Right. There have been new stories about this where schools are kicking kids out of school over this sort of thing and the cops are investigating and charging kids with crimes.
As I understand it, those that advocate for AI claim it can do know wrong and so they desire to keep their heads in the sand refusing to admit AI is running amok and is unable to be controlled growing more dangerous by the day.
AI is the new tower of babble which cannot be stopped except through divine intervention which comes after the great tribulation
You shoud not go running off in all directions with something obtained 3rd, 4th and maybe 5th hand and determine it is the truth and nothing but the truth so help you news sources everywhere.
First off, I don't believe Clancy is little miss goodie 2 shoes but the mass of misdircted, unclear and false info being shoved in all our faces is not the credible truth obtained by people who may actually want the truth. Sure, obviously people have based their assessments on past experience, articles and similar crimes but we are now living in the insta-info age and far too many believe they
are capable of judgement and determnation in this and more cases on the way.
As it is, no one here is going to determine the Clancy outcome but unless God sends someone to her who speaks the truth with discernment and the grace of God, I would state her outcome is written outside of any courtroom along with all liars and murderers.
While I believe that the entire atmosphere of the crime is demonic. I don't think it helpful to state emphatically that Clancy listened to a demon's voice and murdered her children. You may believe that, I might even believe that (I'm not convinced she heard a voice since she was not given to hearing them but for this one time) but there is no proof she heard anything. If you say and continue to say she listened to a demon, then you are giving her credibility she may not deserve. You are saying you believe her when she says that, so why don't you believe everything else she says? Because what she did was evil, you ASSUME she obeyed something evil.
Frankly, we have no way to tell since it was a one off according to what I have read. I could be wrong, but that is my current understanding from what I have read.
AI is not the tower of Babble. It is distinct and very clear on what it capabilities are.
Don't ascribe to God actions against AI that you cannot show from scripture but have decided what you think is true.
Don't get started on me and try to tell me I believe Clancy is innocent or think she should go free. Il think she is as guilty as what it looks like and should never go free. I do not believe the husband had anything to do with it, I am not a liberal and would not abort a puppy, let alone a child.