Search results

I'm sorry, having a little trouble understanding what you're trying to say. Mind shortening it up a bit?

My dad (not Christian) used to live next door to a Jehovah witness, we'll call him Bob. For years Bob would come over to my dad's house to share his satanic gospel. For those of you who don't know, JW's deny the deity of Christ and the gospel of grace, among other things. It's a works based...

To all those who comment on this topic let me remind you, it is not wise to counsel without understanding. As stated previously, false divorce and remarriage doctrines cause much harm, perhaps more than any other (non-salvific) false doctrines. Tread lightly, your counsel could contribute to...

“Through faith” was a reference to Ep. 2:8 Grace/Charis: the divine influence upon the heart….. Through/Dia: by, through, with….because Faith/Pistis: faith, belief……. By the divine influence upon the heart we are saved by faith, which is a gift of God that no man may boast.

I’ve been here a while, haven’t seen a single person claim to be born saved. Oh I see… This another display of your hatred for the gospel of grace isn’t it? I’ve seen plenty of that from you over the years. Understand this folks. There are many gospels of satan that claim the act of man earns...

My question was rhetorical, meant to be thought provoking. Truly sorry you missed it.

Apoluo ≠ apostasion. Put it to the ole hermeneutics test. Definition Usage Context Historical Logic Precedent Unity Inference Until you do this you’re just spinning your wheels bro. There’s a video on YouTube that explains it pretty well if you can make it though. Called: divorce...

That’s what makes a false divorce and remarriage doctrine one of the most harmful (non salvific) false doctrines, the tremendous damage it causes. Abused women and children being advised to remain by shepherds who are supposed to protect them… Young divorced mothers being told they must remain...

Any reasonable cause, as laid out in Deuteronomy 24:1-4, specifically uncleanness/ervah used 50+ times in the OT. Usages are many disgraceful acts, including but not limited to sexual immorality. Jesus never changed or voided this law he gave to Moses. Most westerners are confused by a bad...

Neither do I @kaylagrl

Whichever one best describes your understanding of scripture. 1. Under no circumstance 2. For any reasonable cause such as sexual immorality or physical abuse etc. 3. Sexual immorality only. 4. I don’t know

Would you expound on that last paragraph, your synopsis? Just want to make sure we all understand your position. “Moses said is was fine to remarry but Jesus says no that’s not right…that’s for the hard hearted sinners…”

What do you believe scripture teaches? 1. Under no circumstance. 2. For reasonable cause such as sexual immorality or physical abuse etc. 3. Sexual immorality only. 4. I don’t know.

I hear you. Just choose whichever one most closely describes your position.

Thanks for all the feedback! Don’t forget to vote please. I’m interested to see what is the majority/minority positions are. Thanks again.

Thanks for taking the time to vote and explain.

Appreciate your participation.

Please vote and give brief explanation of your belief.

I assume by your mention of “unclean” that you’re referencing Deuteronomy 24, Ervah. Ervah is defined as many unclean things, only one of which is fornication. In other words, uncleanness can be fornication or a number of other disgraceful acts. No disrespect but your question is flawed. That’s...

Sorry, didn’t mean to skip a question. Obviously I love scripture and love discussing scripture with others of the same spirit. Forgive me. Ok. We have multiple questions going back and forth here, can we start over please? Where would you like to start. ❤️