Search results

I don't know the difference between post and thread. I had to click on "Post reply" to reply to the earlier posts. I don't know what thread is and don't understand what a post is. Who is this addressed to? I haven't the foggiest notion. More and more I am seeing posts without citing the words...

Oh, if i were only that simple

Why is this post empty? Who wrote the post that you are accusing of all these false beliefs?

I would like for a post-tribber to give me his/her best passage, with explanation for the pre-trib position being demonstrably wrong.

You are right. i looked back on your OP, and I could not find "son of Christ." i completely misread it. My apologies.

Where is the reference to "son of Christ" in Paul's writings? That is a new expression for me.

Hebrews was likely written before 70 AD since the destruction of Temple would have been brought up to make the point the second generation author was trying making. But, the muratorian fragment does not list it as one of Paul's writings, but all 13 of his writings are mentioned. Heb 2:3,4...

T This is the most convoluted presentation I have read in a long time. By your writings I can see you are a babe in Christ. So, don't take offense at my response to your reply. You show no signs of having mastered the Pre-Trib Rapture doctrine. For example, the 7 year Tribulation is just a way...

You really need to read the book of Hebrews, but look at post 5.

I will do a little of your own study, you should know where to find these 3. GJohn 14 1-3 1 “Do not let your hearts be troubled. You believe in God ; believe also in me. 2 My Father’s house (in heaven) has many rooms; if that were not so, would I have told you that I am going there to...

There are 5 warning passages in Hebrews that has encouraged poor theology. In Hebrews the issues all deal with physical death, not spiritual death. The Hebrews understood "saved" or "salvation" more times than not to refer to physical salvation/deliverance. If you look at the five warning...

I personally do not find these reasons you have listed to be compelling. 1. This is an poor argument from silence, the second generation author is the only option based on Hebrews itself. There were hundreds of possible candidates in the second generation of Christians who could have written...

I don't know how many commentaries there are on Hebrews, but most of them put their guesses in concerning who the author is. I certainly don't know and would never speculate as to who it is. But, I can eliminate those who did not write it. I wrote a post on the cessation of miracles based on the...

Please let all of us know who you are writing about!

Not in God's eyes. This is a liberal statement of the highest order. I know you didn't mean it that way, but we are only free to interpret scripture in its historical, grammatical, linguistical, cultural, etc. setting. (Paul says, you have to rightly divide the word. Whatever that means, it...

If you are serious, just find three scholarly commentaries (and not all from your persuasion) on Genesis and you will have your answer. I personally don't see any problems with the translation. The concordance is pretty much not going to be of help. Stick with scholarly commentaries.

Yup, and it is called the Second Coming.

I can see you (Howdy) are not a serious bible student. You are just looking to defend God's honor by helping God set all the other Christian's straight. Truth alone resides with you. Keep showing us the truth so we can sit at your feet and marvel at your brilliance and how you come to God's...