Search results

All I can say is that you can't take away words, sentences and entire verses from God's Word. Below is an example of all the modern translations, which all are the same in omitting Scripture. I would rather trust a translation with many manuscript evidence (about 3,000 manuscripts...

Amen, no worries with the KJV or NKJV and a few other Bible like them. I don't mind the labor of answering anyone, because the answer is read by everyone and can learn from it. Concerning "scribal error," this is just what translators and scribes have attributed to this problem.

There are two passage needed to check to determine if the translation is from the detracted text or the Traditional Text: 2Sam 21:19 omits the phrase "the brother of" rendering a reading that says "Elhanan slew Goliath." The other passage is 1JN 5:7 omits the primary Trinity passage. If these...

It's was the translators and scribes attribution to the problem.

All I know is that I would rather have thousands of manuscript evidence (regardless their age), than just mainly two (Vaticanus and Sinaticus manuscripts). I don't count the other old one, the Alexandrinus because it is worst than these two.

Good find! Wasn't aware of this one, but it is so far as I know it is attributed also to scribal error, unless other suspicions are true. Take a look if you like: https://answersingenesis.org/bible-timeline/genealogy/two-ages-at-once/

Lol! That's because many Christians want to know (some think they know) the truths of Scripture--and understand it, and it can frustrate if we are not patient or seek where the truth can be found.

Section XI of "Were Westcott and Hort Secret Practitioners of the Occults?" http://deanburgonsociety.org/Preservation/westcott.htm

The modern Bible show themselves to be corrupt by error (2Sam 21:19 - David killed Goliath, not Elhanan), and omissions of hundreds of Scriptures. One of many examples is 1Jn 5:7 which the entire passage is omitted.

I'm glad you brought this up. Do you think I should be posting in the Bible Discussion Forum? It seems it would be more accurate to my posts. God bless!

I wouldn't think it maters where a Bible translation discussion is done, considering the importance of Scripture. Sorry but I disagree with you here.

Amen, these two producers of the modern translations were into the occult: The Dean Burgon Society, section XI, http://deanburgonsociety.org/Preservation/westcott.htm

I know I can't trust a Bible that says Elhanan killed Goliath (2Sam 21:19), and omits important passages (1JN 5:7).

A translation has no significance if it omits Scripture. The Majority Text is the only source that retains the entire Word, and is why it will always be the most used, because you can't use a concordance with the modern translation, for they are missing to much of Scripture, and contain many...

You might know that the italicized word represent words that were not in the original Greek, and are added to help clarify passages. If they didn't italicize they would be guilty of adding to the Word. What about the warning in Rev 22:19, which the Modern translations are guilty of with their...

I know what you mean and thanks for the support!

Which translation of the Bible do you use? Many are unaware that the manuscripts used for the modern translations are highly spurious, because of the numerous differences between them and the Traditional Text (TT). The manuscripts used for the TT (Majority Text, or Textus Receptus, or Received...

Hi Sis! Yes, if you're reborn you will most definitely be with God, and having His Word disallows any believer to know otherwise. Thanks for the encouraging reply, and God bless!

Also, the edit option was gone to soon for me to present the correct passage. It's not 1Co but 2Co 12:9. I believe everyone reborn will always "find a way to escape," because God ensures that we will "be able to bear it" (1Co 10:13). God bless!