Search results

John certainly was familiar with this word because he used it 46 times in the book of John to mean again.

If Jesus meant anew or again in John 3;3, 7, why didn't John use πάλιν? Doesn't make sense that he'd use ἄνωθεν if he meant again. G3825 πάλιν palin (pal'-in) adv. 1. (adverbially) anew

Yeah GOD dwells in us, but not GOD the father. He will not dwell with men until all rebellion is put under foot. That won't happen until the end of the millennium. For “he subjected all things under his feet.” But when it says “all things” are subjected, it is clear that the one who subjected...

That's not what I said. I said the father is too holy to dwell in us. He dwells in us through his holy spirit. I really have no idea how it all parses out, but there is holy, and there is most holy. I'm sure the holy spirit is most holy, but it is able to dwell with sinful men without destroying...

A bit of trivia. Here's a satellite view of the HQs for the Sudanese Air Force and Navy. https://www.google.com/maps/@15.6068435,32.5466714,205m/data=!3m1!1e3

GOD is not emanations. He is spirit, but not the holy spirit. The holy spirit is sent out into all creation to do the father's work, but the father (the one true GOD) is too holy to be in the presence of sin.

I can get it to work in Logos 3, but not Logos 4. Apart from its great library, I hate this software.

Judaism isn't Christianity. I'm going to begin reporting every post in which you slander those who don't agree with you. I encourage others to do the same.

For some reason I can't get it to work. ܡܢ, ܡܰܢ Particle. Etymology: From the Greek word μέν. Gloss: indeed. Root: ܡܢ. Inflected form marked as Lexeme: ܡܰܢ. Index of Inflected Forms: ܡܢ. ܕܪܫ, ܕ݁ܪܱܫ Verb. Gloss: train ( pael ); debate; argue; question; dispute. Root: ܕܪܫ...

Oops. I meant the first word is beget.

This is what my Syriac Sinaiticus has for John 3:3: ܡܬܝܠܕ ܡܢ ܕܪܫ The first word is man, but I can't get again from the other two words. I'm using the Analytical Lexicon of the Syriac New Testament: Based on the SEDRA 3 Database of George Anton Kiraz. It's odd that my Codex Curetonianus doesn't...

The demons were seen then because the light was so strong. The light is weak now, so they are able to hide and look normal.

The mods here really should give you a warning for your slander. It's getting old.

syrᶜ = Syriac Curetonian syrᵖᵃˡ = Palestinian Syriac syrᵖ = Peshitta

The TDNT says that these manuscripts have from above: syrᶜ syrᵖᵃˡ syrᵖ Sorry, I can't tell you what those are, but if you need me to I will find out.

Because Jesus isn't Jewish; he was Jewish. We follow a living GOD, not a dead one. Being a Jew depended upon bloodline. Jesus now has no blood, except what was spilled in death.

The Theological Dictionary of the NT tells me that the Syriac versions strongly favor from above, while the Latin and Coptic versions favor again.

I had to turn off signatures showing in posts because of those.

I can. Easily. I see that kind of spiritual obtuseness around me all of the time.

I think you've nailed it. That's all the sabbath was for in the first place - seek the things above, not things on earth.