Search results

Thanks @Rob7 for sharing your research. Do you interpret the Two Witnesses 1260 days as being symbolic of years?

Just saw your 2:34-35 post. I will check it out. (y)

Sorry, I may have misread your previous posts. You believe that Daniel 2:34-35 has already happened, correct? That would mean that the clay that got destroyed would be the 70 AD event? Thus, the 'metal man' eventually was completely destroyed around the timeline you referenced: Am I...

That is a hugely important point. This is why I believe that no book of Daniel interpretation can be taken seriously until the 'days' mentioned in Daniel (and even Revelation) are solved. Until someone has properly exegeted the 1260, 1290, 1335 and 2300 days, they have no business teaching this...

Why then would God describe the clay being destroyed in so many verses? There was 'no place found' for the clay. How is that the nation of Israel? The clay appears to be something that is eventually thrown in the Lake of Fire. How do you interpret that?

I am of the opinion that most, if not all of the major 'antichrist' figures throughout the entire Bible have always been about persecuting God's people, mainly the Israelites and later Jews and Christians. So, trying to fit the Papacy into that just doesn't work for me. The Pope doesn't go...

I know right? That's what I get for leaving my computer under the swamp cooler all night.

I believe the Little Horn in Daniel 7 is the Image of the Beast. It has eyes 'like' a man. It is some sort of facsimile. He is something man made. Therefore, it is still future. He is the 'deadly wound that is healed'. Little Horn 2.0 perhaps? He is the eighth of the seven: He was the Little...

The Little Horn in Daniel 8 is associated with the 'Prince of the Host' and the daily sacrifice being taken away... My interpretation: Prince of the Host: Jesus Daily Sacrifice Taken Away: Crucifixion That alone teaches us it happened during the times of Jesus. This is given to us in great...

It looks like you interpret the Little Horn in Daniel 7 as the same in Daniel 8. That is assuming a too much right from the beginning. There is a very important difference between the two. Look at how the Little Horn in Daniel 8 is described: Now why in the world would God have to go out of...

Ha, my keyboard decided to go haywire. Anyhow, the Little Horn is only mentioned in Daniel 7 and 8.

aaaahe aLittle aHorn is only mentiond in aDaniel 7 a1nd 8.aTTTTTTTTTTT`

Abraham as the archetype for the Father in Heaven.

That would be Yom Kippur, correct?

Hi @cv5 . I am curious as to your thoughts on this answer: Are they correct? Also, would the Last Supper correspond to the phrase 'shall take away the daily sacrifice' in this verse: Thanks.

Daniel 11:18 breakdown and commentary: After this…: This is a continuation of verse 15, right after Antiochus Epiphanes IV (King of the North) led his first campaign into Egypt against Ptolemy VI (King of the South). It was around this time that Antiochus Epiphanes IV caused major upheaval in...

This scene from the movie Cleopatra is Daniel 11:30: It describes the famous Battle of Actium: Octavian (Augustus): King of the North Mark Antony and Queen Cleopatra VII: King of the South The 'ships of Chittim' is Rome 'coming against' Mark Antony: Mark Antony formed an alliance with...

I have a bit of time tonight to add some more detail to the timeline of Daniel 11. Something that I have noticed is that most scholars are in agreement up to Daniel 11:14. The timeline is fairly straightforward with the various kings of the north and south duking it out. However, Daniel 11:15...

I'm posting this from Gary's website as it aligns with my beliefs...

Hi @Rob7 . Part of the reason why I can't post all of my info is that it ties to the chapters you reference. Basically Daniel 11 has so many incredible parallels to chapters 2, 7 and 8 that it would take many posts to go through them all. Just for the record, I do not connect the Papacy to...