Search results

um... Hebrews 1:6 But when He again brings the Firstborn into the world, He says: "Let all the angels of God worship Him." the Father commands that the Son be worshipped.

the correct name is יהוה :)‎

Yah Shuah God is Salvation also written as Yeshua Iesous is just a transliteration. Greek has no 'sh' sound, so they wrote it with just a sigma, 's' it would be pronounced in Greek, 'yee-sus' or in shortened form, ee-sus. in Germanic languages 'J' is pronounced like an English 'Y' and they...

is come :)

these are Hebrew books that the Jews have never considered to be scripture. they were translated with the scripture in the Septuagint but identified as not canon. you have to be just as bold to add something as to remove!

long after the bishop of Rome had any legitimacy whatsoever, hundreds of years after they were blatantly rewriting history, and totally in antagonistic response to the orthodox and the reformers (y)

the canon of scripture has been the canon since probably about 150AD, well before there was any such thing as a pope ((6-700AD and absolutely no one outside of Rome thought it was legitimate, ever)) there haven't ever been any changes or serious challenges to the canon of scripture. only a few...

No, we have the same Bible. There are a few apocrypha in most RCC editions but they are apocrypha. That means they aren't considered part of the Bible. The reformers did not remove any of what is considered scripture, and some protestant Bibles still also include apocrypha.

purgatory isn't in the catholic Bible. we have the same Bible.

not one jot or tittle of the Torah need be removed for it to have no authority whatsoever over a person who has already died and been buried. have you been baptized?

how is it them that circumcision - which was 430 years before the law - is taken away? does that mean God has changed? how is it that Adam only ate vegetables, Noah was given all meats, Moses was given only kosher meats, then Jesus declared all food clean again? does that mean God has...

hit a nerve eh

or... they reject Paul altogether, because the writings we have from him are particularly clear on these things.

may i remind you... :) 1 Corinthians 13:12 For now we see in a mirror, dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part, but then I shall know just as I also am known. 2 Samuel 6:22 And I will be even more undignified than this, and will be humble in my own sight. But as for the maidservants...

Paul also obviously instructed believers to be water baptized. your point being ..? and Peter obviously taught the gospel of salvation by grace through faith: 1 Peter 1:13 Therefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and rest [your] hope fully upon the grace that is to be brought to you...

please note that it says "we" that's plural. who does the Holy Spirit mean by "we"? 1 Corinthians 1:1 Paul, called [to be] an apostle of Jesus Christ we = the apostles. 1 Corinthians 1:12-13 Now I say this, that each of you says, "I am of Paul," or "I am of Apollos," or "I am of Cephas,"...

or these epistles were written decades after Christ ascended, by which time, just as Jesus Himself had foretold us, there were many false gospels being preached, and Paul was making sure the reader knew that what he and the other apostles were preaching was not to be confused with those false...

plucking one quip from Peter that encourages baptism and one from Paul that encourages belief, as though neither ever spoke of the other, is quite a deceptive attempt at persuasion. the truth is that your arguments don't hold water. Peter also preaches faith in God, not works: 1 Peter 1:5 ...

@vassal also the combined discernment and study of 2,000 years of church history, and most importantly the scripture itself, says you are wrong.

the Holy Spirit witnesses in Acts 9, though from your response it is clear you reject the Bible. so why are you in a Christian forum?