Search results for query: hosper

...IN/WITHIN the future 7-year-period... for several reasons (all fitting together): --Paul says "the Day of the Lord" ARRIVES "exactly like [hosper] the INITIAL "birth PANG [same word Jesus used, but Paul uses it in the SINGULAR]" that COMES UPON a woman, 1Th5:1-3 (and later basically makes...

..."that the day of the Lord is present"; --in his earlier letter, he'd already made clear that the day of the Lord ARRIVES "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]" that Jesus had talked about; which itself takes place WELL PRIOR TO His Second Coming to the earth (7 yrs...

...had said the INTIAL ONE ("birth PANG [SINGULAR]" that COMES UPON a woman) is the ARRIVAL of "the DAY OF THE LORD" time period ("exactly like [hosper]"!); and those "beginning of birth pangs" ARE the "SEALS" of Rev6; [and since Rev1:1 / 1:19c / 4:1 informs us that the things John was going to...

...of the 3.5 yr SECOND HALF you are referencing; --Paul's words in 1Th5:1-3 lets us know that "the Day of the Lord" ARRIVES "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]" that comes upon a woman in labour (not well-after these have begun), and like I just said, Jesus spoken of...

...Paul addresses the "WHEN" of the ARRIVAL of "the Day of the Lord" (i.e the 7-yr / TRIB portion) when he says it will arrive "EXACTLY LIKE [hosper] the INITIAL "birth PANG" (Jesus spoke of those!) that comes upon a woman (ITh5:1-3)... NOT well-after those have commenced! (The FIRST "birth...

...and ALL he is slated to DO over the course of SOME TIME])... ... which time-period Paul also says in this context will arrive "exactly like [hosper]" the initial "birth pang [singular]" that comes upon a woman in labor--"suddenly" as the text also states (not after the "birth pangs [plural]"...

...at some point WITHIN those "7 years / 2520 days"); Scripture informs us that "the Day of the Lord" ARRIVES (to commence) "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]" that COMES UPON a woman in labor [Jesus spoke of this very point in time, in Matt24:4/Mk13:5 where He refers to...

...time of His Second Coming to the earth (Rev19 / Matt24:29-31 / Isa27:9,12-13, etc), as many suppose. NO! No, it ARRIVES... "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]" that COMES UPON a woman (the FIRST "BIRTH PANG" JESUS SPOKE OF: Matt24:4 / Mk13:5 "A CERTAIN ONE [(bringing...

..."G5604 [in the SINGULAR]" when referencing when and how "the Day of the Lord" will ARRIVE / COMMENCE, which he says will be "exactly like [hosper] the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR, G5604]" that COMES UPON a woman with child/in labor (i.e. SUDDENLY this initial pang comes upon her! And then...

Paul, in his first letter to the Thessalonians, said that "the Day of the Lord" ARRIVES "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]" that comes upon a woman (the very SAME word that Jesus used in the plural when referencing the "PANGS" ['beginning of'])... which is what Jesus had...

...was "near" / soon to take place)?; c) and that Paul had already in his first letter acknowledged WHEN and HOW it will ARRIVE ("exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [singular]" OF the very ones of those that Jesus had already talked about in Matt24:4-8 / Mk13:5-8 / Lk21:8-11)?; d)...

...[note: again, I believe the man of sin will have already been "revealed" at Seal #1, i.e. when "the day of the Lord" ARRIVES "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [singular]," per Paul's 1Th5:1-3 [and elsewhere], i.e. Seal #1). [note: I believe that Rev1:1's "to SHOW unto...

...acknowledged is when "the Day of the Lord" ARRIVES, like he says in 1Th5:1-3... where he says that that time-period ARRIVES "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]" that comes upon a woman... i.e. what Jesus had already spoken of in Matt24:4 / Mk13:5 as the INITIAL ONE of...

...epistle to them, in 1Th5:1-3 [re: the INTIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]"--which he says "the day of the Lord" will ARRIVE "exactly like [G5618 - hosper]"--that's Seal #1--OF the very "beginning of birth PANGS [PLURAL]" that Jesus had spoken of... Matt24:4/Mk13:5 "A CERTAIN ONE [G5100 - tis - 'a...

...BY" [BY the fact of "our Rapture" (v.1)]; --in 1Th5:1-3, Paul already made abundantly clear that "the Day of the Lord" ARRIVES "exactly as [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]" (OF "the beginning of birth PANGS [PLURAL]" that Jesus had spoken of in His Olivet Discourse); and the...

...Trib yrs; --1Th5:1-3 already made abundantly clear that "the day of the Lord" (an earthly-located TIME-PERIOD) will "ARRIVE" "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [singular]" that comes upon a woman in labor... and this is exactly what Jesus had spoken of in Matt24:4 / Mk13:5...

...(with its "judgments" and its "man of sin"); and Paul had already made abundantly clear that "the Day of the Lord" ARRIVES "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [singular]" (i.e. Matt24:4 / Mk13:5 [aka SEAL #1]), NOT LATER at His Second Coming point in time (Matt24:29-31)...

...that] the day of the Lord IS PRESENT / IS ALREADY HERE." [Recall, Paul in his earlier letter states "the DOTL" ARRIVES "exactly like [hosper ] the INITIAL "birth PANG"... Jesus spoke of those in the PLURAL, and they ARE EQUIVALENT the SEALS of Rev6 at the START OF the "IN QUICKNESS [noun...

...(if by that you mean: Rev19 / Matt24:29-31 / 2Th2:8b, etc); Paul very clearly says that the ARRIVAL of the day of the Lord is "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]" and he is talking about what Jesus had referred to when in His Olivet Discourse He spoke of "the beginning...

...say that. It's referring back to verse 2 ("the DAY of the Lord"), which Paul in his first letter had already stated arrives "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth pang" that comes upon a woman (that's well-prior to His Second Coming to the earth). You are doing the same thing that...