was a real wake up call for me, and how if I were ever on trial I’d want an all male jury, that didn’t operate on emotions or toxic empathy.

Oh, I forgot to mention, it ended in a hung jury. You could tell the judge was peeved at the prosecutor, and said something like, “ since this trial was only an hour, and you deliberated for longer than that, I’m dismissing you, thank you”.

I have no idea if they tried him again.
 
Did you notice your post #439 got a thumbs up from the very one that derailed this thread by injecting the garbage of Candace Legion Owens?🤣

This is why some here think people let other people post under their pseudonym,screen name.
Because of the incongruity of postings.

Lord!

If I don't get an answer from Locket, would someone else please tell me who the person who introduced Crazy Candace into this thread?

Thanks
 
Right. There have been new stories about this where schools are kicking kids out of school over this sort of thing and the cops are investigating and charging kids with crimes.

As I understand it, those that advocate for AI claim it can do know wrong and so they desire to keep their heads in the sand refusing to admit AI is running amok and is unable to be controlled growing more dangerous by the day.

AI is the new tower of babble which cannot be stopped except through divine intervention which comes after the great tribulation

You shoud not go running off in all directions with something obtained 3rd, 4th and maybe 5th hand and determine it is the truth and nothing but the truth so help you news sources everywhere.

First off, I don't believe Clancy is little miss goodie 2 shoes but the mass of misdircted, unclear and false info being shoved in all our faces is not the credible truth obtained by people who may actually want the truth. Sure, obviously people have based their assessments on past experience, articles and similar crimes but we are now living in the insta-info age and far too many believe they
are capable of judgement and determnation in this and more cases on the way.

As it is, no one here is going to determine the Clancy outcome but unless God sends someone to her who speaks the truth with discernment and the grace of God, I would state her outcome is written outside of any courtroom along with all liars and murderers.

While I believe that the entire atmosphere of the crime is demonic. I don't think it helpful to state emphatically that Clancy listened to a demon's voice and murdered her children. You may believe that, I might even believe that (I'm not convinced she heard a voice since she was not given to hearing them but for this one time) but there is no proof she heard anything. If you say and continue to say she listened to a demon, then you are giving her credibility she may not deserve. You are saying you believe her when she says that, so why don't you believe everything else she says? Because what she did was evil, you ASSUME she obeyed something evil.

Frankly, we have no way to tell since it was a one off according to what I have read. I could be wrong, but that is my current understanding from what I have read.

AI is not the tower of Babble. It is distinct and very clear on what it capabilities are.

Don't ascribe to God actions against AI that you cannot show from scripture but have decided what you think is true.

Don't get started on me and try to tell me I believe Clancy is innocent or think she should go free. Il think she is as guilty as what it looks like and should never go free. I do not believe the husband had anything to do with it, I am not a liberal and would not abort a puppy, let alone a child.
 
Yes, that was the voice of a demon spirit

Do you think it was an angel; of the Lord Jesus telling her to murder her innocent children?

Jesus tells us in John 10:10 that satan comes to steal, kill, and to destroy

This means when an "unfamiliar male voice" tells someone to do murder, it's the voice of the devil speaking.



No, she just takes orders from demons.



Nobody should witness to her to try and get her to accept Jesus and repent from her grievous sins so she can go to Heaven?

Really?



The Lord is the One Who prescribes the death penalty for those that commit murder.



The New Testament teaches God is not mocked, we reap what we sow and it also teaches civil authority is setup by the Lord and they do not bare the sword in vain and are God's ministers who minister wrath upon evil doers such as this lady who murdered he innocent children.

Can't get more evil than that.



Jesus said all murders will have their part on the lake of fire.

Did Jesus get it wrong? Is the Lord in error?

Revelation 21:8 - But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

Certainly you aren't saying this lady is going to Heaven even without becoming a Christian and repenting of her sins are you?

I sure hope you know the Word of the Lord better than that.

I can't even but I already said what I thought about your loose shooting in the dark in all directions personal opinions. smh
 
False, no one has defended the killing of the children.

Beyond ridiculous and completely and utterly false.
He didn't say anyone defended killing the children, your reading comprehension is a real problem. He said that they have defended the woman who killed the children.
 
False, no one has defended the killing of the children.

Beyond ridiculous and completely and utterly false.
I agree. None want to see the killing of Children.

But it's ok for a woman with a few split ends to MURDER HER CHILDREN?


Lock her up for life. Mental institution or prison...........Can anyone say, "She is fit for society?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: PennEd