Search results

Right on. Judicial hardening is meaningless if there is total depravity. I guess God REALLY gotta make sure no one gets saved!

The Bible also says things like "in the hope of eternal life" so it is talking about it in present and future tense. The simple explanation is that eternal life is in Christ. So if you are in Christ, you have eternal life, if you are not, you do not. And obviously we while we are in Christ...

Where can I read more about this please? I am interested as I am a son of these barbarians

What do people benefit from botting forums btw? Who benefits from that.

Which nations did they become? Is there any proof one way or another?

You do not, no person reading the Bible comes across thousands of "come to me" statements and then says "You know what man this acutally means nobody can do it unless God regenerates me first cause it says the natural man cannot receive things of the Spirit in a completely different context...

Leighton Flowers is doing a good job of it. It is a dying dusty relic of the 1500s for sure. The young restless and reformed are now Old atheist and bitter.

Contrary to this thread, for the first 400 years of the Church nobody has heard of the doctrine you talk about and for another 1500 years nobody had heard of the word calvinism. lol Okay. Who has the patience to deal with these AI generated calvinist bots? Parroting the same garbage they...

If you claim all the verses where God tells people to repent and turn yet they are incapable, yes you indeed are changing the plain meaning of the text. You have zero reading comprehesion when you read the Bible, yet you are capable of reading a novel or a news paper or watching a movie and...

So the opposite of what the Bible teaches? Gotcha. Already addressed. The prodigal son was "dead" yet he still came to his senses and returned to the Father who gracefully took the repentant son back. Calvinist arguments are utter garbage. Really easy to refute, you guys portray yourselves...

You keep spamming these same verses and photos and they have been addressed over and over again I even gave you a link where each of these is talked about and I posted the explanation. There is a better explanation available than the one you guys are peddle which has to change the meaning of...

Here we are, debating with Christians bringing dishonor to Christ and to the faith. All of this division of course going by God's secret will ;) It is all going according to His plan they say

Cool. Now how does one obtain this grace? It is in CHRIST. So you gotta get in Christ to get it. Not true, we are justified by FAITH, not prior to it.

There is so much explaining to do if you are a calvinist, WE can just read passages that say "Return to me, come to me" and conclude that God wants us to come to Him and He is telling us to do so. Very simple. I am suggesting an Occam's razor situation here Calvinism requires a lot of extra...

I agree the world cannot receive the spirit of truth. But that is why Peter says to save yourselves from this untoward generation. Repent and believe. That is when you are no longer of the world. Jesus says you won't come to me so that you won't have life. So how can someone have life before...

These proof texts have been answered many times. The natural man is the Corinthian church? They are called carnal for their divisions, yet are still Christians. https://soteriology101.com/2016/03/16/answering-calvinistic-proof-texts/ " 1 Corinthians 2:14 — “The natural person does not...

There is no way for a calvinist to explain this verse to go according to their doctrine. If it is the leadership of Jerusalem that is preventing the chicks who Jesus wants to gather, that doesn't fit calvinism. If it is just Jerusalem's citizens in general Jesus wanted to gather, same...

True Deuteronomy 30:11-14 “For this commandment that I command you today is not too hard for you, neither is it far off. It is not in heaven, that you should say, ‘Who will ascend to heaven for us and bring it to us, that we may hear it and do it?’ Neither is it beyond the sea, that you should...

I do, but why can no calvinist answer my question: Matthew 23:37 JESUS wants to gather, but the ones He wanted to gather were unwilling. How does that work? You can quote the verses you did. And lets say I apply them in a way that you do, it still would not work with Matthew 23:37 where Jesus...

We know these verses, does quoting them remove Matthew 23:37 ? If the argument is that those people just weren't elect, then why is Jesus saying what He does? Why does Jesus say HE was willing, if in reality He was not willing to gather?