Search results

This OP is about the lack of validity toward modern claims of the miraculous. No one is claiming that miracles cannot happen. The issue is are these particular claims real. Do people still get sick? Yes Does God still heal? Yes Does this prove the claims of the Pentecostals and their sort are...

Because God is sovereign by nature. Why did the manna stop? Because God said so. The reason is not important.

I notice that you use the term "gifts of the Holy Spirit" but the OP uses the term "physical supernatural manifestations of the Holy Spirit". Do you consider these terms to be the same? Many speak of the 7 gifts of the Holy Spirit as the following: Wisdom Understanding Counsel Fortitude...

"TASTE and SEE that the Lord is good, Ps.34:8. Not read and hear." This is the verse: Psalm 34:8 Oh, taste and see that the Lord is good! Blessed is the man who takes refuge in him! Is this your theology? Is this what you are using to negate Romans 10:17?

What are you talking about? The source materials for the Bibles translated in French, Russian, Japanese, Hindu and Arabic is the same source materials used to translate the Bible into English. Are you now enlighten?

I doubt this is true. Can you cite this?

This is the old worn out and desperate attempt to declare that all Bible translations should have used "because of" in place of "for", "so that" or "into". This is the hail Mary attempt of pushers of Faith Alone Regeneration Theology use to ignore clear scripture. There are no translations of...

Something to think about but I know of no passages that uses repentance as the moment of the remission of sins.

Did not the verses on repentance, baptism and continued faithfulness not apply to the jailer? I doubt Peter taught the jailer OSAS, FART or the "sinners prayer".

If I remember correctly, there are only three main schools of thought on the issue of the moment of regeneration. Baptismal Regeneration Theology (Remission of sins at water baptism) Faith Alone Regeneration Theology (Remission of sins at a point of faith) Universal Regeneration Theology...

Regardless, you are the one presenting claims of people being raised from the dead that you have not researched. The onus is on you to do the research. Lamar has no reason to do your research. There is no good faith in your words. This is easy to see. You are quite the dishonest disputant...

Just a lame cop-out. Deep down you know this.

Hold on. Did you not research this claim before you presented it??? Why would Lamar need to do research on a claim that you have presented but not researched? No they are not and yes you are rather dishonest.

Must? Why? What does "negativity toward healing" have to do with the validity of modern healings? Did not the Pharisees, Sadducees and Naaman not see the healing miracles? Were those miracles not valid?

For some reason you changed the question. Suze simply answered the question. Nothing personal.

No. This was the question. "Are there any examples in the Bible of anything other than a physical object being labeled as a idol worthy of worship as a deity? IOW, if we are saying that money can be an idol does this mean that the person is worshipping money as a deity?" Suze did a great job...

Good point. So what sin is not idoltry?

Okay...but what about the question?

Are there any examples in the Bible of anything other than a physical object being labeled as a idol worthy of worship as a deity? IOW, if we are saying that money can be an idol does this mean that the person is worshipping money as a deity?

None of the claims of the Pentecostal movement can be called New Testament healings. You are labeling the mundane as works of the Holy Spirit. You will regret and be ashamed of your words when the real healings of the Holy Spirit return.