The Covid CANCER Shot!

HealthAndHappiness said:

Do you remember Gill Gates of Hell saying that was what he was working on too?
Your article is the first I've heard a bout rabies specifically. I think he also mentioned malaria as his motive.
Lately there has been a lot about modified rabies.
Do you think that the globalists made scientists are stirring a witches brew for a new release? Perhaps like I am legend the movie?

Click to expand...

Everyone knows that TNT can be used to help man or to kill man.

Same thing with nuclear energy.

In fact every tool can be used for good or evil.

Except of course vaccines (whether injected by doctors or mosquitoes). If you claim those can also be used for evil then you are a tin foil hat conspiracy nut.

Now of course psychopaths in literature and the movies have used needles and poisons for centuries. That is fine, but if you say a doctor or philanthropist is doing that then you are a tin foil hat conspiracy nut.

Look, governments don't finance psychopaths, unless of course we are talking about Nazi Germany, or Japan during WW2, or of course that Chinese psychopath Jani Beg's army caught the plague while besieging Caffa and used trebuchets to launch infected corpses over the city walls to wipe out the defenders.

The bottom line is that it is OK to talk about Russia, China, N. Korea, Iran or Hitler like this, but if you suggest that the US or Bill Gates is like this, well that is like shouting fire in a movie theater. You just don't do that, even if the place is burning down.

HealthAndHappiness said:

PS: just the 5-10 +/-minute mark about rabies. Just wanted your perspective.

Click to expand...

I enjoyed that Video

About the Rabies thing I state my views on it on this you tube video, which has stayed up on you tube which surprises me - I don't really use you tube because of its censorship.


In the video you posted, Peggy mentioned small pox also, this is my take on that:

On May 8th 1980, the World Health Organisation anounced the complete world wide elimination of the Smallpox virus.

This is supposed to be the greatest achievement of vaccination, but was Smallpox really erradicated?

What really happened is that if people developed symptoms previously known as Smallpox after Vaccination, rather than admit the ineffectiveness of the treatment, they re-classified minute differences as different diseases.

The creation of new labels is a method still used today. If you want to show success in eliminating a so called epidemic, you re-classify diseases. This is easy to do since, most diseases have the same symtoms anyway. If you want to scare people with an epidemic, to sell the flu-shots or covid vaccines, you just join the different classifications into one.

What today we call Chickenpox, monkeypox, tanapox, scarlet fever, measles, rubella, herpes zoster, erythema multiforme, molluscum contagiosum, impetigo, dermatitis and so on, were all previously unified under the term Smallpox.

All of these labels are simply different stages of the same detoxification process, in which the skin is involved.

HealthAndHappiness said:

PS: just the 5-10 +/-minute mark about rabies. Just wanted your perspective.

Click to expand...

Sorry about the long reply btw

HealthAndHappiness said:

I posted an historical video expose' that included Dr Hellerman and a panel recorded live time, discussing the "merits" of their newly improved Salk vaccine. It might even be in this thread, but don't have time to check. You can put my name with key term polio and likely find it. It was narrated by Dr Leonard Horowitz, so that will also bring it up.

In their own words the Drs were giggling and gleeful about the fact the most famous polio vaccine spread cancer to their victims!
Keep in mind that this is the "gold standard" by which every other vaccine was measured and their rationale for spreading cancer, I mean vaccines worldwide.

Click to expand...

Thank you I found it

Skittle said:

Autism does not have such a standard. One cannot even begin to claim autism is increasing, only that the diagnosis is increasing.

Click to expand...

If autism rates are the same as before, why do we not observe a nearly equal population of 50-something people with Autism spectrum disorder?

Skittle said:

Autism is a complicated neurodevelopmental disorder that is diagnosed. It is not something you can test by blood. No one was diagnosed with it in 1900.

Click to expand...

Autism does not go away, unlike measles.

Skittle said:

There was not a known increase in cases.

Click to expand...

Only if you get your head where the sun does not shine.

Skittle said:

There was a determination of the disorder and over time an increase in the diagnosis of cases.

Click to expand...

There was

Skittle said:

I understand that some people want everything dumbed down

Click to expand...

Dumbed down, from you?

Skittle said:

unless you can make a convoluted non-sensical conspiracy out of it.

Click to expand...

Autism, like seizures and encephalopathy, brain damage. The vaxx court has awarded judgements for these two and autism, they just don't call it autism, they call it general brain damage as they are more likely to get a positive jusgement.

Skittle said:

Autism did not "increase." To make a statement like that you would need to use the same standard and population.

Click to expand...

No we would need to observe a large population of elderly persons with ASD and we do not. Your statement is falsified.

Skittle said:

Autism is not an order, it is a diagnosis. To be diagnosed a child needs access to someone trained. To have an increase from 1970 to 2020, you would need the same conditions for the diagnosis.

Click to expand...

Who made up that standard and why should we care? A bunch of bozo's attempting to hide the truth? Along with their lackeys?

It is never autism it is always something else.

''The purpose of the vaccine court is to protect the vaccine program, not to monitor vaccine safety or mete out justice.''


The New York Times joined the government Health Agency (HRSA) and its big pharma allies hailing the decisions as proof that the scientific doubts about vaccine safety had finally been "demolished." The US Department of Health and Human services said the rulings should "help reassure parents that vaccines do not cause autism." The Times, which has made itself a blind mouthpiece for HRSA and a leading defender of vaccine safety, joined crowing government and vaccine industry flacks applauding the decisions like giddy cheerleaders, rooting for the same court that many of these same voices viscously derided just one year ago, after Hannah Poling won compensation for her vaccine induced autism.


But last week, the parents of yet another child with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) were awarded a lump sum of more than $810,000 (plus an estimated $30-40,000 per year for autism services and care) in compensation by the Court, which ruled that the measels-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine had caused acute brain damage that led to his autism spectrum disorder.

The family of 10-year-old Bailey Banks won their case quietly and without fanfare in June of 2007, but the ruling has only now come to public attention. In the remarkably clear and eloquent decision, Special Master Richard Abell ruled that the Banks had successfully demonstrated that "the MMR vaccine at issue actually caused the conditions from which Bailey suffered and continues to suffer."

Bailey's diagnosis is Pervasive Developmental Disorder -- Not Otherwise Specified (PDD-NOS) which has been recognized as an autism spectrum disorder by CDC, HRSA and the other federal health agencies since at least the 1990s.